A randomized controlled trial of potential tobacco policies prohibiting menthol flavor in cigarettes and e-cigarettes: a study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Menthol cigarette use remains a large public health problem and disproportionately affects Black adults in the United States. The Food and Drug Administration has proposed prohibiting menthol flavor in cigarettes to protect public health. However, e-cigarettes are available in menthol flavor and are a popular alternative product adults might switch to if menthol is prohibited in cigarettes. Research is needed to understand how availability of menthol (vs. tobacco) flavored e-cigarettes could impact cigarette use among adults who smoke menthol cigarettes. METHODS: We will recruit 150 adults who currently smoke menthol cigarettes and will randomize them to 1 of 3 conditions modeling different regulatory scenarios. We will recruit equal numbers of participants identifying as Black vs. non-Black and will stratify randomization by race. To promote standardization and adherence, cigarette and e-cigarette products will be provided for 8 weeks based on the assigned condition: (A) no menthol restriction (menthol cigarette and menthol flavored e-cigarette), (B) menthol prohibited in cigarettes only (non-menthol cigarette and menthol flavored e-cigarette), (C) menthol prohibited in both cigarettes and e-cigarettes (non-menthol cigarette and tobacco flavored e-cigarette). A follow-up visit will occur at week 12 to assess tobacco use status. The study aims are to (1) examine the impact of prohibiting menthol flavor in cigarettes and e-cigarettes on smoking behavior and (2) investigate whether outcomes differ by race to understand the impact of menthol policies on Black (vs. non-Black) individuals given high rates of menthol cigarette use in this population. The primary outcome will evaluate changes in the number of cigarettes smoked per day during the 8-week study period and will examine differences by regulatory scenario. Secondary outcomes will compare percent days smoke-free, changes in nicotine dependence, and motivation, confidence, and intentions to quit smoking by the regulatory scenarios. We will examine whether changes in the outcomes differ by Black vs. non-Black participants to compare the magnitude of the effect of the various menthol policy scenarios by race. DISCUSSION: Results will contribute critical information regarding menthol in cigarettes and e-cigarettes to inform regulatory policies that maximize reductions in cigarette smoking and reduce tobacco-related health disparities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05259566. Yale IRB protocol #2000032211, last approved 12/8/2023.

Nicotine flux as a powerful tool for regulating nicotine delivery from e-cigarettes: Protocol of two complimentary randomized crossover clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: Electronic cigarette (EC) use has increased rapidly in the last decade, especially among youth. Regulating nicotine delivery from ECs could help curb youth uptake and leverage EC use in harm reduction yet is complicated by varying device and liquid variables that affect nicotine delivery. Nicotine flux, the nicotine emission rate, is a parameter that incorporates these variables and focuses on the performance rather than the design of an EC. Nicotine flux therefore could be a powerful regulatory tool if it is shown empirically to predict nicotine delivery and subjective effects related to dependence. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This project consists of two complementary clinical trials. In Trial I, we will examine the relationship between nicotine flux and the rate and dose of nicotine delivery from ECs, hence, impacting abuse liability. It will also examine the extent to which this relationship is mediated by nicotine form (i.e., freebase versus protonated). At Yale School of Medicine (YSM), study participants will puff EC devices under conditions that differ by flux and form, while arterial blood is sampled in high time resolution. In Trial II, we will assess the relationship between nicotine flux, form, and subjective effects. At the American University of Beirut (AUB), participants will use EC devices with varying nicotine fluxes and forms, while dependency measures, such as the urge to use ECs, nicotine craving, and withdrawal symptoms, will be assessed. We will also monitor puffing intensity and real-time exposure to toxicants. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol of Trial I and Trial II was approved by YSM and AUB IRBs, respectively. We will disseminate study results through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05706701 for Trial I and NCT05430334 for Trial II.

Nicotine, alcohol, and caffeine use among individuals with untreated obstructive sleep apnea.

BACKGROUND: Psychoactive substance use (i.e., nicotine, alcohol, and caffeine) has substantial effects on sleep architecture in healthy individuals, but their effects in those with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have not been well described. We aimed to describe the association between psychoactive substance use and sleep characteristics and daytime symptoms in individuals with untreated OSA. METHODS: We performed a secondary, cross-sectional analysis of The Apnea Positive Pressure Long-term Efficacy Study (APPLES). Exposures included current smoking, alcohol and caffeine use in individuals with untreated OSA. Outcome domains included subjective and objective sleep characteristics, daytime symptoms, and comorbid conditions. Linear or logistic regression assessed the association between substance use and each domain (e.g., self-reported sleep duration, total polysomnographic sleep time, sleepiness, and anxiety). RESULTS: Of the 919 individuals with untreated OSA, 116 (12.6%) were current cigarette smokers, 585 (63.7%) were moderate or heavy alcohol users, and 769 (83.7%) were moderate or heavy caffeine users. Participants were on average 52.2±11.9 years old, 65.2% were male with a median BMI of 30.6 (IQR: 27.2, 35.9, kg/m2). Current smokers exhibited lower sleep duration (0.3 h), longer sleep latency (5 min) compared with non-smokers (all p-values < 0.05). People with heavy or moderate alcohol use exhibited more REM sleep (2.5 and 5% of total sleep time respectively), as did those with moderate caffeine use (2%, p-values < 0.05). The combined smoker plus caffeine group exhibited shorter sleep duration (0.4 h, p-value < 0.05) and higher risk for chronic pain [Odds Ratio (95%CI) = 4.83 (1.57, 14.9) compared with non-users. CONCLUSIONS: Psychoactive substance use is associated with sleep characteristics and clinically relevant correlates in people with untreated OSA. Further investigation into the effects that various substances have on this population may present opportunities to understand disease mechanisms more fully and increase the effectiveness of treatment in OSA.

Receipt of Smoking Cessation Medications Among People With and Without Human Immunodeficiency Virus in the Veterans Aging Cohort Study (2003-2018).

Background: Nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion, and varenicline are smoking cessation medications (SCMs) shown to be similarly effective in people with and without human immunodeficiency virus (PWH and PWoH, respectively), although rates of receipt of these medications are unknown. Methods: We identified patients in the Veterans Aging Cohort Study with electronic health record-documented current smoking using clinical reminder data for tobacco use (2003-2018). We measured receipt of SCMs using Veterans Affairs pharmacy data for outpatient prescriptions filled 0-365 days after current smoking documentation. We used log-linear, Poisson-modified regression models to evaluate the relative risk (RR) for receiving SCM by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) status, the annual rate of receipt, and rate difference among PWH relative to PWoH. Results: The sample included 92 632 patients (29 086 PWH), reflecting 381 637 documentations of current smoking. From 2003 to 2018, the proportion receiving SCMs increased from 15% to 34% for PWH and from 17% to 32% among PWoH. There was no statistical difference in likelihood of receiving SCM by HIV status (RR, 1.010; 95% confidence interval [CI], .994-1.026). Annual rates of receiving SCM increased for PWH by 4.3% per year (RR, 1.043; 95% CI, 1.040-1.047) and for PWoH by 3.7% per year (RR, 1.037; 95% CI, 1.036-1.038; rate difference +0.6% [RR, 1.006; 95% CI, 1.004-1.009]). Conclusions: In a national sample of current smokers, receipt of SCM doubled over the 16-year period, and differences by HIV status were modest. However, fewer than 35% of current smokers receive SCM annually. Efforts to improve SCM receipt should continue for both groups given the known dangers of smoking.

Nicotine Use and Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor 5 in Individuals With Major Depressive and Posttraumatic Stress Disorders.

Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) dysregulation has been implicated in the pathophysiology of many psychiatric disorders, as well as nicotine use and dependence. We used positron emission tomography with [18F]FPEB to measure mGluR5 availability in vivo in 6 groups: (1) nicotine users (NUs) without other psychiatric comorbidities (n = 23); (2) comparison controls (CCs) without nicotine use or psychiatric comorbidities (n = 38); (3) major depressive disorder subjects with concurrent nicotine use (MDD-NU; n = 19); (4) MDD subjects without concurrent nicotine use (MDD-CC; n = 20); (5) posttraumatic stress disorder subjects with concurrent nicotine use (PTSD-NU; n = 17); and (6) PTSD subjects without concurrent nicotine use (PTSD-CC; n = 16). The goal of the study was to test the hypothesis that mGluR5 availability in key corticolimbic regions of interest (ROIs) is different in NU with versus without comorbid psychiatric disorders (ROI: dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [dlPFC], orbitofrontal cortex [OFC], ventromedial prefrontal cortex [vmPFC], anterior cingulate cortex [ACC], amygdala, hippocampus). We found that NU had 11%-13% lower mGluR5 availability in OFC, vmPFC, dlPFC, and ACC as compared with CC, while PTSD-NU had 9%-11% higher mGluR5 availability in OFC, dlPFC, and ACC compared with PTSD. Furthermore, relationships between mGluR5 availability and psychiatric symptoms varied as a function of psychiatric diagnosis among NUs. NU showed a negative correlation between mGluR5 and smoking cravings and urges (r's = -0.58 to -0.70, p's = 0.011 - 0.047), while PTSD-NU had the reverse relationship (r's = 0.60-0.71, p's = 0.013-0.035 in ACC, vmPFC, and dlPFC). These findings have substantial implications for our understanding of glutamate homeostasis in psychiatric subgroups and for identifying key neural phenotypes among NU. mGluR5 is a potential treatment target for precision medicine in individuals with nicotine use.

Cholinergic system adaptations are associated with cognitive function in people recently abstinent from smoking: a (-)-[18F]flubatine PET study.

The cholinergic system is a critical mediator of cognition in animals. People who smoke cigarettes exhibit cognitive deficits, especially during quit attempts. Few studies jointly examine the cholinergic system and cognition in people while trying to quit smoking. We used positron emission tomography (PET) brain imaging with the ß2-subunit containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (ß2*-nAChR) partial agonist radioligand (-)-[18F]flubatine and the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine to jointly examine the cholinergic system, smoking status, and cognition. (-)-[18F]Flubatine scans and cognitive data were acquired from twenty people who recently stopped smoking cigarettes (aged 38 ± 11 years; 6 female, 14 male; abstinent 7 ± 1 days) and 27 people who never smoked cigarettes (aged 29 ± 8 years; 11 female, 16 male). A subset of fifteen recently abstinent smokers and 21 never smokers received a mid-scan physostigmine challenge to increase acetylcholine levels. Regional volume of distribution (VT) was estimated with equilibrium analysis at "baseline" and post-physostigmine. Participants completed a cognitive battery prior to (-)-[18F]flubatine injection and physostigmine administration assessing executive function (Groton Maze Learning test), verbal learning (International Shopping List test), and working memory (One Back test). Physostigmine significantly decreased cortical (-)-[18F]flubatine VT, consistent with increased cortical acetylcholine levels reducing the number of ß2*-nAChR sites available for (-)-[18F]flubatine binding, at comparable magnitudes across groups (p values < 0.05). A larger magnitude of physostigmine-induced decrease in (-)-[18F]flubatine VT was significantly associated with worse executive function in people who recently stopped smoking (p values < 0.05). These findings underscore the role of the cholinergic system in early smoking cessation and highlight the importance of neuroscience-informed treatment strategies.

Recently Abstinent Smokers Exhibit Mood-Associated Dopamine Dysfunction in the Ventral Striatum Compared to Nonsmokers: A [11C]-(+)-PHNO PET Study.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic nicotine exposure desensitizes dopamine responses in animals, but it is not known if this occurs in human tobacco smokers. Deficits in dopamine function are likely to make smoking cessation difficult. We used positron emission tomography (PET) brain imaging with the dopamine D2/3 receptor agonist radioligand [11C]-(+)-PHNO to determine if abstinent smokers exhibit less amphetamine-induced dopamine release in the ventral striatum than nonsmokers, and whether this was associated with clinical correlates of smoking cessation. METHODS: Baseline [11C]-(+)-PHNO scans were acquired from smokers (n = 22, 7 female, abstinent 11 ± 9 days) and nonsmokers (n = 20, 7 female). A subset of thirty-seven participants (18 smokers) received oral amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg) three hours before a second [11C]-(+)-PHNO scan. Binding potential (BPND) (i.e., D2/3 receptor availability) was estimated at baseline and postamphetamine in the ventral striatum. Amphetamine-induced percent change in BPND was calculated to reflect dopamine release. Subjects also completed the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). RESULTS: There were no group differences in baseline BPND. Amphetamine-induced percent change in BPND in the ventral striatum was significantly lower in abstinent smokers compared to nonsmokers (p=0.019; d=0.82). Higher CES-D scores were significantly associated with lower ventral striatal percent change in BPND for abstinent smokers (rs=-0.627, p=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, abstinent smokers exhibited significantly less amphetamine-induced dopamine release in the ventral striatum than nonsmokers. In abstinent smokers, worse mood was significantly associated with less striatal dopamine release. Our findings highlight a potential neural mechanism that may underlie negative mood symptoms during early abstinence. IMPLICATIONS: This study combined quantitative PET imaging and an amphetamine challenge to examine striatal dopamine function during early smoking cessation attempts. The findings demonstrate that recently abstinent tobacco smokers exhibit significant, mood-associated striatal dopamine dysfunction compared to nonsmokers. This study advances our knowledge of the neurobiology underlying early quit attempts, and bridges novel neural findings with clinically relevant symptoms of smoking cessation. These results may explain the challenge of maintaining long-term abstinence from smoking, and can lend insight into the development of treatment strategies for smoking cessation.

Use and perceptions of electronic nicotine delivery systems among patients attending lung cancer screening who smoke.

Given accumulating evidence that electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) may be a harm-reduction alternative to combustible tobacco products, it is important to understand the real-world implications of these devices in the populations that may benefit from them the most. We surveyed the use, perceptions of, and interest in using ENDS among patients attending their initial low-dose CT scan (LDCT) for lung cancer screening (LCS) who reported current smoking, a cohort of older individuals at high-risk for lung cancer and other smoking-related illnesses due to their heavy smoking history (30 or more pack years). Participants (N = 107) completed the survey in clinic immediately before their shared decision-making visit for lung cancer screening on the day of their LDCT. Approximately a quarter of participants reported ever use of ENDS in the past; nearly a third expressed a willingness to try switching to them in the future. Prior ENDS use was significantly associated with willingness to try switching to ENDS in the future. The most common reasons to consider switching included smoking cessation and harm reduction. Only about a third were aware that ENDS are not approved by the FDA for smoking cessation; knowledge significantly varied by demographic and clinical characteristics. These findings have important implications for ENDS public health campaigns and tobacco harm reduction strategies for older individuals who smoke.

Clearing the Haze: What Do We Still Need to Learn about Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems?

Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS; i.e., electronic cigarettes, e-cigarettes, vaping devices, vape pens) were introduced to the U.S. market in 2007 as a potential harm reduction alternative for people who smoked combustible cigarettes. Since that time, ENDS popularity grew very quickly, particularly among individuals who smoke cigarettes. However, young people and never smokers also started using ENDS, cohorts for whom these products were not intended. There are now a broad range of devices and e-liquid constituents. ENDS devices vary considerably in their design and generation of potentially toxic chemicals, with higher power devices likely much more hazardous than lower power devices. This landscape may further change after September 9, 2020, when all ENDS manufacturers are required to submit a premarket tobacco product application to the FDA to obtain authorization for marketing. Research has not kept pace with this rapidly changing technology and important questions remain regarding the relative benefits versus risks of ENDS. In light of these challenges, we propose key ENDS research priorities to address these gaps.

Electronic Cigarettes: Past, Present, and Future: What Clinicians Need to Know.

Electronic cigarettes (EC) are battery-operated devices that heat and aerosolize a liquid solution that typically contains nicotine. ECs have become commonly used among youth and may pose substantial risks of future addiction and health problems in this population. However, ECs are far less toxic per puff compared with combustible cigarettes, and as a result, might present an important harm reduction opportunity for cigarette smokers who cannot stop smoking by traditional means. The long-term health effects of ECs on individuals and the net effect on public health will remain unknown for many years.

Nicotine Dependence in US Military Veterans: Results from the National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study.

BACKGROUND: Veterans are a unique population that may be at increased risk of tobacco use disorder and nicotine dependence (ND). We analyzed data from the National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study (NHRVS), a large nationally representative sample of US veterans, in order to more fully understand the prevalence and correlates of lifetime ND in US Veterans. METHODS: Descriptive statistics were conducted to summarize health and functioning/quality of life characteristics among veterans with and without lifetime ND. Hierarchical binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationship between ND and psychiatric and physical health variables. RESULTS: Compared with veterans without lifetime ND, veterans with lifetime ND were more likely to screen positive for several lifetime psychiatric disorders including current alcohol use disorder (odds ratio [OR] 2.79 [95% confidence interval [CI] 2.23, 3.49]), depression (OR 1.86 [1.38, 2.50]), and PTSD (OR 1.68 [1.14, 2.47]). From a medical standpoint, they were more likely to endorse having kidney disease (OR 4.18 [2.55, 6.86]), heart attack (OR 2.09 [1.51, 2.89]), and rheumatoid arthritis (1.90 [1.20, 3.00]) in addition to other conditions. They scored lower in overall physical functioning and higher in somatization symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Veterans with lifetime ND in the NHRVS survey were more likely to have psychiatric and medical conditions and lower physical functioning compared with Veterans without lifetime ND. Veterans with lifetime ND may therefore require a comprehensive and integrated approach to care that includes attention to co-morbid illness in addition to drug addiction.

Marijuana Vaping in U.S. Adults: Evidence From the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

INTRODUCTION: As of February 18, 2020, states have reported 2,807 cases of e-cigarette, or vaping, product use-associated lung injury to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Most cases involved cannabinoids. This study identifies current risk factors for adult marijuana vaping by analyzing 2017 and 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data. METHODS: Data on 8,255 people who recently used marijuana were analyzed in September 2019. Sample-weighted multivariate logistic regressions considered a binary indicator for vaping as the primary method of marijuana use. Adjusting for demographic controls, regressions assessed the association between marijuana vaping and marijuana use for medical purposes (versus nonmedical only), current conventional cigarette use, current nicotine e-cigarette use, and 2 mental health variables. Demographic controls were binary indicators for female sex, Hispanic ethnicity, race, and having completed ≥1 year of college. RESULTS: Odds of marijuana vaping were higher among those who reported using for medical purposes (AORage18-24years=3.8, 95% CI=1.91, 7.67; AORage25-54years=1.8, 95% CI=1.02, 3.08; AORage55-64years=2.3, 95% CI=0.75, 7.07) and lower among people who smoked combustible cigarettes (AORage18-24years=0.2, 95% CI=0.06, 0.65; AORage25-54years=0.2, 95% CI=0.10, 0.26; AORage55-64years=0.1, 95% CI=0.05, 0.34). Vaping nicotine e-cigarettes was associated with greater odds of vaping marijuana for adults aged 25-54 years (AOR=4.6, 95% CI=2.70, 7.78) but not those aged 18-24 years (AOR=0.9, 95% CI=0.33, 2.26). CONCLUSIONS: Among people who use marijuana, adults reporting medical marijuana use were more likely to vape as their primary mode of consumption, whereas conventional cigarette smokers were less likely to do so. Use of nicotine e-cigarettes was associated with a greater likelihood of vaping marijuana for adults aged 25-54 years.

Receipt and predictors of smoking cessation pharmacotherapy among veterans with and without HIV.

Smoking is highly prevalent among people living with HIV (PLWH) and increases cardiovascular risk. Pharmacotherapies such as nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), bupropion, and varenicline help to reduce smoking, though rates of receipt among PLWH compared with HIV-uninfected persons are unknown. Among 814 PLWH and 908 uninfected patients enrolled in the Veterans Aging Cohort Study (2012-2017) who reported current smoking, we used marginal multivariable log-linear regression models to estimate adjusted relative risks (ARR) of receiving pharmacotherapy by HIV status. We also assessed patient-level factors associated with pharmacotherapy receipt within each group. In multivariable analyses, receipt of NRT was less likely among PLWH relative to uninfected participants (ARR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67, 0.89). In both populations, documented mental health disorders and contemplation to quit were associated with greater likelihood of receiving pharmacotherapy. Further research is needed to explore potential treatment disparities.

Electronic cigarette and tobacco use in individuals entering methadone or buprenorphine treatment.

BACKGROUND: Although smoking is prevalent among populations with opioid use disorder (OUD), few studies have examined electronic cigarette (EC) use in individuals seeking opioid agonist therapy (OAT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and correlates of EC use among individuals seeking OAT. METHODS: 782 patients seeking OAT for OUD completed surveys assessing current and past EC use, reasons for use, current and past cigarette smoking, nicotine dependence, psychiatric distress, trauma, and pain. Bivariate and multivariate models evaluated correlates of daily EC use, past-30-day EC use, and current cigarette smoking. RESULTS: 6% of patients reported daily EC use, 18% reported past-30-day use, 62% reported EC use history, and 85% reported current cigarette smoking. 46% reported using ECs to quit or cut down smoking. In multivariate analyses, daily EC use was associated with higher odds of being a former smoker (OR 21; CI 1.7-273) and lower odds of ever smoking more than 100 cigarettes (OR 0.07; CI 0.01-0.32), while EC use in the past 30 days was associated with lower odds of being Caucasian (OR 0.55; CI 0.34-0.89), ever smoking more than 100 cigarettes (OR 0.13; CI 0.02-0.67), and history of chronic pain (OR 0.59; CI 0.38-0.90), and higher odds of reporting psychiatric distress (OR 1.5; CI 1.1-2.2). CONCLUSIONS: EC use is common among people with OUD who smoke cigarettes. Those with daily use had higher odds of being former smokers than current smokers. Interventions using ECs may be effective to help reduce harms and mortality in OUD.

Practice Patterns and Perceptions of Chest Health Care Providers on Electronic Cigarette Use: An In-Depth Discussion and Report of Survey Results.

INTRODUCTION: The emergence of electronic cigarettes (ECs) has become a growing phenomenon that has sharply split opinion among the public health community, physicians, and lawmakers. AIMS: We sought to determine chest physician perceptions regarding ECs. METHODS: We conducted a web-based survey of 18,000 American College of Chest Physician (CHEST) members to determine healthcare provider experiences with EC users and to characterize provider perceptions regarding ECs. RESULTS/FINDINGS: There were 994 respondents. 88% reported that patients had asked their opinion of ECs, and 31% reported EC use among at least 10% of their patients. More disagreed than agreed (41% vs. 21%) that patients could improve their health by switching from tobacco smoking to daily EC use. Respondents were split on whether ECs promote tobacco cessation (32% agree vs. 33% disagree). CONCLUSIONS: Current perceptions of ECs are variable among providers. More than 1/3 of respondents felt that EC's could be used for smoking cessation for smokers who failed prior quit attempts with approved therapies. However, many respondents were not convinced that ECs will reduce harms from tobacco use. There is an urgent need to generate additional high quality scientific data regarding ECs to inform chest physicians, health professionals and the general public.

Electronic cigarettes for adults with tobacco dependence enrolled in a tobacco treatment program: A pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Electronic cigarettes (ECs) have emerged as a potential harm-reducing alternative for tobacco smokers. However, the role ECs might play in treatment settings is unclear. We conducted an exploratory study of treatment-seeking smokers enrolling in a standard tobacco treatment program who were provided with either a nicotine or non-nicotine EC to use as needed to cease tobacco smoking. METHODS: Treatment-seeking smokers received standard tobacco treatment for 8weeks and were given nicotine transdermal patch therapy, behavioral counseling, and either a nicotine or non-nicotine EC to use as needed. Smoking and EC use patterns were tracked longitudinally to week 24. RESULTS: 40 subjects were enrolled into the study. At week 24, 6 subjects (15%) were abstinent, and the mean reduction in reported cigarettes smoked per day was 6.8±12. There were no significant differences in smoking outcomes between those who received a nicotine or non-nicotine EC (proportion abstinent at 24weeks: nicotine EC=4/20 (20%); non-nicotine EC=2/20 (10%); p=0.66). Among subjects assessed at follow-up, 62.5% were EC non-users. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a 2nd generation EC to outpatient tobacco treatment among tobacco smokers is feasible. Among those who quit smoking, half were still using the EC at 6-month follow-up. Appeal of the EC among smokers was variable, and those who had quit smoking tended to switch to lower strength nicotine solutions. Further research is needed to determine whether ECs can reduce harm and be an effective adjunct to existing tobacco treatment interventions.