Predictive factors for successful colonic stenting in acute large-bowel obstruction: a 15-year cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: Colonic stenting has failed to show an improvement in mortality rates in comparison with emergency surgery for acute large-bowel obstruction. However, it remains unclear which patients are more likely to benefit from this procedure. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to identify factors that may be predictive of successful outcome of colonic stenting in acute large-bowel obstruction. DESIGN: All patients undergoing colonic stenting for acute large-bowel obstruction between 1999 and 2013 were studied. The demographics and characteristics of the obstructing lesion were analyzed. SETTINGS: This investigation was conducted at a district general hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 126 (76 men; median age, 76 y; range, 42-94 y) with acute large-bowel obstruction were included in the analysis. INTERVENTION: The insertion of a self-expanding metal stent was attempted for each patient to relieve the obstruction. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were technical success in the deployment of the stent, clinical decompression, and perforation rates. RESULTS: Technical deployment of the stent was accomplished in 108 of 126 (86%) patients; however, only 89 (70%) achieved clinical decompression. Successful deployment and clinical decompression was associated with colorectal cancer (p = 0.03), shorter strictures (p = 0.01), and wider angulation distal to the obstruction (p = 0.049). Perforation was associated with longer strictures (p = 0.03). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSION: Colonic stenting in acute large-bowel obstruction is more likely to be successful in shorter, malignant strictures with less angulation distal to the obstruction. Longer benign strictures are less likely to be successful and may be associated with an increased risk of perforation.

Adjacent thoracic lymph node metastases originating from two separate primary cancers: case report.

Reported is an unusual case of adjacent thoracic lymph nodes demonstrating metastases from two different primary malignancies. A 51 year-old woman with a previous history of bilateral breast cancer underwent a radical gastro-oesophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the oesophagus. The resection specimen demonstrated breast and oesophageal metastases in adjacent thoracic lymph nodes. Mechanisms for this phenomenon, including the known local immune suppression on lymphoid cells by oesophageal carcinoma cells, are discussed.

The incidence, indications and outcome for the non-operative management of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify the proportion of patients with breast cancer who do not undergo primary operative treatment, to identify the reasons surgery is not performed, and to determine the outcome for this group of patients. METHODS: Data was obtained from the Bedford Breast Cancer Registry for all non-metastatic patients presenting between January 1990 and December 2004 who were initially treated non-operatively. Robust diagnostic, therapeutic, and follow-up data on all patients was collected prospectively during this period. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-five out of 2110 episodes of breast cancer were treated non-operatively during this period. Sixty-eight percent of patients were unfit for surgery, 15% had inoperable tumours, and 17% refused surgical intervention. Median survival and 5-year survival rate for all non-operative patients were 3.7 years and 41.2%. Median survival for inoperable patients was 3.7 years, compared with 3.5 years for those unfit for surgery and 4.2 years for those who refused surgery. The 5-year survival rate for patients refusing surgery was 43%, compared with 61% for a matched group of patients undergoing standard surgical therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides useful data on the reasons for, and outcome of, the non-operative management of breast cancer.