Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 48(3): 261-267, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32046897

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether administration of topical and intraperitoneal zinc for maxillofacial fractures has any impact on the bone healing process. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Thirty-two New Zealand rabbits were randomly assigned to four groups of eight each. The first group was the control group; fracture lines were fixed using titanium microplates and no medication was administered. The second group received fixations using zinc-coated titanium microplates. A single dose of 3 mg/kg zinc was administered intraperitoneally to the third group following fixations with titanium microplates. A single dose of 3 mg/kg zinc was administered intraperitoneally to the fourth group following fixations with zinc-coated titanium microplates. Zinc coating on to the titanium microplates was achieved using the physical vapor deposition technique. A fracture line was created in the nasal bones of all subjects and fixed with five-hole flat microplates and three 5-mm micro screws. All work groups were sacrificed at the end of the sixth week. RESULTS: Histological examination showed that the number of osteoblasts were significantly higher in zinc-coated group (Group 2) than zinc uncoated, control group (Group 1), (415.6 ± 46.7 vs 366.3 ± 11.8) (p < 0.001). It was observed that intraperitoneal zinc treatment alone (Group 3) did not significantly increase in the osteoblast count compared to zinc un-coated group (Group 1), (390.6 ± 83.2 vs 366.3 ± 11.8), (p = 0.341). The immunoreactivity scores for IGF-1 were significantly higher in the zinc-coated group compared to control group (Group 2 vs 1), (9.3 ± 2.8 vs 3.7 ± 1.9) (p < 0.05). It was observed that intraperitoneal zinc treatment did not cause a significant difference in the aspect of IGF-1 for zinc-coated groups (Group 2 vs 4) (9.3 ± 2.8 vs 9.6 ± 2.2) (p = 0.791). The difference in the immunoreactivity score among whole groups for TGF-ß was not statistically significant (Group 1 vs 2, 3.2 ± 1.7 vs 4.4 ± 2.3, p = 0.256; Group 1 vs 3, 3.2 ± 1.7 vs 3.8 ± 2.8, p = 0.524; Group 1 vs 4, 3.2 ± 1.7 vs 2.8 ± 1.3, p = 0.717; Group 2 vs 3, 4.4 ± 2.3, vs 3.8 ± 2.8, p = 0.610; Group 2 vs 4, 4.4 ± 2.3, vs 2.8 ± 1.3, p = 0.124; Group 3 vs 4, 3.8 ± 2.8, vs 2.8 ± 1.3, p = 0.311). CONCLUSION: The local use of titanium microplates coated with zinc by PVD technique was found effective for fracture healing. Zinc coating of titanium microplates used in fracture treatment can accelerate fracture healing. It may be concluded that clinical studies should be performed now in order to explore if comparable results can be achieved in humans.


Assuntos
Consolidação da Fratura , Zinco , Animais , Materiais Revestidos Biocompatíveis , Humanos , Osteoblastos , Coelhos , Titânio , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta
2.
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.);83(1): 88-93, Jan.-Feb. 2017. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-839412

RESUMO

Abstract Introduction Onodi cells are the most posterior ethmoid air cells and extend superolateral to the sphenoid sinus. These cells are also intimately related with the sphenoid sinus, optic nerve, and carotid artery. Radiologic evaluation is mandatory to assess for anatomic variations before any treatment modalities related to the sphenoid sinus. Objective To evaluate the effect of Onodi cells on the frequency of sphenoiditis. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed in 618 adult patients who underwent high-resolution computed tomography between January 2013 and January 2015. The prevalence of Onodi cells and sphenoiditis was evaluated. Whether the presence of Onodi cells leads to an increase in the prevalence of sphenoiditis was investigated. Results Onodi cell positivity was observed in 326 of 618 patients and its prevalence was found to be 52.7%. In the study group, 60.3% (n = 73) were ipsilaterally (n = 21) or bilaterally (n = 52) Onodi-positive, whereas 39.7% (n = 48) were Onodi-negative (n = 35) or only contralaterally Onodi-positive (n = 13). Of the control group, 48.3% (n = 240) were Onodi-positive and 51.7% (n = 257) were Onodi negative. The co-existence of Onodi cells ipsilaterally was observed to increase the identification of sphenoiditis 1.5-fold, and this finding was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion The prevalence of sphenoiditis appears to be higher in patients with Onodi cells. However, it is not possible to state that Onodi cells are the single factor that causes this disease. Further studies are needed to investigate contributing factors related to sphenoiditis.


Resumo Introdução As células de Onodi são as células etmoidais mais posteriores, que se prolongam superolateralmente ao seio esfenoidal. Essas células também se encontram em íntima relação com o seio esfenoidal, o nervo óptico e a artéria carótida. Para análise de variações anatômicas antes da implantação de qualquer modalidade terapêutica relacionada ao seio esfenoidal, a avaliação radiológica é obrigatória, Objetivo Nosso objetivo foi avaliar o papel das células de Onodi na frequência de esfenoidite. Método Em nosso estudo, foi feita uma análise retrospectiva em 618 pacientes adultos que se submeteram à tomografia computadorizada de alta resolução entre janeiro de 2013 e janeiro de 2015. Avaliamos a prevalência de células de Onodi e de esfenoidite. Investigamos se a presença de células de Onodi leva a um aumento na prevalência de esfenoidite. Resultados A positividade para células de Onodi foi observada em 326 de 618 pacientes e sua prevalência foi de 52,7%. No grupo de estudo, 60,3% (n = 73) eram CO-positivas: ipsilateral (n = 21) ou bilateralmente (n = 52); e 39,7% (n = 48) eram CO-negativas (n = 35) ou apenas contralateralmente CO-positivas (n = 13). No grupo de controle, 48,3% (n = 240) eram CO-positivas; e 51,7% (n = 257) eram CO-negativas. Observamos que a coexistência de CO ipsilateralmente aumentava em 1,5 vez a associação com esfenoidite e esse achado foi estatisticamente significante (p < 0,05). Conclusão A prevalência de esfenoidite parece ser maior em pacientes com células de Onodi, mas não é possível afirmar que elas são isoladamente o fator causador dessa doença. Novos estudos precisam ser feitos para uma investigação dos fatores contributivos relacionados à esfenoidite.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Adulto Jovem , Sinusite Esfenoidal/diagnóstico por imagem , Seios Paranasais/fisiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA