Safety and Efficacy of Mucograft Porcine Collagen Bioengineered Acellular Dermal Matrix as a Spacer Graft in Lower Eyelid Elevation Surgery.

Background: Recent regulatory changes have limited the access to a widely used commercially available bioengineered acellular dermal matrix (BADM) product as a spacer graft in the surgical correction of lower eyelid retraction. We report our off-label usage of Mucograft, a porcine BADM, as an alternative BADM. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of patients undergoing bilateral lower lid surgery with Mucograft (12 eyes) at a single institution. Results: For the six patients, there was a mean lower lid elevation of 1.93 mm, without any serious complications. There was greater elevation of the lower lid position for the Mucograft group compared with four septo-retractor control patients (1.93 versus 0.94mm, P = 0.008). Conclusion: Mucograft performed satisfactorily, and further investigation is warranted regarding its longer-term safety and efficacy.

Demography, Clinical Settings and Outcomes in Evisceration with Implant: An Electronic Medical Records Driven Analytics of 2071 Cases.

PURPOSE: To describe the demography, clinical settings and outcomes in 2071 patients undergoing evisceration across a multi-tier ophthalmology hospital network and comparison of results with the global scenario of clinical settings for evisceration. METHODS: An analysis of 2071 patients undergoing evisceration and implant between 2013 and 2019. RESULTS: The mean age at surgery was 39 ± 22 years. Children constituted 303(15%) of the cases. The four leading indications for surgery included painful blind eye in 760(37%), phthisis bulbi in 552(27%), staphyloma in 215(10%) and open globe injury in 195(9%) patients. The clinical settings encountered were trauma in 852(41%), ocular infection in 714(34%), glaucoma in 198(10%), post ocular surgery in 146(7%), congenital in 95(5%) and uveitis in 21(1%). Trauma and infection remained the commonest clinical settings in the urban (843,75%), rural (622,77%) and metropolitan (101,71%) areas. Decade wise distribution suggested trauma to be the commonest clinical setting in the first 4 decades and infection in the next 6 decades. The mean follow-up period was 351 ± 386 days (median 194). While trauma remained one of the commonest clinical setting in both the developed and the developing economies, painful blind eye and intractable glaucoma were other common clinical settings in the developed economies and infection was one of the leading clinical setting in the developing economies. CONCLUSION: Most patients undergoing evisceration are young. The commonest indications for surgery include painful blind eye and phthisis bulbi. Trauma and infection remain the commonest clinical settings for evisceration in developed and developing economies.

Outcomes and complications of evisceration with primary implant: an electronic medical record driven analytics of 1800 cases.

PURPOSE: To describe the surgical outcomes and implant complications in 1,800 patients undergoing evisceration with primary implant. METHODS: An Electronic Medical Record-driven analysis of 1,800 patients undergoing evisceration with primary implant between 2013 and 2019. Implant sizing was performed intra-operatively to place the largest implant without tension on the wound closure. Outcome measures included implant complications, prosthesis measurements, and incidence of a good aesthetic outcome. Good outcome was defined as <2 mm enophthalmos and grade 1 or less superior sulcus deformity with a custom ocular prosthesis. RESULTS: Eighteen hundred eyes of 1800 patients were included. The mean age at surgery was 36 ± 21 years (median 32 years). Implants used were poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) in 1737 (97%) and porous polyethylene in 63 (3%) patients. Two-petal sclerotomy was performed in 1512 (88%) and four-petal sclerotomy in 165 (10%) patients. The mean diameter of the implant used was 19.35 ± 1.18 mm (median 20, range 10-22 mm). The implant extrusion rate was 3% (56) and implant displacement was seen in none. The mean prosthesis volume and thickness were 2.22 ± 0.67 ml (median 2, range 1-6.5 ml) and 6 ± 1 mm (median 6, range 2-9 mm). The mean difference in prosthesis projection on Hertel's exophthalmometer was 0.28 ± 1 mm (median 0, range 0-1 mm). Good outcome was observed in 93%. The mean follow-up period was 351 ± 386 days (median 194). CONCLUSION: Evisceration with empirically selected primary orbital implant placement is associated with minimal implant complications and gives a good aesthetic outcome in 93% of the patients.

Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Update Study (CUP Study): Report III. Analysis of Earlier Failed Probing without Endoscopy Guidance.

AIM: The purpose of this study was to report the profile and outcomes of children with an earlier failed probing that was performed without endoscopy guidance. METHODS: Retrospective interventional case study was performed on all the patients who were referred with a diagnosis of a single or multiple failed probing from Jan 2016 to June 2019 to a tertiary care Dacryology center. All the patients had a blind probing without an endoscopy assistance before referral. The parameters evaluated were patient demographics, number of earlier probings, prior operative notes, clinical presentation, findings of endoscopy guidance during the repeat procedure, simple vs complex CNLDO, types of complex CNLDO, management, complications and outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred eyes of 82 children had a failed probing experience without endoscopic guidance elsewhere. The mean age of the children was 55.7 months (range: 9-168 months). Of these, 63 eyes underwent repeat probing under endoscopic guidance, 35 eyes being simple CNLDO (35/63, 55.5%), and 28 eyes (28/63, 44.5%) being complex CNLDO. Among the complex subset, balloon dacryoplasty was performed for five cases and monoka-Crawford stents for eight cases under direct endoscopy visualization. Buried probes were managed successfully by standard protocols of probe exteriorization. The two cases of misdirected probes were re-directed under endoscopy guidance for appropriate recanalization and the single case of granuloma at the NLD opening was excised followed by intubation without any recurrence. CONCLUSION: Endoscopy guidance plays a crucial role in the management of CNLDO with an earlier failed probing.

Behavior and outcomes of 70 adult lacrimal sac mucoceles.

Purpose: To study the clinical profile and outcomes in adults with lacrimal sac mucoceles.Methods: A retrospective, interventional study on consecutive adult patients with lacrimal sac mucoceles who underwent dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR)/dacryocystectomy surgery. Primary outcome measure was subsidence of lacrimal sac swelling after intervention. Secondary outcome measure was anatomical patency of the lacrimal system.Results: A total of 70 patients were studied, mean age of the group being 49.2 ± 13.5 years. Majority of the patients were female (n = 49; 70%) and all had unilateral disease. An appreciable number (n = 14; 20%) presented with acute dacryocystitis of which 6(8%) developed a lacrimal sac fistula. Encystment of the lacrimal sac mucocele was seen in 47 (67%) patients, 3(4%) developed preseptal cellulitis and 3(4%) needed imaging. Resolution of sac swelling after intervention was seen in 70 (100%) patients. Definitive management was DCR in 57 (81%) patients, of which anatomical patency was achieved in 55 (96%) patients, mean duration of follow up of the group being 138 ± 70.2 days. A trend to prefer adjuvants like Mitomycin-C and/or intubation was noted in 56 (98%) of patients.Conclusions: Adult lacrimal sac mucocele is more commonly seen in females and unilaterally. Complications of this entity include encysted mucocele (67%), acute dacryocystitis (20%), lacrimal sac fistula (8%), and preseptal cellulitis (4%). It is essentially a clinical diagnosis and favourable outcomes are seen with DCR surgery.

Multidrug-Resistant Escherichia coli Canaliculitis.

Escherichia coli canaliculitis is an exceptionally rare organism to cause primary canaliculitis. The present case describes unilateral canaliculitis refractory to conventional therapy with a significant history of recurrent culture proven E. coli urinary tract infection. Microbiological analysis revealed E. coli bacilli and histological examination showed goblet cell metaplasia, subepithelial edema with acute and chronic inflammatory infiltrate. The possibility of an endogenous infection or autoinoculation secondary to urinary tract infection cannot be ruled out.

Punctal dilatation and non-incisional canalicular curettage in the management of infectious canaliculitis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcomes of punctal dilatation and non-incisional canalicular curettage in patients with infectious canaliculitis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 53 canaliculi of 47 eyes of 46 consecutive patients diagnosed with canaliculitis was performed from November 2015 to December 2018. All patients were treated with punctal dilatation and a non-incisional canalicular curettage. Parameters studied include demographics, clinical presentation, microbiological analysis, management and treatment outcomes. The outcome measures were clinical resolution of canaliculitis and resolution of epiphora. RESULTS: The mean age at presentation was 59.34 years with female preponderance (M:F = 19:28). Left eye was more affected (64%, n = 30) as compared to the right (36%, n = 17). Only one patient presented bilaterally. Lower canaliculus was most commonly involved (68%, n = 32). Six eyes showed involvement of both upper and lower canaliculus. Presenting symptoms include discharge (81%), swelling of the eyelids (64%), watering (55%), redness (51%) and pain (39%). Punctal dilatation and non-incisional canalicular curettage were performed using punctum dilator and a small chalazion scoop (1 mm Meyhoefer chalazion curette). Of the 53 involved canaliculi, 14 canaliculi of 14 eyes underwent a repeat curettage for complete resolution and 1 canaliculus underwent the same procedure thrice. The most common micro-organisms isolated were Streptococci species (28% cases). At a mean follow-up of 6.8 months, resolution of canaliculitis was achieved in all patients; however, epiphora persisted in two eyes (4%). CONCLUSION: Non-incisional canalicular curettage is a minimally invasive technique with good preservation of the punctal and canalicular anatomy. It also facilitates good anatomical and functional outcomes in infectious canaliculitis.