Quality, patient safety, and professional values.

From the time of Earnest Codman until recently, measuring and improving quality has variably been viewed as a supportive group in the hospital, or an irritating "fringe" movement in health care. A more thoughtful view of quality improvement (QI) is that it is a central tenet of surgical professionalism, and really what we signed up for when we accepted the responsibility of healing patients using surgery as our methodology. The following article uses a patient safety event to highlight the successful use of a well-known method of improving care, while engaging trainees in the principles of physician engagement, accountability, and professionalism.

One hospital, one appendectomy: The cost effectiveness of a standardized doctor's preference card.

PURPOSE: Appendicitis in children provides a unique opportunity to explore changes that reduce variation, reduce cost, and improve value. In this study we sought to evaluate the effectiveness of standardization of surgical technique and intraoperative disposable device utilization for laparoscopic appendectomy among all surgeons at a tertiary children's hospital. METHODS: All 6 surgeons at our tertiary children's hospital agreed to standardize to a single technique of performing a laparoscopic appendectomy. We collected data on all pediatric patients who had a laparoscopic appendectomy following implementation of the uniform doctor's preference card (DPC) (March 1, 2013 to February 28, 2014) and compared them to a historical control group. RESULTS: Implementation of the uniform DPC decreased the device cost per appendectomy from $844.11 to $305.32. Operative times (skin incision to skin closure) were 34.8 minutes prior to the uniform DPC and 37.0 minutes using the uniform DPC. There were no significant differences in postappendectomy outcomes. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that implementation of a uniform DPC and technical standardization for laparoscopic appendectomy can significantly reduce cost. Furthermore, this can occur without dramatically increasing operative times, length of stay, or postoperative complications.

A dynamic postoperative protocol provides efficient care for pediatric patients with non-ruptured appendicitis.

PURPOSE: Postoperative management of pediatric patients with non-ruptured appendicitis is highly variable and often includes an overnight stay in the hospital. We implemented a criteria-based postoperative protocol designed to eliminate postoperative antibiotics and facilitate timely discharge by utilizing the bedside nurse to evaluate for readiness for discharge. METHODS: We collected data on all patients with non-ruptured appendicitis at our institution following protocol implementation (May 1, 2012 to April 30, 2013) and compared them to a control group. RESULTS: 580 patients were treated for non-ruptured appendicitis (285 prior protocol, 295 new protocol). Following implementation of our protocol, there was an overall reduction in length of stay from 40.1 (SD 27.5) to 23.5 (SD 20.8)h, and total cost of care per patient also decreased from $5783 (SD $2501) to $4499 (SD $1983) (p<0.001). There was no change in hospital readmission rate (1.1% prior protocol, 1.4% new protocol) or postoperative abscess rate (0.8% prior protocol, 0.3% new protocol). CONCLUSION: Our new protocol reveals the value of eliminating postoperative antibiotics and leveraging the continuous availability of the bedside nurse in the determination of readiness for discharge.

Response-based therapy for ruptured appendicitis reduces resource utilization.

PURPOSE: We examined the effectiveness of a postoperative ruptured appendicitis protocol that eliminated Pseudomonas coverage and based the duration of IV antibiotic treatment and length of hospital stay on the patient's clinical response. METHODS: In our new protocol, IV antibiotics were administered until the patient met discharge criteria: adequate oral intake, pain control with oral medications, and afebrile for 24h. We collected data on all patients with ruptured appendicitis at our institution following protocol implementation (May 1, 2012, to April 30, 2013) and compared them to a control group. RESULTS: 306 patients were treated (154 prior protocol, 152 new protocol). The new clinical response-based protocol led to a decrease in hospital stay from 134h (SD 66.1) to 94.5h (SD 61.7) (p<0.001) and total cost of care per patient also decreased from $13,610 (SD $6859) to $9870 (SD $5670) (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our clinical response-based protocol for pediatric patients with ruptured appendicitis decreased LOS, cost, and IV antibiotics use without significant changes in adverse events.