CHARACTERISTICS OF CHRONIC RHINOSINUSITIS PHENOTYPES IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING FUNCTIONAL ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY: AN OBSERVATIONAL COHORT RETROSPECTIVE STUDY.

This study analyzed the characteristics of chronic rhinosinusitis patients with and without nasal polyps failing conservative treatment and undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery as part of their treatment for chronic inflammatory sinonasal disease. The aim of this retrospective single-institution cohort study conducted at a university hospital tertiary referral center was to evaluate the characteristics of patients with both disease phenotypes in whom conservative treatment was unsuccessful. Patients who were surgically treated with functional endoscopic sinus surgery performed by two rhinology surgeons during a one-year period (2016) were enrolled in the study. Patient data collection included demographics, risk factor exposure, diagnosis, and type of endoscopic surgical procedure performed. In total, 185 patients were included in the study. Patients with malignant disease and those with incomplete data were excluded from the study. In the group of patients with nasal polyps, mean age, male gender, presence of allergy (34.9%), asthma (21.4%), aspirin sensitivity (6.3%), cystic fibrosis (1.6%), and previous nasal surgery rates (36.5%) were significantly higher as compared with the group of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps. Septal deviation was more prevalent in the chronic rhinosinusitis group (55%) as compared to the group with nasal polyps (25%). The ethmoid (17%) and maxillary sinus (13%) were most frequently involved, but most of the patients who needed surgery had involvement of multiple or all sinuses (40%). The reasons for conservative treatment failure in chronic rhinosinusitis are multifactorial, but identifying the most prevalent characteristics in patients treated surgically may be helpful in identifying patients who would benefit most from surgery.

A systematic review of common landmarks in navigated endoscopic sinus surgery (NESS).

BACKGROUND: Navigation brought about a tremendous improvement in functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). When upgraded accordingly, FESS becomes navigated endoscopic sinus surgery (NESS). Indications for intraoperative use of navigation can be broadened to almost any FESS case. NESS in advanced sinus surgery is currently still not used routinely and requires systematic practice guidelines. PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to report on commonly identified landmarks while performing advanced NESS according to evidence-based medicine (EBM) principles. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This review paper has been assembled following PRISMA guidelines. A PubMed and Scopus (EMBASE) search on anatomical landmarks in functional endoscopic and navigated sinus surgery resulted in 47 results. Of these, only 14 (29.8%) contained original data, constituting the synthesis of best-quality available evidence. RESULTS: Anatomical landmarks are considered to be the most important points of orientation for optimal use of navigation systems during FESS surgery. The most commonly identified significant landmarks are as follows: (1) Maxillary sinus ostium; (2) Orbital wall; (3) Frontal recess; (4) Skull base; (5) Ground lamella; (6) Fovea posterior; (7) Sphenoid sinus ostium. Conclusions: Establishing common landmarks are essential in performing NESS. This is true for advanced and novice surgeons alike and offers a possibility to use navigation systems systematically, taking advantage of all the benefits of endoscopic navigated surgery.

Risks and benefits of local anesthesia versus general anesthesia in tonsillectomy.

PURPOSE: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in otorhinolaryngology. Modern general anesthetic techniques have reduced surgical risks, but performing the procedure under local anesthesia may still offer significant benefit for both the patient and surgeon. This study analyzed the risks and benefits of performing tonsillectomies under local anesthesia. METHODS: This is a retrospective longitudinal cohort study analyzing postoperative bleeding rates as a primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures were duration of surgery, consumption of analgesics and total surgery cost. RESULTS: The study enrolled 1112 patients undergoing tonsillectomy, with 462 (41.5%) patients treated under general and 650 (58.5%) patients treated under local anesthesia. There were 12 postoperative bleeding incidents in in the local anesthesia group and 9 cases of postoperative bleeding in the general anesthesia group. No significant differences based on gender regarding quantity of intraoperative bleeding or patient age were observed between the patients undergoing local versus general anesthesia. However, significant differences were noted between the groups in analgesic consumption, (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.001), duration of operating room stay (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.001), duration of surgery (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.001) and cost of surgery (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of postoperative bleeding is not dependent on type of anesthesia. The results suggest that tonsillectomy performed under local anesthesia is a safe alternative to tonsillectomy under general anesthesia, with significant reduction of cost and duration of surgery.