Preliminary Results of a Combined Score Based on sIL2-Rα and TIM-3 Levels Assayed Early After Hematopoietic Transplantation.

Assays of cytokines in the plasma at the onset of graft-vs. -host disease (GVHD) can predict disease severity and treatment-related mortality (TRM); however, the optimal time during which cytokines should be tested and the specific panel of cytokines with the highest predictive ability remain unknown. We chose a predefined time point, 18 days after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), to measure the levels of six cytokines in the plasma: soluble interleukin-2 receptor alpha (sIL2-Rα), T-cell immunoglobulin domain and mucin domain-3 (TIM-3), suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (ST-2), intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM-1), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and interleukin-6 (IL-6). The study included 95 patients, who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation at our institution. Plasma levels of sIL2-Rα and TIM-3, measured as continuous data, had predictive value for overall survival (sIL2-Rα, p = 0.002; TIM-3, p = 0.0007), while TRM could be predicted by sIL2-Rα (p = 0.0005), IFN-gamma (p = 0.01), and IL-6 (p = 0.0001). No cytokine was associated with the risk of relapse. Patients were categorized into groups, according to cytokine thresholds determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (sIL2-Rα ≤ or > 8,100 pg/ml; TIM-3 ≤ or > 950 pg/ml) and multivariate analysis was conducted. High levels of both TIM-3 and sIL2-Rα were significant predictors of poor survival [TIM-3 > 950 pg/ml: hazard ratio (HR) = 6.214 (95% CI 1.939-19.910), p = 0.002 and sIL2-Rα > 8.100 pg/ml: HR = 2.644 (95% CI 1.308-5.347), p = 0.006]. Using these cutoff thresholds, we constructed a composite scoring system that could distinguish three different groups of patients with varying rates of TRM: high risk, 41.7%; intermediate risk, 10.8%; and low risk, 7.1% (Gray's test: p = 0.001). If confirmed in a validation cohort, this composite scoring system could be used to guide the modulation of post-transplant immune suppressive therapy.

Cost-effectiveness of on-demand plerixafor added to chemotherapy and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma.

We here report final results of a phase II/III prospective study that evaluated in Multiple Myeloma the use of on-demand plerixafor (PLX) added to mobilizing chemotherapy for patients showing predictive signs of mobilization failure. A total of 111 patients with MM were registered, all received cyclophosphamide 4 g/m2 and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Overall, a successful CD34+ cell mobilization was achieved in 97.2% (108/111) of patients. Minimum harvest (≥2.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg) was achieved in 97.2% (108/111) and optimal harvest success (≥4.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg) was achieved in 84.6% (94/111). Multivariate analysis showed that patients who received on-demand PLX treatment had significantly higher likelihoods of successfully achieving both the minimal (p = .006) and optimal harvest (p = .05) in respect to a historical control group mobilized without any PLX. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, for each 1% increase in probability of achieving a successful minimal harvest, was €40.6 per patient.

Acute GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation affects early marrow reconstitution and speed of engraftment.

Our aim was to study the influence of acute graft-versus-host disease (a-GVHD) on primary engraftment times after allogeneic transplantation. Primary engraftment and frequency of marrow granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units and erythroid burst-forming units, at day +18, were studied in 126 allogeneic transplants. Patients were grouped according to the time when a-GVHD treatment with corticosteroids was started. The no-a-GVHD group are those who, during the first 3 months, had no need for a-GVHD treatment; the early-a-GVHD group are those who needed a-GVHD treatment within 19 days; and the postengraftment-a-GVHD group are those who were not on corticosteroid treatment at the time of engraftment but needed it after day +19. The no-a-GVHD group reached a neutrophil count (N) > 0.5 × 10(9)/L in a median of 17.8 days. The postengraftment-a-GVHD group reached N > 0.5 × 10(9)/L in a median of 21.4 days (p = 0.0003). The early-a-GVHD group had N > 0.5 × 10(9)/L in a median of +17.0 days (p = 0.23). When factors important for engraftment were studied in a multivariate analysis, postengraftment a-GVHD was a significant factor in delayed neutrophil and platelet engraftment. Both the early-a-GVHD and postengraftment-a-GVHD groups showed a significant reduction in frequency of granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming units and erythroid burst-forming units found in marrow at day +18. In conclusion, a-GVHD may influence early marrow reconstitution and is a relevant factor for primary myeloid and platelet engraftment.

Chemosensitivity of nonleukemic clonogenic precursors in AML patients in complete remission: association with CD34(+) mobilization and with disease-free survival.

A high number of CD34(+) cells in the peripheral blood during mobilization in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in complete remission (CR) is associated with a high relapse rate. The variability in chemoresistance of normal bone marrow precursors has been hypothesized as explanation for the variable CD34 mobilization in AML. In 37 patients with AML in CR, we determined the chemosensitivity of bone marrow clonogenic precursors to maphosphamide and etoposide, which was then correlated with the degree of CD34(+) mobilization. In an enlarged set of 49 patients, we also studied the importance of chemosensitivity of marrow precursors for disease-free survival and relapse incidence. Significant correlations were demonstrated between the peak number of CD34(+) cells and residual growth of colony-forming unit granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) after maphosphamide (R = 0.550; p = 0.0003) and after etoposide (R = 0.793; p = 0.0003). It was possible to identify three groups of AML patients based on chemosensitivity. The mean CD34(+) peak was 33 × 10(6)/L in the hyperchemosensitive group, 141 × 10(6)/L in the normochemosensitive (p = 0.03), and 379 × 10(6)/L in the chemoresistant group (p = 0.002). Failed CD34(+) mobilization was observed in 72% of the hyperchemosensitive group, 23% of the normochemosensitive group, and 0% of the chemoresistant group (p = 0.001). Hyperchemosensitivity of CFU-GM, together with a low platelet count, were independent factors important in the failure of CD34(+) cell mobilization. A disease-free survival significantly inferior to that of all other patients was associated with chemoresistance of CFU-GM (log rank, p = 0.030) and with chemoresistance of burst-forming unit erythroid (BFU-E) (log rank, p = 0.033). Chemoresistance of CFU-GM (p = 0.048) and BFU-E (p = 0.017) was also associated with increase relapse incidence. Nonleukemic nature of these precursors was demonstrated studying minimal residual disease from single colony cells. In conclusion, we found that hyperchemosensitivity of normal nonleukemic CFU-GM is associated with a high risk of CD34(+) cell mobilization failure, while a chemoresistant pattern in CFU-GM and BFU-E is associated with poor disease-free survival and increased cumulative incidence of relapse.

Expression profile and specific network features of the apoptotic machinery explain relapse of acute myeloid leukemia after chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: According to the different sensitivity of their bone marrow CD34+ cells to in vitro treatment with Etoposide or Mafosfamide, Acute Myeloid Leukaemia (AML) patients in apparent complete remission (CR) after chemotherapy induction may be classified into three groups: (i) normally responsive; (ii) chemoresistant; (iii) highly chemosensitive. This inversely correlates with in vivo CD34+ mobilization and, interestingly, also with the prognosis of the disease: patients showing a good mobilizing activity are resistant to chemotherapy and subject to significantly higher rates of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) and relapse than the others. Based on its known role in patients' response to chemotherapy, we hypothesized an involvement of the Apoptotic Machinery (AM) in these phenotypic features. METHODS: To investigate the molecular bases of the differential chemosensitivity of bone marrow hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) in CR AML patients, and the relationship between chemosensitivity, mobilizing activity and relapse rates, we analyzed their AM expression profile by performing Real Time RT-PCR of 84 AM genes in CD34+ pools from the two extreme classes of patients (i.e., chemoresistant and highly chemosensitive), and compared them with normal controls. RESULTS: The AM expression profiles of patients highlighted features that could satisfactorily explain their in vitro chemoresponsive phenotype: specifically, in chemoresistant patients we detected up regulation of antiapoptotic BIRC genes and down regulation of proapoptotic APAF1, FAS, FASL, TNFRSF25. Interestingly, our analysis of the AM network showed that the dysregulated genes in these patients are characterized by high network centrality (i.e., high values of betweenness, closeness, radiality, stress) and high involvement in drug response. CONCLUSIONS: AM genes represent critical nodes for the proper execution of cell death following pharmacological induction in patients. We propose that their dysregulation (either due to inborn or de novo genomic mutations selected by treatment) could cause a relapse in apparent CR AML patients. Based on this, AM profiling before chemotherapy and transplantation could identify patients with a predisposing genotype to MRD and relapse: accordingly, they should undergo a different, specifically tailored, therapeutic regimen and should be carefully checked during the post-treatment period.

Intermediate dose etoposide plus G-CSF 16 g/kg is more effective than cyclophosphamide 4 g/m(2) plus G-CSF 10 g/kg in PBSC mobilization of lymphoma patients.

We designed intermediate dose etoposide + G-CSF 16 microg/kg as a Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) mobilization schedule suitable for outpatient administration. Forty-one Lymphoma patients received intermediate dose etoposide (200 mg/m(2) i.v. day +1, +2, +3) +G-CSF 16 microg/kg/day. Results of PBSC mobilization in these patients were compared with those of a group of 37 lymphoma patients mobilized using cyclophosphamide (CTX) at dosage of 4 g/m(2) + G-CSF 10 microg/kg/die. Mean peak of CD34+ cells achieved in P.B. and total CD34+ cells harvested were higher in patients mobilized with intermediate dose etoposide (p = 0.003 and p = 0.004, respectively). After transplantation recovery of polymorphonucleate neutrophils (PMN) > 0.5 x 10(9)/L did not differ significantly between groups: 11.7 days in intermediate dose etoposide group and 11.5 days in CTX group (p = 0.7). Intermediate dose etoposide + G-CSF 16 microg/kg resulted in a maximum length of neutropenia (PMN < 0.5 x 10(9)/L) of 2 days and neutropenic fever was registered during only 3/41 courses (7.3%). Intermediate dose etoposide + G-CSF 16 microg/kg is a highly effective mobilizing therapy, further, it has the advantage of low hematologic toxicity and can be easily administered as outpatient treatment.