RESUMO
Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) is generally contraindicated in persons with dementia but it is frequently performed in people with mild cognitive impairment or normal cognition, and current clinical guidelines are primarily based on these cohorts. Objectives: To determine if moderately cognitive impaired individuals including those with mild dementia could meaningfully benefit from DBS in terms of motor and non-motor outcomes. Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, we identified a cohort of 40 patients with PD who exhibited moderate (two or more standard deviations below normative scores) cognitive impairment (CI) during presurgical workup and compared their 1-year clinical outcomes to a cohort of 40 matched patients with normal cognition (NC). The surgery targeted subthalamus, pallidus or motor thalamus, in a unilateral, bilateral or staged approach. Results: At preoperative baseline, the CI cohort had higher Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) subscores, but similar levodopa responsiveness compared to the NC cohort. The NC and CI cohorts demonstrated comparable degrees of postoperative improvement in the OFF-medication motor scores, motor fluctuations, and medication reduction. There was no difference in adverse event rates between the two cohorts. Outcomes in the CI cohort did not depend on the target, surgical staging, or impaired cognitive domain. Conclusions: Moderately cognitively impaired patients with PD can experience meaningful motor benefit and medication reduction with DBS.
RESUMO
Ischemic stroke remains a major cause of disability in the United States and worldwide. Following the large-scale implementation of stroke thrombectomy and the optimization of treatment protocols for acute stroke, the reduction in stroke-associated mortality has resulted in an increased proportion of stroke survivors, many of whom have moderate to severe disability. To date, the treatment of subacute and chronic stroke has remained a challenge. Several approaches, involving pharmacological interventions to promote neuroplasticity, brain stimulation strategies and rehabilitative interventions, are currently being explored at different stages of the translational spectrum, yet level 1 evidence is still limited. In a recent landmark study, surgical intervention using contralateral C7 nerve transfer, an approach used to treat brachial plexus injury, was implemented in patients with chronic stroke, demonstrating an added benefit to standard rehabilitation strategies, leading to improved motor performance and reduced spasticity. The procedure involved the transfer of the C7 nerve root and middle trunk from the uninjured extremity to the injured extremity using a short conduit that allows for faster regeneration and innervation of the injured upper extremity via the ipsilateral (contralesional) hemisphere. In this work, we review the rationale for using contralateral C7 nerve transfer in stroke, describe the surgical intervention with associated variations and limitations, and discuss the current evidence for the efficacy of this technique in ischemic stroke research.