Oropharyngeal Cancer Staging Health Record Extraction Using Artificial Intelligence.

Importance: Accurate, timely, and cost-effective methods for staging oropharyngeal cancers are crucial for patient prognosis and treatment decisions, but staging documentation is often inaccurate or incomplete. With the emergence of artificial intelligence in medicine, data abstraction may be associated with reduced costs but increased efficiency and accuracy of cancer staging. Objective: To evaluate an algorithm using an artificial intelligence engine capable of extracting essential information from medical records of patients with oropharyngeal cancer and assigning tumor, nodal, and metastatic stages according to American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition guidelines. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective diagnostic study was conducted among a convenience sample of 806 patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Medical records of patients with staged oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas who presented to a single tertiary care center between January 1, 2010, and August 1, 2020, were reviewed. A ground truth cancer stage dataset and comprehensive staging rule book consisting of 135 rules encompassing p16 status, tumor, and nodal and metastatic stage were developed. Subsequently, 4 distinct models were trained: model T (entity relationship extraction) for anatomical location and invasion state, model S (numerical extraction) for lesion size, model M (sequential classification) for metastasis detection, and a p16 model for p16 status. For validation, results were compared against ground truth established by expert reviewers, and accuracy was reported. Data were analyzed from March to November 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: The accuracy of algorithm cancer stages was compared with ground truth. Results: Among 806 patients with oropharyngeal cancer (mean [SD] age, 63.6 [10.6] years; 651 males [80.8%]), 421 patients (52.2%) were positive for human papillomavirus. The artificial intelligence engine achieved accuracies of 55.9% (95% CI, 52.5%-59.3%) for tumor, 56.0% (95% CI, 52.5%-59.4%) for nodal, and 87.6% (95% CI, 85.1%-89.7%) for metastatic stages and 92.1% (95% CI, 88.5%-94.6%) for p16 status. Differentiation between localized (stages 1-2) and advanced (stages 3-4) cancers achieved 80.7% (95% CI, 77.8%-83.2%) accuracy. Conclusion and Relevance: This study found that tumor and nodal staging accuracies were fair to good and excellent for metastatic stage and p16 status, with clinical relevance in assigning optimal treatment and reducing toxic effect exposures. Further model refinement and external validation with electronic health records at different institutions are necessary to improve algorithm accuracy and clinical applicability.

Conservative Approach For The Management Of Bilateral Pneumothorax And Pneumomediastinum After Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair.

Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair is considered a common and safe procedure. Here, we present the case of a 31-year-old male with right indirect inguinal hernia and no medical history. The patient underwent laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair and the operation was completed successfully. During extubation, subcutaneous emphysema was noted at the neck, chest, and above the nipples. Tracheal injury was excluded by the anaesthesiologists and otorhinolaryngologists. On arterial blood gas, the patient's oxygen saturation was 95% with nasal oxygen support. The patient was followed-up closely in the general surgery inpatient clinic. Computed tomography was performed, on which bilateral pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum were noted. Conservative management was planned and the patient was discharged on the fourth postoperative day. Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair is considered a routinely applied safe procedure, however, appropriate care should be taken to avoid possible complications.

Enhancing Outpatient Symptom Management in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Qualitative Analysis.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with head and neck cancer manage a variety of symptoms at home on an outpatient basis. Clinician review alone often leaves patient symptoms undetected and untreated. Standardized symptom assessment using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been shown in randomized clinical trials to improve symptom detection and overall survival, although translation into real-world settings remains a challenge. OBJECTIVE: To better understand how patients with head and neck cancer cope with cancer-related symptoms and to examine their perspectives on standardized symptom assessment. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS, AND SETTING: This was a qualitative analysis using semistructured interviews of patients with head and neck cancer and their caregivers from November 2, 2020, to April 16, 2021, at a regional tertiary center in Canada. Purposive sampling was used to recruit a varied group of participants (cancer subsite, treatment received, sociodemographic factors). Drawing on the Supportive Care Framework, a thematic approach was used to analyze the data. Data analysis was performed from November 2, 2020, to August 2, 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Patient perception of ambulatory symptom management and standardized symptom assessment. RESULTS: Among 20 participants (median [range] age, 59.5 [33-74] years; 9 [45%] female; 13 [65%] White individuals), 4 themes were identified: (1) timely physical symptom management, (2) information as a tool for symptom management, (3) barriers to psychosocial support, and (4) external factors magnifying symptom burden. Participants' perceptions of standardized symptom assessment varied. Some individuals described the symptom monitoring process as facilitating self-reflection and symptom detection. Others felt disempowered by the process, particularly when symptom scores were inconsistently reviewed or acted on. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This qualitative analysis provides a novel description of head and neck cancer symptom management from the patient perspective. The 4 identified themes and accompanying recommendations serve as guides for enhanced symptom monitoring.

Simple Blood Tests May Be Used to Predict the Increased Risk of Conversion in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery.

Background: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the possibility if simple blood tests that can be made in majority of hospitals may be used predict to risk of conversion to laparoscopic surgery to an open approach. Patients and Methods: The hospital records of 636 patients who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (L-C) were retrospectively reviewed, and 583 patients included in the study protocol. Preoperative laboratory tests of all patients and data of patients who underwent conversion from laparoscopic surgery to open surgery were examined. Results: Of the 583 patients who were included in the study, 404 (69.29%) were female and the mean age was 50.02 ± 12.84 (19-89) years. The cholecystectomy was completed laparoscopically in 559 (89.5%) patients. The most common symptoms seen in the patients were epigastric discomfort and right upper quadrant pain. The high level of white blood cell (WBC) count and c-reactive protein (CRP) were found to be statistically significant before surgery in patients who had a conversion to open cholecystectomy (P < .001). Conclusion: Elevation of WBC count and CRP value before elective L-C may be useful in the prediction of a high risk of conversion from laparoscopic to open approach. This finding will help the surgeon to plan the treatment and inform the patient of the possibility before surgery.

The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System: A narrative review of a standardized symptom assessment tool in head and neck oncology.

OBJECTIVE: Symptom burden is common in head and neck cancer patients though it frequently remains undetected and untreated. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System - revised version (ESAS-r) is a generic symptom scale deployed in many outpatient settings worldwide. The ESAS-r is meant to improve symptom detection and management. We sought to review the ESAS-r and its psychometric properties in a head and neck oncology population. METHODS: Narrative Review. RESULTS: Over the past 30 years, the ESAS-r has emerged as one of the most used symptom scales for cancer patients. Its psychometric properties in a heterogenous cancer population are well supported, proving to be reliable and valid in a variety of settings. The linking of ESAS-r scores with Ontario administrative health data has led to a detailed assessment of validity in head and neck cancer. The ESAS-r can discriminate between high and low levels of symptom burden and is responsive to change over time in this patient population. ESAS-r scores have also been shown to be a strong predictor of future emergency department use and unplanned hospitalization in head and neck cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: The ESAS-r is reliable and valid in the head and neck cancer population and may serve as a useful clinical endpoint in research studies.

Feasibility and Safety of Outpatient Thyroidectomy: A Narrative Scoping Review.

Background: Outpatient thyroid surgery is gaining popularity as it can reduce length of hospital stay, decrease costs of care, and increase patient satisfaction. There remains a significant variation in the use of this practice including a perceived knowledge gap with regards to the safety of outpatient thyroidectomies and how to go about implementing standardized institutional protocols to ensure safe same-day discharge. This review summarizes the information available on the subject based on existing published studies and guidelines. Methods: This is a scoping review of the literature focused on the safety, efficacy and patient satisfaction associated with outpatient thyroidectomies. The review also summarizes and editorializes the most recent American Thyroid Association guidelines. Results: In total, 11 studies were included in the analysis: 6 studies were retrospective analyses, 3 were retrospective reviews of prospective data, and 2 were prospective studies. The relative contraindications to outpatient thyroidectomy have been highlighted, including: complex medical conditions, anticipated difficult surgical dissection, patients on anticoagulation, lack of home support, and patient anxiety toward an outpatient procedure. Utilizing these identified features, an outpatient protocol has been proposed. Conclusion: The salient features regarding patient safety and selection criteria and how to develop a protocol implementing ambulatory thyroidectomies have been identified and reviewed. In conclusion, outpatient thyroidectomy is safe, associated with high patient satisfaction and decreased health costs when rigorous institutional protocols are established and implemented. Successful outpatient thyroidectomies require standardized preoperative selection, clear discharge criteria and instructions, and interprofessional collaboration between the surgeon, anesthetist and same-day nursing staff.