[Effectiveness of early invasive strategy of treatment of angina of new onset].

Aim of the study was to assess effectiveness of early invasive strategy of treatment of angina of new onset (ANO). We conducted comparative assessment on invasive and noninvasive risk estimation in 106 patients admitted to N.V.Sklifosofsky Institute of Urgent Aid in 2003-2007. Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) on symptom related artery (SRA) within single procedure were carried out in 74 cases (70%), indications to coronary artery bypass surgery were detected in 16 cases (15%), in 16 more cases conservative treatment was used. The data obtained showed that it is rational to consider ANO as unstable angina in all cases including those without progression. Visualization of coronary arteries gives possibility to define significance of SRA and zone at risk of injury, determine indications to myocardial revascularization, and avoid inadequacy of noninvasive assessment of risk and choice of treatment tactics. The method of choice in the treatment of patients with ANO is PCI performed during single procedure. Detection of indications to coronary artery bypass surgery in low risk patients and in absence of progression confirm necessity of routine use of invasive strategy which provides timely pathogenetic treatment. Absence of indications to myocardial revascularization detected in sporadic cases provides possibility to avoid groundless hospitalizations.

[Different methods of myocardial revascularization in non-stable stenocardia].

The purpose of the study was to evaluate different methods of myocardial revascularization. Three hundred and twenty-two patients with non-stable stenocardia were divided into two groups: group one consisted of 226 patients with mono-, bi-, or tri-vascular lesion of the coronary arteries (CA), who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCCI) on the symptom-related CA (128 patients) or coronary bypass surgery (CBS) without cardiopulmonary bypass (59 patients); group two consisted of 96 patients with tri-vascular lesion of CA only, who underwent CBS with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (32 patients) or without CPB (52 patients). The rest patients in both groups received drug therapy. The data from the research show that PCCI on the symptom-related CA is the method of choice in most patients, including those with tri-vascular lesion. In cases with extensive isolated stenosis of anterior descendent coronary artery and chronic occlusions preference may be given to CBS without CPB. CBS with CPB is the method of choice in patients with left CA trunk stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction. In this group of patients, CBS without CPB does not lead to complete myocardial revascularization and thus does not make surgery successful.