Blood eosinophils as a marker of response to inhaled corticosteroids in COPD.

Identification of a biomarker that predicts response to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) would help evaluate the risk/benefit profile of ICS in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and guide treatment.The ISOLDE study randomised 751 patients (mean post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 1.4 L: 50% predicted normal) to fluticasone propionate 500 µg twice daily or placebo for 3 years, finding no difference in FEV1 rate of decline between treatments (p=0.16) and a significant reduction in median exacerbation rate with fluticasone propionate versus placebo (p=0.026). We re-analysed ISOLDE results by baseline blood eosinophil count to investigate whether eosinophil level predicts ICS benefit.Patients with eosinophils <2% (n=456) had a similar rate of post-bronchodilator FEV1 decline with fluticasone propionate as placebo (-2.9 mL·year(-1); p=0.688). With eosinophils ≥2% (n=214), the rate of decline decreased by 33.9 mL·year(-1) with fluticasone propionate versus placebo (p=0.003). Exacerbation rate reduction on ICS for fluticasone propionate versus placebo was higher in the eosinophil <2% group compared with the ≥2% group; time-to-first moderate/severe exacerbation was not different between treatments in either group.A baseline blood eosinophil count of ≥2% identifies a group of COPD patients with slower rates of decline in FEV1 when treated with ICS: prospective testing of this hypothesis is now warranted.

Implementing lessons learned from previous bronchial biopsy trials in a new randomized controlled COPD biopsy trial with roflumilast.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic inflammatory disease mediated by an array of inflammatory cells and mediators, but above all, CD8+ T-lymphocytes, macrophages and neutrophils are important players in disease pathogenesis. Roflumilast, a first-in-class, potent and selective phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor, reduces the rate of exacerbations in patients with a high risk of future exacerbations and has been shown to reduce inflammatory cells and mediators in induced sputum, a surrogate of airway inflammation. However, these anti-inflammatory effects are yet to be confirmed in another robust study directly assessing inflammatory markers in bronchial sub-mucosa. METHODS/DESIGN: An international, 16-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study investigating the effects of roflumilast 500 µg once-daily versus placebo on inflammatory parameters in bronchial biopsy tissue specimens, sputum and blood serum. One hundred and fifty patients with COPD and chronic bronchitis for at least 12 months will be recruited into the study and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either roflumilast or placebo. The primary endpoint will be the number of CD8+ cells (cell counts per mm2) in bronchial biopsy tissue specimens (sub-mucosa) and the key secondary endpoint will be the number of CD68+ cells (cell counts per mm2), assessed by indirect immunohistochemistry. DISCUSSION: It is hypothesized that treatment with roflumilast reduces the characteristic inflammation found in the airways of patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, compared with placebo. The design of the present study has built on the work of previous bronchial biopsy studies available in the literature. It is hoped that it will reveal the cellular mechanisms underlying the anti-inflammatory effects of roflumilast and identify potentially important biomarkers and other surrogate endpoints in patients with COPD. The design and rationale for this trial are described herein.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease?

Significant cardiac morbidity and mortality exists in patients with COPD. Shared risk factors include age, smoking history and exposure to air pollution and passive smoke. Although the inappropriate under-prescribing of ß-blockers contributes, it is now appreciated that the observed cardiac risk is not only due to smoking and conventional cardiovascular risk factors, but also other independent factors. A number of hypotheses exist for the increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality seen in COPD including inflammation, pulmonary hypertension, lung hyperinflation and shared genetics models. Mounting evidence from large randomised controlled trials suggests that COPD treatment may be cardio-protective. We review the current evidence supporting the aforementioned hypotheses and how their modulation may prevent cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in COPD. The persisting underdiagnosis of COPD may have significant consequences. Further mechanistic studies identifying the onset and impact of individual interventions will develop our understanding of this emerging and highly relevant clinical field.

Single maintenance and reliever therapy (SMART) of asthma: a critical appraisal.

The use of a combination inhaler containing budesonide and formoterol as both maintenance and quick relief therapy (SMART) has been recommended as an improved method of using inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta agonist (ICS/LABA) therapy. Published double-blind trials show that budesonide/formoterol therapy delivered in SMART fashion achieves better asthma outcomes than budesonide monotherapy or lower doses of budesonide/formoterol therapy delivered in constant dosage. Attempts to compare budesonide/formoterol SMART therapy with regular combination ICS/LABA dosing using other compounds have been confounded by a lack of blinding and unspecified dose adjustment strategies. The asthma control outcomes in SMART-treated patients are poor; it has been reported that only 17.1% of SMART-treated patients are controlled. In seven trials of 6-12 months duration, patients using SMART have used quick reliever daily (weighted average 0.92 inhalations/day), have awakened with asthma symptoms once every 7-10 days (weighted average 11.5% of nights), have suffered asthma symptoms more than half of days (weighted average 54.0% of days) and have had a severe exacerbation rate of one in five patients per year (weighted average 0.22 severe exacerbations/patient/year). These poor outcomes may reflect the recruitment of a skewed patient population. Although improvement from baseline has been attributed to these patients receiving additional ICS therapy at pivotal times, electronic monitoring has not been used to test this hypothesis nor the equally plausible hypothesis that patients who are non-compliant with maintenance medication have used budesonide/formoterol as needed for self-treatment of exacerbations. Although the long-term consequences of SMART therapy have not been studied, its use over 1 year has been associated with significant increases in sputum and biopsy eosinophilia. At present, there is no evidence that better asthma treatment outcomes can be obtained by moment-to-moment symptom-driven use of ICS/LABA therapy than conventional physician-monitored and adjusted ICS/LABA therapy.

Airway inflammation in patients with asthma with high-fixed or low-fixed plus as-needed budesonide/formoterol.

BACKGROUND: Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy maintains asthma control and reduces exacerbation frequency compared with higher fixed-dose combination regimens. Its effects on eosinophilic airway inflammation and structure are unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the effects of budesonide/formoterol 200/6 microg twice daily plus as-needed with budesonide/formoterol 800/12 microg twice daily on airway eosinophils and remodeling. METHODS: This 52-week, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind study of 127 asthma patients who were symptomatic despite therapy compared (1) the change between induced sputum percent eosinophils at baseline and the geometric mean of 4 on-treatment values and (2) the change in endobronchial biopsy eosinophil counts pre- and post-treatment. RESULTS: Mean daily doses of budesonide/formoterol were 604/18 microg in the maintenance and reliever therapy group and 1,600/24 microg in the high fixed-dose group. In the former, the geometric mean percent sputum eosinophils remained unchanged (1.6% to 1.9%), whereas biopsy specimen subepithelial eosinophils increased (6.2 to 12.3 cells/mm(2)). Sputum and biopsy eosinophil counts decreased with high fixed-dose treatment (2.2% to 1.2% and 7.7 to 4.8 cells/mm(2), respectively), resulting in significant treatment differences of 0.7% (ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.8; P = .0038) and 7.5 cells/mm(2) (ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.6-5.3; P < .001), respectively. There were no between-treatment differences in reticular basement membrane thickness, exhaled nitric oxide, exacerbation frequency, or FEV(1). CONCLUSION: Compared with fixed-dose combination treatment containing a 4-fold higher maintenance dose of budesonide, budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy is associated with higher eosinophil counts, but these remain within the range associated with stable clinical control.

Cigarette smoking alters bronchial mucosal immunity in asthma.

RATIONALE: Cigarette smoking worsens asthma and is associated with reduced response to corticosteroid therapy. As cigarette smoke is known to have immunomodulatory effects, we hypothesized that one mechanism by which smoking mediates its adverse effect is by reduction of the numbers of bronchial mucosal dendritic cells (DCs), which control B-cell growth and T-cell responses. OBJECTIVES: We set out to sample the bronchial mucosa in smoking and never-smoking patients with asthma and to count DCs, B cells, and cells expressing genes for two key T-lymphocyte regulatory cytokines. METHODS: Twenty-one never-smoker patients with asthma (6 steroid naive), 24 smoker patients with asthma (9 steroid naive), and 10 healthy never-smokers (control subjects) were recruited and their endobronchial biopsy samples were immunostained for detection of mature DCs (CD83(+)), Langerhans cells (CD1a(+)), B lymphocytes (CD20(+)), and helper T-cell type 1 (IFN-gamma) and helper T-cell type 2 (IL-4) cytokine-expressing cells. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The number (per square millimeter) of CD83(+) mature DCs was significantly lower in smoker patients with asthma (median [range]: 37 [0, 131]) in comparison with never-smoker steroid-naive and steroid-treated patients with asthma (76 [24, 464]; p = 0.006) or control subjects (85 [40, 294]; p = 0.004). Moreover, B cells were fewer in smoker (26 [4, 234]) versus never-smoker steroid-naive and steroid-treated patients with asthma (45 [10, 447]; p = 0.01) and in smoker steroid-naive patients with asthma (23 [4, 111]) versus control subjects (34 [10, 130]; p = 0.05). The number of cells expressing IFN-gamma showed a trend toward fewer in smoker (70 [6, 24]) versus never-smoker steroid-naive patients with asthma (144 [44, 323]; p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: There are important and statistically significant differences in the number of CD83(+) mature DCs and B cells in the large airways of smokers with asthma. We speculate that their reductions may render patients with asthma less responsive to corticosteroids and more susceptible to infection.

Antiinflammatory effects of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate in chronic obstructive lung disease.

RATIONALE: No currently available treatment is reported to reduce the exaggerated airway wall inflammation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. OBJECTIVES: We tested the hypothesis that inhaled combined long-acting beta2-agonist (salmeterol) and corticosteroid (fluticasone propionate) will reduce inflammation. METHODS: Bronchial biopsies and induced sputum were taken from 140 current and former smokers (mean age, 64 yr) with moderate to severe disease, randomized in a 13-wk double-blind study to placebo (n = 73) or salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/500 microg (n = 67) twice daily. Biopsies were repeated at 12 wk and sputa at 8 and 13 wk. After adjustment for multiplicity, comparisons between active and placebo were made for median change from baseline in the numbers of biopsy CD8+ and CD68+ cells/mm2 and sputum neutrophils. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Combination therapy was associated with a reduction in biopsy CD8+ cells of -118 cells/mm2 (95% confidence interval [CI], -209 to -42; p = 0.02), a reduction of 36% over placebo (p = 0.001). CD68+ cells were unaffected by combination treatment. Sputum differential (but not total) neutrophils reduced progressively and, at Week 13, significantly with combination treatment (median treatment difference, 8.5%; 95% CI, 1.75%-15.25%; p = 0.04). The combination also significantly reduced biopsy CD45+ and CD4+ cells and cells expressing genes for tumor necrosis factor-alpha and IFN-gamma and sputum total eosinophils (all p < or = 0.03). These antiinflammatory effects were accompanied by a 173-ml (95% CI, 104-242; p < 0.001) improvement in prebronchodilator FEV1. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate has a broad spectrum of antiinflammatory effects in both current and former smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, which may contribute to clinical efficacy.

Antiinflammatory effects of the phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor cilomilast (Ariflo) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Cilomilast (Ariflo), a new oral phosphodiesterase-4 selective inhibitor, improves lung function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We have evaluated its antiinflammatory effects in 59 patients with COPD randomized to receive cilomilast, 15 mg two times a day, or placebo for 12 weeks. Induced sputum differential cell counts were obtained at baseline and at five further visits. Interleukin-8 and neutrophil elastase were measured in sputum supernatant. Bronchial biopsies obtained at baseline and at Week 10 were immunostained and counted for neutrophils, CD8+ and CD4+ T-lymphocyte subsets, and CD68+ macrophages. Cells expressing the genes for interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha were identified by in situ hybridization and quantified. Compared with placebo, analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the change from baseline showed that cilomilast did not alter any sputum endpoint or FEV1. However, bronchial biopsies demonstrated that cilomilast treatment was associated with reductions in CD8+ (p = 0.001; ANOVA) and CD68+ cells (p < 0.05; ANOVA). In addition, by Poisson analysis, comparison of cell counts analyzed as a ratio of active to placebo demonstrated reductions of CD8+ (48% p < 0.01) and CD68+ (47% p = 0.001) cells. This is the first demonstration of reduction by any agent of airway tissue inflammatory cells characteristic of COPD. Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors represent a promising new class of substances for use in antiinflammatory treatment of this disease.

Safety of bronchoscopy, biopsy, and BAL in research patients with COPD.

BACKGROUND: Bronchoscopy with biopsy and BAL is being performed increasingly in patients with COPD as a research tool. Previous reports have shown these procedures to be safe in asthmatic patients, but there is little safety data specific to COPD. METHODS: We studied 57 patients with COPD (11 women and 46 men; median FEV(1), 1.2 L [range, 0.64 to 2.69 L]; percent predicted FEV(1), 44.5% [range, 25 to 74.8%]). Eleven patients had mild disease, 28 patients had moderate disease, and 18 patients had severe disease according to British Thoracic Society classification. Ninety-eight bronchoscopies were performed according to American Thoracic Society guidelines: 68 procedures with endobronchial biopsy and BAL and 30 procedures with biopsy alone. Controlled oxygen was administered via nasal cannula, and pulse oximetry and vital signs were monitored. RESULTS: Five adverse events occurred. One patient in the moderate-disease group had severe bronchospasm requiring 4 days of inpatient treatment. One patient in the severe-disease group had a pneumothorax requiring 7 days of inpatient treatment. There were three episodes of hemoptysis, two with pleuritic pain (in the BAL group) that settled without intervention. No deaths or prolonged morbidity were observed. We found a 2.0% incidence of adverse events requiring hospital treatment and a 3.1% incidence of minor hemoptysis requiring no intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Bronchoscopy, biopsy, and BAL can be performed safely in patients with COPD, including those with severe disease, provided careful assessment is performed and guidelines are adhered to.

The effects of inhaled fluticasone on airway inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a double-blind, placebo-controlled biopsy study.

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are effective in the treatment of asthma and markedly reduce the numbers of inflammatory cells in bronchial biopsies. However, the effect of ICS on the inflammatory profile of biopsies in smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is unknown. We have performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study to compare fluticasone propionate (FP) 500 microg twice daily via a dry powder inhaler and placebo (P) over a 3-month period in subjects with COPD. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy and bronchial biopsy was carried out at baseline and after the 3 months of treatment. Thirty-one subjects completed the trial and 30 paired biopsies were available for analysis. Compared with P (n = 14), subjects on inhaled FP (n = 16) had no significant reductions in the primary endpoints: CD8+, CD68+ cells, or neutrophils, considered to be of importance in COPD. However, there was a reduction in the CD8:CD4 ratio in the epithelium and of the numbers of subepithelial mast cells in the FP group. CD4+ cells were significantly raised in the P group in both subepithelium and epithelium. Symptoms significantly improved, and there were significantly fewer exacerbations in subjects on FP, compared to subjects on P. The data indicate that inhaled fluticasone does affect selected aspects of airway inflammation in COPD, and this may explain, in part, the decrease in exacerbations seen in long-term studies with fluticasone propionate.