Association of Laparoscopic Approach With Improved Short-Term Outcomes in Patients With Hematologic Malignancy Undergoing Splenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hematologic malignancies undergo splenectomy for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Although minimally invasive surgery continues to be increasingly utilized for a variety of abdominal operations, no large-scale data has compared the postoperative outcomes for laparoscopic vs open splenectomy in patients with hematologic malignancy. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of hematologic malignancy who underwent laparoscopic and open splenectomy between 2015 and 2020 were queried using the ACS-NSQIP database. 30-day outcomes of laparoscopic vs open splenectomy were compared. RESULTS: Out of 430 patients included in the study, 52.6% were male, with a mean age of 63.4 ± 13.1 years. 233 patients (54.2%) underwent laparoscopic splenectomy. On bivariate analysis, laparoscopic surgery was associated with lower rates of 30-day mortality [2.1% vs 11.7% (P < .001)] and morbidity [9.0% vs 24.4% (P < .001)]. On multivariate regression, elective operations (OR .255, 95%CI: 0.084-.778, P = .016) and laparoscopic surgery (OR .239, 95%CI: 0.075-.760, P = .015) were independently associated with lower mortality, while history of metastatic cancer (OR 3.331, 95%CI: 1.144-9.699, P = .027) was associated with higher mortality. Laparoscopic surgery (OR .401, 95%CI: 0.209-.770, P = .006) and steroid use (OR 2.714, 95%CI: 1.279-5.757, P = .009) were the only two factors independently associated with 30-day morbidity. Laparoscopic surgery was also associated with shorter hospital length of stay (median 3 [IQR:3] vs 6 [IQR:7] days). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic splenectomy was associated with lower 30-day mortality and morbidity, and shorter length of stay in patients with hematologic malignancies. These data suggest that laparoscopic approach, when feasible, may be preferred for splenectomy in this patient population.

A Novel Strategy to Manage Below-Knee-Amputation (BKA) Stump Complications for Early Wound Healing and BKA Salvage.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal management of major stump complications (operative infection or dehiscence) following below-knee-amputation (BKA) is unknown. We evaluated a novel operative strategy to aggressively treat major stump complications hypothesizing it would improve our rate of BKA salvage. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients requiring operative intervention for BKA stump complications between 2015 and 2021. A novel strategy employing staged operative debridement for source control, negative pressure wound therapy, and reformalization was compared to standard care (less structured operative source control or above knee amputation). RESULTS: 32 patients were studied, 29 of which were male (90.6%) with an average age of 56.1 ± 9.6 y. 30 (93.8%) had diabetes and 11 (34.4%) peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The novel strategy was used in 13 patients and 19 had standard care. Novel strategy patients had higher BKA salvage rates, 100% vs 73.7% (P = .064), and postoperative ambulatory status, 84.6% vs 57.9% (P = .141). Importantly, none of the patients undergoing the novel therapy had PAD, while all progressing to above-knee amputation (AKA) did. To better assess the efficacy of the novel technique, patients progressing to AKA were excluded. Patients undergoing novel therapy who had their BKA level salvaged (n = 13) were compared to usual care (n = 14). The novel therapy's time to prosthetic referral was 72.8 ± 53.7 days vs 247 ± 121.6 days (P < .001), but they did undergo more operations (4.3 ± 2.0 vs 1.9 ± 1.1, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Utilization of a novel operative strategy for BKA stump complications is effective in salvaging BKAs, particularly for patients without PAD.

The Impact of Primary Care Physicians on the Surgical Presentation and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer in Vulnerable Populations.

BACKGROUND: Multiple socioeconomic and clinical factors have been implicated in the health disparities that exist amongst vulnerable populations with colorectal cancer. Efforts have been directed toward addressing these factors to improve outcomes. We evaluate the impact of primary care physicians (PCP) on the surgical presentation and outcomes of colorectal cancer at a safety-net hospital. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 331 patients diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinoma between 2014 and 2020 at a single-institution urban county medical center. RESULTS: The cohort was predominantly male (59%) and Hispanic (52.1%). Thirty-two percent of patients had a PCP at time of diagnosis. Patients with PCPs compared to those without PCPs had significantly lower rates of acute presentation (perforation or obstruction) (17.0 vs 38.1%, P < .001), higher rates of surgical resection (83.0 vs 70.7%, P = .016), and were less likely to have metastatic disease at presentation (20.4 vs 33.5%, P = .02). Overall, having a PCP also improved probability of survival (HR 1.36, P < .04). CONCLUSION: Having a PCP at the time of colorectal cancer diagnosis is associated with improved outcomes in a safety-net population, with significant differences in surgical presentation and resection.

Racial Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Care for Black Patients: Barriers and Solutions.

Racial disparities in colorectal cancer for Black patients have led to a significant mortality difference when compared to White patients, a gap which has remained to this day. These differences have been linked to poorer quality insurance and socioeconomic status in addition to lower access to high-quality health care resources, which are emblematic of systemic racial inequities. Disparities impact nearly every point along the colorectal cancer care continuum and include barriers to screening, surgical care, oncologic care, and surveillance. These critical faults are the driving forces behind the mortality difference Black patients face. Health care systems should strive to correct these disparities through both cultural competency at the provider level and public policy change at the national level.