Differential CTLA-4 expression in human CD4+ versus CD8+ T cells is associated with increased NFAT1 and inhibition of CD4+ proliferation.

Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) is a costimulatory molecule that negatively regulates T-cell activation. Originally identified in murine CD8(+) T cells, it has been found to be rapidly induced on human T cells. Furthermore, CTLA-4 is expressed on regulatory T cells. Clinically, targeting CTLA-4 has clinical utility in the treatment of melanoma. Whether the expression of CTLA-4 is differentially regulated in CD8(+) vs CD4(+) human T cells is unclear. Here, we analyzed CTLA-4 in normal human CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell subsets and show for the first time that CTLA-4 is expressed significantly higher in the CD4(+) T cells than in CD8(+) T cells. CTLA-4 is higher at the protein and the transcriptional levels in CD4(+) T cells. This increase is due to the activation of the CTLA-4 promoter, which undergoes acetylation at the proximal promoter. Furthermore, we show that blocking CTLA-4 on CD4(+) T cells permits greater proliferation in CD4(+) vs CD8(+) cells. These findings demonstrate a differential regulation of CTLA-4 on CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell subsets, which is likely important to the clinical efficacy for anti-CTLA-4 therapies. The findings hint to strategies to modulate CTLA-4 expression by targeting epigenetic transcription to alter the immune response.

Cooperation between VEGF and TNF-alpha is necessary for exposure of active tissue factor on the surface of human endothelial cells.

This study was undertaken to characterize tissue factor (TF) induction, localization, and functional activity in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) exposed to recombinant vascular endothelial growth factor (rVEGF) and recombinant tumor necrosis factor-alpha (rTNF-alpha). rVEGF (1 nmol/L) and rTNF-alpha (500 U/mL) synergistically increased TF mRNA, protein, and total activity, as measured in cell lysates. To examine surface TF expression, living cells were treated with antibody to TF and examined microscopically. Almost no staining was seen in control cells or cells treated with a single agent. In contrast, cells treated with both agonists showed intense membrane staining with surface patches, appearing as buds by confocal microscopy. To determine surface TF activity, studies were performed using a parallel-plate flow chamber, which allows detection of factor Xa generation on living cells. rVEGF and rTNF-alpha induced little surface TF activity (0.032+/-0.008 and 0.014+/-0.008 fmol/cm2, respectively). In combination, they significantly increased TF expression on the cell surface (0.429+/-0.094 fmol/cm2, P<0.05). These data indicate that the synergistic effect of rVEGF and rTNF-alpha is necessary to generate functional TF on the surface of endothelial cells. The requirement for multiple agonists to expose active TF may serve to protect endothelial cells from acting as a procoagulant surface, even under conditions of cell perturbation.

Assessment of potential exposure to antineoplastic agents in the health care setting.

In response to reports of measurable air levels of antineoplastic agents in hospitals and preliminary evidence of exposure to personnel handling these agents, a survey was designed and conducted to document the current handling practices of injectable antineoplastic drugs by hospital and health care workers at two major teaching hospitals and three affiliated community hospitals. The survey included assessment of drug preparation, administration, and disposal. A sample of nurses, pharmacists, physicians, and other staff who routinely come in contact with these drugs was interviewed for validation of the observed results. Typical working conditions encountered and the potential numbers of people at risk and their job titles are presented here. Drug preparation facilities and methods were not uniform even within a single institution, including local preparation in the pharmacy under controlled or uncontrolled conditions, as well as individual drug preparation and administration on the hospital floors. Handling practices for drug preparation were not consistent from practitioner to practitioner. In some cases, where laboratory coats and disposable gloves were provided, it was not a routine practice to wear them. Based on such analysis of risk factors, recommendations for improved practices are given.