The Association Between Low Preoperative Phosphate Levels and Postliver Surgery Outcomes- a Single Center Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Previous research has demonstrated the impact of postoperative phosphate levels on liver regeneration and outcomes after liver resection surgeries, a potential predictor for regenerative success and liver failure. However, little is known about the association between low preoperative serum phosphate levels and outcomes in liver resections. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of liver resections performed at our institution. Patients were categorized based on preoperative phosphate levels (low versus normal). Our primary outcome measure was posthepatectomy liver failure. RESULTS: A total of 265 cases met the study criteria. 71 patients (26.7%) had low preoperative phosphate levels. The incidence of posthepatectomy liver failure was higher in the low preoperative phosphate group (19.2% versus 12.4%). However, after propensity score matching, rates of posthepatectomy liver failure were similar between low and normal preoperative phosphate cohorts (13% versus 14%, P = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: Low preoperative phosphate levels were not associated with worse postoperative outcomes in this study. Further studies are warranted to investigate this association and its relevance as a clinical prognostic factor for postoperative liver failure.

Does the Surgical Approach Affect the Incidence of Post-Hepatectomy Liver Failure in Cirrhotic Patients? An Analysis of the NSQIP Database.

Background: The association between surgical approach and post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) in cirrhotic patients is poorly understood. We hypothesize that patients will have similar rates of liver failure regardless of whether they undergo minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) or open liver resection (OLR) in major liver resections. In contrast, there will be lower rates of PHLF in patients undergoing minor hepatectomy via the MILR approach.Methods: Propensity score matching was used to analyze regression by matching the MILR to the OLR cohort. Patient demographics from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, including race, age, gender, and ethnicity, were matched. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, renal failure, dyspnea, dialysis dependence, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (>ASA III) were among the preoperative patient characteristics subject to matching. PHLF (Grade A vs B. vs C) was our primary outcome measure.Results: A total of 2129 cirrhotic patients were included in the study. In the minor hepatectomy group, patients undergoing an OLR were more likely to get discharged to a facility (7.0% vs 4.4%; P = .03), had greater hospital length of stay (5 vs 3 days; P = .02), and had a greater need for invasive postoperative interventions (10.7% vs 4.6%; P < .01). They were also noted to have higher rates of organ space superficial surgical infections (SSIs) (7.3% vs 3.7%; P = .003), Clostridium difficile infection (.9% vs .1%; P = .05), renal insufficiency (2.1% vs .1%; P < .01), unplanned intubations (3.1% vs 1.4%; P = .03), and Grade C liver failure (2.3% vs .9%; P = .03).Conclusion: A higher incidence of PHLF grade C was found in patients undergoing OLR in the minor hepatectomy group. Therefore, in cirrhotic patients who can tolerate minimally invasive approaches, MILR should be offered to prevent postoperative complications as part of their optimization plan.

Comprehensive review of clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, and prognosis of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) is a life-threatening complication that occurs in 3 % to 15 % of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This review aimed to discuss the most recent updates in the epidemiology, pathophysiology, risk factors, diagnosis as well as presentation, management, and prognostic factors of rHCC. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic review was conducted using Medline/PubMed and Web of Science databases with the end of search date being December 1, 2023 regarding rHCC diagnosis, imaging, and management. RESULTS: Achieving adequate hemostasis and stabilization of the patient remains the primary objective in the management of patients with rHCC. In earlier studies, the mortality rate in the acute phase of rHCC was reported to be 25 % to 75 %. However, more recent studies have demonstrated that transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE)/transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) followed by elective hepatectomy in select patients may offer improved survival benefits and decrease perioperative complications compared with TAE/TACE alone or emergent/1-stage hepatectomy. CONCLUSION: Although the prognosis for rHCC remains the worst among causes of death related to HCC, more recent studies have demonstrated that improved short- and long-term patient outcomes may be achieved through active surveillance efforts for HCC combined with advanced multimodal diagnostic tools and multidisciplinary management strategies.

Liver transplant versus liver resection in patients with multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical option in patients with multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma (MHCC) is an area of active research. The preference varies based on geographic variations and institutional policies. We sought to determine long-term outcomes in patients with MHCC based on surgical treatment-liver transplant (LT) vs resection (LR). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (2004-2015) and identified patients with MHCC within Milan criteria. Patients with α-fetoprotein ≥ 1000 ng/mL and those who underwent ablation were excluded. The primary outcome measure was long-term survival in patients undergoing LT vs LR. The secondary aim of our study was to determine clinicodemographic factors associated with the receipt of LT and LR. RESULTS: A total of 1546 patients were included, of whom 1211 received LT and 335 underwent LR. Patients who were non-Hispanic White (70.8% vs 54.9%; P < .01), privately insured (53.7% vs 36.7%; P < .01), and treated at academic centers (85.4% vs 71.6%; P < .01) were more likely to receive an LT. Multivariable Cox analysis revealed LT was associated with improved survival compared with LR (hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.28-0.42). CONCLUSION: We described clinical and sociodemographic differences in LT and LR patients and found LT to be associated with a decreased mortality risk compared with LR. The study's findings should be interpreted in the context of several limitations, including the selection of MHCC criteria within Milan criteria.

Hepatic adenoma: evolution of a more individualized treatment approach.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic adenomas (HAs) are benign, solid liver lesions, which carry a risk of hemorrhage and malignant transformation. This review article highlights the advances in the diagnosis and management of HAs. METHODS: A comprehensive review was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science databases with a search period ending on September 30, 2023. Using PubMed, the terms "hepatocellular," "hepatic," and "adenoma" were searched. RESULTS: HA has been classified into at least 8 subtypes based on molecular pathology, each exhibiting unique histopathologic features, clinical considerations, and risk of malignant transformation. The most common subtype is inflammatory HA, followed by hepatocyte nuclear factor 1α-inactivated HA, ß-catenin exon 3-mutated HA (ßex3-HA), ß-catenin exon 7- or 8-mutated HA, sonic hedgehog HA, and unclassified HA. Magnetic resonance imaging is the best imaging method for diagnosis and can distinguish among HA subtypes based on fat and telangiectasia pathologic characteristics. The risk of malignant transformation varies among molecular subtypes, ranging from <1% to approximately 50%. Up to 42% of HAs present with spontaneous intratumoral hemorrhage and peritoneal hemorrhage. In general, only 15% to 20% of patients require surgery. HA larger than 5 cm are more likely to be complicated by bleeding and malignant transformation, regardless of subtype, and should generally be resected. In particular, ßex3-HA carries a high risk of malignant transformation and can be considered a true precancerous lesion. CONCLUSION: The management of HAs is based on a multidisciplinary approach. Clinical decision-making should integrate information on gender, tumor size, and HA subtyping. In the future, patients with HA will benefit from novel medical therapies tailored to the individual molecular subtypes.

Liver resection is superior to tumor ablation in patients with multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The management of T2 multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma (MHCC) is controversial, and the comparative impact of liver resection (LR) versus tumor ablation (TA) on survival continues to be debated. The aim of our study was to examine short- and long-term survival for LR and TA in a nationally representative cohort. We hypothesized that patients who underwent LR would have improved survival. METHODS: We utilized the National Cancer Database (2004-2015) to identify patients diagnosed with non-metastatic T2 MHCC. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to compare 10-year overall survival (OS) between LR and TA patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis with stratification was also performed based on lymphovascular invasion, resection margin status, and Charlson-Deyo score. Cox proportional hazard models were used in multivariable analyses. RESULTS: A total of 1225 patients met the inclusion criteria. 991 patients received LR, and 234 received TA. The majority of patients were male, White, and older than ≥60 years old. Clinicodemographic characteristics were generally similar between LR and TA patients. Among patients who underwent LR, 84% had negative margins, and 17% had lymphovascular invasion. Mortality at 30 days was significantly higher among LR patients compared to TA patients (5.4% vs 0.0%, p < 0.001), with those having a Charlson-Deyo score ≥2 facing the highest risk at 7.3%. Nevertheless, 10-year OS for the LR cohort was 27.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.4%-30.8%) versus 14.7% (95% CI: 9.8%-20.7%, p < 0.001) for TA patients. In stratified analysis, survival benefit was statistically significant only among those with negative resection margin, no lymphovascular invasion, and Charlson-Deyo score ≤1. In multivariable Cox analysis, LR was independently associated with improved survival compared to TA (hazard ratio: 0.80; 95% CI = 0.67-0.95). CONCLUSION: LR poses a higher long-term survival benefit than TA. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings. Although our study patients are a highly selected group of multifocal T2 patients, it gives us a good insight into the fact that LR provides better outcomes if a transplant option is unavailable.

Trends and disparities in access to minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (midp): an eight-year analysis from the national cancer database.

Laparoscopic and robotic approaches to distal pancreatectomy are becoming the standard of care. The aim of our study was to evaluate the trends of utilization and disparities in access to minimally invasive approaches in distal pancreatectomy. We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and analyzed all the patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy from 2010 to 2017. Patients were divided into groups of those with open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) and those with laparoscopic or robotic distal pancreatectomy (MIDP = minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy). Our outcome measures were trends of MIDP and disparities in access to MIDP. Cochran Armitage trend analysis and multivariate regression analysis were used to evaluate outcomes. A total of 13,537 patients with distal pancreatectomy were identified in the NCDB from 2010 to 2017. 7548 (55.8%) underwent ODP, while 5989 (44.2%) underwent MIDP. The MIDP rates increased from 25% in 2010 to 52% in 2017 (p < 0.01). On regression analysis, when controlled for age, gender, diagnosis, tumor size, grade, staging, and chemoradiotherapy, African American patients were 30% less likely to undergo MIDP than White (OR 0.7, 95% CI [0.5-0.8], p < 0.01). Similarly, Hispanic patients were 25% less likely to undergo MIDP than non-Hispanic patients OR 0.75, 95% CI [0.6-0.9], p = 0.02). Compared to Medicare/private insured patients, uninsured patients were 50% less likely to undergo MIDP (OR 0.5, 95% CI [0.4-0.7], p < 0.01). Based on the medium household income, compared to patients in the fourth quartile, patients in the third quartile OR 0.9, 95% CI [0.3-0.9], p = 0.03). Second OR 0.8, 95%CI [0.5-0.9], p < 0.01), first quartile OR 0.7, 95% CI [0.5-0.8], p < 0.01) were less likely to undergo MIPD as well. Utilization of MIDP has increased from one in every four patients in 2010 to every other patient in 2017. However, African Americans, Hispanics, the uninsured, and those from low-income quartiles are less likely to undergo MIDP. Efforts should be made to ensure access to minimally invasive approches are available to minorities.

Effect of conditions being present at time of surgery (PATOS) on outcomes in liver surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Information about condition(s) being present at time of surgery (PATOS) in the American College of Surgeons (ASC) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database can influence the postoperative complication rates after liver surgeries. Here, we compare the postoperative complication rates with and without taking condition(s) being PATOS into account. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the ACS NSQIP Participant User Files (PUFs) from 2015 through 2019. We analyzed rates of eight different postoperative complications: superficial surgical site infection (SSI), deep SSI, organ space SSI, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, ventilator, sepsis, and septic shock. In addition, we calculated the percent change in event rates after taking into account whether a condition is PATOS. RESULTS: Of the 22,463 patients in the ACS NSQIP PUFs for liver surgery, 334 (1.49%) had one or more conditions PATOS. The percentages of patients with PATOS events ranged from 2.03% for superficial SSI to 14.74% for sepsis. For all complications, event rates declined when taking condition(s) PATOS into account. From 2015 through 2019, the observed-to-expected ratios for most complications remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Whether a condition is PATOS is important in reporting postoperative complication rates for patients undergoing liver surgery. When taking whether a condition is PATOS into account, we demonstrated an overall decrease in event rates across all eight postoperative complications.

Does Preoperative Weight Loss Affect Outcomes After Major Liver Resection? Analysis of a National Database.

Introduction: The association between unintentional weight loss (WL) and outcomes after major hepatectomy for malignancy remains unclear.Methods: This retrospective cohort study reviewed the 2014-2019 NSQIP database of all patients who underwent major liver resections. The patients were categorized into two groups based on their history of weight loss. The primary outcome measure was the 30-day mortality. The secondary outcome was 30-day in-hospital complications.Results: In total, 384 patients had a history of preoperative weight loss. Preoperative WL was an independent predictor of septic shock (OR, 2.44; CI: 1.61, 3.69), bile leak (OR: 1.96; CI: 1.51, 2.55), and grade C liver failure (OR: 2.57; CI: 1.64, 4.01). However, preoperative WL was not a significant predictor of perioperative mortality (OR: 1.38; CI: 0.82, 2.32).Conclusion: The study found higher morbidity rates in patients undergoing liver resection with a history of weight loss. Further validation with prospective weight monitoring is needed to validate as a prognostic marker in patients undergoing hepatectomy. In addition, weight changes can help guide multidisciplinary decision-making in treating patients undergoing hepatectomy.

Analysis of Conflicts of Interest in Studies Related to Robotics in Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Wall Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Industry payments to physicians represent a potential conflict of interest (COI) and can influence the study conclusions. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the COIs reported in major surgical journals. STUDY DESIGN: Studies with at least one American author published between 2016 and 2021 that discussed observational and intervention studies assessing robotic surgery were included in the analysis. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Open Payments database was used to collect the industry payments. A COI is defined as receiving funding from a robotics company while publishing research directly related to the company's products. A COI statement was defined as disclosed (or accurate) if the disclosure statement for the study in question acknowledged funding from the robotics companies. A COI was defined as undisclosed (or inaccurate) if the disclosure statement for the study in question did not acknowledge funding from the robotics companies. RESULTS: A total of 314 studies and 1978 authors were analyzed. Only 13.6% of the studies had accurate COI statements, whereas the majority (86.4%) had inaccurate COI disclosures. Additionally, 48.9% of the authors who received funding of $10,000 to $100,000 failed to report this amount in their disclosures, and 18% of the authors who received funding of $100,000 or more did not report it in their disclosures. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant discordance between the self-reported COI in gastrointestinal and abdominal wall surgeries. This study calls for continued efforts to improve the definitions of what constitutes a relevant COI and encourages a standardized reporting process. It is imperative for investigators to make accurate disclosure statements.

Financial Relationships in General Surgery Education: Recent Trends in Industry Payments to General Surgery Residency Leadership.

INTRODUCTION: Residency programs and their directors frequently receive funding from industry payers. Both general surgery residency program directors (PDs) and assistant program directors (APDs) receive industry funding for various reasons, including educational advancement. This study investigates recent trends in industry payments to both PDs and APDs to better understand the financial relationships among leaders in residency education. METHODS: We compared industry payments to general surgery residency PDs and APDs from 2019 to 2021 utilizing the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) open payments database. In addition, secondary analyses were performed among PDs to assess differences based on gender, practicing surgical specialty, and geographical region. RESULTS: During the study period (2019-2021), PDs received payments amounting to 2,882,821 USD. PDs were found to receive more funding than APDs, with each receiving average funding of 10,045 vs. 323 USD (p < 0.01), respectively, over the study period. There was a significant decrease in total payments from 2019 to 2020 (1,512,190 vs. 868,811 USD; p < 0.01). Total payments made in 2021 were similar compared to 2020 (905,836 vs. 868,811 USD; p = 0.1). We found that male PDs received significantly more in-industry payments when compared to female PDs (11,702 USD per PD vs. 3971 USD per PD, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: This study presents initial data that residency program leadership has robust biomedical industry relationships, and further research is warranted to investigate the impacts of these payments on program resources, educational opportunities for residents, and program outcomes. Male PDs received significantly more industry payments when compared to female PDs. Leaders in the surgical training community must cautiously ensure that these industry relationships are appropriately navigated.

Association Between Preoperative Angioembolization and Bleeding Complications in Patients With Benign Liver Tumors: Analysis of a National Database.

INTRODUCTION: The role of angioembolization (AE) in patients with benign liver diseases is an area of active research. This study aims to assess any difference in liver resection outcomes in patients with benign tumors dependent on utilization of preoperative AE. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing elective liver resections for benign liver tumors was performed using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2014-2019). Only tumors of 5 cm in size or more were included in the analysis. We categorized the patients based on preoperative AE (AE + versus AE -). The primary outcome measured included bleeding complications within 72 h. The secondary outcomes were to determine predictors of bleeding. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, there were 103 patients in both groups. There was no difference in intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusions within 72 h of surgery (14.6% versus 12.6%; P = 0.68), reoperation (1.9% versus 1.9%; P = 1), or mortality (1.0% versus 0.0%; P = 1) between the two groups. Multivariate regression analysis revealed an open surgical approach (odds ratio [OR]: 4.59 confidence interval [CI]: 2.94-7.16), use of Pringle maneuver (OR: 1.7, CI: 1.26-2.310), preoperative anemia (OR: 2.79, CI: 2.05-3.80), and preoperative hypoalbuminemia (OR: 1.53 [1.14-2.05]) were associated with the need for intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusions within 72 h of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative AE was not associated with reducing intraoperative or postoperative bleeding complications or blood transfusions within 72 h after surgery.

Outcomes in elderly patients undergoing hepatic resection compared to liver transplant for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic resection (HR) is an excellent option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). For patients meeting the Milan criteria, a liver transplant (LT) is also a viable option for patients with HCC, especially those with end-stage liver disease. With increasing rates of LTs amongst the elderly, we sought to determine long-term outcomes in patients who underwent HR compared to LTs in this patient population. METHODS: We queried the national cancer database for elderly patients (≥70 years) diagnosed with HCC between 2004 and 2020. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) computed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression. One-to-one propensity score matching was conducted on the basis of clinicodemographic features to account for baseline differences between patients undergoing each procedure. RESULTS: Of the 5090 patients included, 4674 (91.8%) and 416 (8.2%) patients underwent HR and LT, respectively. Compared with HR patients, patients receiving LT had better OS (p < 0.001) and greater median survival time (65.6 months HR vs. 97.9 months LT, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, a LT was independently associated with improved survival (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.61, 95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.76, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LT is associated with improved survival for well-selected elderly patients with HCC. Age alone should not be used as the sole parameter for the candidacy of LT in elderly patients.

Program Website Evaluation Regarding Dedicated Research Years Offered in General Surgery Residency Programs in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Research is a vital component in the advancements of surgical sciences due to the reliance of treatment options on innovations and outcomes of patient care. This study aimed to identify research pathways, opportunities, and academic productivities of different general surgery residency programs in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based review was conducted concerning accredited US general surgery residency programs. Each program's official website was assessed for the availability of research year, compulsory status, duration, type, structure, and location. The study also identified faculty supervision, research day, funding, output, and opportunities to obtain an advanced degree. RESULTS: Data were collected from all 313 general surgery programs in the United States, out of which 127 (41%) offered a dedicated research year to their residents. The research year was deemed mandatory in 27 programs (8%) and optional in 100 programs (32%). Seventy-two programs (23%) offered to start the dedicated research year after postgraduate year 2 or postgraduate year 3. Twenty-two programs (7.02%) provided examples of resident publications and presentations. Resident research day was cited by 42 programs (13.41%). On campus research opportunity was mentioned by nine programs (2.8%), while the off campus chance was provided by 10 programs (3.19%). Furthermore, 36 programs (11.5%) demonstrated potential funding sources. Finally, 38 (12.14%) programs mentioned receiving advanced degrees after the research year. CONCLUSIONS: Although dedicated research time is provided to trainees for some research programs, there is a lack of structure and the need to expand the available content and information regarding research opportunities for the various general surgery residency programs.

Outcomes in elderly patients undergoing hepatic resection compared to ablative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Hepatic resection is an excellent option in the care of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Elderly patients often forego hepatic resection in favor of liver-directed ablative therapies due to the increased likelihood of adverse postoperative outcomes due to age. We sought to determine long-term outcomes in patients who underwent hepatic resection compared to liver-directed ablative therapy in this patient population. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database for elderly patients (≥70 years) diagnosed with HCC between 2004 and 2018. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) computed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard regression. RESULTS: A total of 10 032 patients were included in this analysis. On unadjusted analysis (p < 0.001) as well as multivariable analysis (hazard ratio: 0.65, 95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.73), hepatic resection was associated with improved OS. The protective association between hepatic resection and OS persisted after 1:1 propensity score matching. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic resection is associated with improved survival for well-selected elderly patients with HCC. While age is often thought of as influencing the decision to offer surgery, our study, in combination with others, demonstrates that it should not. Instead, other objective indicators of performance and functional status may be considered.

Effect of Present at Time of Surgery (PATOS) on Outcomes in Pancreatic Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: While there is some data available on the importance of accounting for the effect of present at time of surgery (PATOS) when estimating unadjusted postoperative complication rates, little is known about the impact of PATOS on outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery specifically. By taking PATOS into account, we hypothesized that unadjusted, observed postoperative complication rates might be reduced, with these reductions being different across outcomes; however, we expected fewer differences in risk-adjusted results, i.e., observed to expected ratios (O/E ratios). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the ACS NSQIP Participant Use Files (PUFs) from 2015 to 2019. PATOS data were analyzed for the 8 postoperative complications of superficial, deep, and organ space surgical site infection; pneumonia; urinary tract infection; ventilator dependence; sepsis; and septic shock. Postoperative complication rates were compared by ignoring PATOS vs. taking PATOS into account. RESULTS: Of the 31,919 patients in the ACS NSQIP PUFs who underwent pancreatic surgery, 1120 (3.51%) patients had one or more PATOS conditions. The event rates after taking PATOS into account declined for all outcomes-superficial surgical site infection (SSI) rates reduced by 2.56%, deep SSI rates reduced by 4.28%, organ space SSI rates reduced by 9.31%, pneumonia rates reduced by 2.91%, urinary tract infection rates declined by 4.69%, and septic shock rates declined by 9.27%. CONCLUSION: Our paper highlights that accounting for PATOS is important for estimating unadjusted postoperative complication rates in patients undergoing pancreatic surgery. Risk adjustment is essential to any attempt at quality assessment and benchmarking. Failure to account for PATOS may penalize surgeons who care for the sickest and most complicated patients and subsequently encourage cherry-picking of less risky patients and procedures.

Management of Mucinous Cystic Neoplasms of the Liver.

BACKGROUND: Mucinous cystic neoplasms of the liver (MCN-L) including biliary cystadenomas (BCA) and biliary cystadenocarcinomas (BCAC) are rare cystic lesions that comprise less than 5% of all liver cysts and affect only a small subset of individuals. We herein review the current evidence regarding the clinical presentation, imaging characteristics, tumor markers, pathological findings, clinical management, and prognosis of MCN-L. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed using MEDLINE/Pubmed and Web of Science databases. In PubMed, the terms "biliary cystadenoma," "biliary cystadenocarcinoma," and "non parasitic hepatic cysts" were queried to identify the most recent data on MCN-L. RESULTS: US imaging, CT, and MRI, as well as consideration of clinicopathological features, are required to appropriately characterize and diagnose hepatic cystic tumors. BCA are premalignant lesions and cannot be reliably differentiated from BCAC based on imaging alone. As such, both types of lesions should be treated with margin-negative surgical resection. Following surgical resection, recurrence is fairly low among patients with BCA and BCAC. Despite having worse long-term outcomes than BCA, the prognosis following surgical resection of BCAC still remains more favorable than other primary malignant liver tumors. CONCLUSION: MCN-L are rare cystic liver tumors that include BCA and BCAC, which can be difficult to differentiate based on imaging alone. Surgical resection remains the mainstay of management for MCN-L with recurrence being generally uncommon. Future multi-institutional studies are still required to better understand the biology behind BCA and BCAC to improve the care of patients with MCN-L.