Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Thorac Cancer ; 15(29): 2110-2115, 2024 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39233498

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Lung and bronchus cancer is a leading cause of death in the United States. Compared with the national average, Michigan has an increased mortality rate and low early screening and treatment rates. This study aimed to explore the epidemiological trends and assess overall survival (OS) of patients diagnosed with lung cancer in Michigan from 1996 to 2017. METHODS: Data was acquired from the Michigan Cancer Surveillance Program (MCSP). Log-rank test was used to test OS among the time periods, univariate and multivariate cox regression models were employed to determine factors that significantly affected OS. We hypothesized that the introduction of more inclusive lung cancer screening guidelines in 2013 would improve OS for patients diagnosed after its implementation and that individual characteristics and tumor characteristics would both affect OS. RESULTS: Notably, 153 742 individuals met inclusion criteria: 54.22% male and 45.78% female. Mean age at diagnosis was 69 years. No significant difference in OS was found among the three time periods (p = 0.99). Univariate analyses identified four individual characteristics associated with reduced OS: age at diagnosis, male sex, American Indian race, and living in rural or urban area. Reduced OS was associated with primary sites tumors at main bronchus, lung base, or within overlapping lobes, and SEER stage 7. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights several factors that influence OS. Consideration of these factors may be helpful as a community outreach tool to help increase early detection and reduce overall mortality.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Michigan/epidemiologia , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Brônquicas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Brônquicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Brônquicas/patologia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Estudos Epidemiológicos
2.
Am J Med Sci ; 367(6): 363-374, 2024 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38417573

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients with COVID-19 have been reported to experience adverse cardiovascular outcomes, such as myocarditis, acute myocardial infarction, and heart failure. Among these complications, heart failure (HF) has emerged as the most common critical complication during exacerbations of COVID-19, potentially leading to increased mortality rates and poorer clinical outcomes. We aimed to investigate the in-hospital outcomes of COVID-19 patients with HF. METHODS: We analyzed the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) dataset to select COVID-19 patients aged over 18 years who were hospitalized between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020, using ICD-10. Based on the presence of acute HF, the patients were divided into two cohorts. The clinical outcomes and complications were assessed at index admissions using STATA v.17." RESULTS: 1,666,960 COVID-19 patients were hospitalized in 2020, of which 156,755 (9.4%) had associated HF. COVID-19 patients with HF had a mean age of (72.38 ± 13.50) years compared to (62.3 ± 17.67) years for patients without HF. The HF patients had a higher prevalence of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes, smoking, and preexisting cardiovascular disease. Additionally, after adjusting for baseline demographics and comorbidities, COVID-19 patients with HF had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (23.86% vs. 17.63%, p<0.001), acute MI (18.83% vs. 10.91%, p<0.001), acute stroke (0.78% vs. 0.58%, p=0.004), cardiogenic shock (2.56% vs. 0.69%, p<0.001), and sudden cardiac arrest (5.54% vs. 3.41%, p<0.001) compared to those without HF. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 patients admitted with acute HF had worse clinical outcomes, such as higher mortality, myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, and a higher length of stay and healthcare than patients without HF.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/mortalidade , COVID-19/complicações , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Comorbidade , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto
3.
Am J Cardiol ; 192: 39-44, 2023 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36716522

RESUMO

The prevalence of COVID-19 infection-related myocarditis, its in-hospital cardiovascular outcomes, and its impact on hospital cost and stay at national level are not well studied in the literature. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database from 2020 was queried to identify patients with COVID-19 and myocarditis versus those without myocarditis. Cardiovascular outcomes and resource utilization were studied among cohorts with COVID-19, with and without myocarditis, using descriptive statistics, multivariate regression matching, and propensity score matching using STATA version 17. Of 1,678,995 patients, 3,565 (0.21%) had COVID-19 with myocarditis, and 1,675,355 (99.78%) had COVID-19 without myocarditis. On multivariate regression analysis, we found higher odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27 to 1.9) in patients with myocarditis than in those without myocarditis, in addition to higher odds of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (aOR 3.54, 95% CI 2.8 to 4.4), acute kidney injury (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.9), heart failure (aOR 2.77, 95% CI 2.3 to 3.4), cardiogenic shock (aOR 10.2, 95% CI 7.9 to 13), myocardial infarction (aOR 5.74, 95% CI 4.5 to 7.3), and use of mechanical circulatory support (aOR 2.81, 95% CI 1.6 to 4.9). The propensity-matched cohort also favored similar outcomes. In conclusion, patients with COVID-19 and myocarditis had worse clinical outcomes, having a higher rate of in-hospital mortality, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events with longer length of hospital stay, and higher hospitalization costs. Large prospective trials are necessary to validate these findings with diagnostic measures, including biopsy and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the extent of myocardial involvement.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Miocardite , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Estudos Prospectivos , Hospitais , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA