Efficacy of embolic protection devices in renal artery stenting.

The efficacy of embolic protection devices (EPDs) have been studied extensively in coronary saphenous vein grafts and extra cranial cerebrovascular disease. Recent ex-vivo and in-vivo renal artery stenting studies suggest atheroembolism is not unique to the coronary and cerebrovascular domain and it seems intuitive, renal EPDs may be beneficial. In an attempt to better understand the current objective evidence regarding renal protection efficacy we systematically reviewed the contemporary literature and summarize the findings herein. There is increasing observational data suggesting the use of embolic protection devices decrease the risk of continued decline in renal function after renal artery stenting. There is also prospective randomized data to suggest that the use of adjuvant IIb/IIIa glycoprotein inhibitor and embolic protection has synergistic benefit, but this is a very small series. However, there are currently no well controlled prospective trials to conclude the added risk and expense of renal protection is countered by proven clinical benefit. Based on the literature compiled in this manuscript we do believe EPDs should be considered in some high-risk patients.

Transcatheter therapy for the treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis.

UNLABELLED: The preemptory challenge in this invited review was to provide a contemporary evidence-based analysis of how renal artery intervention effects renal function and hypertension while also addressing the efficacy in transplanted kidneys. The authors tailored the paper architecture in a way that provides a systematic review of the randomized and observational data relating to the impact of renal stenting in each of these clinical domains. When appropriate the authors include data from their experience with over 1 200 renal stent procedures. This contemporary literature review provides objective insight into the procedural risk and early outcomes following renal intervention based on observational study RESULTS: However, well-controlled randomized trials and standardization of interventional technique with or without embolic protection is desperately needed.

Comparative study of operative treatment and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stenting for recurrent carotid disease.

PURPOSE: This study is a nonrandomized parallel comparison of the outcome for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)/stenting for recurrent carotid artery stenosis (RCS). METHODS AND PATIENTS: Between June 1996 and June 2000, 83 carotid procedures (58 reoperations, Group I, and 25 PTA/stentings, Group II) were done for RCS. Patients were followed at regular intervals with duplex ultrasound scanning. The outcome of the stented group (Group II) was divided into early experience (Group IIA, first 12 cases) and late experience (Group IIB, last 13 cases) for learning curve consideration, and each was compared with the reoperation group. A Kaplan-Meier life table analysis was used to estimate the stroke-free survival rates and freedom from > or =50% recurrent restenosis for both groups. RESULTS: The demographic and clinical characteristics and indications for intervention were similar for both groups. The mean time from the original CEA to reoperation was 41 months in Group I versus 43 months in Group II. Overall, stenting had higher 30-day stroke rates than reoperations-16% (3 major and 1 minor stroke) versus 3.4% (1 out of 2 [1.7%] was a major stroke, P <.05). However, Group IIB had similar major stroke rates to Group I (0% versus 1.7%). Cranial nerve injury was noted in 10 patients (17%) in Group I (only 1 [1.7%] was permanent) versus 0% in Group II (P <.05). Recurrent > or =50% restenosis was higher in Group II than in Group I (24% versus 0%, P <.001). Stroke-free survival rates at 6 months and 1, 2, and 3 years for Group I were 97%, 97%, 94%, and 82%, respectively, versus 79%, 79%, 79%, and 79%, respectively, for Group II (P =.059). Freedom from recurrent > or =50% restenosis rates at 6 months and 1, 2, and 3 years were 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively, for Group I versus 100%, 94%, 65%, and 44%, respectively, for Group II (P <.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Carotid PTA/stenting has a similar 30-day stroke rate to that of reoperation for RCS once experience is established. However, PTA/stenting has a higher incidence of restenosis than reoperation, which is associated with a percentage of cranial nerve injuries. Therefore, PTA/stenting can be an alternative to reoperation, particularly in marginal surgical risk patients.

Continued benefit of lovastatin in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia in 36 patients.

After one year of treatment, low-dose (20 mg/d) lovastatin achieved continued efficacy without tachyphylaxis in 36 patients with Type IIa or IIb hyperlipoproteinemia. Six week and one year reductions in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were significant at 33% and 31% in these patients respectively; reductions in total cholesterol were also significant at 25% and 22% respectively. Increases in high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) were 6% at six weeks and 10% at one year; triglycerides were reduced 16% and 11% respectively. The cholesterol lowering effects were similar for males and females (23% and 21% respectively). Low-dose lovastatin (20 mg/d) is a good choice for reducing cholesterol in patients with primary Type IIa or IIb hyperlipoproteinemia refractory to diet therapy because it is effective in lowering LDL-cholesterol, while raising HDL-cholesterol with few side effects and without tachyphylaxis.

The use of Gianturco-Roubin flexible metallic coronary stents in old saphenous vein grafts: in-hospital outcome and 7 day angiographic patency.

After placement of a Gianturco-Roubin metallic, coiled coronary stent(s) following balloon angioplasty (PTCA), a pre-discharge (7 day) angiogram determined the patency of the old coronary bypass vein graft(s) (SVG) (> or = 5 years remote from their last surgery, mean age: 8.5 +/- 1.8 years). Metallic, coiled stents were successfully deployed in 95/96 (99%) patients within 100/101 (99%) SVGs. The indications for deployment were threatened [81 patients (84%)] or acute [15 patients (16%)] vein graft closure following PTCA. Intragraft urokinase infusion was performed in 17 patients (17%) [6 patients with baseline occlusions; 11 with abrupt closure post PTCA]. Complications encountered included three (3%) in-hospital deaths (two procedure related) two (2%) Q wave myocardial infarctions, six (6%) non-Q wave myocardial infarctions, and 22 (22%) bleeding problems. These included, not mutually exclusively, 21 (22%) requiring transfusions, six (6%) cases of gastrointestinal bleeding, six (6%) pseudoaneurysms, five (5%) retroperitoneal haemorrhages and two (2%) cerebrovascular accidents. All patients received dipyridamole, aspirin, dextran, and anticoagulation (heparin 10-20,000 U intra-procedurally); a heparin infusion was continued for 5 +/- 1 days, despite warfarin administration which attained a therapeutic prothrombin time (PT) (1.5-2 times control) by 3 +/- 1 days. Out of the 95 successfully treated patients, six with eight stented grafts were ineligible for pre-discharge angiography. Of the six, three died in hospital (four SVGs), one had an intracerebral haemorrhage (one SVG), and two were asymptomatic patients with chronic renal failure (three SVGs).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effectiveness of low-dose lovastatin in lowering serum cholesterol. Experience with 56 patients.

This study reviews the progress of 56 consecutive patients with type IIa and IIb hyperlipoproteinemia following treatment with lovastatin. Lovastatin, a potent inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase, has been shown to have a cholesterol-lowering effect in doses ranging from 10 to 80 mg/d. Thus far, however, no large study has been performed to show the effectiveness of low-dose lovastatin (20 mg/d) for more than a 6-week duration. Fifty-six patients with known coronary artery disease were prospectively studied, with fasting lipid values being measured at baseline and after 6, 12, 18, and 24 weeks of 20-mg/d lovastatin therapy given as a single evening dose. The total cholesterol level fell 26% from a mean baseline of 8.12 mmol/L (314 mg/dL) and triglyceride levels fell by 12% from a mean baseline of 2.46 mmol/L. The high-density lipoprotein levels increased 7.6%. One patient with known preexisting liver disease was withdrawn from the study owing to an asymptomatic significant rise in liver function test results; one subject complaining of proximal muscle weakness was also withdrawn. The maximal decrease in total cholesterol level occurred within 6 weeks of initiation of therapy. We conclude that low-dose (20-mg/d) lovastatin was effective in lowering serum cholesterol levels in patients with primary type IIa or IIb hyperlipoproteinemia with minimal short-term side effects. Further studies are needed to establish the long-term safety and effectiveness of this drug.

Xanthelasma: clinical indicator of decreased levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

The fasting plasma lipid and lipoprotein levels were measured prospectively in 41 consecutive patients with xanthelasma seen over a four-year period. The study group included 25 women and 16 men with mean ages of 60 and 56 years, respectively. Each patient had clinical evaluation for medications or illnesses that might affect plasma lipid levels before entry into the study. The most striking lipid abnormality was the preponderance of decreased levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). In 94% of the study population, HDL-C values were less than the mean values of the age-matched reference population. For men the mean HDL-C level was 30.8 mg/dl (vs 45 mg/dl in the reference population, P less than .001); for women the mean HDL-C level was 33 mg/dl (vs 50 mg/dl, P less than .001). The total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, and triglyceride levels of those in the study were not significantly different from those of the patients in the reference population. Evaluation of cardiac risk based solely on HDL-C levels showed 80% of the study population to have three to four times the average risk. This study points out the high probability of decreased HDL-C levels in patients with xanthelasma. Since the level of HDL-C has been shown to be inversely related to the incidence of cardiovascular disease, it may be prudent to evaluate HDL-C levels and do a thorough cardiovascular evaluation in patients with xanthelasma.