RESUMO
CONTEXT: Snapping scapula syndrome (SSS) is commonly misdiagnosed and underreported due to lack of awareness. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to summarize the current evidence related to SSS diagnosis and treatment to aid clinicians in managing the condition more effectively. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Medline, and Embase databases were searched for studies related to the etiology, diagnosis, or treatment of SSS (database inception to March 2020). STUDY SELECTION: Databases were searched for available studies related to the etiology, diagnosis, or treatment of SSS. STUDY DESIGN: A scoping review study design was selected to explore the breadth of knowledge in the literature regarding SSS diagnosis and treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. DATA EXTRACTION: Primary outcomes abstraction included accuracy of diagnostic tests, functional outcomes, and pain relief associated with various nonoperative and operative treatment options for SSS. RESULTS: A total of 1442 references were screened and 40 met the inclusion criteria. Studies commonly reported SSS as a clinical diagnosis and relied heavily on a focused history and physical examination. The most common signs reported were medial scapular border tenderness, crepitus, and audible snapping. Three-dimensional computed tomography had high interrater reliability of 0.972, with a 100% success rate in identifying symptomatic incongruity of the scapular articular surface. Initial nonoperative treatment was reported as successful in most symptomatic patients, with improved visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (7.7 ± 0.5 pretreatment, to 2.4 ± 0.6). Persistently symptomatic patients underwent surgical intervention most commonly involving bursectomy, superomedial angle resection, or partial scapulectomy. High satisfaction rates of surgery were reported in VAS (6.9 ± 0.7 to 1.9 ± 0.9), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (50.3 ± 12.2 to 80.6 ± 14.9), and mean simple shoulder test scores (5.6 ± 1.0 to 10.2 ± 1.1). CONCLUSION: Focused history and physical examination is the most crucial initial step in the diagnostic process, with supplemental imaging used to assess for structural etiologies when nonoperative management fails. Nonoperative management is as effective as surgical management in pain relief and is advised for 3 to 6 months before operative treatment.
Assuntos
Escápula , Dor de Ombro , Humanos , Exame Físico , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Dor de Ombro/diagnóstico , Dor de Ombro/etiologia , Dor de Ombro/terapia , SíndromeRESUMO
With solid tumor cancer survivorship increasing, the number of patients requiring post-treatment surveillance also continues to increase. This highlights the need for evidence-based cancer surveillance guidelines. Ideally, these guidelines would be based on combined high-quality data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We present a systematic review of published cancer surveillance RCTs in which we sought to determine the feasibility of data pooling for guideline development. We carried out a systematic search of medical databases for RCTs in which adult patients with solid tumors that had undergone surgical resection with curative intent and had no metastatic disease at presentation, were randomized to different surveillance regimens that assessed effectiveness on overall survival (OS). We extracted study characteristics and primary and secondary outcomes, and assessed risk of bias and validity of evidence with standardized checklist tools. Our search yielded 32,216 articles for review and 18 distinct RCTs were included in the systematic review. The 18 trials resulted in 23 comparisons of surveillance regimens. There was a highlevel of variation between RCTs, including the study populations evaluated, interventions assessed and follow-up periods for the primary outcome. Most studies evaluated colorectal cancer patients (11/18, [61%]). The risk of bias and validity of evidence were variable and inconsistent across studies. This review demonstrated that there is tremendous heterogeneity among RCTs that evaluate effectiveness of different postoperative surveillance regimens in cancer patients, rendering the consolidation of data to inform high-quality cancer surveillance guidelines unfeasible. Future RCTs in the field should focus on consistent methodology and primary outcome definition.
RESUMO
There is a lack of consensus around optimal surgical management for Legg-Calvé-Perthes Disease (LCPD). This case report discusses the benefits of combining arthroscopic femoral neck osteochondroplasty and labral repair with Morscher's Osteotomy (MO) for LCPD. S.A. is a 17-year-old female diagnosed with LCPD at the age of 6 years and has long-standing right hip symptoms. An arthroscopic femoral neck osteochondroplasty and labral repair followed by MO was performed. The pre-operative and 8 months post-operative International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) scores were 16.3 and 79.8 out of 100, respectively, indicating better quality-of-life. Also, the femoral neck-shaft-angle (NSA) changed from 120 pre-operative to 138.7 post-operative to represent the correction of coxa vara. The literature review revealed no published reports describing combined MO with hip arthroscopic interventions in managing LCPD. Combined arthroscopic femoral neck osteochondroplasty (with labral repair) and MO provides high patient satisfaction and improves radiographic parameters in patients with LCPD.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The open-access model has changed the landscape of academic publishing over the last 20 years. An unfortunate consequence has been the advent of predatory publishing, which exploits the open-access model for monetary gain by collecting publishing fees from authors under the pretense of being a legitimate publication while providing little-to-no peer review. This study aims to investigate the predatory publishing phenomenon in orthopaedic literature. METHODS: We searched Beall's List of Predatory Journals and Publishers and another list of predatory journals for journal titles that are possibly related to orthopaedics. We then searched their web sites for the following information: total number of articles published, journal country of origin, author country of origin, article processing charge (APC), quoted review time, and location of the listed headquarters. We also reported the article quality of a random sample of these journals. We consulted InCites Journal Citation Reports to determine the number of nonpredatory orthopaedic publications that are indexed, and we manually searched a random sample of these legitimate journals for Beall's criteria. Additionally, we searched the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) and PubMed databases for any possible predatory journal titles. RESULTS: We found 104 suspected predatory publishers, representing 225 possible predatory journals. One journal was indexed in the DOAJ, and 20 were indexed in PubMed. Review time was not identified for 56.2% of the journals, and 36.5% quoted a review time of <1 month. Nearly half of the listed addresses of the publishers were either unsearchable or led to residential or empty lots. Eighty-two legitimate journals were identified. The median APC was $420 for predatory journals and $2,900 for legitimate journals. We found that a random sample of the legitimate journals published studies with higher reporting standards, but a few also contained 1 criterion that is found on Beall's list. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the scope of orthopaedic predatory publishing. Possibly predatory journals outnumber legitimate orthopaedic journals. Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of the suspected predatory journals and consult available online tools to identify them because distinguishing them from legitimate journals can be a challenge.
Assuntos
Publicação de Acesso Aberto , Ortopedia , Bibliometria , Políticas Editoriais , Humanos , Revisão da Pesquisa por Pares , Publicações Periódicas como AssuntoRESUMO
The surgical management of benign and benign aggressive bone tumors typically involves intralesional curettage and reconstruction of the resulting defect with cement or bone graft material. At the authors' institution, an injectable synthetic calcium sulfate-calcium phosphate composite is now the standard graft material for these cases. This study reports the long-term follow-up, specifically the stability of bone regeneration, for the use of the synthetic graft material for oncologic reconstruction. Fourteen patients who underwent intralesional curettage of a primary bone tumor followed by cavitary reconstruction with synthetic graft material who had at least 4-year follow-up were identified from an institutional orthopedic oncology database. Clinical outcome data, focusing on long-term clinical and radiographic features of the reconstruction, were extracted from electronic and paper medical records. Seven females and 7 males were included (mean age at surgery, 28.1 years; range, 13-64 years). Follow-up ranged from 50 to 105 months (mean, 68 months). Most surgical reconstructions were done for the lower limb (n=11), and giant cell tumor of bone was the most common tumor treated. The mean amount of synthetic graft material used was 18.6 cm3. Complete radiographic resorption and new bone incorporation was observed within the first year, and bone remodeling was complete in all patients. Bone remodeling remained stable throughout the longer-term follow-up (ie, up to 9 years). The use of an injectable synthetic calcium sulfate-calcium phosphate composite is a viable option in the reconstruction of cavitary bone defects following intralesional curettage of primary benign bone tumors. This reconstruction technique was safe, with no long-term complications, and led to complete radiographic resorption and new bone incorporation with long-lasting stability. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(6):e868-e875.].