The Long-Term Outcome of Kidney Transplant Recipients in the Eighth Decade Compared With Recipients in the Seventh Decade of Life.

BACKGROUND: With the aging of the population, more older patients are being considered for kidney transplantation; therefore, it is crucial to evaluate the risks and benefits of transplantation in this population. This study aimed to assess long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation in a cohort of patients who underwent kidney transplantation at age >70 years, compared with patients aged 60 to 69 years at transplantation. METHODS: Included in the study were 261 consecutive kidney transplant recipients: 52 were aged >70 years, and 209 were aged 60 to 69 years at transplantation. Data were collected retrospectively and analyzed using multivariate logistic regression to identify potential outcome risk factors. RESULTS: The number of transplants in both groups increased during the study period. Mortality after transplantation was strongly correlated to age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.11; 95% CI, 1.05-1.18; P < .001), deceased donor (HR = 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.8; P = .034), and pretransplant diabetes (HR = 2.9; 95% CI, 1.7-4.9; P = .001). Recipients aged >70 years had an increased risk of death censored graft failure (HR = 2.98; 95% CI, 1.56-5.74; P = .001). In living donor transplants, 3-year survival was 80% in recipients age >70 years, compared with 98% in the 60- to 69-year group. Five-year survival was 71% and 92%, respectively. In deceased donor transplants, 3-year survival was 63% and 78%, and 5-year survival was 58% and 72%, respectively. The risk of malignancy (excluding nonmelanotic skin cancer) was nearly triple in the age >70 years group (HR = 2.96; 95% CI, 1.3-6.8; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Patient and graft survival in kidney recipients in the eighth decade is worse compared with recipients in the seventh decade of life. However, it is improved with living kidney donation.

Inhaled Exosomes Genetically Manipulated to Overexpress CD24 (EXO-CD24) as a Compassionate Use in Severe ARDS Patients.

RATIONALE: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a major global health concern with a significant unmet need. EXO-CD24 is delivered via inhalation-reduced cytokines and chemokine secretion and lung injury in ARDS and improved survival in mice models of ARDS, influenza, and sepsis. OBJECTIVES: This clinical paper aims to evaluate the potential of EXO-CD24, a novel immunomodulatory treatment, in the compassionate care of critically ill, intubated patients with post-infection-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: Eleven critically ill patients diagnosed with post-infection ARDS (10 with COVID-19 and one with an adenovirus-associated infection) were administered EXO-CD24 in four medical centers across Israel. The patients had multiple co-morbidities, including cancer, hypertension, diabetes, and ischemic heart disease, and met the criteria for severe ARDS according to the Berlin classification. EXO-CD24 was administered via inhalation, and adverse events related to its use were carefully monitored. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The administration of EXO-CD24 did not result in any recorded adverse events. The median hospitalization duration was 11.5 days, and the overall mortality rate was 36%. Notably, patients treated at the Tel Aviv Medical Center (TASMC) showed a lower mortality rate of 12.5%. The WBC and CRP levels decreased in comparison to baseline levels at hospitalization, and rapid responses occurred even in patients with kidney transplants who were off the ventilator within a few days and discharged shortly thereafter. The production of cytokines and chemokines was significantly suppressed in all patients, including those who died. Among the patients at TASMC, four had kidney transplants and were on immunosuppressive drugs, and all of them fully recovered and were discharged from the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: EXO-CD24 holds promise as a potential therapeutic agent for all stages of ARDS, even in severe intubated cases. Importantly, EXO-CD24 demonstrated a favorable safety profile without any apparent side effects with promising efficacy. Furthermore, the potential of EXO-CD24 as a platform for addressing hyper-inflammatory states warrants exploration. Further research and larger-scale clinical trials are warranted to validate these preliminary findings.

Humoral Response to the Third Dose of Sars-Cov-2 Vaccine in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Most solid organ transplant recipients did not develop an appreciable serologic response after 2 doses of the mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. METHODS: We analyzed the humoral response after a third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine in 130 kidney transplant recipients, compared to 48 health care workers, and associated factors, including prevaccine cellular immune response, by evaluating intracellular cytokine production after stimulation of donor's peripheral blood mononuclear cells. RESULTS: After 2 doses, most of the controls (47 out of 48, 98%) and only 40% of kidney recipients (52 of 130) kidney recipients were seropositive (P < .001). Most seronegative recipients developed a serologic response after the booster (47 out 78, 60%), thus bringing the total number of seropositive recipients to 99 out of 130 (76%). After the third dose, there was a significant increase in antibodies titers in both groups. Decreased humoral response was significantly associated with an older age, lower lymphocyte count, and a lower level of antibodies before booster administration. CD4+TNFα+ and CD4+INFγ+ were correlated with mean increase in antibody titers. CONCLUSIONS: A third dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in kidney recipients is safe and effectively results in increased IgG anti-S levels, including in individuals who were seronegative after 2 doses. Long-term studies of the length of the immune response and protection are required.

The effect of a third-dose BNT162b2 vaccine on anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels in immunosuppressed patients.

OBJECTIVES: The recent surge in coronavirus disease 2019 cases led to the consideration of a booster vaccine in previously vaccinated immunosuppressed individuals. However, the immunogenic effect of a third-dose severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine in immunosuppressed patients is still unknown. METHODS: This was an observational cohort study of 279 previously vaccinated immunosuppressed patients followed at a single tertiary hospital in Israel. Patients were administered a third dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2) between July 14 and July 21, 2021. Levels of IgG antibodies against the spike receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 were measured 3 to 4 weeks after vaccination. RESULTS: Of the cohort of 279 patients, 124 (44.4%) had haematologic malignancies, 57 (20.4%) had rheumatologic diseases, and 98 (35.1%) were solid organ-transplant recipients. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels increased in 74.9% of cases. Across the entire cohort, the median absolute antibody levels (expressed in AU/mL) increased from 7 (interquartile range (IQR), 0.1-69) to 243 (IQR, 2-4749) after the booster dose. The response significantly varied across subgroups: The transplant cohort showed the greatest increase in absolute antibody levels (from 52 (IQR, 7.25-184.5) to 1824 (IQR, 161-9686)), followed by the rheumatology (from 22 (IQR, 1-106) to 1291 (IQR, 6-6231)) and haemato-oncology (from 1 (IQR, 0.1-7) to 7.5 (IQR, 0.1-407.5)) cohorts. The χ2 test was 8.30 for difference in fold change (p = 0.016). Of the 193 patients who were seronegative at baseline, 76 became seropositive after vaccination, corresponding to a 39.4% (95% CI, 32.8%-46.4%) seroconversion rate. Transplant patients had the highest seroconversion rate (58.3% (95% CI, 44.3%-71.2%)), followed by rheumatology (44.1% (95% CI, 28.9%-60.5%)) and haemato-oncology (29.7% (95% CI, 22%-38.8%); χ2 = 11.87; p = 0.003) patients. DISCUSSION: A third dose of BNT162b2 is immunogenic in most immunosuppressed individuals, although antibody response may differ based on the type of disease and immunosuppression. The antibody level that correlates with protection is still unknown; thus, future studies are needed to evaluate clinical outcomes.

Cutaneous Malignancies After Kidney and Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantations.

BACKGROUND: Organ transplant recipients are at increased risk of nonmelanotic skin cancers (NMSC). Scarce data exist regarding secondary malignancies developing post-simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantations. Our aim was to assess long-term risk of skin cancers among kidney alone (KA) and SPK transplantation recipients. METHODS: In this study, 521 patients who underwent KA or SPK transplantation at our medical center were observed up by dedicated nephrologists and dermatologists. SPK transplantation recipients were matched with a control group of KA transplantation recipients based on demographic and clinical data. A multivariate analysis was performed to find independent cancer risk factors. RESULTS: Patients who developed skin cancer were generally older, had a fair skin type, and had a higher incidence of NMSC before transplantation. Older age and fair skin type were independent risk factors on multivariate analysis. SPK transplantation in itself was not an independent risk factor. Cancer recurrence was associated with older age and male sex. Darker skin type and lowered immunosuppressive burden were protective. CONCLUSION: In contrast to previous studies, the use of antithymocytic agents or SPK transplantation were not independently associated with increased skin cancer risk in this multivariate analysis. These findings emphasize the complex interplay between posttransplantation NMSC and various clinical and epidemiologic risk parameters.

Normal-range albuminuria in healthy subjects increases over time in association with hypertension and metabolic outcomes.

Albuminuria is a prognostic factor for mortality and cardiovascular events, even at low levels. Changes in albumin excretion are associated with end-stage renal disease and hypertension (HTN) in cohorts including high-risk participants. We aimed to investigate the evolvement of albumin excretion in healthy individuals with normal kidney function and normoalbuminuria, and possible associations with HTN and metabolic outcomes. The study cohort consisted of 1967 healthy adults with normal kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m2; urine albumin to creatinine ratio [ACR] < 30 mg/g). Delta ACR slope was calculated as ACR difference between two consecutive visits divided by the time interval. During a mean follow-up period of 93.8 months, mean delta ACR slope was 0.27 ± 3.29 mg/g/year and was higher in participants with age >40 years, obesity, a high waist circumference, higher baseline ACR, HTN, prediabetes, and metabolic syndrome. Delta ACR slopes in the upper quartile predicted diabetes (OR = 1.31, P = .027) and albuminuria (4.34, P < .001). Upper quartile of ACR slopes correlated with a higher risk for new-onset HTN (1.249, P = .031). Delta systolic and diastolic blood pressures were associated with ACR slopes in addition to age, body mass index, and baseline ACR. In conclusion, accelerated change in ACR correlates with HTN and diabetes in healthy individuals with normal kidney function and normoalbuminuria.

Early and late presentations of graft arterial pseudoaneurysm following pancreatic transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Graft pseudoaneurysm (PSA) following pancreatic transplantation (PT) is a rarely reported complication that has significant morbidity and mortality. Few case reports and small series of this complication exist. METHODS: Retrospective review of files of 106 patients who underwent PT at the Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical center between 1995 and 2010. Accessible asymptomatic patients (n = 35) were referred for graft PSA screening using ultrasound-Doppler. RESULTS: Eight patients developed graft PSA (8 %). All had early posttransplant sepsis. PSA incidence among patients who had perioperative sepsis is 13 %. Three patients developed early postoperative PSA, presenting as massive abdominal bleeding requiring urgent laparotomy and graft resection. Five patients were diagnosed with late-onset graft PSA between 3 months and 11 years posttransplant: clinical presentations were massive gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 2), acute renal failure (n = 1), and asymptomatic finding on screening ultrasound-Doppler (n = 2, 6 % of screened patients). CONCLUSIONS: PSA following PT occurs in 8 % of patients. Perioperative infection is a risk factor. Early PSAs present as massive intra-abdominal bleeding. PSA may develop years posttransplant, may be asymptomatic, but late rupture is possible and presents as gastrointestinal bleeding. We recommend screening of patients at risk with ultrasound Doppler for early detection and treatment of asymptomatic PSAs.