Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Cardiovasc Echogr ; 33(3): 125-132, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38161775

RESUMO

Background: The Italian Society of Echography and Cardiovascular Imaging (SIECVI) conducted a national survey to understand the volumes of activity, modalities and stressors used during stress echocardiography (SE) in Italy. Methods: We analyzed echocardiography laboratory activities over a month (November 2022). Data were retrieved through an electronic survey based on a structured questionnaire, uploaded on the SIECVI website. Results: Data were obtained from 228 echocardiographic laboratories, and SE examinations were performed in 179 centers (80.6%): 87 centers (47.5%) were in the northern regions of Italy, 33 centers (18.4%) were in the central regions, and 61 (34.1%) in the southern regions. We annotated a total of 4057 SE. We divided the SE centers into three groups, according to the numbers of SE performed: <10 SE (low-volume activity, 40 centers), between 10 and 39 SE (moderate volume activity, 102 centers) and ≥40 SE (high volume activity, 37 centers). Dipyridamole was used in 139 centers (77.6%); exercise in 120 centers (67.0%); dobutamine in 153 centers (85.4%); pacing in 37 centers (21.1%); and adenosine in 7 centers (4.0%). We found a significant difference between the stressors used and volume of activity of the centers, with a progressive increase in the prevalence of number of stressors from low to high volume activity (P = 0.033). The traditional evaluation of regional wall motion of the left ventricle was performed in all centers, with combined assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) in 90 centers (50.3%): there was a significant difference in the centers with different volume of SE activity: the incidence of analysis of CFVR was significantly higher in high volume centers compared to low - moderate - volume (32.5%, 41.0% and 73.0%, respectively, P < 0.001). The lung ultrasound (LUS) was assessed in 67 centers (37.4%). Furthermore for LUS, we found a significant difference in the centers with different volume of SE activity: significantly higher in high volume centers compared to low - moderate - volume (25.0%, 35.3% and 56.8%, respectively, P < 0.001). Conclusions: This nationwide survey demonstrated that SE was significantly widespread and practiced throughout Italy. In addition to the traditional indication to coronary artery disease based on regional wall motion analysis, other indications are emerging with an increase in the use of LUS and CFVR, especially in high-volume centers.

2.
Cardiovasc Pathol ; 30: 72-77, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28793276

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Two-dimensional echocardiography is the main noninvasive imaging tool to identify cardiac masses but is unable to provide detailed tissue characterization. AIM: The aim of the study was to assess the ability of low mechanical index (MI) contrast echocardiography to detect presence and amount of tissue vascularization as validated by histopathology study of cardiac masses. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twelve consecutive patients (5 females and 7 males, age range 51-82 years) underwent conventional and contrast two-dimensional echocardiography with low MI. By contrast echocardiography, mass enhancement was classified as absent (suggesting thrombus), partial, or complete (suggesting vascularized mass, both with early or late >20 cycles of opacification) as compared to the adjacent myocardium. The precise nature of the cardiac masses was provided by histopathology examination and/or by resolution after anticoagulation therapy during follow-up. Presence, type, and degree of mass vascularization were assessed by histology, immunohistochemistry, and morphometric analysis. Among the 12 cases, mass enhancement was absent, late and peripheral, late and partial, and early and complete in three cases each. Cardiac masses consisted of thrombus (three), secondary malignant cardiac tumor (three), myxoma (three), papillary fibroelastoma (two), and cavernous hemangioma (one). At histology, cardiac hemangioma had the highest degree of vascularization, at difference from thrombi which were not vascularized, and data were in keeping with contrast echocardiography findings. CONCLUSIONS: Low MI contrast echocardiography is an easy, noninvasive cardiac imaging tool to assess cardiac mass vascularization. The degree of contrast enhancement and time to opacification are highly variable among cardiac masses and correspond to different extent of vascularization.


Assuntos
Ecocardiografia/métodos , Neoplasias Cardíacas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Cardíacas/patologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Meios de Contraste , Trombose Coronária/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose Coronária/patologia , Feminino , Átrios do Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Átrios do Coração/patologia , Neoplasias Cardíacas/irrigação sanguínea , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mixoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Mixoma/patologia , Metástase Neoplásica/diagnóstico por imagem , Metástase Neoplásica/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA