Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Haematol ; 106(2): 148-157, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32989806

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Emerging treatments for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (rrMM) have led to increasing options for many patients. This study aimed to assess changes in utilization of these options in Germany with a focus on modern triplet regimens including new agents, such as carfilzomib, ixazomib, elotuzumab and daratumumab, and to evaluate whether this had an impact on rrMM-related outcomes over time. METHODS: The study population consisted of 1255 rrMM patients who were assigned to one of the following 6 treatment groups: immunomodulatory drug (IMiD)-based doublets, proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based doublets, daratumumab monotherapy, PI-IMiD-based triplets, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs)-based triplets, or other treatment. RESULTS: Use of triplet-based therapy regimens increased from 5.9% in 2014 to 31.4% in 2017. In parallel, use of IMiD-based doublets decreased from 74.3% in 2014 to 37.6% in 2017. Over the same time period, the risk of death decreased by 32% and the risk of hospitalization which was reduced by 30%. The risk for serious adverse events remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Between 2014 and 2017, the use of triplet-based therapy regimens for rrMM in Germany has significantly increased and this was associated with a significant decline in deaths and hospitalizations without an increased incidence of serious adverse events.


Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Terapia Combinada , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Gerenciamento Clínico , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Feminino , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiplo/epidemiologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Razão de Chances , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Eur J Health Econ ; 21(9): 1351-1361, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32654072

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In Germany, several triplet therapies for treating relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (rrMM) patients have recently been approved. While most of them are administered intravenously, ixazomib-based combination is the only orally bioavailable regimen. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a 1-year and 3-year budget impact analysis (BIA) of different novel triplets to treat patients with rrMM in second or subsequent therapy lines accounting for costs covered by German statutory health insurance (SHI). METHODS: A 3-state partitioned survival model (PSM) was developed to evaluate the budget impact of the following regimens: carfilzomib plus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (KRd), elotuzumab plus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (ERd), daratumumab plus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (DRd), and ixazomib plus lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (IRd). The analysis included direct medical costs such as drug acquisition, comedication and preparation for parenteral solutions, drug administration and other 1-time costs, adverse event management costs and direct non-medical costs, such as transportation costs. RESULTS: Based on current drug market shares in German healthcare market, the estimated costs after 1 year of treatment was €551 million (KRd), €163 million (ERd), €584 million (DRd), and €95 million (IRd). The total budget impact of €1393 million is mainly driven by drug acquisition and subsequent therapy costs. CONCLUSION: Among the regimens of interest, the oral-based therapy regimens offered cost advantages over intravenous-based therapy regimens. The higher overall costs of intravenous therapy regimens were attributed primarily to higher drug acquisition costs.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Mieloma Múltiplo , Administração Intravenosa , Administração Oral , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/economia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Alemanha , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiplo/economia , Recidiva
3.
Transplant Proc ; 52(10): 3103-3111, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32493677

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus is an established immunosuppressant in renal transplantation with antineoplastic and antiviral features, but side effects like proteinuria limit its use. The aim of this retrospective multicenter observational study is to define predictors for determining which patients most likely benefit from a sirolimus-based therapy. METHODS: All patients from 10 German centers that were switched to a sirolimus-containing maintenance immunosuppression in 2000 to 2008 after 3 months or later post-transplantation were enrolled (n = 726). Observation times after switching to sirolimus ranged from 4 days to 9 years (median: 24.3 months). With multinomial logistic regression, risk factors for the endpoints terminal graft failure and withdrawal of sirolimus therapy compared to successful therapy were identified. RESULTS: Successful sirolimus therapy was observed in 304 patients. Forty patients died with functioning graft. Therapy failures included graft loss (n = 106) and sirolimus-discontinuation for various reasons (n = 276). Successful sirolimus-use was predicted in 83% and graft failure in 65%, whereas prediction of deliberate sirolimus-discontinuation was poor (48%). Most favorable results for sirolimus-use were observed in patients switched in 2006 to 2008. Using ROC analysis, an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 32 mL/min was shown to be the cut-off in patients withdrawing from therapy as a result of renal reasons, as well as in patients with graft loss. Proteinuria above 151 mg/L was shown to be predictive for patients with graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: eGFR and proteinuria are the major determinants for successful sirolimus-therapy. Our findings help stratifying patients who will benefit most from this therapy and avoid toxicities in patients without potential benefits for this therapy.


Assuntos
Terapia de Imunossupressão/efeitos adversos , Terapia de Imunossupressão/métodos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Rim , Sirolimo/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA