Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Sociol Health Illn ; 38(7): 1151-66, 2016 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27260997

RESUMO

This study uses conversation analysis to explore 'candidate obstacles', a practice observed in sequences of patient resistance to lifestyle advice within health professional consultations. This article presents illustrative analyses of selected data excerpts drawn from audio-visual recordings of 116 tracked consultations between health professionals and 34 patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus in New Zealand. The analysis shows that in consultations where health promotion activities are central, patient resistance can provide space for patients to identify obstacles to their compliance with lifestyle advice. Identifying candidate obstacles provides opportunities for health professionals to align advice with concerns of patients and potentially improve patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/dietoterapia , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Cooperação do Paciente , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Adulto , Comunicação , Feminino , Promoção da Saúde , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nova Zelândia , Pesquisa Qualitativa
2.
Qual Health Res ; 25(3): 397-407, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25281239

RESUMO

Little research has been undertaken on the actual decision-making processes in cancer care multidisciplinary meetings (MDMs). This article was based on a qualitative observational study of two regional cancer treatment centers in New Zealand. We audiorecorded 10 meetings in which 106 patient cases were discussed. Members of the meetings categorized cases in varying ways, drew on a range of sources of authority, expressed different value positions, and utilized a variety of strategies to justify their actions. An important dimension of authority was encountered authority-the authority a clinician has because of meeting the patient. The MDM chairperson can play an important role in making explicit the sources of authority being drawn on and the value positions of members to provide more clarity to the decision-making process. Attending to issues of process, authority, and values in MDMs has the potential to improve cancer care decision making and ultimately, health outcomes.


Assuntos
Tomada de Decisão Clínica/métodos , Processos Grupais , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Neoplasias/terapia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Humanos , Nova Zelândia , Pesquisa Qualitativa
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA