Racial and ethnic disparities in access to minimally invasive gynecologic surgery for benign pathology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review current US literature and describe the extent, source, and impact of disparities that exist among Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) in surgical route and outcomes for hysterectomy, myomectomy, and endometriosis surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite the nationwide trend toward minimally invasive surgery (MIS), BIPOC women are disproportionally less likely to undergo MIS hysterectomy and myomectomy and have higher rates of perioperative complications. African American women, in particular, receive significantly disparate care. Contemporary literature on the prevalence of endometriosis in BIPOC women is lacking. Further, there is little data on the racial and ethnic differences in endometriosis surgery access and outcomes. SUMMARY: Racial and ethnic disparities in access to minimally invasive gynecologic surgery for benign pathology exist and these differences are not fully accounted for by patient, socioeconomic, or healthcare infrastructure factors. Initiatives that incentivize hiring surgeons trained to perform complex gynecologic surgery, standardized pathways for route of surgery, quality improvement focused on increased hospital MIS volume, and hospital-based public reporting of MIS volume data may be of benefit for minimizing disparities. Further, initiatives to reduce disparities need to address racism, implicit bias, and healthcare structural issues that perpetuate disparities.

A Clinically Applicable Prediction Model for the Risk of Transfusion in Women Undergoing Myomectomy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify the variables independently associated with intra/postoperative blood transfusion at the time of myomectomy. We further hoped to develop an accurate prediction model using preoperative variables to categorize an individual's risk of blood transfusion during myomectomy. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Not applicable to this study, which used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. PATIENTS: Women who underwent an open/abdominal or laparoscopic (robotic or conventional) myomectomy between 2014 and 2017 at participating ACS-NSQIP sites. INTERVENTION: The primary dependent variable was occurrence of intra/postoperative bleeding requiring blood transfusion. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, preoperative comorbidities, intraoperative variables, and additional 30-day postoperative outcomes were compared at the bivariable level. For the prediction-model development, only variables that can be reasonably known before surgery were included. Variables associated with intra/postoperative bleeding were entered into 2 separate multivariable logistic regression models. Validation of our prediction model was performed internally using 250 bootstrapped iterations of 50% subsamples drawn from the overall population of myomectomy cases from the ACS-NSQIP database. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We identified 6387 myomectomies performed during the defined study period. The most common race in our population was black/African American (45.7%), and most of the patients (57.5%) received an open/abdominal route of myomectomy. A total of 623 patients who underwent myomectomy (9.8%) experienced intraoperative/postoperative bleeding with a need for blood transfusion. At the bivariable level, we identified several variables independently associated with the need for blood transfusion at the time of myomectomy. In using only those variables that can be reasonably known before surgery to develop our prediction model, additional multivariable logistic regression elucidated black race, need for preoperative blood transfusion, planned abdominal/open route of surgery, and preoperative hematocrit value as independently associated with blood transfusion. CONCLUSION: We identified a number of perioperative variables associated with intraoperative or postoperative bleeding requiring blood transfusion at the time of myomectomy. We subsequently created a model that accurately predicts individual bleeding risk from myomectomy, using variables that are reasonably apparent preoperatively. Making this prediction model clinically available to gynecologic surgeons will serve to improve the care of women undergoing myomectomy.

Patterns of voiding following laparoscopic hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Clarify the normal patterns of voiding after minimally invasive hysterectomy. We also aim to identify perioperative factors associated with delayed time to void immediately following hysterectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study SELECTION: Women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy between September 2012 to October 2018 at a single academic university hospital. RESULTS: 450 minimally invasive hysterectomies were included in the final analysis, 274 (60.9%) robotically-assisted, and 176 (39.1%) conventional laparoscopy. The overall median postoperative time-to-void following a retrograde bladder filling of 150 mL normal saline was 179 min. Based on the 50th percentile of the distribution of the time-to-void, two groups were created. Demographic characteristics between the groups were similar, except those who were above the 50th percentile were more likely to be older, have a reported history of previous myomectomy, and had a longer postoperative PACU stay compared to those below or equal to the 50th percentile. The mean time-to-void following conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy was less than that of robotic surgery (187.3 vs 200.5 min) however the difference was not statistically significant (p=.22). The use of hydromorphone intraoperatively and the combination of oxycodone-acetaminophen postoperatively were more likely to be associated with the group of patients above the 50th percentile but there was no significant difference in perioperative utilization of median morphine milliequivalents (MME) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Following laparoscopic hysterectomy (either conventional or with robotic-assistance) with a retrograde bladder fill of 150 mL normal saline most patients will void within 4 h after surgery. This is consistent with historic data on normal voiding patterns facilitating safe same day discharge without prolonged time in the PACU.

Rates of anastomotic leak and fistula following surgical management of bowel endometriosis: a comparison of shaving, discoid excision, and segmental resection.

Endometriosis is a complex chronic inflammatory condition that can create a multitude of bothersome painful symptoms for women. Bowel endometriosis is often misdiagnosed or overlooked leading to years of suffering for many women. The surgical management of bowel endometriosis varies based on extent of disease as well as surgeon experience. Surgical treatment for bowel endometriosis is complex and a variety of intraoperative and postoperative complications must be considered. Two significant postoperative complications for bowel endometriosis include anastomotic leak and fistula formation. There is continued debate regarding the appropriate surgical treatment for bowel endometriosis. Aggressive surgery with segmental bowel resection is being utilized more cautiously, with an increase in less aggressive shaving or disc excision techniques. Historic beliefs regarding the limitations of shaving and disc excision are being challenged, and with a reduction in morbidity these less aggressive techniques are winning favor among gynecologic surgeons. Shaving, discoid excision, and segmental bowel resection are all feasible surgical management options for bowel endometriosis. Segmental resection is associated with the highest rates of both anastomotic leak and fistula formation, while shaving is associated with the lowest.

Reliability and Validity of 2 Surgical Prioritization Systems for Reinstating Nonemergent Benign Gynecologic Surgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Scientifically evaluate the validity and reproducibility of 2 novel surgical triaging systems, as well as offer modifications to the Medically-Necessary, Time-Sensitive (MeNTS) criteria for improved application in gynecologic surgeries. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic university hospital. PATIENTS: Ninety-seven patients with delayed benign gynecologic procedures owing to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. INTERVENTION(S): Surgical prioritization was assessed using 2 novel scoring systems, the Gynecologic Medically-Necessary Time-Sensitive (Gyn-MeNTS) and modified Elective Surgery Acuity Scale (mESAS) systems for all 93 patients included. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The interrater reliability and validity of 2 novel surgical prioritization systems (Gyn-MeNTS and mESAS) were assessed. The Gyn-MeNTS scores were calculated by 3 raters and analyzed as continuous variables, with a lower score indicating more urgency/priority. The mESAS score was calculated by 2 raters and analyzed as a 3-level ordinal variable with a higher score indicating more urgency/priority. All 5 raters were blinded to reduce bias. The Gyn-MeNTS interrater reliability was tested using Spearman r and paired t tests were used to detect systematic differences between raters. Weighted κ indicated mESAS reliability. Concurrent validity with mESAS and surgeon self-prioritization (SSP) was examined with Spearman r and logistic regression. Spearman r's for all Gyn-MeNTS rater pairs were above 0.80 (0.84 for 1 vs 2; 0.82 for 1 vs 3; and 0.82 for 2 vs 3, all p <.001) indicating strong agreement. The weighted κ for the 2 mESAS raters was 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.73) indicating moderate agreement. When used together, both scores were significantly independently associated with SSP, with strong discrimination (area under the curve, 0.89). CONCLUSION: Interrater reliability is acceptable for both scoring systems, and concurrent validity of each is moderate for predicting SSP, but discrimination improves to a high level when they are used together.