Long-term experience with tepotinib in Japanese patients with MET exon 14 skipping NSCLC from the Phase II VISION study.

Tepotinib is a highly selective MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that has demonstrated robust and durable clinical activity in patients with MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the Phase II VISION study, patients received oral tepotinib 500 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was an objective response by an independent review committee (IRC) according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. The secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Here we report the analysis of the efficacy and safety of tepotinib in all Japanese patients with advanced METex14 skipping NSCLC from VISION (n = 38) with >18 months' follow-up. The median age of the Japanese patients was 73 years (range 63-88), 39.5% of patients were ≥75 years old, 68.4% were male, 55.3% had a history of smoking, 76.3% had adenocarcinoma, and 10.5% of patients had known brain metastases at baseline. Overall, the objective response rate (ORR) was 60.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 43.4, 76.0) with a median DOR of 18.5 months (95% CI: 8.3, not estimable). ORR in treatment-naïve patients (n = 18) was 77.8% (95% CI: 52.4, 93.6), and in patients aged ≥75 years (n = 15), ORR was 73.3% (95% CI: 44.9, 92.2). The most common treatment-related adverse event (AE) with any grade was blood creatinine increase (65.8%), which resolved following tepotinib discontinuation. Other common treatment-related AEs were peripheral edema (60.5%), hypoalbuminemia (34.2%), diarrhea (28.9%), and nausea (15.8%). In summary, tepotinib demonstrated robust and durable clinical activity irrespective of age or therapy line, with a manageable safety profile in Japanese patients with METex14 skipping NSCLC enrolled in VISION.

Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer in Japanese patients from CheckMate 816.

In the open-label, phase III CheckMate 816 study (NCT02998528), neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy demonstrated statistically significant improvements in event-free survival (EFS) and pathological complete response (pCR) versus chemotherapy alone in patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here we report efficacy and safety outcomes in the Japanese subpopulation. Patients with stage IB-IIIA, resectable NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone for three cycles before undergoing definitive surgery within 6 weeks of completing neoadjuvant treatment. The primary end-points (EFS and pCR) and safety were assessed in patients enrolled at 16 centers in Japan. Of the Japanese patients randomized, 93.9% (31/33) in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy arm and 82.9% (29/35) in the chemotherapy arm underwent surgery. At 21.5 months' minimum follow-up, median EFS was 30.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.8-not reached [NR]) with nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus 19.6 months (95% CI, 8.5-NR) with chemotherapy; hazard ratio, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.30-1.24). The pCR rate was 30.3% (95% CI, 15.6-48.7) versus 5.7% (95% CI, 0.7-19.2), respectively; odds ratio, 7.17 (95% CI, 1.44-35.85). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 59.4% versus 42.9% of patients, respectively, with no new safety signals identified. Neoadjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy resulted in longer EFS and a higher pCR rate versus chemotherapy alone in Japanese patients, consistent with findings in the global population. These data support nivolumab plus chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment option in Japanese patients with resectable NSCLC.

A randomized phase III study of docetaxel alone versus docetaxel plus S-1 in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer: JMTO LC09-01.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination chemotherapy of docetaxel plus S-1 in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compared to docetaxel alone. METHODS: Patients with previously treated NSCLC were randomly assigned to docetaxel alone (arm A) or a combination of docetaxel and S-1 (arm B) for a maximum of four cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The study was terminated early because of poor accrual. The number of patients evaluated were 74 and 77 in arm A and arm B, respectively. The median OS was 9.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.8-15.2) and 12.3 months (95% CI: 9.2-14.5) in arms A and B, respectively. In arms A and B, the median progression-free survival was 3.5 months (95% CI: 2.7-4.0) and 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.2-4.7), respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed in OS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.984, 95% CI: 0.682-1.419, p = 0.4569) or progression-free survival (HR: 0.823, 95% CI: 0.528-1.282, p = 0.0953). The major toxicity was myelosuppression. The incidence of grade 3 or more neutropenia was higher in arm A than in arm B (44.6% vs. 35.1%). However, the incidence of grade 3 or more febrile neutropenia and infection with neutropenia (12.2% vs. 22.1%) was more frequently observed in arm B. CONCLUSIONS: The prematurely terminated study did not show the benefit of two cytotoxic agents over single-agent therapy for previously treated NSCLC patients.

Biomarker analysis of the phase II JO25567 study comparing erlotinib with or without bevacizumab in first-line advanced EGFR+non-small-cell lung cancer.

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as erlotinib, are standard-of-care for patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but most patients progress within 1 year. Previously, we demonstrated that erlotinib plus bevacizumab (EB) improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with EGFR-positive non-squamous NSCLC in the randomized JO25567 study. To understand this effect, we conducted comprehensive exploratory biomarker analyses. Methods: Using blood and tissue specimens from patients enrolled in the JO25567 study, angiogenesis-related serum factors, plasma vascular endothelial growth factor-A (pVEGFA), angiogenesis-related gene polymorphisms, and messenger RNAs (mRNAs) in tumor tissue were analyzed. Interactions between potential predictors and treatment effect on PFS were analyzed in a Cox model. Continuous variable predictors were evaluated by multivariate fractional polynomial interaction methodology and subpopulation treatment effect pattern plotting (STEPP). Results: Overall, 152 patients treated with EB or erlotinib alone (E) were included in the analysis. Among 26 factors analyzed in 134 baseline serum samples, high follistatin and low leptin were identified as potential biomarkers for worse and better outcomes with EB, with interaction P values of 0.0168 and 0.0049, respectively. Serum concentrations of 12 angiogenic factors were significantly higher in patients with high follistatin. Low pVEGFA levels related to better outcomes with EB, interaction P=0.033. VEGF-A165a was the only predictive tissue mRNA, showing a similar trend to pVEGFA. No valid results were obtained in 13 polymorphisms of eight genes. Conclusions: EB treatment showed better treatment outcomes in patients with low pVEGFA and serum leptin, and limited efficacy in patients with high serum follistatin.

Survival Impact of Second-Line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Older Patients With Advanced Squamous-Cell NSCLC: Post Hoc Analysis of the CAPITAL Study.

Introduction: In the CAPITAL study, a randomized phase 3 study, wherein carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel treatment was compared with docetaxel treatment for older patients with squamous-cell lung cancer, the former became the new standard of care for such patients. Our study aimed to evaluate whether the efficacy of second-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) affected the primary analysis of overall survival (OS). Methods: Herein, we performed a post hoc analysis of the impact of second-line ICIs on OS, safety in each group of participants aged more than 75 years, and intracycle nab-paclitaxel skip status. Results: Patients were randomly allocated to the carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel (nab-PC) arm (n = 95) or the docetaxel (D) arm (n = 95). Of these patients, 74 of 190 (38.9%) were transferred to ICIs for second-line treatment (nab-PC arm: 36, D arm: 38). A survival benefit was numerically observed only for patients for whom first-line therapy was terminated owing to disease progression (median OS [nab-PC arm]: with and without ICIs, 321 and 142 d, respectively; median OS [D arm]: with and without ICIs, 311 and 256 d, respectively). The OS among patients who received ICI after adverse events was similar in the two arms. In the D arm, a significantly higher frequency of grade greater than or equal to 3 adverse events was observed among patients aged more than or equal to 75 years (86.2%) than among those aged less than 75 years (65.6%, p = 0.041), including a significantly higher frequency of neutropenia (84.6% versus 62.5%, p = 0.032); no such differences were observed in the nab-PC arm. Conclusions: We found that second-line ICI treatment seemed to have a little impact on OS.

Clinical benefit of platinum doublet combination therapy in older adults with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A prospective multicenter study by the National Hospital Organization in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Previous trials suggest that older adults with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) derive benefit from platinum doublet combination therapy, but its superiority is controversial. Although geriatric assessment variables are used to assess the individual risk of severe toxicity and clinical outcomes in older patients, the standard first-line treatment is still debated. Therefore, we aimed to identify the risk factors for clinical outcomes in older patients with NSCLC. METHODS: Patients aged ≥75 years with advanced NSCLC treated at any of 24 National Hospital Organization institutions completed a pre-first-line chemotherapy assessment, including patient characteristics, treatment variables, laboratory test values, and geriatric assessment variables. We evaluated whether these variables were the risk factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 148 patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with combination therapy (n = 90) or monotherapy (n = 58). Median PFS was 5.3 months and OS was 13.6 months. We identified that hypoalbuminemia (hazard ratio [HR] 2.570, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.117-5.913, p = 0.0264) was a risk factor for PFS and monotherapy (HR 1.590, 95% CI: 1.070-2.361, p = 0.0217), lactate dehydrogenase (HR 3.682, 95% CI: 1.013-13.39, p = 0.0478), and high C-reactive protein (HR 2.038, 95% CI: 1.141-3.642, p = 0.0161) were risk factors for OS. The median OS was significantly longer in patients treated with combination therapy than in those who received monotherapy (16.5 months vs. 10.3 months; HR 0.684, 95% CI: 0.470-0.995, p = 0.0453). DISCUSSION: Platinum doublet combination therapy may be beneficial in older patients with NSCLC. Identification of risk factors will assist in the development of a personalized treatment strategy.

Standard versus low-dose nab-paclitaxel in previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A randomized phase II trial (JMTO LC14-01).

BACKGROUND: Nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX) has better transfer to tumor tissue than cremophor-based paclitaxel. It suggests that the optimum dose of nab-PTX might be lower than the dose and schedule that is widely used. We designed a randomized phase II trial to examine the clinical utility and safety of nab-PTX in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive nab-PTX monotherapy at 100 mg/m2 (group A) or 70 mg/m2 (group B). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Finally, 81 patients were randomized. Similar results were observed in both groups for PFS (3.75 vs. 3.71 months), OS (13.50 vs. 16.13 months), or ORR (20.5% vs. 23.1%). The incidences of grade 3 or worse AEs were 57.5% in group A and 41.5% in group B. The proportion of serious side effects was 10.0% in group A and 4.9% in group B. CONCLUSION: Both standard dose and low dose of nab-PTX monotherapy are active for previously treated NSCLC patients with better safety profile. Therefore, nab-PTX 70 mg/m2 dose and schedule in the trial would be a reasonable option.

Opioids impair nivolumab outcomes: a retrospective propensity score analysis in non-small-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Opioids are often administered for cancer-related pain relief. However, few reports have evaluated the association between opioids and immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this retrospective study was to reveal the effect of opioids on the prognosis of patients harbouring NSCLC treated with nivolumab. METHODS: The medical records of consecutive patients with NSCLC receiving nivolumab at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. We collected clinical data at the time of nivolumab treatment initiation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimise potential selection bias. We compared clinical outcomes with and without baseline opioid use. RESULTS: Of the 296 patients identified in the study, after PSM, 38 cases with opioid use and matched 38 cases without opioid use were selected. The overall response rate was significantly lower in patients with opioid use than in those without (2.63%, 95% CI 0.47% to 13.49%, vs 21.05%, 95% CI 11.07% to 36.35%; p=0.0284). The median progression-free survival in patients with opioid use was significantly shorter than that in patients without (1.17, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.73 months, vs 2.07 95% CI 1.23 to 4.73 months; p=0.002). The median overall survival in patients with opioid use was significantly shorter than that in patients without (4.20, 95% CI 2.53 to 6.20 months, vs 9.57, 95% CI 2.23 to not reached months; p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NSCLC receiving regular opioid administration at nivolumab treatment initiation had a worse nivolumab treatment outcome than patients without opioid use.

Predicting systemic therapy toxicity in older adult patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A prospective multicenter study of National Hospital Organization in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies have developed risk stratification schemas to assess systemic therapy toxicity. However, it is controversial which geriatric assessment variables should be used to assess the individual risk of severe treatment-associated toxicity in older adult patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≥70 years with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated at 24 National Hospital Organization institutions completed a pre-first-line systemic therapy assessment, including patient characteristics, treatment variables, laboratory test values, and geriatric assessment variables. Patients were followed through one cycle of systemic therapy to assess grade 3 (severe) to grade 5 (death) adverse events according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. RESULTS: In total, 348 advanced NSCLC patients with a median age of 76 years (range, 70 to 95 years) joined this prospective study. Severe adverse events ≥grade 3 occurred in 136 patients (39.1%). Predictors of hematologic toxicity were treatment variables, body mass index, body weight loss, and limitation in daily living due to dementia. These predictors provided the predictive model of hematologic toxicity ≥grade 3; 0 point (22.2%), 1 point (33.8%), 2 points (59.6%), ≥3 points (73.3%). Sex, daily living independence level, and lactate dehydrogenase levels were associated with non-hematologic toxicity ≥grade 3 in multivariate analysis. A scoring system using these predictors distinguished the risk levels of non-hematologic toxicity ≥grade 3; 0 point (6.6%), 1 point (12.2%), 2 points (39.0%), 3 points (75.0%). DISCUSSION: A stratification using individual extracted risk factors may be useful to predict the vulnerability to systemic therapy in older adult NSCLC patients.

A randomized phase II study of docetaxel or pemetrexed with or without the continuation of gefitinib after disease progression in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations (JMTO LC12-01).

BACKGROUND: Gefitinib (G) is a recommended molecular-targeted agent for elderly patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Docetaxel (Doc) and pemetrexed (Pem) have similar efficacies, and either is often used as the sole agent during treatment. The efficacy of continuing G after progressive disease (PD) develops has been reported. It remains unclear whether the continuation of G in combination with a single cytotoxic agent beyond PD is beneficial for elderly patients. Here, we conducted a randomized phase II study to assess the efficacy and safety of cytotoxic chemotherapy with G for elderly patients with progressive EGFR-mutant NSCLC. METHODS: Elderly patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC with PD previously treated with G were enrolled. Patients received Pem 500 mg/m or Doc 60 mg/m every 21 days and were randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy with 250 mg G (G+ Doc/Pem arm) or without G (Doc/Pem arm) until further disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: This trial was terminated early owing to slow accrual. A group of 22 patients underwent analysis. The primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS), was significantly longer in the G + Doc/Pem arm (median: 1.6 months vs. 5.6 months, hazard ratio = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.16-0.99, p = 0.0391). Adverse events ≥ grade 3 were more frequent in the G + Doc/Pem arm (45.5% vs. 90.9%, p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Patients on G and Pem or Doc beyond PD showed a longer PFS than those on single-agent chemotherapy; however, it was associated with increased toxicity.

Nintedanib plus chemotherapy for nonsmall cell lung cancer with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a randomised phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fatal lung disease implicated as an independent risk factor for lung cancer. However, optimal treatment for advanced lung cancer with IPF remains to be established. We performed a randomised phase 3 trial (J-SONIC) to assess the efficacy and safety of nintedanib plus chemotherapy (experimental arm) compared with chemotherapy alone (standard-of-care arm) for advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with IPF. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve advanced NSCLC patients with IPF were allocated to receive carboplatin (area under the curve of 6 on day 1) plus nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) (100 mg·m-2 on days 1, 8 and 15) every 3 weeks with or without nintedanib (150 mg twice daily, daily). The primary end-point was exacerbation-free survival (EFS). RESULTS: Between May 2017 and February 2020, 243 patients were enrolled. Median EFS was 14.6 months in the nintedanib plus chemotherapy group and 11.8 months in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio (HR) 0.89, 90% CI 0.67-1.17; p=0.24), whereas median progression-free survival was 6.2 and 5.5 months, respectively (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50-0.92). Overall survival was improved by nintedanib in patients with nonsquamous histology (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.40-0.93) and in those at GAP (gender-age-physiology) stage I (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.38-0.98). Seven (2.9%) out of 240 patients experienced acute exacerbation during study treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The primary end-point of the study was not met. However, carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel was found to be effective and tolerable in advanced NSCLC patients with IPF. Moreover, nintedanib in combination with such chemotherapy improved overall survival in patients with nonsquamous histology.

A multicenter, open-label, single-arm study of anamorelin (ONO-7643) in patients with cancer cachexia and low body mass index.

BACKGROUND: Cancer cachexia is a syndrome characterized by anorexia and decreased body weight. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of anamorelin, an orally active, selective ghrelin receptor agonist, in patients with cancer cachexia and a low body mass index (BMI). METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, single-arm study enrolled Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer or gastrointestinal cancer with cancer cachexia (BMI < 20 kg/m2 , involuntary weight loss > 2% in the last 6 months, and anorexia). Patients were administered 100 mg of anamorelin once daily for up to 24 weeks. The primary end point was a composite clinical response (CCR) at 9 weeks, which was defined as an increase in body weight of ≥5% from the baseline, an increase of ≥2 points in the score of the 5-item Anorexia Symptom Scale of the Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy, and being alive. RESULTS: One hundred two patients were eligible and enrolled. The means and standard deviations for age and BMI were 71.0 ± 8.2 years and 17.47 ± 1.48 kg/m2 , respectively. The CCR rate at 9 weeks was 25.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.3%-35.3%), which met the primary end point with a lower 95% CI exceeding the prespecified minimum of 8%. Improvements in body weight and anorexia were durable and were accompanied by improvements in patients' global impression of change for appetite/eating-related symptoms and overall condition. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 37 of 101 treated patients (36.6%), with the most common being glycosylated hemoglobin increases, constipation, and peripheral edema. CONCLUSIONS: Anamorelin improved body weight and anorexia-related symptoms in patients with cancer cachexia and a low BMI with durable efficacy and favorable safety and tolerability. LAY SUMMARY: Anamorelin is a drug that stimulates appetite and promotes weight gain. This clinical trial was aimed at determining its efficacy and safety in Japanese cancer patients with a low body mass index and cachexia, a syndrome associated with anorexia and weight loss. Anamorelin was found to improve body weight and anorexia-related symptoms in these patients, and these effects were durable for up to 24 weeks. Moreover, anamorelin was generally well tolerated. These findings suggest that anamorelin is a valuable treatment option for patients with cancer cachexia and a low body mass index.

Deciphering the clinical features of heterogeneous stage III non-small cell lung cancer in Japanese real-world clinical practice: Expanded cohort of the SOLUTION study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the actual treatment patterns with respective outcomes and the patient characteristics of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (aged ≥20 years at diagnosis) who were diagnosed with stage III NSCLC between January 2013 and December 2014 and underwent surgery, chemoradiotherapy (CRT), chemotherapy (CT), or radiotherapy (RT) at 11 institutions in Japan were consecutively registered in this retrospective, observational study (SOLUTION; UMIN000031385). Study measures included patient characteristics, first-line treatments, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, objective response rate, and incidence of radiation-related adverse events. RESULTS: The study population comprised 744 patients. The tumors were classified as stage IIIA and IIIB in 58.9% and 41.1% of patients, respectively. The tumors were considered resectable at diagnosis in 25.0% of patients. First-line treatments were surgery (20.0%), CRT (46.1%), CT (22.2%), and RT (11.7%). The median OS (mOS) in the overall population was 25.4 months and the 3-year OS rate was 38.7%. Among the four first-line treatment cohorts, OS most favored the surgery cohort: mOS was 43.4 months and the 3-year OS rate was 53.8%. Prognostic factors for OS in each treatment modality were analyzed using multivariable analysis and included the following: age, performance status, and histological type for the surgery cohort; sex, histological type, and primary lesion location (lower lobe) for the CRT cohort; and performance status and clinical stage for the RT cohort. The timing of peak incidence of pneumonitis from the start of first-line treatment was 18-20 and 12-14 weeks in the CRT and RT cohorts, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with clinical stage III NSCLC received a variety of treatments selected to the clinical background and tumor status, and we clarified the outcome and prognostic factors. These findings will be a useful reference for future studies evaluating newly introduced treatments for stage III NSCLC.

Retrospective analysis of long-term survival factors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab.

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), has changed the treatment paradigm for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, factors associated with long-term survival in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs remain unknown. This study aimed to evaluate patient characteristics and clinical laboratory changes related to long-term survival in NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab, using real-world data. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) ≤1 treated with nivolumab. We defined patients with overall survival (OS) ≥3 years as long-term survivors. We evaluated the differences in patient characteristics and tumor response between nonlong-term survivors and long-term survivors and performed univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with long-term survival. RESULTS: Out of 213 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with nivolumab, 162 patients with ECOG-PS ≤1 were included in the study. Young age, ECOG-PS 0, absolute neutrophil count decrease, lymphocyte percentage increase, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) change (ΔNLR) <1 were significantly associated with long-term survival. Long-term survivors had significantly higher response and disease control rates than nonlong-term survivors. Multivariate analysis showed that ΔNLR <1 was significantly associated with long-term survival. Further, OS was significantly different between the PS 0 and PS 1 groups (median OS: 32.0 months vs. 10.6 months) and the nonincreasing NLR and increasing NLR groups (median OS: 20.8 months vs. 5.7 months). CONCLUSIONS: ΔNLR <1 was a significant long-term survival factor compared to ΔNLR ≥1 in advanced NSCLC patients treated with nivolumab.

Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in Patients with Resected Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Received Adjuvant Osimertinib in the Phase III ADAURA Trial.

PURPOSE: In the phase III ADAURA trial, adjuvant treatment with osimertinib versus placebo, with/without prior adjuvant chemotherapy, resulted in a statistically significant and clinically meaningful disease-free survival benefit in completely resected stage IB-IIIA EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We report health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes from ADAURA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients randomized 1:1 received oral osimertinib 80 mg or placebo for 3 years or until recurrence/discontinuation. HRQoL (secondary endpoint) was measured using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) health survey at baseline, 12, and 24 weeks, then every 24 weeks until recurrence or treatment completion/discontinuation. Exploratory analyses of SF-36 score changes from baseline until week 96 and time to deterioration (TTD) were performed in the overall population (stage IB-IIIA; N = 682). Clinically meaningful changes were defined using the SF-36 manual. RESULTS: Baseline physical/mental component summary (PCS/MCS) scores were comparable between osimertinib and placebo (range, 46-47) and maintained to Week 96, with no clinically meaningful differences between arms; difference in adjusted least squares (LS) mean [95% confidence intervals (CI), -1.18 (-2.02 to -0.34) and -1.34 (-2.40 to -0.28), for PCS and MCS, respectively. There were no differences between arms for TTD of PCS and MCS; HR, 1.17 (95% CI, 0.82-1.67) and HR, 0.98 (95% CI, 0.70-1.39), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HRQoL was maintained with adjuvant osimertinib in patients with stage IB-IIIA EGFRm NSCLC, who were disease-free after complete resection, with no clinically meaningful differences versus placebo, further supporting adjuvant osimertinib as a new treatment in this setting. See related commentary by Patil and Bunn, p. 2204.

Uncommon EGFR mutations conducted with osimertinib in patients with NSCLC: a study protocol of phase 2 study (UNICORN/TCOG1901).

Patients with uncommon EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) demonstrated lower clinical efficacy of first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors compared with patients harboring common EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The US FDA has approved afatinib for uncommon EGFR mutation positive NSCLC based on the pooled analysis in the first- or second-line setting. Osimertinib has limited evidence in the small sample sizes of phase 2 studies in any-line settings. The aim of the present single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 study is to evaluate the efficacy of osimertinib for previously untreated NSCLC. The primary end point is to assess the overall response to osimertinib. The secondary end points include disease control rate, progression-free survival, duration of time-to-treatment failure, overall survival and safety. Clinical trial registration: jRCTs071200002.

Lay abstract Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) medications are targeting EGFR work on the first-line treatment for patients with common EGFR mutation positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EGFR+ NSCLC) that has spread to other parts of the body and has the EGFR+ NSCLC in tumor testing. Uncommon EGFR mutations and compound EGFR mutations have less activity for first-generation EGFR-TKIs; however, second- or third-generation EGFR-TKIs are broader spectrum than first-generation EGFR-TKIs have activities ideally. The authors describe the need for and design a study of osimertinib in patients with uncommon/compound EGFR+ NSCLC.

Randomized Phase III Study of Gefitinib Versus Cisplatin Plus Vinorelbine for Patients With Resected Stage II-IIIA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Mutation (IMPACT).

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of gefitinib as an adjuvant therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: IMPACT (WJOG6410L; University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000006252), a randomized, open-label, phase III study, included patients with completely resected pathologic stage II-III non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletion or L858R) during September 2011 to December 2015. Patients were randomly assigned to receive gefitinib (250 mg once daily) for 24 months or cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1) plus vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; cis/vin) once every 3 weeks for four cycles. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: Overall, 234 patients were randomly assigned. Among 232 eligible patients (116 each; excluding two who withdrew consent), the median DFS was 35.9 and 25.1 months in the gefitinib and cis/vin groups, respectively. However, Kaplan-Meier curves crossed around 4 years after surgery with no statistically significant difference (stratified log-rank P = .63; hazard ratio by stratified Cox proportional hazards model = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.28). Overall survival (OS) was also not different (stratified log-rank P = .89; hazard ratio = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.65), with the 5-year OS rates being 78.0% and 74.6% in the gefitinib and cis/vin groups, respectively. Treatment-related deaths occurred in 0 and three patients in the gefitinib and cis/vin groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although adjuvant gefitinib appeared to prevent early relapse, it did not prolong DFS or OS. However, similar DFS and OS may justify adjuvant gefitinib in the selected patient subsets, especially those deemed ineligible for platinum-doublet adjuvant therapy; however, this was not a noninferiority trial.

Efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Ramucirumab (RAM) plus Docetaxel (DOC) is one of the standard treatments after first-line treatment failure in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, little is known about the efficacy and safety of RAM plus DOC in older patients. We aimed to clarify these and elucidate the prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study, conducted at four medical facilities in Japan, we evaluated the efficacy and safety data for two groups (<65 and ≥ 65 years). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed to reveal the prognostic factors for better PFS and OS. Patient characteristics and adverse events (AEs) in both groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney's U and Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. RESULTS: A total of 237 patients were included, of whom 43% (n = 103), and 57% (n = 134) were aged <65, and ≥ 65 years. Median OS was 12.2 (95% CI: 9.4-15.0), and 14.8 months (95% CI: 10.8-18.8), respectively, and there were no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.534). Multivariate analysis identified DOC dose reduction (none vs performed, HR: 2.66, 95% CI: 1.62-4.35, p < 0.001) as an independent prognostic factor for OS in older patients, and a similar result was shown for the PFS. Grade ≥ 3 all AEs were identified in 42.7% and 56.7% of younger and older patients, respectively, and there was a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.033); however, the difference between the groups disappeared with primary DOC dose reduction (p = 0.526). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of RAM plus DOC administration in older, pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC was comparable to those of younger patients, whereas RAM plus DOC should be cautiously administered to older patients because of severe toxicity. Moreover, appropriate DOC dose reduction may be recommended for increased survival benefit and safety in such patients.

A quantitative evaluation of the histological type dependence of the programmed death-ligand 1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer including various adenocarcinoma subtypes: a cross-sectional study.

The association between non-small cell lung cancer histology and programmed death-ligand 1 expression remains controversial. We retrospectively analyzed histological dependence of the programmed death-ligand 1 expression by a multiple regression analysis of 356 non-small cell lung cancer patients. The programmed death-ligand 1 expression patterns of adenocarcinoma were consistent with a pathological predominant growth pattern as a reference to papillary adenocarcinoma: minimally invasive adenocarcinoma[partial regression coefficient (B), 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.59], lepidic adenocarcinoma (B, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.90), acinar adenocarcinoma (B, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-3.76) and solid adenocarcinoma (B, 5.11; 95% confidence interval, 2.20-11.9). In histology other than adenocarcinoma, the programmed death-ligand 1 expression tended to be high with poor differentiation: adenosquamous carcinoma (B, 4.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-16.6), squamous cell carcinoma (B, 4.32; 95% confidence interval, 2.45-7.62) and pleomorphic carcinoma (B, 13.0; 95% confidence interval, 4.43-38.2). We showed quantitatively that the programmed death-ligand 1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer tended to be clearly histology-dependent, with more poorly differentiated histology showing a higher expression.