Management of refractory atrial fibrillation post surgical ablation.

Over the past two decades, invasive techniques to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) including catheter-based and surgical procedures have evolved along with our understanding of the pathophysiology of this arrhythmia. Surgical treatment of AF may be performed on patients undergoing cardiac surgery for other reasons (concomitant surgical ablation) or as a stand-alone procedure. Advances in technology and technique have made surgical intervention for AF more widespread. Despite improvements in outcome of both catheter-based and surgical treatment for AF, recurrence of atrial arrhythmias following initial invasive therapy may occur.Atrial arrhythmias may occur early or late in the post-operative course after surgical ablation. Early arrhythmias are generally treated with prompt electrical cardioversion with or without antiarrhythmic therapy and do not necessarily represent treatment failure. The mechanism of persistent or late occurring atrial arrhythmias is complex, and these arrhythmias may be resistant to antiarrhythmic drug therapy. The characterization and management of recurrent atrial arrhythmias following surgical ablation of AF are discussed below.

Ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest due to 5-fluorouracil cardiotoxicity.

The antimetabolite chemotherapeutic agent 5-fluorouracil is used to treat a variety of cancers. Although 5-fluorouracil is generally well tolerated, its toxicity profile includes potential cardiac ischemia, vasospasm, arrhythmia, and direct myocardial injury. These actual or potential toxicities are thought to resolve upon cessation of the medication; however, information about the long-term cardiovascular effects of therapy is not sufficient. We present the case of a 58-year-old man who had 2 ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrests, with evidence of coronary vasospasm and myocarditis, on his 4th day of continuous infusion with 5-fluorouracil. External defibrillation and cessation of the 5-fluorouracil therapy resolved the patient's electrocardiographic abnormalities. In addition to reporting the clinical manifestations of 5-fluorouracil-associated cardiotoxicity in our patient, we discuss management challenges in patients who develop severe 5-fluorouracil-induced ventricular arrhythmias.

Severity of esophageal injury predicts time to healing after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The delivery of radiofrequency (RF) energy to the posterior left atrium creates a risk of injury to the adjacent esophagus. Esophageal endoscopy (EGD) is used to screen patients at risk for esophageal thermal injury after RF ablation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the macroscopic features of the severity of esophageal injuries induced by RF ablation to the left atrium as seen by EGD and evaluate the association of these descriptions with the time elapsed until complete healing. METHODS: This study analyzed 219 patients undergoing RF ablation for atrial fibrillation. Esophageal temperature probes were used during each ablation, and EGD was performed in cases with intraesophageal temperature ≥39°C. Repeat EGD was obtained at 10 days to evaluate for healing in all cases demonstrating esophageal injury. Serial endoscopies were repeated every 2 weeks until complete healing was documented. Lesions were classified according to severity as superficial or deep ulceration; size and shape were also noted. RESULTS: We found 37.4% of patients (82 of 219) with esophageal intraluminal temperatures ≥39°C. Of these, 22 patients (27%) were identified with esophageal injury, with 68% being superficial ulcerations and 32% deep. On repeat EGD at 10 days, only 29% of deep ulcerations were healed, as compared with 87% of the superficial injuries (P = .0136). No difference in healing was found when analyzed for size or shape. CONCLUSIONS: The macroscopic severity of esophageal lesions detected on endoscopy the day after RF ablation can predict the time to resolution, with severe, deep ulcerations requiring a longer time to heal.

Pulmonary vein isolation with complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation for paroxysmal and nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is recognized as a potentially curative treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). Ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) in addition to PVI has been advocated as a means to improve procedural outcomes, but the benefit remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study sought t synthesize the available data testing the incremental benefit of adding CFAE ablation to PVI. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing the effect of PVI with CFAE ablation vs. PVI alone in patients with paroxysmal and nonparoxysmal AF. RESULTS: Of the 481 reports identified, 8 studies met our inclusion criteria. There was a statistically significant increase in freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (AT) with the addition of CFAE ablation (relative risk [RR] 1.15, P = .03). In the 5 reports of nonparoxysmal AF (3 randomized controlled trials, 1 controlled clinical trial, and 1 trial using matched historical controls), addition of CFAE ablation resulted in a statistically significant increase in freedom from AT (n = 112 of 181 [62%] for PVI+CFAE vs. n = 84 of 179 [47%] for PVI alone; RR 1.32, P = .02). In trials of paroxysmal AF (3 randomized controlled trials and 1 trial using matched historical controls), addition of CFAE ablation did not result in a statistically significant increase in freedom from AT (n = 131 of 166 [79%] for PVI+CFAE vs. n = 122 of 164 [74%] for PVI alone; RR 1.04, P = .52). CONCLUSION: In these studies of patients with nonparoxysmal AF, addition of CFAE ablation to PVI results in greater improvement in freedom from AF. No additional benefit of this combined approach was observed in patients with paroxysmal AF.