Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Magy Seb ; 65(2): 44-51, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Húngaro | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22512878

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is still one of the great challenges in gastro-intestinal surgery. According to recent studies, intravenously administered glutamine with total parenteral nutrition may be beneficial in the prevention of infectious complications and may reduce mortality rate. However, it has not been investigated yet, whether i.v. glutamine is able to achieve the same effect with early enteral nutrition as well. OBJECTIVES: The objective of our prospective randomized double-blind study was to explore the effects of intravenously administered glutamine with early nasojejunal nutrition in severe acute pancreatitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients with severe acute pancreatitis (with a Glasgow score at least 3 and/or a CRP level above 150 mg/ml on admission) were randomized into two groups. Group Glutamine (n = 24) was given 0.5 g/kg/die glutamine intravenously, while the control group (n = 21) received normal amino acid solution in the same quantity for 7 days. Nasojejunal nutrition was introduced 48 hours after admission in case of all patients, and their management was the same in every other aspect, too. The primary end-points of the study were the rate of pancreas-specific infectious complications and organ failure, and the secondary end-points were the necessity for radiological and surgical interventions, length of hospital stay and mortality rate. RESULTS: In group Glutamine, infected acute peripancreatic fluid collections (APFC) were detected in 4 patients, 2 patients had post-necrotic pancreatic/peripancreatic fluid collections (PNPFC), 2 patients had infected pseudocysts and 2 patients had walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN). Ten patients were cured by ultrasound assisted puncture or drainage successfully. No surgical intervention was necessary. In the control group, 4 patients had infected APFC, 2 patients had infected PNPFC, infected pseudocysts and infected WOPN were diagnosed in 3 cases. Radiological intervention was effective in 9 cases, but 3 patients needed surgery. Three patients died of multi-organ failure, thus the mortality rate of the control group was 14%, while the mortality rate of the Glutamine group was zero. The mean hospital stay of the Glutamine group was 10.6 days, which is significantly shorter than the mean hospital stay of the control group, which was 15.9 days (p = 0.00104). DISCUSSION: The results of the Glutamine group are better in every end-points, however, statistically significant difference was detected in one parameter only, the length of hospital stay.


Assuntos
Nutrição Enteral , Glutamina/administração & dosagem , Tempo de Internação , Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Método Duplo-Cego , Drenagem , Feminino , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Intubação Gastrointestinal , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos , Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/complicações , Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/radioterapia , Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Punções , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção
3.
Hepatogastroenterology ; 53(70): 603-7, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16995471

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Infected pancreatic necrosis diagnosed by fine needle aspiration (FNA) is generally considered an indication for surgery. Percutaneous drainage can postpone surgical intervention and in some cases can even have a therapeutic effect. Furthermore, targeted antibiotic therapy alone, based on bacterial cultures from FNA, can result in a full recovery. A retrospective analysis was carried out on the various treatment modalities of infected pancreatic necrosis. METHODOLOGY: Eighty patients with infected pancreatic necrosis were treated in the Department of Surgery, Teaching County Hospital, Györ, Hungary between 1998 and 2003. Seventy-four patients required surgical intervention, 12 of which underwent prior ultrasound or CT-guided drainage. RESULTS: In patients with previous percutaneous drainage the average time to first surgical intervention was 30 days (n=12). However, in those patients who did not undergo percutaneous drainage the time to initial surgical intervention was 15.6 days. This was statistically significant (p = 0.001). There was a full recovery in 3 out of the 15 patients, who underwent percutaneous drainage. This figure of 20% corresponds with that in the published literature. Three of the total 80 patients studied made a complete recovery when treated with targeted antibiotic therapy alone and did not require further radiological or surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that percutaneous drainage can postpone surgical intervention. Furthermore, we demonstrate that percutaneous drainage alone can lead to full recovery in selected cases. In addition, targeted antibiotic therapy based on FNA may result in the complete recovery of a stable patient without requiring radiological or surgical intervention.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Drenagem/métodos , Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biópsia por Agulha Fina , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/cirurgia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia
4.
Magy Seb ; 58(3): 167-72, 2005 Jun.
Artigo em Húngaro | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16167470

RESUMO

This is a retrospective study about 80 patients treated for infected necrosis of the pancreas between 1998-2003. Operation was performed in 74 patients, diagnosis was achieved by CT or U.S. guided drainage in 12 patients. In further 6 patients drainage and antibiotic therapy provided cure. In patients who were drained pre-operatively (n=12) the first surgical intervention was performed on average on the 30.2 days after admission, while in the group of patients without drainage surgery became necessary after 15.6 days. The difference is statistically significant (p = 0.001). Our data proved that in certain cases percutaneous drainage can delay surgical intervention. Our results also prove that percutaneous drainage itself can lead to complete cure. In our own practice this stands for about 20% of our patients. In 3 patients we proved that if the patients general condition is stable infected necrosis detected by fine needle aspiration can be successfully treated by antibiotic therapy, without surgical or further radiological intervention.


Assuntos
Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Drenagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/diagnóstico , Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Pancreatite Necrosante Aguda/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA