RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of sotorasib monotherapy versus docetaxel as monotherapy or combination therapy in patients with pretreated KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC in the real-world. METHODS: A US-based electronic health record-derived de-identified database was used in this study. Patients with pretreated KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC who initiated sotorasib between May 28, 2021, and September 30, 2022, and docetaxel between January 1, 2019, and September 30, 2022 (to enhance sample size), were included, with a minimum of 12-month opportunity for follow-up. Treatment groups were balanced via overlap weighting propensity score methods. Median OS in the 2L and 2L+ settings were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated via Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Overall, the clinical characteristics in sotorasib and docetaxel cohorts were balanced after propensity score weighting. At baseline, most patients were > 65 years of age, had ECOG performance status of 0-1, were from the community practice setting, had advanced stage at initial diagnosis, and had prior anti-PD-(L)1 treatment and/or platinum-based chemotherapy. In the 2L setting, the median OS (95 % CI) for sotorasib (N=102) and docetaxel (N=58) patients was 10.2 (7.6-16.3) and 6.0 (4.2-11.0) months, respectively, with a corresponding mortality HR (95 % CI) of 0.62 (0.41-0.93). In the 2L+ setting, the median OS (95 % CI) for sotorasib (N=164) and docetaxel (N=116) was 10.2 (8.0-14.6) and 7.2 (5.1-10.6) months, respectively, with a corresponding mortality HR (95 % CI) of 0.65 (0.49-0.87). In patients with prior anti-PD-(L)1 treatment, the mortality HR (95 % CI) in the sotorasib group versus docetaxel was 0.61 (0.39-0.94) and 0.65 (0.48-0.89) in the 2L and 2L+ settings, respectively. Findings from other subgroups were consistent with the primary analyses. CONCLUSION: In this real-world comparative analysis of patients with pretreated KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC, sotorasib monotherapy demonstrated a longer median OS compared to docetaxel monotherapy or combination therapy.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The landscape of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has changed since the 2019 and 2020 approvals of anti-PD-L1 atezolizumab and durvalumab for first-line (1L) treatment in combination with chemotherapy. We studied treatment patterns and real-world overall survival (rwOS) following 1L-3L therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified database was used to describe treatment patterns, characteristics, and survival of patients with extensive-stage (ES)-SCLC by 1L anti-PD-L1 treatment. Patients with ES-SCLC who initiated ≥1 line of systemic therapy from 2013 to 2021, with potential follow-up through 2022, were included. RESULTS: Among 9952 patients with SCLC, there were 4308 patients with ES-SCLC treated during the study period who met eligibility criteria. Etoposideâ +â platinum (EP) chemotherapy was most common in the 1L, with addition of anti-PD-L1 therapy to most regimens by 2019. Second-line regimens varied by platinum sensitivity status and shifted from topotecan to lurbinectedin over time. Median rwOS following 1L therapy was 8.3 months (95% CI, 7.9-8.8) in those treated with 1L anti-PD-L1 and 8.0 months (95% CI, 7.8-8.2) in those who were not. Following 2L and 3L, median rwOS was 5.6 (95% CI, 4.9-6.3) and 4.9 months (95% CI, 3.4-6.0), respectively, among 1L anti-PD-L1-treated, and 4.5 (95% CI, 4.2-4.9) and 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.7-4.5), respectively, among those who were not. CONCLUSION: Despite the introduction of frontline anti-PD-L1 therapy, survival remains dismal among patients with ES-SCLC treated in the real-world setting.
RESUMO
Introduction: The treatment landscape of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is evolving. Evidence generated from administrative claims is needed to characterize real-world SCLC patients. However, the current ICD-10 coding system cannot distinguish SCLC from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We developed and estimated the accuracy of an algorithm to identify SCLC in claims-only databases. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of lung cancer patients diagnosed from 2016-2017 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER), linked with Medicare database. The analysis included two phases - data exploration (utilizing a 25% random sample) and data validation (remaining 75% sample). The SEER definition of SCLC and NSCLC were used as the gold standard. Claims-based algorithms were identified and evaluated for their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: The eligible cohort included 31,912 lung cancer patients. The mean age was 76.3 years, 44.6% were male, with 9.4% having SCLC and 90.6% identified as NSCLC using SEER. The exploration analysis identified potential algorithms based on treatment data. In the validation analysis of 7,438 lung cancer patients who received systemic treatment in the outpatient setting, an etoposide-based algorithm (etoposide use in 180 days following lung cancer diagnosis) to identify SCLC showed: sensitivity 95%, specificity 95%, PPV 82% and NPV 99%. Discussion: An etoposide treatment-based algorithm showed good accuracy in identifying SCLC patients. Such algorithms can facilitate analyses of treatment patterns, outcomes, healthcare resource and costs among treated SCLC patients, thereby bolstering the evidence-base for best patient care.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe treatment patterns and estimate outcomes among real-world small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients in the US who received three or more lines of therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients with SCLC who received a front-line platinum-based regimen and two additional lines of therapy (ie., a cohort of at least three lines of therapy). De-identified patients were selected from a United States Flatiron Health oncology database of electronic health records. Treatment patterns were captured by line of therapy. Outcomes evaluated by line of therapy included real-world overall survival (rwOS), real-world progression free survival (rwPFS), real-world response rate (rwRR) and real-world duration of response (rwDOR). RESULTS: The analysis included 326 3L SCLC patients, of which 103 (32â¯%) received 4L treatment, and 38â¯% (39/103) of 4L treated received 5L of therapy. Among the 3L cohort, the average age was 67â¯years, 49â¯% were male, and nearly all had a history of smoking (96â¯%). In the 3L setting, the median rwOS was 5.3â¯months (95â¯% Confidence Interval (CI): 4.5, 6.0), median rwPFS was 2.5â¯months (95â¯% CI: 2.1, 2.7), rwRR was 19.3â¯% (95â¯% CI: 15.2, 24.0) and median DOR was 3.4â¯months (95â¯% CI: 2.8, 4.4). No differences were seen in outcomes between the overall cohort and a subgroup of patients treated with front-line platinum-based regimen with an anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) agent (atezolizumab or durvalumab), in each respective line of therapy. CONCLUSION: Results from this large, real-world study of US patients with SCLC in the 3L setting and beyond highlight the poor treatment outcomes in advanced SCLC patients with existing therapies and underscore the dire need for new therapies for SCLC patients.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/mortalidade , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/patologia , Masculino , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Taxa de Sobrevida , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
Racial disparities in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) outcomes have been reported. However, the biological mechanisms underlying these disparities remain unclear. We integrated imaging mass cytometry and spatial transcriptomics, to characterize the tumor microenvironment (TME) of African American (AA) and European American (EA) patients with TNBC. The TME in AA patients was characterized by interactions between endothelial cells, macrophages, and mesenchymal-like cells, which were associated with poor patient survival. In contrast, the EA TNBC-associated niche is enriched in T-cells and neutrophils suggestive of an exhaustion and suppression of otherwise active T cell responses. Ligand-receptor and pathway analyses of race-associated niches found AA TNBC to be immune cold and hence immunotherapy resistant tumors, and EA TNBC as inflamed tumors that evolved a distinctive immunosuppressive mechanism. Our study revealed the presence of racially distinct tumor-promoting and immunosuppressive microenvironments in AA and EA patients with TNBC, which may explain the poor clinical outcomes.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3), a member of the Notch pathway, has been identified as a potential therapeutic target as it is highly expressed in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), a subtype accounting for 15% of lung cancer cases. OBJECTIVE: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to understand the prevalence and prognostic impact of DLL3 expression on survival of patients with SCLC and treatment response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Systematic literature searches were conducted across multiple databases to capture studies of any SCLC population that evaluated DLL3 expression. Specific outcomes of interest included prevalence of DLL3 expression, method of expression analysis, and impact on outcome, including treatment response and survival (overall, progression-free, disease-free) according to varying levels of DLL3 expression/positivity. Standard risk of bias tools were used to evaluate study quality. RESULTS: Among the 30 included studies, the most common DLL3 testing method was immunohistochemistry (N = 26, 86.7%). For comparability, results focused on the 13 (22.3%) studies that used the Ventana DLL3 (SP347) immunohistochemistry assay. The prevalence of DLL3 positivity ranged from 80.0-93.5% for studies using a threshold of ≥ 1% of tumor cells (N = 4) and 58.3-91.1% for studies with a ≥ 25% threshold (N = 4). DLL3 expression was generally categorized as high using cutoffs of ≥ 50% (prevalence range: 45.8-79.5%; N = 6) or ≥ 75% (prevalence range: 47.3-75.6%; N = 5) of cells with positivity. Two studies used an H-score of ≥ 150 to define high DLL3 expression with prevalence ranging from 33.3-53.1%. No consistent associations were seen between DLL3 expression level and patient age, sex, smoking history, or disease stage. Two studies reported change in DLL3 expression category (high versus low) before and after chemotherapy. No statistically significant differences were reported between DLL3 expression groups and survival (overall, progression-free, or disease-free) or treatment response. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high prevalence of DLL3 expression in SCLC. Further research and analytical methods may help to characterize different populations of patients with SCLC based on DLL3 expression. While no significant prognostic factor in the included studies was identified, additional cohort studies using standardized methodology, with longer follow-up, are needed to better characterize any potential differences in patient survival or response by DLL3 expression level in SCLC.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão , Humanos , Carcinoma de Pequenas Células do Pulmão/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Prognóstico , Ligantes , Prevalência , Proteínas de Membrana/metabolismo , Peptídeos e Proteínas de Sinalização Intracelular/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Describe the demographic profile of US participants in Amgen clinical trials over a 10-year period and variations across therapeutic areas, indications, and geographies. METHODS: Cross-sectional retrospective study including participants enrolled (2005-2020) in phase 1-3 trials completed between January 1, 2012 and June 30, 2021. RESULTS: Among 31,619 participants enrolled across 258 trials, one-fifth represented racial minority populations (Asian, 3%; Black or African American, 17%; American Indian or Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, multiracial, each < 1%); fewer than one-fifth (16%) represented an ethnic minority population (Hispanic or Latino). Compared with census data, representation of racial and ethnic groups varied across US states. Across most therapeutic areas (bone, cardiovascular, hematology/oncology, inflammation, metabolic disorders, neuroscience) except nephrology, participants were predominantly White (72-81%). A similar proportion of males and females were enrolled between 2005 and 2016; male representation was disproportionately higher than female between 2016 and 2020. Across most medical indications, the majority of participants were 18-65 years of age. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: While the clinical research community is striving to achieve diversity and proportional representation across clinical trials, certain populations remain underrepresented. Our data provide a baseline assessment of the diversity and representation of US participants in Amgen-sponsored clinical trials and add to a growing body of evidence on the importance of diversity in clinical research. These data provide a foundation for strategies aimed at supporting more equitable and representative research, and a baseline from which to assess the impact of future strategies to advance health equity.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Patients diagnosed with cancer have an increased risk both for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following treatment. METHODS: Using SEER-Medicare data, we selected patients aged 66 years and older who completed systemic therapy between 2002 and 2014 for breast (stage I-III), lung (stage I-III), or prostate (stage I-IV) cancer. For each cancer, we estimated the risk of a composite endpoint of MDS or AML in patients receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) vs. not. RESULTS: The 10-year cumulative risk difference (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [G-CSF] - no G-CSF) for MDS-AML was 0.45% (95% CI 0.13-0.77%) in breast cancer and 0.39% (95% CI 0.15-0.62%) in lung cancer. G-CSF use was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.60 (95% CI 1.07-2.40) in breast cancer and 1.50 (95% CI 0.99-2.29) in lung cancer. Filgrastim use was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.01 (95% CI 1.00-1.03) per administration in breast cancer and 1.02 (95% CI 0.99-1.05) per administration in lung cancer. Pegfilgrastim was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.08 (95% CI 1.01-1.15) per administration in breast cancer and 1.12 (95% CI 1.00-1.25) per administration in lung cancer. Analyses in prostate cancer were limited because of the low number of events. CONCLUSIONS: The use of G-CSF in patients diagnosed with breast and lung cancer is associated with an increased risk of MDS-AML. However, the MDS-AML absolute risk difference is very low.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas , Neoplasias da Próstata , Idoso , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Pulmão , Masculino , Medicare , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/complicações , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: African American (AA) patients have higher cancer mortality rates and shorter survival times compared to European American (EA) patients. Despite a significant focus on socioeconomic factors, recent findings strongly argue the existence of biological factors driving this disparity. Most of these factors have been described in a cancer-type specific context rather than a pan-cancer setting. METHODS: A novel in silico approach based on Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) coupled to Transcription Factor enrichment was carried out to identify common biological drivers of pan-cancer racial disparity using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset. Mitochondrial content in patient tissues was examined using a multi-cancer tissue microarray approach (TMA). RESULTS: Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation was uniquely enriched in AA tumors compared to EA tumors across various cancer types. AA tumors also showed strong enrichment for the ERR1-PGC1α-mediated transcriptional program, which has been implicated in mitochondrial biogenesis. TMA analysis revealed that AA cancers harbor significantly more mitochondria compared to their EA counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight changes in mitochondria as a common distinguishing feature between AA and EA tumors in a pan-cancer setting, and provide the rationale for the repurposing of mitochondrial inhibitors to treat AA cancers.
Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/genética , Bases de Dados de Ácidos Nucleicos , Mitocôndrias/genética , Proteínas de Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/genética , Coativador 1-alfa do Receptor gama Ativado por Proliferador de Peroxissomo/genética , Receptores de Estrogênio/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Mitocôndrias/metabolismo , Mitocôndrias/patologia , Proteínas de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Neoplasias/metabolismo , Neoplasias/patologia , Coativador 1-alfa do Receptor gama Ativado por Proliferador de Peroxissomo/metabolismo , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismo , Transcrição Gênica , População Branca/genética , Receptor ERRalfa Relacionado ao EstrogênioRESUMO
The purpose of this work was to evaluate systemic glucocorticoid exposure and fracture among patients with newly-diagnosed inflammatory and immune-modulated conditions. Using administrative data, inception cohorts of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), multiple sclerosis (MS), lupus, and sarcoidosis patients age 18 to 64 years with benefits coverage ≥12 months before diagnosis (January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2012) were followed to clinical fracture, cancer diagnosis, or December 31, 2012. Glucocorticoid users were new to therapy. Fracture incidence rates (IRs) per 1000 person-years were stratified by prednisone equivalent doses. Cox's proportional hazards models assessed risk by daily and cumulative dose, and by time since discontinuation, adjusted for baseline characteristics. Most patients (72% of 403,337) had glucocorticoid exposure; 52% were under age 50. IR (95% confidence interval [CI]) of any osteoporotic fracture was elevated at doses <5 mg/day (IR 9.33; 95% CI, 7.29 to 11.77) versus 0 mg/day (IR 4.87 (95% CI, 4.72 to 5.02). Fracture rates were elevated at doses <5 mg/day in patients <50 years and those ≥50 years. In both age groups, fracture risk increased with increasing cumulative exposure, being approximately 2.5-fold higher at cumulative dose ≥5400 mg compared to <675 mg. At ≥5400 mg, IR values were 5.69 (95% CI, 4.32 to 7.35) in patients <50 years and 17.10 (95% CI, 14.97 to 19.46) in older patients. Fracture risk decreased significantly within months following glucocorticoid discontinuation. In patients with a variety of inflammatory conditions, fracture risk increased at doses as low as <5 mg/day. Risk increased with increasing cumulative exposure and decreased soon following glucocorticoid discontinuation. Trends were similar between patients older and younger than 50 years. © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Assuntos
Glucocorticoides/efeitos adversos , Fraturas por Osteoporose/induzido quimicamente , Fraturas por Osteoporose/epidemiologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Fraturas por Osteoporose/patologia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
Curcumin is a natural dietary polyphenol compound that has various pharmacological activities such as antiproliferative and cancer-preventive activities on tumor cells. Indeed, the role reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by curcumin on cell death and cell proliferation inhibition in colon cancer is poorly understood. In the present study, we hypothesized that curcumin-induced ROS may promote apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in colon cancer. To test this hypothesis, the apoptosis-inducing potential and cell cycle inhibition effect of ROS induced by curcumin was investigated in Smd4 and p53 mutated HT-29 colon adenocarcinoma cells. We found that curcumin treatment significantly increased the level of ROS in HT-29 cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Furthermore, curcumin treatment markedly decreased the cell viability and proliferation potential of HT-29 cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Conversely, generation of ROS and inhibitory effect of curcumin on HT-29 cells were abrogated by N-acetylcysteine treatment. In addition, curcumin treatment did not show any cytotoxic effects on HT-29 cells. Furthermore, curcumin-induced ROS generation caused the DNA fragmentation, chromatin condensation, and cell nuclear shrinkage and significantly increased apoptotic cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner in HT-29 cells. However, pretreatment of N-acetylcysteine inhibited the apoptosis-triggering effect of curcumin-induced ROS in HT-29 cells. In addition, curcumin-induced ROS effectively mediated cell cycle inhibition in HT-29 cells. In conclusion, our data provide the first evidence that curcumin induces ROS independent apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in colon cancer cells that carry mutation on Smad4 and p53.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/metabolismo , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/farmacologia , Colo/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias do Colo/metabolismo , Curcumina/farmacologia , Mitocôndrias/efeitos dos fármacos , Espécies Reativas de Oxigênio/metabolismo , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Antineoplásicos Fitogênicos/uso terapêutico , Apoptose , Pontos de Checagem do Ciclo Celular , Sobrevivência Celular , Colo/citologia , Colo/metabolismo , Colo/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo/tratamento farmacológico , Curcuma/química , Curcumina/uso terapêutico , Células HT29 , Humanos , Mitocôndrias/metabolismo , Mutação , Fitoterapia , Extratos Vegetais/farmacologia , Extratos Vegetais/uso terapêutico , Proteína Smad4/metabolismo , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53/metabolismoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Previous studies combining biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have shown an increased risk of infection. However, the risk of infection with concurrent use of denosumab, a biologic agent for the treatment of osteoporosis, and a bDMARD remains unclear. Here, we evaluated the incidence of serious and opportunistic infections in patients treated concurrently with denosumab and a bDMARD and patients treated with a bDMARD alone. METHODS: A chart review of patients with RA from 2 Canadian rheumatology practices between July 1, 2010, and July 31, 2014, identified 2 groups of patients: those taking denosumab and a bDMARD concurrently (concurrent group) and those taking only a bDMARD (biologic-alone group). Patients were followed from the time of initiation of denosumab, or a matched index date for the biologic-alone group, to the end of the study or loss to followup. Instances of serious or opportunistic infections were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients (n = 102 for the concurrent group and n = 206 for the biologic-alone group) were evaluated. Within the concurrent group, 3 serious infection events occurred. Within the biologic-alone group, 4 serious infection events and 1 opportunistic infection event occurred. In both groups, all patients with serious or opportunistic infection recovered, and there were no instances of death during the study period. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated a low occurrence of serious and opportunistic infections in patients with RA taking bDMARD, including patients with concurrent denosumab use.
Assuntos
Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Produtos Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Denosumab/uso terapêutico , Infecções Oportunistas/epidemiologia , Idoso , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Produtos Biológicos/efeitos adversos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Denosumab/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Oportunistas/etiologia , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidoresRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Clinical practice recommendations state that patients with fragility fractures should be evaluated for osteoporosis and treated for the disease if it is present. The purpose of this study was to assess osteoporosis evaluation and treatment patterns for patients with fragility fractures and assess whether anti-osteoporosis pharmacotherapy initiated immediately following a fragility fracture is associated with improved adherence to the treatment protocol. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study involved data from a large commercially insured population seen in the period from 2001 through 2009. Patients were community-dwelling individuals aged fifty years or older who had a new low-energy fracture at the hip, vertebra, wrist, or humerus with no evidence of a fragility fracture, osteoporosis treatment, malignant disease, or Paget disease for twelve months preceding the fracture. Rates of diagnostic testing and pharmacotherapy for osteoporosis within twelve months post-fracture were evaluated. Patients treated with oral bisphosphonates were evaluated to determine whether twelve-month adherence to the treatment protocol differed between those who had initiated therapy sooner (at zero to ninety days) and those who initiated it later (at ninety-one to 365 days) following the fracture. RESULTS: The 88,571 women and 41,984 men had an average age of 72.3 years and 70.5 years, respectively. Nineteen percent (16,464) of the women and 10% (4014) of the men initiated osteoporosis pharmacotherapy, and 30% (26,481) of the women and 15% (6427) of the men underwent diagnostic testing and/or pharmacotherapy following fracture. Treatment rates were highest following vertebral fracture and lowest following wrist or humeral fracture. Treatment rates significantly decreased over time (from 2001 through 2009). The average twelve-month adherence (medication possession ratio) was 56% and 61% among women and men, respectively. Adherence was similar between patients who had initiated treatment sooner after the fracture and those who had initiated it later after the fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical guidelines for evaluation and treatment following fragility fracture were met for less than one-third of women and less than one-sixth of men. While primary fracture prevention remains the ideal, secondary prevention is critical and there is a need to reverse the downward trend in adherence to post-fracture guidelines.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Absorciometria de Fóton/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose/complicações , Osteoporose/diagnóstico , Fraturas por Osteoporose/etiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Prevenção Secundária/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis is a common condition and the economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures is significant. While studies have reported the incremental or attributable costs of osteoporosis-related fracture, data on the economic impact of osteoporosis-related fractures in commercial health plan populations are limited. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the direct costs of osteoporosis-related fractures among pharmacologically treated patients in a large, commercially insured population between 2005 and 2008. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients were identified from a large, commercially insured population with integrated pharmacy and medical claims. Inclusion criteria were age 45-64 years; one or more osteoporosis medication claim(s) with first (index) claim between 1 January 2005 and 30 April 2008; and continuous insurance coverage for ≥12 months pre-index and ≥6 months post-index. Patients with pre-index Paget's disease or malignant neoplasm; skilled nursing facility stay; combination therapy at index; or fracture ≤6 months post-index were excluded. A generalized linear model compared differences in 6-month pre-/post-event costs for patients with and without fracture. Propensity score weighting was used to ensure comparability of fracture and non-fracture patients. Generalized estimating equations accounted for repeated measures. RESULTS: The study included 49,680 patients (2613 with fracture) with a mean (SD) age of 56.4 (4.7) years; 95.9% were female. Mean differences between pre- and post-event direct costs were $US14,049 (95% CI 7670, 20,428) for patients with vertebral fractures, $US16,663 (95% CI 11,690, 21,636) for patients with hip fractures, and $US7582 (95% CI 6532, 8632) for patients with other fractures. After adjusting for covariates, osteoporosis-related fractures were associated with an additional $US9996 (95% CI 8838, 11,154; p < 0.0001) in direct costs per patient across all fracture types during the 6 months following fracture. CONCLUSION: Patients with osteoporosis-related fractures were found to incur nearly $US10,000 in estimated additional direct healthcare costs in the 6 months post-fracture, compared with patients with no fracture. Reduced fracture risk may lower associated direct healthcare costs.
Assuntos
Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/economia , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/economia , Osteoporose/economia , Fraturas por Osteoporose/economia , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/uso terapêutico , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Serviços de Saúde/economia , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoporose/complicações , Osteoporose/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Estimate the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of cervical cancer screening strategies based on high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A subset of 1,665 women (age range, 18-50 y) participating in a cervical cancer screening study were screened by liquid-based cytology and by high-risk HPV DNA testing of both self-collected vaginal swab samples and clinician-collected cervical samples. Women with positive/abnormal screening test results and a subset of women with negative screening test results were triaged to colposcopy. On the basis of individual and combined test results, 5 screening strategies were defined. Estimates of sensitivity and specificity for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse were calculated, and a Markov model was used to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for each strategy. RESULTS: Compared with cytology-based screening, high-risk HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples was more sensitive (68%, 95% CI = 58%-78% vs 85%, 95% CI = 76%-94%) but less specific (89%, 95% CI = 86%-91% vs 73%, 95% CI = 67%-79%). A strategy of high-risk HPV DNA testing of self-collected vaginal samples followed by cytology triage of HPV-positive women was comparably sensitive (75%, 95% CI = 64%-86%) and specific (88%, 95% CI = 85%-92%) to cytology-based screening. In-home self-collection for high-risk HPV DNA detection followed by in-clinic cytology triage had a slightly lower lifetime cost and a slightly higher quality-adjusted life year (QALY) expectancy than did cytology-based screening (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of triennial screening compared with no screening was $9,871/QALY and $12,878/QALY, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Triennial screening by high-risk HPV DNA testing of in-home, self-collected vaginal samples followed by in-clinic cytology triage was cost-effective.
Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Vagina/virologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Papillomavirus/complicações , Autoadministração/métodos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The causal relationship between persistent high-risk human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer is widely accepted. HR-HPV DNA testing, alone or in combination with Pap smear testing, may have a role in primary screening. The screening results (VIA, VILI, Pap, and HR-HPV DNA) of 9,057 women in rural China were analyzed to determine the screening performance for the detection of CIN3+. All screening strategies had comparable AUCs (0.9). Cotesting strategies had the overall highest sensitivity for CIN3+ (99.4%), followed by HR-HPV DNA testing alone (96.3%), Pap alone (80.2%), and reflex testing (75.4%). Reflex testing had the highest specificity (96.7%), followed by Pap alone (93.3%), HR-HPV DNA testing alone (85.5%), and both cotesting strategies (LSIL: 84.8%, HSIL: 84.8%). Of the single-test strategies, HR-HPV DNA testing had a higher sensitivity (96.3% vs. 80.2%) compared with Pap testing. The specificity of the Pap test was higher (93.3% vs. 85.5%) and it had a lower percent referred for colposcopy (7.8% vs. 15.8%) than HR-HPV DNA testing. HR-HPV DNA testing with a 10.0 cutoff point (relative light units/cutoff ratio) had a sensitivity (85.2%) and specificity (90.6%) estimate comparable to Pap testing. A single-test primary screening strategy with adequate performance would permit less frequent screening and be most appropriate. Of the primary screening strategies investigated in this setting in China, the performance of HR-HPV DNA testing with an increased cutoff-point might best meet these criteria.
Assuntos
Alphapapillomavirus/isolamento & purificação , Encaminhamento e Consulta , População Rural , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Adulto , Alphapapillomavirus/genética , China , DNA Viral/análise , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controleRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The low sensitivity of cytology and low specificity of human papillomavirus testing prompts searching for more accurate cervical cancer screening strategies. Our goal was to evaluate an ELISA-based test for p16(INK4a). METHODS: 1,781 women undergoing routine screening provided cervical specimens for p16(INK4a) ELISA (original and enhanced versions of a prototype), liquid-based cytology, and Hybrid Capture II (hc2) testing. All women with a positive result and a random sample of those with negative results on all tests were referred for histologic diagnosis. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade >or=3 (>or=CIN3) was the main outcome. The original analysis included all >or=CIN3 outcomes (n = 28). The a posteriori analysis was used to represent clinically relevant results with >or=CIN3 as outcomes only when detected after a positive screening test (n = 27). RESULTS: Participants had a median age of 23 years. The prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA was 30.6%. In a posteriori analyses, the sensitivity and specificity for p16(INK4a) ELISA (>or=8 pg/mL cut-point), cytology, and hc2 were 50.9%, 58.1%, and 100.0%, respectively, and 90.4%, 89.3%, and 69.2%, respectively. Referral to colposcopy of women with positive results for hc2 and p16(INK4a) (enhanced ELISA, >or=6 pg/mL cut-point) had a sensitivity of 91.8% (95% confidence interval, 79.1-100.0%) and specificity of 86.0% (95% confidence interval, 82.0-89.0%). Results of the original analyses had similar specificity but substantially lower sensitivity due to the strong influence of the single CIN3 case with completely negative screening results. CONCLUSIONS: An enhanced version of this prototypic p16(INK4a) ELISA showed promise in screening, particularly when combined with hc2.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Inibidor p16 de Quinase Dependente de Ciclina/análise , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/química , Adolescente , Adulto , DNA Viral/análise , DNA Viral/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Prognóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Esfregaço Vaginal , Adulto JovemRESUMO
We developed a liquid bead microarray (LBMA) assay for genotyping genital human papillomaviruses (HPVs) based on the MY09-MY11-HMB01 PCR system and the reverse line blot (RLB) assay probe sequences. Using individual HPV plasmids, we were able to detect as few as 50 copies per reaction. In two separate retrospective studies, the LBMA assay was compared to the RLB assay and to the Hybrid Capture II (hc2) assay. Testing was performed without knowledge of other assay results. In the first study, 614 cervical swab samples (enriched for HPV infection) from 160 young women were tested for HPV DNA, and 360 (74.8%) type-specific HPV infections were detected by both assays, 71 (14.8%) by the LBMA assay only, and 50 (10.4%) by the RLB assay only. Type-specific agreement for the two assays was excellent (99.1%; kappa=0.85; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.82 to 0.88). Samples with discrepant LBMA and RLB test results tended to have low viral loads by a quantitative type-specific PCR assay. In the second study, cervical swab samples from 452 women (including 54 women with histologically confirmed cervical-intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse [>or= CIN2]) were tested initially by the hc2 and subsequently by the LBMA assay. The estimated sensitivities for >or= CIN2 were similar for the LBMA and hc2 assays (98.4% [95% CI, 95.0 to 100%] and 95.6% [95% CI, 89.2 to 100%], respectively). The percentages of negative results among 398 women without >or= CIN2 were similar for the LBMA and hc2 assays (45% and 50%, respectively). The repeat test reproducibility for 100 samples was 99.1% (kappa=0.92; 95% CI, 0.90 to 0.95). We conclude that the new LBMA assay will be useful for clinical and epidemiological research.
Assuntos
Análise em Microsséries/métodos , Papillomaviridae/classificação , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Colo do Útero/virologia , DNA Viral/genética , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Microesferas , Hibridização de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Papillomaviridae/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
p16(INK4a), a cell cycle regulation protein, accumulates in abnormal epithelial cells infected with high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV). In immunostaining studies, p16(INK4a) has shown potential as a marker of high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and invasive cervical cancer. To evaluate its potential use in cervical cancer screening, we conducted a feasibility study to compare the performance of a new enzyme linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) for p16(INK4a) (mtm laboratories, Heidelberg, Germany) to that of the Hybrid Capture 2 (hc2) test for high-risk HPV DNA for the detection of CIN3. Three hundred and nineteen women were referred from Western Washington Planned Parenthood clinics for colposcopy examination and cervical biopsy because of abnormal Pap test results. Cervical samples were obtained from study participants for p16(INK4a) ELISA, liquid-based cytology and hc2. The order (first and second) for obtaining samples for cervical cytology and p16(INK4a) ELISA changed with every other subject. Concentrations of p16(INK4a) protein were higher when the sample was taken before the cytology. The sensitivity of p16(INK4a) ELISA (concentration > or = 8 units/ml) taken as first sample was 90.0% for CIN3, and the sensitivity of HC2 taken as a second sample was 85%. In the same group, the specificity of p16(INK4a) ELISA (46.9%) was slightly better than hc2 (35.4%) Results from this proof-of-concept study suggest that p16(INK4a) ELISA has a similar sensitivity and slightly better specificity for CIN3 compared to hc2. These findings support proceeding with a larger study with samples from a population of women presenting for routine cytology screening.
Assuntos
Inibidor p16 de Quinase Dependente de Ciclina/análise , DNA Viral/análise , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Papillomaviridae/genética , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sensibilidade e EspecificidadeRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of repeated liquid cytology at the time of colposcopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We screened 5,100 women with liquid-based cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing. Women with any abnormal cytology result including atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) or a positive high-risk HPV DNA test result were referred for colposcopy. One thousand three hundred thirty-three women returned for colposcopy with repeated cytology and cervical biopsy. RESULTS: Twenty-one women had less than high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) screening cytology and cervical biopsy results; however, their repeated cytology at the colposcopy visit revealed HSIL, and excisional treatment was recommended. Repeated cytology at colposcopy significantly changed the clinical management for 1.6% (21) of 1,333 women. CONCLUSIONS: As an adjunct test to colposcopy, liquid cytology was similar to conventional cytology. Given current practice patterns, repeated liquid cytology at the time of colposcopy is rarely clinically useful.