Infective endocarditis in patients with diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Numerous studies have been conducted to investigate the conditions associated with poor outcome among patients with infective endocarditis (IE). Yet, diabetes mellitus alone has rarely been analyzed as participating in the prognosis, and few data are available relating to the clinical characteristics of IE in diabetics. The study aim was to assess the influence of diabetes mellitus on the characteristics and prognosis of IE, and to identify predictors of poor outcome among diabetic patients with this condition. METHODS: The study included consecutive patients with IE who had presented to a tertiary center between 1990 and 2006. All patients underwent transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography. Three or more blood cultures were collected from each patient. Records of all patients were collected prospectively into a computerized database. RESULTS: Among 309 patients with definitive IE (according to modified Duke criteria), 38 (12%) had diabetes mellitus. Typically, diabetic patients were older than non-diabetics (67.1 +/- 10.4 versus 60.7 +/- 15.8 years; p < 0.001), had more serious comorbidities (Charlson index 2.8 +/- 0.7 versus 1.2 +/- 0.5; p = 0.005), and a higher frequency of enterococcal endocarditis. No differences were noted between patients with or without diabetes mellitus for the valve involved, nor for the subvalvular involvement. In a multivariate analysis, diabetes mellitus was identified as an independent predictor of mortality (OR 2.49; 95% CI 1.15-5.62). Surgery was performed in the active phase in 139 patients: surgical mortality was higher for diabetic patients (29% versus 10% p = 0.049). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher among diabetic patients (34%) than in non-diabetics (20%) (p = 0.002). Enterococcal endocarditis, left ventricular ejection fraction < 0.45, multi-organ failure, heart failure, persistent fever after one week of antibiotic therapy, and a Charlson index > 3 were associated with an increased mortality among diabetic patients. CONCLUSION: Diabetes mellitus represents a relevant risk factor for a worse clinical course and outcome of IE.

Clinical and anatomical characteristics of subtle-discrete dissection of the ascending aorta.

Subtle or discrete (class 3 in the classification of the European Society of Cardiology) dissection is the most neglected variant of aortic dissection. This study was conducted to define the clinical manifestations, diagnostic findings, and outcomes of subtle or discrete dissection involving the ascending aorta. The clinical and surgical records, preoperative studies, and outcomes of 109 consecutive patients with ascending aortic dissection observed from 1995 to 2005 were reviewed. Eight patients (7.3%) had discrete dissection. Five patients presented with acute anterior chest pain, 2 with abdominal pain, and 4 with syncope. The mean diameter of the ascending aorta was 44 +/- 8.8 mm. The intimal tears were located in all patients on the posterior aspect of the ascending aorta 1 to 40 mm above the left coronary ostium; its length varied from 2.8 to 12.3 mm. Preoperative aortography, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography could not identify the discrete intimal tears. Transesophageal echocardiography provided unique diagnostic information on (1) subtle intimal discontinuity, (2) circumscribed intramural hematoma, and (3) discrete pericardial fluid around the dissected aorta. Six patients underwent emergency surgery on the basis of echocardiographic findings, and they were all alive at follow-up. Compared with patients with classic aortic dissection, those with discrete dissection had lower operative mortality (0% vs 26%, p = 0.11), shorter hospital stay (7.2 +/- 2.8 vs 21 +/- 19 days, p = 0.01), and less frequent need for blood transfusions (0% vs 39%, p = 0.02). In conclusion, elevated clinical suspicion and detailed transesophageal echocardiographic examination are important for the early identification of discrete aortic dissection, leading to prompt surgery, shorter hospital stays, and better outcomes.