Laparoscopic-Assisted Transvaginal Cholecystectomy - the US Military Experience With Long-Term Follow Up.

Objectives: We present our initial clinical experience applying Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgical (NOTES) technique to perform cholecystectomy in ten patients at a military institution. Methods: A posterior colpotomy was created to accommodate a single site working port used to facilitate dissection and gallbladder mobilization under direct visualization via an infraumbilical port. The specimen was retrieved through the vagina and the colpotomy was closed with absorbable suture under direct visualization. Long-term follow up was performed over the phone to assess quality of life with 2 widely used health-related quality of life (HRQoL) surveys including RAND-36 Health Item Survey (Version 1.0),1 and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).2. Results: Ten women underwent a laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal cholecystectomy (TVC) with 7 available for long-term follow-up. The average age was 28.9 years (20-37) and the indications for surgery included symptomatic cholelithiasis (9) and biliary dyskinesia (1). The mean operative time was 129 mins (95-180), and median blood loss was 34 ml (5-400). There were no conversions and the average length of stay was 9.98 hours (2.4-28.8). Pain (analogue scale 1-10) on postoperative day three was minimal (mean 2.3) and was limited to the infraumbilical incision. On average patients returned to work by postoperative day six and resumed normal daily activities at seven days. Immediate postoperative complications included one incident of postoperative urinary retention requiring bladder catheterization. One intra-operative cholangiogram was successfully performed due to elevated preoperative liver enzymes without significant findings. Long-term complications included one asymptomatic incisional hernia repair at the infraumbilical port site. The RAND-36 survey demonstrated an average physical and mental health summary score of 82.2 and 63.7 with an average general health score of 63.6. The average FSFI total score was 21.8. Conclusion: TVC is safe and effective. Implementation may improve operational readiness by returning service members to normal activities more expeditiously than conventional laparoscopy.

Surgical tele-mentoring using a robotic platform: initial experience in a military institution.

BACKGROUND: Surgical tele-mentoring leverages technology by projecting surgical expertise to improve access to care and patient outcomes. We postulate that tele-mentoring will improve surgeon satisfaction, procedural competence, the timeliness of operative intervention, surgical procedure efficiency, and key intra-operative decision-making. As a first step, we performed a pilot study utilizing a proof-of-concept tele-mentoring process during robotic-assisted surgery to determine the effects on the perceptions of all members of the surgical team. METHODS: An IRB-approved prospective feasibility study to determine the safety and efficacy of remote surgical consultation to local surgeons utilizing robotic surgery technology in the fields of general, urology, gynecology and thoracic surgery was performed. Surgical teams were provided a pre-operative face-to-face orientation. During the operation, the mentoring surgeon was located at the same institution in a separate tele-mentoring room. An evaluation was completed pre- and post-operatively by the operative team members and mentor. RESULTS: Fifteen operative cases were enrolled including seven general surgery, four urology, one gynecology and three thoracic surgery operations. Surveys were collected from 67 paired survey respondents and 15 non-paired mentor respondents. Participation in the operation had a positive effect on participant responses regarding all questions surveyed (p < 0.05) indicating value to tele-mentoring integration. Connectivity remained uninterrupted with clear delivery of audio and visual components and no perceived latency. Participant perception of leadership/administrative support was varied. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical tele-mentoring is safe and efficacious in providing remote surgical consultation to local surgeons utilizing robotic surgery technology in a military institution. Operative teams overwhelmingly perceived this capability as beneficial with reliable audio-visual connectivity demonstrated between the main operative room and the Virtual Medical Center. Further study is needed to develop surgical tele-mentoring to improve patient care without geographic limitations during times of peace, war and pandemic outbreaks.

Between the devil and the deep blue sea: A review of 25 modern naval mass casualty incidents with implications for future Distributed Maritime Operations.

ABSTRACT: In the future, United States Navy Role 1 and Role 2 shipboard medical departments will be caring for patients during Distributed Maritime Operations in both contested and noncontested austere environments; likely for prolonged periods of time. This literature review examines 25 modern naval mass casualty incidents over a 40-year period representative of naval warfare, routine naval operations, and ship-based health service support of air and land operations. Challenges, lessons learned, and injury patterns are identified to prepare afloat medical departments for the future fight. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Literature Review, level V.

Venous thromboembolism after traumatic amputation: an analysis of 366 combat casualties.

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the incidence, risk factors, and time course for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (DVT/PE) after combat-related major limb amputations. METHODS: Patients with amputation in Iraq or Afghanistan from 2009 through 2011 were eligible. Details of postinjury care, date of diagnosis of DVT/PE, and injury specific data were collected. Military databases and chart reviews were used. RESULTS: In 366 patients, 103 (28%) had DVT/PE; PE was diagnosed in 59 (16%) and DVT in 59 (16%). Most DVT (69%) and PE (66%) occurred within 10 days. Increasing ventilator days (odds ratio [OR], 1.97; 95% CI, 1.16 to 3.37) and units of blood transfused (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.68) were associated with DVT. Increasing units of fresh-frozen plasma were associated with PE (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.55). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of DVT/PE is high after combat-related amputation. Most DVT/PE occur early and prophylaxis is indicated.

Heparin versus enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after trauma: A randomized noninferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Research comparing enoxaparin with unfractionated heparin (UFH) given every 12 hours for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after trauma overlooks original recommendations that UFH be given every 8 hours. We conducted a prospective, randomized, noninferiority trial comparing UFH every 8 hours and standard enoxaparin every 12 hours. We hypothesized that the incidence of VTE in trauma patients receiving UFH every 8 hours would be no more than 10% higher than that in patients receiving enoxaparin every 12 hours. METHODS: Trauma patients who met criteria for VTE prophylaxis at a Level I trauma center were randomly assigned to 5,000-U UFH every 8 hours or 30-mg enoxaparin every 12 hours between November 2012 and September 2014. Surveillance duplex ultrasound was performed twice weekly on intensive care unit patients and weekly on ward patients. Primary end points were deep vein thrombosis diagnosed by duplex ultrasound and pulmonary embolism diagnosed by computed tomography angiography. RESULTS: Of 495 randomized patients, 220 received UFH and 216 received enoxaparin for analysis. Overall, 105 in the UFH group and 103 in the enoxaparin group underwent VTE surveillance or diagnostic testing. In the analysis of randomized patients who received treatment, UFH was noninferior compared with enoxaparin (absolute VTE risk difference, 3.1%; 95% confidence interval, -1.6% to 7.7%; p = 0.196); however, in the screening ultrasound group, the noninferiority of UFH was inconclusive (absolute VTE risk difference, 6.5%; 95% confidence interval, -2.9% to 15.8%; p = 0.179). The two treatments did not differ with regard to adverse events. The pharmaceutical cost for the regimen of UFH ($2,809) was nearly 20-fold lower than that for enoxaparin ($54,138). CONCLUSION: A regimen of UFH every 8 hours may be noninferior to enoxaparin every 12 hours for the prevention of VTE following trauma. Given UFH's cost advantage, the use of UFH for VTE prophylaxis may offer greater value. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management study, level II.

Does resuscitation with plasma increase the risk of venous thromboembolism?

BACKGROUND: Resuscitation with blood products improves survival in patients with traumatic hemorrhage. However, the risk of venous thromboembolic (VTE) complications associated with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) resuscitation is unknown. We hypothesized that a higher ratio of FFP to packed red blood cells (PRBCs) given during acute resuscitation increases the risk of VTE independent of severity of injury and shock. METHODS: The records of patients admitted from April 2007 to December 2011 who had surveillance lower extremity duplex ultrasounds were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received at least 1 U of PRBCs within 24 hours of admission were included. Patients who died without VTE were excluded. The relationship between FFP and VTE was evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 381 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 77 (20.2%) developed VTE. In patients who required less than 4 U of PRBCs, increasing units of FFP were associated with an increasing risk for VTE, with each unit of FFP having an adjusted odds ratio of 1.27 (95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.54, p = 0.015). Conversely, in patients who required four or greater units of PRBCs, FFP in equal or greater ratios than PRBCs was not associated with VTE. CONCLUSION: Each unit of FFP increased VTE risk by 25% in patients who required less than 4 U of PRBCs. In patients who required 4 U or greater PRBCs, FFP administration conferred no increased risk of VTE. This suggests that FFP should be used cautiously when early hemodynamic stability can be achieved with less than 4 U of PRBCs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Care management study, level III.

Isolated traumatic brain injury and venous thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is considered an independent risk factor of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the role of TBI severity in VTE risk has not been determined. We hypothesized that increased severity of brain injury in patients with isolated TBI (iTBI) is associated with an increased incidence of VTE. METHODS: The records of patients admitted from June 2006 to December 2011 were reviewed for injury data, VTE risk factors, results of lower extremity surveillance ultrasound, and severity of TBI. Patients were identified by DRG International Classification of Diseases-9th Rev. codes for TBI, and only those with a nonhead Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score of 1 or lower, indicating minimal associated injury, were included. The association of iTBI and VTE was determined using a case-control design. Among iTBI patients, those diagnosed with VTE (cases) were matched for age, sex, and admission year to those without VTE (controls). Data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 345 iTBI patients: 41 cases (12%) and 304 controls (88%). A total of 151 controls could not be matched to an appropriate case and were excluded. Of the remaining 153 controls, 1 to 16 controls were matched to each of the 41 VTE cases. Compared with the controls, the cases had a higher mean head-AIS score (4.4 vs. 3.9, p = 0.001) and overall Injury Severity Score (20.4 vs. 16.8, p = 0.001). Following adjustment for all factors found to be associated with VTE (ventilator days, central line placement, operative time > 2 hours, chemoprophylaxis, history of VTE, and history of cancer), the cases were significantly more likely to have a greater head injury severity (head-AIS score ≥ 5; odds ratio, 5.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.59-17.30; p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: The incidence of VTE in iTBI patients was significantly associated with the severity of TBI. VTE surveillance protocols may be warranted in these high-risk patients, as early detection of VTE could guide subsequent therapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic/prognostic study, level III.

The value of lower-extremity duplex surveillance to detect deep vein thrombosis in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: Venous duplex surveillance (VDS) is commonly used in trauma patients considered at risk for deep venous thrombosis. Economic evaluations have not addressed the quality of either the process of care or the outcomes achieved through the use of VDS. We sought to determine the value (quality/cost) of VDS in trauma patients stratified by risk for venous thromboembolism. METHODS: We reviewed records of all trauma patients from July 2006 to December 2010 who received weekly VDS examinations of the lower extremities. Prophylaxis and risk stratification were performed according to the American College of Chest Physicians recommendations. Patients were stratified by level of venous thromboembolism risk according to the results of a systematic review of the literature. The "value" of VDS was expressed as the number of clinically relevant findings divided by the cost (defined as the percent full-time equivalent of a certified vascular technologist performing VDS). RESULTS: A total of 2,169 patients met inclusion criteria and were stratified by deep venous thrombosis risk (218 moderate, 1,173 high, 778 highest). The quality of the process (the percent of sites adequately visualized per VDS) was not clinically different among risk groups. The quality of the outcome (number of clinically relevant findings) was significantly greater, and the work time required per finding was significantly lower in the highest-risk group (p < 0.001). The value of VDS was significantly greater in the highest-risk group compared with high or moderate-risk groups (1,104 vs. 337 vs. 76 findings per percent full-time equivalent, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: VDS has significantly greater value in the highest-risk group and is warranted in this group. It is of less value in the moderate risk trauma patient. Calculating the value of specific health care interventions can guide the allocation of limited resources. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level II; value-based evaluation, level III.

Back to the future: reducing reliance on torso computed tomography in the initial evaluation of blunt trauma.

BACKGROUND: Reliance on chest-abdomen-pelvis computed tomography (CAP) in the initial evaluation of blunt trauma is a major source of patient radiation exposure. Our trauma surgeon group (TSG) modified its practice to limit the use of CAP. We evaluated the effect of this practice change on patient radiation exposure and diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: We compared data on blunt injury trauma activations evaluated by the five-member TSG for two 6-month intervals, before (T1) and after (T2) instituting the practice change. Patient demographic and injury data, complications, torso imaging and radiation dosage were collected. Following analysis of T1, the surgeon with the lowest CAP use was identified and found to have no errors or delays in diagnosis. The TSG agreed to adopt that surgeon's focus on findings of the physical examination and Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma to reduce CAP use in the initial evaluation. T2 was analyzed to assess the effect of implementation of this guideline. RESULTS: There were 897 patients in T1 and 948 in T2. In the two intervals, patients did not differ by age, sex, mortality, or probability of survival. CAP use decreased by 38.5% with a significant drop in mean patient radiation exposure (p < 0.001). There were no missed injuries or delays in diagnosis in either interval. CONCLUSION: The use of CAP and its associated radiation burden in the initial evaluation of blunt trauma can be reduced without diagnostic errors by comparing use and identifying best practice. This process has implications for optimal trauma care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, level IV; case management study, level IV.