Clinical outcomes using a flexible regimen of GnRH-antagonists and a 'step-up' of additional gonadotropins in donor oocyte cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of serum estradiol upon oocyte donor cycle stimulation characteristics and clinical outcomes using flexible GnRH-antagonist (GnRH-ant) with additional FSH supplementation. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 99 oocyte donor cycles using ovarian hyperstimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH) and GnRH-ant was analyzed. Following discontinuation of oral contraceptives, controlled ovarian hyperstimulation was begun using rFSH (150-300 IU daily). GnRH-ant (ganirelix, Organon) and an additional 75 IU of FSH/day were begun when lead follicles were 13-14 mm in greatest diameter. Cycles were analyzed based on serum estradiol response following administration of GnRH-ant (Group 1: progressive rise and Group 2: no rise or a decline). Primary endpoints were cycle stimulation characteristics based on serum estradiol following GnRH-ant, clinical pregnancy and implantation rates. RESULTS: A decline in serum estradiol was seen after GnRH-ant administration in 45% of cycles. Clinical pregnancy rates per transfer (70 vs. 72%) and implantation rates (43 vs. 56%) were similar for each group. CONCLUSION: Flexible regimens of GnRH-ant even with additional rFSH in a 'step-up' fashion frequently result in a decline in serum estradiol during ovulation induction. While our study is non-randomized, it does not appear to result in any adverse affect in clinical outcomes in donor oocyte cycles.

Promoter hypermethylation frequency and BRAF mutations distinguish hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer from sporadic MSI-H colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancers resulting from defective DNA mismatch repair can occur in both hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) and in the sporadic setting. They are characterised by a high level of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and superficially resemble each other in that they are frequently located in the proximal colon and share features such as circumscribed tumour margins and tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. However, significant differences can be demonstrated at the molecular level including widespread promoter hypermethylation and BRAF -activating mutations which occur significantly less often in HNPCC. AIMS: In this study, we sought to determine whether the presence of widespread promoter hypermethylation and BRAF mutations would exclude HNPCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated the methylation status of four methylated in tumour markers (MINTs 1,2,12 and 31), and the promoter regions of 5 genes hMLH1, HPP1, MGMT, p16INK4A and p14ARF, in 21 sporadic MSI-H colorectal cancers and compared these with 18 cancers from HNPCC patients. The methylation status of CpG islands were determined by either methylation specific PCR (MSP) or combined bisulfite restricton analysis (COBRA). In addition we considered the BRAF mutation status of 18 HNPCC tumours and 19 sporadic MSI-H cancers which had been previously determined by RFLP analysis and confirmatory sequencing. RESULTS: Methylation of the promoter regions in target genes occurred less frequently within the HNPCC tumours (27% of analyses), compared with the sporadic MSI-H tumours (59% of analyses) (P < 0.001). Methylation of MINTs 1, 2, 12 and 31 occurred in 4% of analyses for HNPCC tumours contrasted with 73% for sporadic MSI-H tumours (P < 0.001). BRAF mutations were detected in 74% of sporadic tumours but none of the HNPCC cancers tested. CONCLUSIONS: The total number of genes and MINTs methylated in HNPCC was lower than in MSI-H colorectal tumours. No HNPCC tumour showed evidence of widespread promoter hypermethylation or BRAF mutation suggesting this feature could be used as a discriminator between familial and sporadic cases.

BRAF mutation is associated with DNA methylation in serrated polyps and cancers of the colorectum.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Mutations in BRAF have been linked with colorectal cancers (CRC) showing high level microsatellite instability (MSI-H). However, the distribution of BRAF mutations in MSI-H cancers remains to be clarified with respect to precursor lesions and the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). METHODS: Forty three hyperplastic polyps (HP), nine mixed polyps (MP), five serrated adenomas (SA), 28 conventional adenomas (AD), 18 hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancers (HNPCC), and 127 sporadic CRC (46 MSI-H and 81 non-MSI-H) were collected from patients undergoing colectomy for either CRC or hyperplastic polyposis. Twenty five of 57 serrated lesions were derived from four patients with hyperplastic polyposis. HP were further subdivided according to recently documented morphological criteria into 27 classical HP and 16 variant lesions described as "sessile serrated adenoma" (SSA). All tumours were screened for BRAF activating mutations. RESULTS: The BRAF mutation was more frequent in SSA (75%) and MP (89%) than in classical HP (19%), SA (20%), and AD (0%) (p<0.0001), and also in sporadic MSI-H cancers (76%) compared with HNPCC (0%) and sporadic non-MSI-H cancers (9%) (p<0.0001). The BRAF mutation was identified more often in CIMP-high serrated polyps (72%) and CIMP-high CRC (77%) than in CIMP-low (30%) and CIMP-negative (13%) polyps (p = 0.002) as well as CIMP-low (18%) and CIMP-negative (0%) CRC (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The BRAF mutation was frequently seen in SSA and in sporadic MSI-H CRC, both of which were associated with DNA methylation. Sporadic MSI-H cancers may originate in SSA and not adenomas, and BRAF mutation and DNA methylation are early events in this "serrated" pathway.