[Physiotherapy in rehabilitation of patients with degenerative disk diseases from positions of evidence-based medicine: a literature review]. / Fizioterapiya v reabilitatsii bol'nykh s degenerativnymi zabolevaniyami pozvonochnika s pozitsii dokazatel'noi meditsiny: obzor literatury.

Back pain is one of the most urgent problems of rehabilitation. Patients with this pathology have a leading place among neurological patients in terms of the number of days of disability. The high economic costs in society are explained by the need for lumbar surgery (discectomy, spinal fusion and disc prosthesis) and rehabilitation after it. The effectiveness of rehabilitative measures is determined both by the patient's rehabilitative potential and by the choice of rehabilitative methods. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of physiotherapy in patients with degenerative disk diseases from positions of evidence-based medicine according to the scientific and technical literature. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis of scientific and technical literature sources and the study of materials of meta-analyses, systematic reviews (depth of search was 20 years) on the evaluation of effectiveness of physiotherapeutical methods in the rehabilitation of patients with degenerative disk diseases have been conducted. RESULTS: The ability of pulsed magnetic field to reduce the intensity of pain and improve the functional capacities of the spine in patients with low back pain has been identified. There was a pronounced analgesic end-point of low-level laser therapy in acute and chronic back pain at short and medium-term (up to 12 months) observation, as well as the ability of the method to reduce temporary disability in degenerative disk diseases. CONCLUSION: The use of magnetotherapy and low-level laser therapy can be recommended for the treatment of patients with degenerative disk diseases (C grade of recommendations, 3rd level of evidence). The recommendation is based on the results of 10 RCTs (1.111 patients with degenerative disk diseases), 3 meta-analyses, 1 systematic review and 1 Cochrane review (a total of 3.431 patients).

[Sacral magnetic stimulation in overactive bladder syndrome: comparative analysis of protocols with a frequency of 1 and 5 Hz]. / Sakral'naya magnitnaya stimulyatsiya pri sindrome giperaktivnogo mochevogo puzyrya: sravnitel'nyi analiz protokolov s chastotoi 1 i 5 Gts.

Peripheral magnetic stimulation (pMS) has shown its effectiveness in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms, such as symptoms of an overactive bladder (OAB). The perineal region (pelvic floor) and the sacral roots area (projection S3 of the root) are used as the locus of stimulation. The published literature presents protocols with different parameters of stimulation, while each of them reliably demonstrates clinical efficacy, however, no comparative studies have been found to select priority stimulation modes when analyzing available sources. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of different frequency - 1 and 5 Hz - modes of sacral MS in patients with symptoms of OAB. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single blind prospective randomized comparative clinical study included 59 patients with OAB symptoms. The patients were divided by simple randomization into the group 1 (n=30), which received MS 3 times a week for 5 weeks with a frequency of 1 Hz per sacral root area (S2-S4), and the group 2 (n=29), in which stimulation was performed at a frequency of 5 Hz, while the remaining parameters and duration of therapy were identical to group 1. RESULTS: Sacral pMS with different frequency modes (1 and 5 Hz) is reliably equally effective against the clinical symptoms of OAB, which is confirmed by the absence of significant intergroup differences. In patients receiving MS with a frequency of 5 Hz, there was a more pronounced increase in maximum cystometric capacity, normalization of the maximum and average urine flow velocity and regression of the residual urine volume (p<0.001, p=0.007, p=0.011 and p=0.012 compared with group 1). The greatest difference in indicators was observed in the increase in the maximum cystometric capacity - +31±25 ml at MS with a frequency of 1 Hz and +109±96 ml at MS with a frequency of 5 Hz (p<0.001). MS is a safe procedure and is well tolerated by patients. CONCLUSION: pMS when exposed to the area of S2-S4 roots for 20 minutes 3 times a week with a course for 5 weeks is reliably effective against the clinical symptoms of OAB at different frequency modes (1 and 5 Hz). At the same time, MS with a frequency of 5 Hz may have an advantage over stimulation of 1 Hz in terms of its effect on urodynamic parameters (maximum cystometric capacity, peak and average urine flow velocity and residual urine volume), which may be associated with a large inhibitory effect on detrusor.

[Hydrogalvanic baths as a method of medical rehabilitation: a literature review and the prospects for the clinical application].

The hydrogalvanic baths provide a tool for the combined application of warm fresh water and low frequency electric current. These procedures are suitable for both systemic and local treatments. The mechanism behind their therapeutic action is based on synergistic effect of two therapeutic agents. This article presents the literature and historical review of the method as well as the current concept of hydrohalvanic therapy. The history of its development is associated with the improvement of the technical equipment and accumulation of clinical experience. Numerous studies carried out up to the present time have demonstrated that hydrohalvanic therapy can be effectively applied for the treatment of diabetic angiopathy, rheumatoid and gouty arthritis, fibromyalgia, ankylosing spondylitis. At the same time, the high potential of this method remains underestimated. At present, one of the most promising approaches to its clinical applications is the treatment of lumbosacral radiculopathy caused by degenerative vertebral disk lesions. The hydrogalvanic baths have analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and decongestant effects, improve microcirculation, and reduce sensory impairment. It is necessary to continue clinical investigations to obtain further evidence of the effectiveness of the method under consideration for the treatment of lumbosacral radiculopathy and to evaluate its short- and long-term effects. Their results will hopefully provide an opportunity to include the hydrogalvanic baths in the programs of medical rehabilitation of the patients presenting with lumbosacral radiculopathy.