RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Family history of colorectal cancer (CRC) is used to stratify individuals into risk categories which determine timing of initial screening and ongoing CRC surveillance. Evidence for long-term CRC risk following a normal index colonoscopy in family history populations is limited. AIMS: To assess the incidence of advanced neoplasia and associated risk factors in a population undergoing surveillance colonoscopies due to family history of CRC. METHODS: Surveillance colonoscopy findings were examined in 425 individuals with a family history of CRC, a normal index colonoscopy and a minimum of 10 years of follow-up colonoscopies. Advanced neoplasia risk was determined for three CRC family history categories (near-average, medium and high-risk), accounting for demographics and time after the first colonoscopy. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 13.5 years (IQR 11.5-16.0), with an incidence of advanced neoplasia of 14.35% (61/425). The number of affected relatives and age of CRC diagnosis in the youngest relative did not predict the risk of advanced neoplasia (p > 0.05), with no significant differences in advanced neoplasia incidence between the family history categories (p = 0.16). Patients ≥ 60 years showed a fourfold (HR 4.14, 95% CI 1.33-12.89) higher advanced neoplasia risk during surveillance than those < 40 years at index colonoscopy. With each subsequent negative colonoscopy, the risk of advanced neoplasia at ongoing surveillance was reduced. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of advanced neoplasia was low (14.35%), regardless of the family history risk category, with older age being the main risk for advanced neoplasia. Delaying onset of colonoscopy or lengthening surveillance intervals could be a more efficient use of resources in this population.
RESUMO
Patients with ulcerative proctitis have favorable long-term outcomes but are typically excluded from ulcerative colitis clinical trials. Refractory proctitis presents a management conundrum for gastroenterologists, and there remains a lack of clarity as to the best therapeutic strategy. This study aimed to undertake a systematic review of studies assessing the clinical efficacy and safety of therapies for refractory proctitis. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE databases were searched without restriction from inception to October 27, 2022. Both interventional and noninterventional studies examining efficacy of therapeutic modalities for the induction and/or maintenance of remission in refractory proctitis were included. Included studies were grouped by therapeutic modalities as follows: (i) immunomodulators, (ii) monoclonal antibodies, (iii) topical calcineurin inhibitors, (iv) other topical therapies, and (v) appendicectomy. The search strategy identified 3301 studies, of which 13 met eligibility criteria for inclusion. Clinical remission rates for systemic therapies ranged from 20-26% for azathioprine to 50-69% for tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor therapies. The use of systemic therapies for proctitis raised safety concerns, with 22-37% of patients discontinuing therapies due to adverse effects across four retrospective cohort studies. Prospective clinical trials of topically applied tacrolimus demonstrated clinical remission rates of 42-46%, with a favorable safety profile. Substantial heterogeneity in study design precluded meta-analysis. Refractory ulcerative proctitis remains a neglected entity, with a dearth of prospective clinical trials to guide therapeutic decision-making. Current evidence supports a role for topically administered tacrolimus.