RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We aimed to describe the financial implications of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) in the USA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cost analysis of 100 CRS/HIPEC procedures to examine the impact of patient and procedural factors on hospital costs and reimbursement. A comparison of surgeons' work relative value units (wRVUs) between CRS/HIPEC and a representative sample of complex surgical oncology procedures was made to assess the physicians' compensation rate. Univariable and multivariable backward logistic regression was used to analyze the association between perioperative variables and high direct cost (HDCs). RESULTS: The median direct cost per CRS/HIPEC procedure was US $44,770. The median hospital reimbursement was US $43,066, while professional reimbursement was US $8608, resulting in a positive contribution margin of US $7493/procedure. However, the contribution margin significantly varied with the payer mix. Privately insured patients had a positive median contribution margin of US $23,033, whereas Medicare-insured patients had a negative contribution margin of US $13,034. Length of stay (LOS) had the most significant association with HDC, and major complications had the most significant association with LOS. Finally, CRS/HIPEC procedures generated a median of 13 wRVU/h, which is significantly lower than the wRVU/h generated by open pancreatoduodenectomies, open gastrectomies, and hepatectomies. However, higher operation complexity and multiple visceral resections help compensate for the relatively low wRVU/h. CONCLUSIONS: CRS/HIPEC is an expensive operation, and prolonged LOS has the most significant impact on the total cost of the procedure. High-quality care is essential to improve patient outcomes and maintain the economic sustainability of the procedure.
Assuntos
Hipertermia Induzida , Neoplasias Peritoneais , Humanos , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias Peritoneais/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medicare , Hipertermia Induzida/métodos , Custos e Análise de Custo , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/métodos , Terapia Combinada , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Despite advances, readmission and mortality rates for surgical patients with colon cancer remain high. Prediction models using regression techniques allows for risk stratification to aid periprocedural care. Technological advances have enabled large data to be analyzed using machine learning (ML) algorithms. A national database of colon cancer patients was selected to determine whether ML methods better predict outcomes following surgery compared to conventional methods. METHODS: Surgical colon cancer patients were identified using the 2013 National Cancer Database (NCDB). The negative outcome was defined as a composite of 30-d unplanned readmission and 30- and 90-d mortality. ML models, including Random Forest and XGBoost, were built and compared with conventional logistic regression. For the accounting of unbalanced outcomes, a synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) was implemented and applied using XGBoost. RESULTS: Analysis included 528,060 patients. The negative outcome occurred in 11.6% of patients. Model building utilized 30 variables. The primary metric for model comparison was area under the curve (AUC). In comparison to logistic regression (AUC 0.730, 95% CI: 0.725-0.735), AUC's for ML algorithms ranged between 0.748 and 0.757, with the Random Forest model (AUC 0.757, 95% CI: 0.752-0.762) outperforming XGBoost (AUC 0.756, 95% CI: 0.751-0.761) and XGBoost using SMOTE data (AUC 0.748, 95% CI: 0.743-0.753). CONCLUSIONS: We show that a large registry of surgical colon cancer patients can be utilized to build ML models to improve outcome prediction with differential discriminative ability. These results reveal the potential of these methods to enhance risk prediction, leading to improved strategies to mitigate those risks.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Colo , Aprendizado de Máquina , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Readmissão do Paciente , Curva ROCRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hepatic angiosarcoma (AS) and hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) are rare primary hepatic vascular malignancies (PHVM) that remain poorly understood. To guide management, we sought to identify factors and trends predicting survival after surgical intervention using a national database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database patients with a diagnosis of PHVM were identified. Clinicopathologic factors were extracted and compared. Overall survival (OS) was estimated and predictors of survival were identified. RESULTS: Three hundred ninty patients with AS and 216 with HEHE were identified. Only 16% of AS and 36% of HEHE patients underwent surgery. The median OS for patients who underwent surgical intervention was 97 months, with 5-year OS of 30% for AS versus 69% for HEHE patients (P< 0.001). Tumor biology strongly impacted OS, with AS histology (Hazard Ratio [HR] of 3.61 [1.55-8.42]), moderate/poor tumor differentiation (HR = 3.86 [1.03-14.46]) and tumor size (HR = 1.01 [1.00-1.01]) conferring worse prognosis. The presence of metastatic disease in the surgically managed cohort (HR = 5.22 [2.01-13.57]) and involved surgical margins (HR = 3.87 [1.59-9.42]), were independently associated with worse survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this national cohort of PHVM, tumor biology, in the form of angiosarcoma histology, tumor differentiation and tumor size, was strongly associated with worse survival after surgery. Additionally, residual tumor burden after resection, in the form of positive surgical margins or the presence of metastasis, was also negatively associated with survival. Long-term clinical outcomes remain poor for patients with the above high-risk features, emphasizing the need to develop effective forms of adjuvant systemic therapies for this group of malignancies.
Assuntos
Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide/terapia , Hemangiopericitoma/terapia , Hemangiossarcoma/terapia , Hepatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide/mortalidade , Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide/patologia , Hemangiopericitoma/mortalidade , Hemangiopericitoma/patologia , Hemangiossarcoma/mortalidade , Hemangiossarcoma/patologia , Humanos , Fígado/irrigação sanguínea , Fígado/patologia , Fígado/cirurgia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasia Residual , Radioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Carga Tumoral , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Accurate clinical staging (CS) of gastric cancer is critical for appropriate treatment selection and prognostication, but CS remains highly imprecise. Our study evaluates factors associated with inaccurate CS, the impact of inaccurate CS on outcomes, and utilization of adjuvant therapy in patients who are understaged. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of NCDB patients diagnosed with clinical early stage gastric adenocarcinoma (cT1-2N0M0) between 2004 and 2016. Patients not undergoing upfront gastrectomy or with missing pathologic staging were excluded. Patients were classified as accurately staged, inaccurately staged with receipt of adjuvant therapy (IS+), and inaccurately staged with no receipt of adjuvant therapy (IS-). Logistic regression was utilized to assess the impact of factors on CS accuracy and receipt of adjuvant therapies. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: Approximately 40% of patients were inaccurately staged (IS). cT2, moderately/poorly differentiated, and site-overlapping tumors were associated with increased likelihood of being IS. Treatment at an academic facility was associated with decreased likelihood of understaging. Only 54% of patients who were IS received adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION: Accurate CS of gastric cancer remains inadequate. Understaging is associated with detrimental effects on receiving guideline-concordant care and, possibly, patient outcomes. Targeted interventions reducing the proportion of understaged patients and ensuring receipt of appropriate therapy is needed to optimize outcomes. Patients with high-risk disease that are frequently understaged may benefit from selective neoadjuvant therapy. Centralization of gastric cancer care may also be a key strategy in improving receipt of guideline-concordant therapies.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Gástricas , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Gastrectomia , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologiaRESUMO
Laparoscopy has emerged as a common alternative to the open approach for colorectal operations. Robotic surgery has many advantages, but cost and outcomes are an area of study. There are no randomized-controlled trials of all techniques. The present study evaluated a cohort of veterans undergoing (procto-) colectomy for benign or malignant colorectal disease. This is a single-institution retrospective review. We compared open, laparoscopic, and robotic colectomies. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. The secondary endpoints included morbidity, operative times, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), conversion rate, and the learning curve (LC). Subgroup analyses were undertaken for: (1) right hemicolectomies (RHC) and (2) by specific surgeons most familiar with each approach. The cohort included 390 patients (men = 95%, White = 70.8%, BMI = 29.3 ± 6.4 kg/m2, age = 63.7 ± 10.2 years) undergoing (open = 117, laparoscopic = 168, and robotic = 105), colorectal operations for colorectal adenocarcinoma (52.8%) and benign disease. Thirty-day morbidity was similar across all techniques (open = 46.2%, laparoscopic = 42.9%, and robotic = 38.1%; NS). EBL and LOS were decreased with minimally invasive techniques compared to open. Operative time was longer in robotic, but equalized to laparoscopic after 90 cases. The learning curve was reduced to 20 when performed by the surgeon most familiar with the robot. EBL and operative time independently predicted complications for the entire cohort. The best technique for colorectal operations rests on the surgeon's experience, but minimally invasive techniques are gaining momentum over open colectomies. Robotic colectomy is emerging as a non-inferior approach to laparoscopy in terms of outcomes, while maintaining all its technical advantages.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Colectomia/métodos , Doenças do Colo/cirurgia , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Proctocolectomia Restauradora/métodos , Doenças Retais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Metastatic foregut cancers (MFC) are associated with debilitating symptoms that negatively impact patients' quality of life. Palliative care (PC) is effective in mitigating disease-, psychosocial-, and treatment-related effects and may improve survival in select cases. Our study characterizes PC utilization rates in MFC and identifies factors associated with PC receipt. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 228,027 National Cancer Database patients diagnosed with MFC between 2004 and 2016. Chi-squared tests were used to analyze differences between groups receiving and not receiving PC. Logistic regression was performed to assess the impact of factors on the likelihood of receiving PC. RESULTS: Overall PC utilization was low (17.8%). A greater proportion of patients not receiving PC were in the lowest median income quartile of < $38,000/year versus those receiving PC (18.1% vs 17.8%, p < 0.0001). Higher education was associated with increased likelihood of receiving PC (OR 1.23 for communities with < 6.3% no high school degree vs ≥ 17.6%, p < 0.0001). Hispanics were significantly less likely to receive PC compared to Whites (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.68-0.76). Patients treated at academic centers were also more likely to receive PC compared to those treated in the community (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.14). CONCLUSIONS: PC is a key component in improving quality of life among MFC patients. Despite slight increases in PC rates over time, PC remains drastically underutilized. Significant racial and socioeconomic disparities in patterns of PC delivery exist. Further studies are needed to understand these disparities in order to identify key targets for interventions aimed at improving equity.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Cuidados Paliativos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Renda , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
Lung cancer (LC) is an aggressive malignancy with early metastatic spread and poor prognosis. Gastrointestinal metastases from primary LC are extremely rare with highly variable presentations. In this report, we review the case of a patient who presented with peritonitis secondary to perforated sigmoid mass as the first manifestation of metastatic squamous cell LC.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Limited research has been performed regarding pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) diagnosed in early-onset patients. This study defined early-onset disease as cancer diagnosed before the age of 50 years and aimed to characterize the clinicopathologic factors associated with early- versus late-onset patients. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried to identify early- and late-onset PDAC patients with cancer diagnosed from 2004 to 2013. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment regimens, and overall survival (OS) were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The study enrolled 207,062 patients, including 12,137 early-onset patients (5.9%) and 194,925 late-onset patients (94.1%). The early-onset patients (stage 3 or 4 cancer) were more likely to present with a later stage of disease (62.1% vs. 55.2%; p < 0.001) and to be male (57.1% vs. 50.0%; p < 0.001) than those with late-onset PDAC. The early-onset patients also presented with a lower Charlson/Deyo comorbidity score (80.9% vs. 66.6% had a score of 0; p < 0.001) and received higher rates of treatment (22.8% vs. 40.1% received no treatment, p < 0.001) than the late-onset patients. Furthermore, early-onset PDAC was associated with improved OS among all the PDAC patients (9.2 vs. 6.0 months; p < 0.001) and among the surgically resected patients (27.3 vs. 24.3 months; p < 0.001). Early-onset PDAC also was found to be independently associated with improved OS after adjustment for other significant clinicopathologic factors. CONCLUSIONS: Despite features suggestive of aggressive tumor biology at presentation, early-onset PDAC was independently associated with better OS than late-onset PDAC among all patients and among curatively resected stage-matched patients.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adulto , Idade de Início , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Data-driven patient selection guidelines are not available to optimize outcomes in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD). We aimed to define risk factors associated with conversion from MIPD to open PD and to determine the impact of conversion on post-operative outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of MIPD using NSQIP from 2014 to 2015. Propensity score was used to match patients who underwent completed MIPD to converted MIPD. RESULTS: 467 patients were included: 375 (80.3%) MIPD and 92 (19.7%) converted. Converted patients were more often male (64% vs. 52%, p = 0.030), had higher rates of dyspnea (10% vs. 3%, p = 0.009), underwent more vascular (44% vs. 14%, p < 0.001) or multivisceral resection (19% vs. 6%, p = 0.0005), and were more likely attempted laparoscopically compared to robotically (76% vs. 51%, p < 0.001). Robotic approach was independently associated with reduced risk of conversion (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.23-0.69), while male gender (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.02-2.84), history of dyspnea (OR 3.85, 95% CI 1.49-9.96), vascular resection (OR 4.32, 95% CI 2.53-7.37), and multivisceral resection (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.05-4.52) were associated with increased risk. Major complications were more common in converted patients (68% vs. 37%, p < 0.001). Converted patients had increased odds of non-home discharge (OR 3.25, 95% CI 1.06-9.97) and an associated increased length of stay of 3 days (95% CI 0.1-6.7). CONCLUSION: Patients with a history of dyspnea or tumors requiring vascular or multivisceral resection were at increased risk of conversion, and the robotic platform was associated with a lower rate of conversion. Conversion was independently associated with increased overall complications, increased length of stay, and non-home discharge.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/métodos , Pontuação de Propensão , Idoso , Conversão para Cirurgia Aberta/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Masculino , Análise por Pareamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fragmented cancer care (FC), or care received from multiple institutions, increases systemic health care costs and potentiates cancer care disparities. There is a paucity of data on mechanisms contributing to FC and the resulting effect on patient outcomes. This study characterized patient- and hospital-level factors associated with FC, time to treatment (TTT), and overall survival (OS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Patients newly diagnosed with HCC from 2004 to 2015 and receiving treatment were identified in the Texas Cancer Registry. Patient- and hospital-level factors were compared across 2 cohorts: an FC treatment group and a nonfragmented cancer care (NFC) treatment group. Covariate-adjusted treatment use and OS were compared between the 2 treatment groups. RESULTS: Among 4329 patients with HCC, 1185 (27.4%) received FC, and 3144 (72.6%) received NFC. Compared with NFC patients, FC patients had larger tumors (median size ≥4 cm, 52.6% vs 35.2%; P < .001), and a higher proportion had a regional/metastatic stage (35.9% vs 26.7%; P < .001). Among patients with localized disease, FC was associated with decreased odds of curative therapy (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-0.9). FC was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95% CI, 1.05-1.24) and increased TTT (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.7-0.8). In the subset of patients with localized-stage HCC who received curative therapy, FC was associated with worse OS (median survival, 67 vs 43 months; HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.4) and increased TTT (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.7-0.8). CONCLUSIONS: FC patients were less likely to undergo curative therapy when they were diagnosed at an early stage. After covariate adjustment, newly diagnosed patients with HCC receiving FC had worse OS and increased TTT.
Assuntos
Institutos de Câncer/organização & administração , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Institutos de Câncer/economia , Institutos de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidade , Estudos de Coortes , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/economia , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Texas/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Meckel's diverticulum (MD) is an anomaly of the small intestine from which malignancy may arise. Among MD neoplasms, neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are considered the most common. However, their metastatic potential and optimal surgical therapy remain ill-defined. METHODS: In a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (2004-2015), patients with a diagnosis of MD malignancy were identified. Clinicopathologic factors were extracted and tumors arising in MD were compared. In the subgroup of patients with NET, the association between tumor factors and node involvement was investigated. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty primary MD malignancies were captured in the National Cancer Database, consisting of 280 (87.5%) NET. The median age at diagnosis was 64 years. Patients were predominantly male (207, 73.9%) and white (269, 96.1%). Most tumors were well-differentiated (118, 42.1%) and sub-centimeter (median size, 0.7 cm). Distant metastasis was present in a minority (16, 5.7%), and the median overall survival was 114 months in the entire cohort. The regional lymph node status was known in 87 NET patients, out of which 39 (44.8%) harbored node metastasis. Although the risk of node involvement increased with larger tumor size, it remained significant even among sub-centimeter (9 out of 34, 26.5%) and well-differentiated (18 out of 44, 41%) tumors. Regional node involvement was associated with the presence of distant metastasis (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Lymph node involvement was common irrespective of the size and grade of NET arising from Meckel's diverticulum. Therefore, regional lymphadenectomy should be considered in the curative-intent surgical management of these neoplasms regardless of tumor size and grade.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Íleo/cirurgia , Excisão de Linfonodo , Divertículo Ileal/complicações , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias do Íleo/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Íleo/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Íleo/patologia , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/diagnóstico , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/mortalidade , Tumores Neuroendócrinos/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Carga TumoralRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Periampullary adenocarcinoma (PAC) is stratified anatomically: ampullary adenocarcinoma (AA), distal cholangiocarcinoma (DCC), duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA), and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). We aimed to determine differences in incidence, prognosis, and treatment in stage-matched PAC patients in a longitudinal study. METHODS: PAC patients were identified in The National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2012. Clinicopathological variables were compared between subtypes. Covariate-adjusted treatment use and OS were compared. RESULTS: The 116 705 patients with PAC were identified: 1320 (9%) AA, 3732 (3%) DCC, 7142 (6%) DA, and 95 511 (82%) PDAC. DA, DCC, and PDAC were associated with worse survival compared with AA (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% CI, 1.1-1.1; HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.4-1.6, and HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.8-1.9). Among resected patients, DA was associated with improved survival compared with AA (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.67-0.75); DCC and PDAC were associated with worse survival (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.31-1.53 and HR, 2.041; 95% CI, 1.07-2.12). Resected AA, PDAC, and DA, but not DCC, demonstrated significantly improved survival over the studied period. While all patients had increased adjuvant therapy (AT) receipt over time (P < 0.001), only patients with PDAC had increased neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) receipt ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Resected PDAC, AA, and DA were associated with clinically significant improved survival over time, mirroring a concurrent associated increased receipt of AT.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Ampola Hepatopancreática/patologia , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/mortalidade , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidade , Colangiocarcinoma/mortalidade , Neoplasias do Ducto Colédoco/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiologia , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Idoso , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/terapia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/terapia , Colangiocarcinoma/epidemiologia , Colangiocarcinoma/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Neoplasias do Ducto Colédoco/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Ducto Colédoco/terapia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Prognóstico , Taxa de Sobrevida , Texas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias PancreáticasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Predictive models for nonhome discharge (NHD) have been proposed in major surgical specialties. The rates and risk factors associated with NHD and prolonged length of stay (PLOS) after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) have not been evaluated. The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for NHD and PLOS after CRS/HIPEC in a national cohort of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CRS/HIPEC cases were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 2011-2012 data set. Patients with an NHD or PLOS (>30 d) were compared with a group of patients discharged to home within 30 d. Univariate analysis was used to compare patient characteristics, operative variables, and postoperative complications among both groups. Multivariate regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of NHD and PLOS. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-six patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC were identified, of which 44 (7.9%) were not discharged to home within 30 d. The rate of NHD and PLOS in this cohort was 4.1% and 3.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified age ≥65 y, pre-op albumin <3.0 g/dL, and having a multivisceral resection as independent predictors of NHD/PLOS. If all three predictors are met preoperatively, the probability of NHD/PLOS was calculated to be 30.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The main risk factors for NHD/PLOS after CRS/HIPEC were advanced age, hypoalbuminemia, and multivisceral resection. Adequate identification of these risk factors may facilitate preoperative discussion with patients, and improve discharge planning and resource utilization.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/efeitos adversos , Hipertermia Induzida/efeitos adversos , Alta do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Peritoneais/terapia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Terapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peritônio/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Prognóstico , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Instituições de Cuidados Especializados de Enfermagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidado Transicional/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Two recent South Korean studies showed adjuvant therapy (AT) was not associated with improved survival in pT1N1 gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). We established the prognostic utility of lymph node status, determined the pattern of use of AT, and compared survival stratified by type of AT in pT1N1 GAC in a Western patient population. METHODS: We identified patients with pT1N0 and pT1N1 GAC using the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2012. Clinicopathologic variables, treatment regimens, and overall survival (OS) were compared. RESULTS: We compared 4516 (86.6%) pT1N0 to 696 (13.4%) pT1N1 patients. pT1N1 tumors were larger (median size 2.5 vs. 1.8 cm, p < 0.001), more often poorly differentiated (56.2% vs. 39.6%, p < 0.001), and had higher median retrieved lymph nodes (RLN) (14 vs. 12, p < 0.001) compared with pT1N0. pT1N1 was associated with worse median overall survival (OS) (6.9 vs. 9.9 years for pT1N0, p < 0.001). pN1 was independently associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.84-2.56). Increased RLN was associated with improved OS (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.65-0.83). Among pT1N1 patients, 330 (47.4%) had observation (OBS), 77 (11.1%) received adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT), 68 (9.8%) received adjuvant radiation therapy (ART), and 221 (31.8%) received adjuvant chemoradiation therapy (ACRT). ACT and ACRT were independently associated with improved OS (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.22-0.65 and HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.28-0.57). CONCLUSIONS: pN1 was associated with worse survival and RLN ≥ 15 was associated with improved survival in pT1 GAC. ACT and ACRT were independently associated with improved survival in pT1N1 gastric cancer suggesting a valuable role in Western patients.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante/mortalidade , Linfonodos/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/epidemiologia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Background: Preoperative therapy is being increasingly used in the treatment of resectable pancreatic cancer. Because there are only limited data on the optimal preoperative regimen, we compared overall survival (OS) between preoperative chemotherapy (CT) and preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients and Methods: Patients receiving preoperative therapy and resection for clinical T1-3N0-1M0 adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were identified in the National Cancer Database for 2006 through 2012. We constructed inverse probability of treatment weights to balance baseline group differences, and compared OS between CT and CRT, as well as pathologic and postoperative findings. Results: We identified 1,326 patients (CT: 616; CRT: 710). Differences in OS were not significant between CRT and CT (median survival, 25 vs 26 months; P=.10; weight-adjusted hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.77-1.02). Compared with patients in the CT group, those in the CRT group had lower pathologic T stage (ypT0/T1/T2: 36% vs 21%; P<.01), less lymph node involvement (ypN1: 35% vs 59%; P<.01), and fewer positive resection margins (14% vs 21%; P=.01), but had more postoperative unplanned readmissions (9% vs 6%; P=.01) and increased 90-day mortality (7% vs 4%; P=.03). Those in the CRT group were also less likely to receive postoperative therapy (26% vs 51%; P<.01). Conclusions: Preoperative CT and CRT have similar OS, but CRT is associated with more favorable pathologic features at the cost of higher postoperative morbidity and mortality. Additional trials investigating preoperative therapy are needed for patients with resectable pancreatic cancer.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidade , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Quimiorradioterapia/efeitos adversos , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Margens de Excisão , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante/efeitos adversos , Terapia Neoadjuvante/métodos , Pâncreas/patologia , Pâncreas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Data on the efficacy of adjuvant therapy (AT) in distal cholangiocarcinoma (dCCA) is limited. This study aimed to determine the role of AT in resected dCCA and identify subgroups that benefit from AT. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of surgically resected dCCA in the NCDB from 2004 to 2013. Patients who received AT or observation (OB) were matched by propensity score. Log-rank test was used to compare OS. RESULTS: Of 1782 patients with resected dCCA, 840 (47%) were in the OB group and 942 (53%) in the AT group. AT was younger (64.0 vs. 68.7 years, p < 0.001), had less comorbidities (Charlson Deyo score 0) (74.6 vs. 68.0%, p < 0.001), and more likely to have private insurance (p < 0.001). AT was more likely to present with T3/T4 stage (72 vs. 57%, p < 0.001), N1/N2 disease (58 vs. 37%, p < 0.001), and positive surgical margins (26 vs. 16%, p < 0.001). After 1:1 propensity score matching, 500 OB and 500 AT patients were compared. AT was associated with better OS (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.67-0.93). Median OS was 31 and 25 months for the AT and OB (p = 0.006). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 87, 46, and 31% for AT; 79, 39, and 24% for OB. Subgroup analysis revealed an associated survival advantage for AT in T3/T4 tumors (HR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.59-0.89), node positive disease (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.56-0.87), and positive margins (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.42-0.81). CONCLUSION: AT is associated with improved OS in resected dCCA, especially in T3/T4 tumors, node positive disease, and positive margins.
Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/cirurgia , Colangiocarcinoma/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/mortalidade , Neoplasias dos Ductos Biliares/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Colangiocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Colangiocarcinoma/mortalidade , Colangiocarcinoma/patologia , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A paucity of data exists regarding the natural history and outcome measures of adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas (ASCP), a histology distinct from pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aim of this study is to characterize the clinicopathological features of ASCP in a large cohort of patients comparing outcome measures of surgically resected patients to PDAC. METHODS: We identified patients diagnosed with ASCP or PDAC from the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2012. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment regimens, and overall survival were analyzed between the groups. RESULTS: We identified 207 073 patients: 205 328 (99%) in the PDAC group and 1745 (1%) in the ASCP group. ASCP tumors were larger, located more frequently in a body/tail location (36% vs 24%, P < 0.001), undifferentiated/anaplastic histology (41% vs 17%, P < 0.001), and early stage presentation, (39% vs 32%, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in OS when comparing all patients with PDAC and ASCP (6.2 months and 5.7 months, P = 0.601). In surgical patients ASCP histology was associated with worse OS (14.8 months vs 20.5 months, P < 0.001) but had lower nodal involvement (55% vs 61%, P < 0.001). ASCP histology was independently associated with worse OS, after adjusting for tumor characteristics, treatment, and patient demographics. In patients with only resected ASCP histology, negative lymph node status, R0 surgical resection, and receipt of chemotherapy was independently associated with improved overall survival following surgical resection. CONCLUSION: Although patients with ASCP and PDAC tumors have similar survival when non-surgical and surgical patients are combined, ASCP is associated with worse survival in stage I/II resected patients.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/patologia , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Idoso , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/mortalidade , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidade , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The evaluation of lymph node involvement is an essential component of cancer staging. Examining an inadequate number of lymph nodes potentially results in understaging. Current guidelines for lymph node retrieval for ampullary adenocarcinoma are based on data extrapolated from other periampullary malignancies and may not be applicable. The aim of this study was to determine the number of lymph nodes that should be examined in resection specimens to optimize staging in ampullary adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma from 2004 to 2014 were identified in the National Cancer Database. We determined the minimum examined lymph node (ELN) count by modeling each potential ELN count from 2 to 30 in a multivariable regression analysis and confirmed the results with a sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: We identified 7451 patients of whom 52.2% had T3 or T4 disease and 51.4% had lymph node metastases. The median ELN count was 13 (interquartile range, 8-19). Increasing ELNs were independently associated with an increased likelihood of having positive nodal disease (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.04) and improved overall survival in both node-negative (hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99) and node-positive patients (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.986-0.998). We determined that at least 17 lymph nodes should be examined. Overall survival for patients with 17 or more ELNs was superior than for those with fewer than 17 ELNs. CONCLUSION: Increasing ELNs were independently associated with improved overall survival in patients with resected ampullary adenocarcinoma. At least 17 lymph nodes should be examined for optimal nodal staging.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/secundário , Ampola Hepatopancreática/patologia , Neoplasias do Ducto Colédoco/patologia , Linfonodos/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Neoplasias do Ducto Colédoco/cirurgia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Racial and ethnic variations have been described in the different malignancies, but no such data exists for ampullary cancer. The aim of this study was to present an updated report on the epidemiology, treatment patterns, and survival of a national cohort of ampullary cancer patients. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with ampullary cancer between 2004 and 2014 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Overall survival was estimated and compared between racial/ethnic groups using the log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 14 879 patients were identified; 78% of the patients were White, 9% Hispanic, 8% Black, and 5% Asian. We noted significant differences in disease presentation, socioeconomic status, and outcomes. Blacks had the lowest median overall survival at 18.9 months followed by Whites at 23.9 months, Hispanics at 32.7 months, and Asians at 37.4 months. On a multivariate Cox proportional-hazards model, being Black was associated with worse survival compared to being White while being Asian and Hispanic were associated with better survival. CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival of ampullary cancer patients was independently associated with race and ethnicity. Further studies are needed to clarify whether these disparities are primarily due to socioeconomic status or biologic factors.