Surgery alone in the curative treatment of localised oesophageal carcinoma.

AIM: To document the results of surgery alone in patients with localised oesophageal carcinoma. METHODS: Between January 1982 and 2002, 179 consecutive patients who underwent curative oesophagectomy for stage 0, I or II oesophageal carcinoma, without neo-adjuvant treatment, were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 2.8 and 30.7%, respectively. The overall actuarial survival rate at 5 years was 59%. No patients with more than four invaded lymph nodes survived 5 years. A lymph node ratio more than 0.2, more than four invaded lymph nodes and an advanced pTNM stage were predictors of poor prognosis. CONCLUSION: Long-term survival after surgery alone for localised oesophageal carcinoma can be achieved in some 2/3rds of patients. These results should be considered before designing neo-adjuvant therapeutic regimen or embarking into exclusive treatment alternate to oesophagectomy.

Value of endoscopic ultrasonography as a predictor of long-term survival in oesophageal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: : Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is considered to be the best locoregional staging technique for cancer of the oesophagus. This study evaluated the relationship between preoperative EUS findings, completeness of surgical resection and survival. METHODS: : Between January 1995 and July 2002, 150 patients who underwent EUS for staging of tumours of the oesophagus were analysed prospectively. All underwent surgical resection with curative intent without neoadjuvant treatment. RESULTS: : Patient survival was significantly related to tumour (EUS T), node (EUS N) and Union Internacional Contra la Cancrum classification (EUS UICC) stage according to sonographic findings (P = 0.003, P = 0.009 and P = 0.004 respectively), and the presence of stenosis determined by EUS (P = 0.004). EUS T stage was a prognostic factor for survival (relative risk 1.7 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1.1 to 3.0); P = 0.046). Complete surgical resection (R0) was also significantly related to EUS T, N and UICC classification (P < 0.001). EUS UICC stage was a factor predictive of R0 resection (relative risk 2.6 (95 per cent c.i. 1.4 to 4.8); P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: : R0 resection and survival of patients with tumours of the oesophagus were strongly related to endosonographic findings. These results support the proposal that EUS should be performed in all patients with oesophageal cancer, not only for staging patients before therapy but also to determine prognosis.

[Patients surviving 5 years after curative oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer]. / Patients vivants à 5 ans après oesophagectomie curative pour cancer.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To analyse the clinical and pathological parameters of 5-year survival patients after curative oesophageal resection for cancer and to identify factors predictive of long-term survival. METHODS: The data of 370 patients who underwent oesophagectomy with curative intent from January 1982 for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (n = 320) or adenocarcinoma (n = 50) were reviewed. After excluding postoperative deaths (n = 20), these patients were surviving (S group, n = 113) or dead (NS group, n = 237) with a 60-month follow-up. Uni- and multivariate analysis allowed comparison between the two groups. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 4.0% and 37.6%, respectively. Parameters related to 5-year survival were: absence of preoperative malnutrition or dysphagia, transhiatal resection, no reoperation, limited tumour, histological response to neoadjuvant treatment, absence of lymph node capsular invasion, number of invaded lymph nodes < or = 4, invaded lymph node ratio < or = 0.1, absence of tumour recurrence or metachronous primary cancer. On multivariate analysis, factors predictive of 5-year survival were: absence of preoperative dysphagia (P < 0.001), stage 0-I-IIA tumour (P<0.001) and absence of metachronous cancer (P = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Complete surgical resection allows 5-year survival. Factors predictive of long-term survival assessed in preoperative evaluation, dysphagia and tumour stage, should be useful to select patients for neoadjuvant treatment.

Extent of oesophageal resection for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction.

AIMS: The optimal extent of oesophageal resection and surgical approach in patients treated for adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) are still uncertain. We report the correlations between resection margin involvement and outcome. METHODS: Patients with positive proximal resection margin (PPRM) and those with negative proximal resection margin (NPRM) were compared. RESULTS: Of 94 patients with macroscopically complete resection, eight were PPRM. There was no difference between the two groups in postoperative mortality or morbidity rates, in anastomotic leakage or in recurrence rates. The median survival in the PPRM group was 11.1 months compared with 36.3 months in the NPRM group (P=0.02). No infiltration was observed in patients whose proximal margin exceeded 7 cm. The extended transthoracic approach was the only prognostic factor for tumours type II (P=0.03, RR=1.4, 95% CI: 1.1-1.8). CONCLUSION: Histologic infiltration of oesophageal resection margin influences 5-year survival rate. In adenocarcinomas of the OGJ that can be treated curatively, a transection with a 8 cm oesophagectomy above the tumour in fresh specimen should be performed, and by thoracoabdominal approach for tumours type I and II.

Surgical management of and long-term survival after adenocarcinoma of the cardia.

BACKGROUND: The choice of surgical strategy for patients with adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction is controversial. This study was performed to analyse the surgical results of a 20-year experience with these lesions. METHODS: From January 1981 to January 2001, 126 patients with adenocarcinoma of the cardia underwent resection in the authors' institution. The treatment of choice was oesophagectomy for type I tumours, and extended gastrectomy for type II and III lesions. Morbidity, mortality and survival were determined retrospectively. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (44.4 per cent) had type I tumours, 44 (34.9 per cent) type II and 26 (20.6 per cent) type III. Primary resection was performed in 113 patients (89.7 per cent). Oesophagectomy with resection of the proximal stomach was carried out in 65 patients (51.6 per cent) and extended total gastrectomy with transhiatal resection of the distal oesophagus in 61 (48.4 per cent). In-hospital mortality and morbidity rates were 4.8 and 34.1 per cent respectively. The overall 3- and 5-year survival rates were 40.9 and 25.1 per cent respectively, and were not affected by the surgical approach. Survival was significantly associated with R0 resection, pathological node-positive category, postoperative complications and tumour differentiation. CONCLUSION: Postoperative mortality, morbidity and long-term survival did not appear to be affected by surgical approach. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the equivalence between transthoracic and transabdominal approaches.

[Reconstruction after total circular pharyngolaryngectomy: comparison between gastric interposition and free jejunal flap]. / Reconstruction après pharyngolaryngectomie totale circulaire: comparaison de la plastie gastrique et du greffon de jejunum libre.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To elucidate hospital mortality, morbidity and actuarial survival rates of patients with carcinoma of the hypopharynx and cervical oesophagus and to identify the technique of choice for reconstruction after pharyngolaryngectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 209 patients who underwent total pharyngolaryngectomy between May 1982 and January 2000. The majority of patients had advanced cancer: hypopharyngeal in 131 cases and cervical oesophageal in 78 cases. Follow-up was complete for all patients. Chi 2 and log rank tests were used, with a limit of significance of 5%. RESULTS: The postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 4.8% and 38.3%, respectively. Alimentary continuity was achieved using the stomach (127 patients), colon (5 patients), or free jejunal autograft (77 patients). The 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 62% and 24%, respectively. There was no significant difference with regard to the survival between gastric transposition and free jejunal autograft, but there were fewer complications in the gastric pull-up group with regard to the respiratory complications (33% vs 47.0%, p < 0.05), local recurrences (15.8% vs 33.8%, p = 0.004) and survival without dysphagia (76% vs 89%, p < 10(-5)). CONCLUSION: Surgical ablation is a viable option for advanced hypopharyngeal and cervical oesophageal neoplasms, and stomach interposition is the preferred method of reconstruction.

[Oesophageal cancer in patients with head and neck cancers: therapeutic implications]. / Association cancers de l'oesophage et des voies aérodigestives supérieures : implications thérapeutiques.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To determine therapeutic and prognostic implications of an associated head and neck primary cancer in patients undergoing oesophagectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1982 and 2000, 868 patients with oesophageal cancer were operated in our institution, including 78 (9%) who underwent oesophagectomy for associated oesophageal and head and neck cancers; the latter was synchronous (n = 52) or anterior metachronous (n = 26). Influence of head and neck cancer on the treatment of oesophageal carcinoma was analysed retrospectively in terms of surgical therapeutic strategy and survival. RESULTS: Oesophageal resection consisted of oeso-pharyngolaryngectomy (n = 14, 17.9%), subtotal oesophagectomy (n = 62, 79.5%) and cervical oesophagectomy (n = 2, 2.6%). Radical resection (R0) was obtained in 85% of cases. Postoperative mortality rate was 5 % (4/78). Main complications were pulmonary (18% = 14/78) and anastomotic leaks (14% = 11/78), all of them cervical. Follow-up (mean = 25 +/- 27 months) was complete for all 78 patients. Five-year survival after R0 resection was 25%. Survival pronostic factors were denutrition, complete resection, and pT status of oesophageal tumor. CONCLUSION: In patients with associated carcinomas of oesophagus and head and neck, agressive treatment -including an oesophagectomy- allowed a 5-year survival rate more than 25% without increased mortality or morbidity rates, compared with patients operated on for isolated oesophageal carcinoma.

[Preoperative prognostic factors for squamous cell carcinomas of the thoracic esophagus]. / Facteurs pronostiques préopératoires des cancers épidermoïdes de l'oesophage thoracique.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To identify preoperative survival prognostic factors in patients with resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. POPULATION: From January 1982 to September 1999, 868 patients underwent surgery for esophageal carcinoma in our department, including 493 for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. The following parameters were retrospectively included in univariate and multivariate analysis: age, sex, undernutrition, dysphagia, tumor diameter and nodal involvement on the CT-scan, preoperative treatment, surgical technique, curative resection, pTNM classification, histologic type and postoperative complications. The actuarial survival was determined. RESULTS: Survival prognostic factors were dysphagia, nodal involvement on CT-scan and depth of tumor invasion at pathological examination. Three groups of patients were identified on the two preoperative variables: group 1: patients without dysphagia (n=102), group 2: patients with dysphagia but without nodal involvement on the CT- scan (n=244), group 3: patients with dysphagia and with nodal involvement on the CT- scan (n=147). The median survivals were 62.4, 19.1 and 14.4 months in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively, and 5-year actuarial survivals were 50%, 21% and 11% (P<0.009). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that dysphagia and nodal involvement on the CT-scan are simple preoperative prognostic factors in patients with resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus.