Efficacy and safety of odevixibat in patients with Alagille syndrome (ASSERT): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In patients with Alagille syndrome, cholestasis-associated clinical features can include high serum bile acids and severe pruritus that can necessitate liver transplantation. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor odevixibat versus placebo in patients with Alagille syndrome. METHODS: The ASSERT study was a phase 3, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial that enrolled patients at 21 medical centres or hospitals in ten countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Poland, Türkiye, the UK, and the USA). Eligible patients had a genetically confirmed diagnosis of Alagille syndrome, a history of significant pruritus, and elevated serum bile acids. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive oral odevixibat 120 µg/kg per day or placebo for 24 weeks (in a block size of six and stratified by age: <10 years and ≥10 years to <18 years) via a web-based system. Patients, clinicians, study staff, and people analysing the data were masked to treatment allocation. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in caregiver-reported scratching score (on the PRUCISION instrument; range 0-4) from baseline to weeks 21-24. The prespecified key secondary efficacy endpoint was change in serum bile acid concentration from baseline to the average of weeks 20 and 24. Outcomes were analysed in patients who received at least one dose of study drug (the full analysis set for efficacy outcomes and the safety analysis set for safety outcomes). This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04674761) and EudraCT (2020-004011-28), and is completed. FINDINGS: Between Feb 26, 2021, and Sept 9, 2022, 52 patients were randomly assigned to receive odevixibat (n=35) or placebo (n=17), all of whom were included in the analysis sets. The median age was 5·5 years (IQR 3·2 to 8·9). 27 (52%) of 52 patients were male and 25 (48%) were female. The mean scratching score was elevated at baseline in both groups (2·8 [SD 0·5] for odevixibat vs 3·0 [0·6] for placebo). Mean scratching scores at weeks 21-24 were 1·1 (0·9) for odevixibat and 2·2 (1·0) for placebo, representing a least-squares (LS) mean change of -1·7 (95% CI -2·0 to -1·3) for odevixibat and -0·8 (-1·3 to -0·3) for placebo, which was significantly greater for odevixibat than for placebo (difference in LS mean change from baseline -0·9 [95% CI -1·4 to -0·3]; p=0·0024). Odevixibat also resulted in significantly greater reductions in mean serum bile acids from baseline versus placebo (237 µmol/L [SD 115] with odevixibat vs 246 µmol/L [121] with placebo) to the average of weeks 20 and 24 (149 µmol/L [102] vs 271 µmol/L [167]; LS mean change -90 µmol/L [95% CI -133 to -48] with odevixibat vs 22 µmol/L [-35 to 80] with placebo; difference in LS mean change -113 µmol/L [95% CI -179 to -47]; p=0·0012). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhoea (ten [29%] of 35 patients in the odevixibat group vs one [6%] of 17 in the placebo group) and pyrexia (eight [23%] vs four [24%]). Seven patients had serious treatment-emergent adverse events during the treatment period: five (14%) in the odevixibat group and two (12%) in the placebo group. No patients discontinued treatment and there were no deaths. INTERPRETATION: Odevixibat could be an efficacious non-surgical intervention to improve pruritus, reduce serum bile acids, and enhance the standard of care in patients with Alagille syndrome. Longer-term safety and efficacy data of odevixibat in this population are awaited from the ongoing, open-label ASSERT-EXT study. FUNDING: Albireo Pharma, an Ipsen company.

Proton pump inhibitors in esophageal atresia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is frequent and prolonged in esophageal atresia (EA) pediatric patients requiring routine use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). However, there are still controversies on the prophylactic use of PPIs and the efficacy of PPIs on GERD and EA complications in this special condition. The aim of the study is to assess the prophylactic use of PPIs in pediatric patients with EA and its complications. We, therefore, performed a systematic review including all reports on the subject from 1980 to 2022. We conducted meta-analysis of the pooled proportion of PPI-and no PPI groups using random effect model, meta-regression, and estimate heterogeneity by heterogeneity index I2 . Thirty-eight reports on the topic met the criteria selection, representing a cumulative 6044 patients with EA. Prophylactic PPI prescription during the first year of life does not appear to prevent GERD persistence at follow-up and is not associated with a significantly reduced rate of antireflux surgical procedures (ARP). PPIs improve peptic esophagitis and induce remission of eosinophilic esophagitis at a rate of 50%. Their effect on other GERD outcomes is uncertain. Evidence suggests that PPIs do not prevent anastomotic stricture, Barrett's esophagus, or respiratory complications. PPI use in EA can improve peptic and eosinophilic esophagitis but is ineffective on the other EA complications. Side effects of PPIs in EA are almost unknown.

The French Experience with a Population-Based Esophageal Atresia Registry (RENATO).

This paper presented a national register for esophageal atresia (EA) started in January 2008. We report our experience about the conception of this database and its coordination. Data management and data quality are also detailed. In 2023, more than 2,500 patients with EA are included. Prevalence of EA in France was calculated at 1.8/10,000 live birth. Main clinical results are listed with scientific publications issued directly from the register.

Comparison of Endoscopic Dilatation and Heller's Myotomy for Treating Esophageal Achalasia in Children: A Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of, and complications from, the 2 main treatments for achalasia: endoscopic dilatation and surgical cardiomyotomy (Heller's myotomy). STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively collected data on children treated for achalasia over an 11-year period from 8 tertiary pediatric centers. A line of treatment was defined as performing either Heller's myotomy or 1-3 sessions of endoscopy dilatation over 3 months. Treatment success was a priori defined as clinical improvement and no need for new treatment. RESULTS: Ninety-seven children (median age, 12 years; 57% boys) were included. The median time to diagnosis was 10.5 months, and the median follow-up period was 27 months. Thirty-seven children were treated by Heller's myotomy and 60 by endoscopy dilatation as the first-line treatment. After adjustment for potentially confounding factors, Heller's myotomy was significantly more successful than endoscopy dilatation (hazard ratio, 3.93 [1.74; 8.88]; P = .001), with a median survival without failure of 49 and 7 months, respectively, and with no significant difference in the occurrence of complications (35.2% for Heller's myotomy, 29.7% for endoscopy dilatation, P = .56). Hydrostatic dilatation was as successful as pneumatic dilatation (hazard ratio, 1.35 [0.56; 3.23]; P = .50). CONCLUSIONS: Heller's myotomy is more successful than endoscopy dilatation, with no significant difference in the occurrence of serious complications. This raises the potential role of peroral endoscopic myotomy as an alternative treatment to Heller's myotomy.

Predictors of anastomotic strictures following œsophageal atresia repair.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the risk factors for anastomotic, refractory and recurrent strictures and to establish whether anastomotic stricture is associated with antireflux surgery. DESIGN: This prospective national multicentre study included all infants born with oesophageal atresia (OA) over an 8-year period. Data on OA and complications were collected at birth and at 1 year old. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. RESULTS: 1082 patients from 37 centres were included in the study. The prevalence of anastomotic stricture at 1 year old was 23.2%. Anastomosis under tension (defined by the surgeon at the time of repair) and delayed anastomosis (defined as anastomosis performed more than 15 days after birth, excluding delays due to prematurity or severe cardiac diseases) were found to be independent risk factors for anastomotic stricture (2.3 (1.42-3.74) and 4.02 (2.12-7.63), respectively). Patients with anastomotic stricture had a 2.3-fold higher rate of fundoplication compared with others (p=0.001). Anastomosis under tension and delayed anastomosis were found to be independent risk factors for recurrent stricture (1.92 (1.10-3.34) and 5.73 (2.71-12.14), respectively), while delayed anastomosis was the only risk factor for refractory stricture (8.30 (3.34-20.64)). There was a 2.39-fold (1.42-4.04) higher rate of fundoplication in the anastomotic stricture group than in the group without anastomotic stricture (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patient-related anatomical factors leading to anastomosis under tension and delayed anastomosis increase the risk of anastomotic stricture.

Prevalence of acid gastroesophageal reflux disease in infants with esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula.

BACKGROUND: Given the high prevalence and complication risks of acid gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) in the first months of life in infants with esophageal atresia, the ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN consensus statement recommends systematic treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) until the age of 1 year and checking for acid GERD thereafter. However, these recommendations have not been evaluated. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted from 2007 to 2016. We evaluated the prevalence of acid GERD in 100 consecutive infants presenting with esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula after the age of 18 months when PPI treatment was stopped. The diagnosis of acid GERD was based on positive pH-metry and/or evidence of complications (e.g., peptic esophagitis, need for jejunal nutrition, or antireflux surgery). Those with acid GERD at a median age of 18 months received a control examination every year or adapted to their clinical situation. RESULTS: The prevalence rates of acid GERD were 64.3% at 18 months and 22.8% at the last follow-up (median age 65 months).There is no risk factor for acid GERD identified. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a high prevalence of acid GERD in late infancy and supports the recommendation of systematic checking for acid GERD when treatment with PPI is stopped. IMPACT: Acid gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a frequent complication of esophageal atresia in infants. The ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN consensus, which is based on expert opinion, recommends systematic treatment of children with PPI until the age of 1 year. The prevalence rates of acid GERD were 64.3% at 18 months and 22.8% at the last follow-up. This study shows a high prevalence of acid GERD in late infancy and supports the recommendation of systematic checking for acid GERD when treatment with PPI is stopped.

Esophageal Atresia and Respiratory Morbidity.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Respiratory diseases are common in children with esophageal atresia (EA), leading to increased morbidity and mortality in the first year. The primary study objective was to identify the factors associated with readmissions for respiratory causes in the first year in EA children. METHODS: A population-based study. We included all children born between 2008 and 2016 with available data and analyzed factors at birth and 1 year follow-up. Factors with a P value <.10 in univariate analyses were retained in logistic regression models. RESULTS: Among 1460 patients born with EA, 97 (7%) were deceased before the age of 1 year, and follow-up data were available for 1287 patients, who constituted our study population. EAs were Ladd classification type III or IV in 89%, preterm birth was observed in 38%, and associated malformations were observed in 52%. Collectively, 61% were readmitted after initial discharge in the first year, 31% for a respiratory cause. Among these, respiratory infections occurred in 64%, and 35% received a respiratory treatment. In logistic regression models, factors associated with readmission for a respiratory cause were recurrence of tracheoesophageal fistula, aortopexy, antireflux surgery, and tube feeding; factors associated with respiratory treatment were male sex and laryngeal cleft. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory morbidity in the first year after EA repair is frequent, accounting for >50% of readmissions. Identifying high risk groups of EA patients (ie, those with chronic aspiration, anomalies of the respiratory tract, and need for tube feeding) may guide follow-up strategies.

Recurrence of Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis After Liver Transplant in Children: An International Observational Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis (rPSC) following liver transplant (LT) has a negative impact on graft and patient survival; little is known about risk factors for rPSC or disease course in children. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We retrospectively evaluated risk factors for rPSC in 140 children from the Pediatric PSC Consortium, a multicenter international registry. Recipients underwent LT for PSC and had >90 days of follow-up. The primary outcome, rPSC, was defined using Graziadei criteria. Median follow-up after LT was 3 years (interquartile range 1.1-6.1). rPSC occurred in 36 children, representing 10% and 27% of the subjects at 2 years and 5 years following LT, respectively. Subjects with rPSC were younger at LT (12.9 vs. 16.2 years), had faster progression from PSC diagnosis to LT (2.5 vs. 4.1 years), and had higher alanine aminotransferase (112 vs. 66 IU/L) at LT (all P < 0.01). Inflammatory bowel disease was more prevalent in the rPSC group (86% vs. 66%; P = 0.025). After LT, rPSC subjects had more episodes of biopsy-proved acute rejection (mean 3 vs. 1; P < 0.001), and higher prevalence of steroid-refractory rejection (41% vs. 20%; P = 0.04). In those with rPSC, 43% developed complications of portal hypertension, were relisted for LT, or died within 2 years of the diagnosis. Mortality was higher in the rPSC group (11.1% vs. 2.9%; P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of rPSC in this cohort was higher than previously reported, and was associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Patients with rPSC appeared to have a more aggressive, immune-reactive phenotype. These findings underscore the need to understand the immune mechanisms of rPSC, to lay the foundation for developing new therapies and improve outcomes in this challenging population.

The Sclerosing Cholangitis Outcomes in Pediatrics (SCOPE) Index: A Prognostic Tool for Children.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Disease progression in children with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is variable. Prognostic and risk-stratification tools exist for adult-onset PSC, but not for children. We aimed to create a tool that accounts for the biochemical and phenotypic features and early disease stage of pediatric PSC. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We used retrospective data from the Pediatric PSC Consortium. The training cohort contained 1,012 patients from 40 centers. We generated a multivariate risk index (Sclerosing Cholangitis Outcomes in Pediatrics [SCOPE] index) that contained total bilirubin, albumin, platelet count, gamma glutamyltransferase, and cholangiography to predict a primary outcome of liver transplantation or death (TD) and a broader secondary outcome that included portal hypertensive, biliary, and cancer complications termed hepatobiliary complications (HBCs). The model stratified patients as low, medium, or high risk based on progression to TD at rates of <1%, 3%, and 9% annually and to HBCs at rates of 2%, 6%, and 13% annually, respectively (P < 0.001). C-statistics to discriminate outcomes at 1 and 5 years were 0.95 and 0.82 for TD and 0.80 and 0.76 for HBCs, respectively. Baseline hepatic fibrosis stage was worse with increasing risk score, with extensive fibrosis in 8% of the lowest versus 100% with the highest risk index (P < 0.001). The model was validated in 240 children from 11 additional centers and performed well. CONCLUSIONS: The SCOPE index is a pediatric-specific prognostic tool for PSC. It uses routinely obtained, objective data to predict a complicated clinical course. It correlates strongly with biopsy-proven liver fibrosis. SCOPE can be used with families for shared decision making on clinical care based on a patient's individual risk, and to account for variable disease progression when designing future clinical trials.

Frequency of Abnormal Glucose Tolerance Test Suggestive of Dumping Syndrome Following Oesophageal Atresia Repair.

OBJECTIVES: Dumping syndrome (DS) is mostly described as a complication of antireflux surgery in oesophageal atresia (OA) but we previously reported 2 cases of DS before any other surgery in infants operated at birth for OA. The objectives of the present study were to assess the prevalence of abnormal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 3 months of age in infants operated at birth with type C OA, to describe symptoms and clinical features, and to assess risk factors in infants presenting with abnormal OGTT suggestive of DS. METHODS: A prospective case series study including infants with type C OA without fundoplication, born between 2013 and 2016 in 8 centres was conducted. An OGTT was performed between 2.5 and 3.5 months. Abnormal OGTT was defined as early hyperglycaemia (>1.8 g/L until 30 minutes; >1.7 g/L between 30 minutes and 2 hours; and >1.4 g/L between 2 and 3 hours) and/or late hypoglycaemia (<0.6 g/L after 2 hours). RESULTS: Eleven of the 38 OGTT (29%) showed abnormalities. None of the patients' demographics (birth weight, sex, prematurity, associated malformation, use of enteral nutrition) or conditions of the surgery tested was associated with abnormal OGTT. No clinical sign was specific for it. CONCLUSIONS: DS should be considered in every infant operated at birth for OA presenting with digestive symptoms. No risk factor was predictive for abnormal OGTT. An OGTT to screen for potential DS around 3 months of age should be considered in infants born with EA. CLINICAL TRIAL NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: DUMPING NCT02525705.

Prevalence of Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Adolescents With Esophageal Atresia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an increasingly recognized childhood disease. Esophageal atresia (EA) is the most frequent congenital malformation of the esophagus. Recently, cases of EoE occurring in patients with EA have been reported, although the exact prevalence of EoE in EA remains unknown. The aim is to investigate the prevalence of EoE among EA in adolescents and to describe these patients' characteristics. METHODS: Systematic upper gastrointestinal endoscopies with multistage esophageal biopsies were prospectively performed in 63 adolescents with EA. A standardized form was used to collect clinical and endoscopic data. Diagnosis of EoE was made as ≥15 intraepithelial eosinophils/high power field, whatever the response on proton pump inhibitors therapy. RESULTS: Six patients (9.5%) presented an EoE (17-100 eosinophils/high power field). An atopic condition was reported more frequently in the eosinophil ≥15 group than in patients with no EoE (66% vs 16%; P = 0.014). Except for chest pain, symptoms and endoscopic features were similar in patients with EoE and patients with no EoE. CONCLUSION: In our series of 63 patients born with EA, mainly distal tracheoesophageal fistula, the prevalence of EoE is increased, and therefore should be considered in adolescents with EA.

Influence of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Children.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is present at long-term follow-up after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), and to identify factors associated with the occurrence or aggravation of GERD after PEG placement. STUDY DESIGN: This prospective, observational study was conducted in our single tertiary center over a 13-year period (gastrostomy performed from 1990 to 2003 and follow-up to 2015). Every child who underwent PEG in our center (N = 368) from 1990 to 2003 was eligible. GERD was defined by clinical manifestations requiring antisecretory or prokinetic treatment, occurrence of a GERD-related complication, or the need for antireflux surgery. Outcomes among patients without antireflux surgery were also assessed. Multivariate analysis was used to identify factors aggravating GERD after PEG placement. RESULTS: A total 326 patients (89%; 56% with a neurologic impairment) were studied with a median follow-up after 3.5 years (range, 2.0-13.5 years). After PEG placement, GERD appeared in 11% of patients and was aggravated in 25% of patients with preexisting GERD. Factors associated with GERD worsening after PEG placement were neurologic impairment and preexisting GERD. Only 53 patients (16%) required antireflux surgery, among whom 22 required surgery in the year after PEG. Neurologic impairment was the only factor significantly associated with the need for antireflux surgery. CONCLUSIONS: GERD predominantly remains clinically controlled after PEG placement. Routine antireflux surgery at the time of PEG placement is not justified.