Depression and associated factors among Brazilian adults: the 2019 national healthcare population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Mental disorders represent a major public health challenge worldwide, affecting 80% of people living in low- and middle-income countries. Depression, a mental disorder, is a chronic disease of long duration that causes changes in the brain, resulting from a combination of genetic, physiologic, environmental, and behavioral factors. The aim of this study was to investigate possible factors associated with depression in Brazilian adults. METHODS: A population-based, cross-sectional study was carried out using the public domain database of the 2019 National Health Survey, conducted in Brazil. Depression was considered the dependent variable, and through hierarchical analysis, predictor variables were investigated such as, at the distal level-socioeconomic variables, at the intermediate level-variables related to lifestyle behavior, health condition, and history, and at the proximal level-demographic variables. Logistic regression analysis was used to obtain the adjusted Odds Ratio and the respective 95% confidence interval to identify possible factors associated with depression. RESULTS: The study included 88,531 participant records with 10.27% diagnosed with depression. The adjusted association measurements, after selecting the independent variables in the hierarchical analysis, showed the following factors associated with depression with differing magnitudes: age, brown and white race/skin color, female sex, poor, very poor, or regular self-reported health condition, diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, work-related musculoskeletal disorder, history of smoking habit, and macroeconomic region. CONCLUSIONS: An effective strategy for preventing and managing depression in Brazilian adults must include the control of health status and lifestyle behavior factors, with actions and programs to reduce people's exposure to these factors, understanding that socioeconomic-demographic differences of each population can potentially reduce the disease burden.

Prevalência de anemia em gestantes das Américas: uma revisão rápida com metanálise / Prevalence of anemia in pregnant women in the Americas: a rapid review with meta-analysis

A anemia em gestantes é um relevante problema de ampla expansão geográfica, típica de grandes centros urbanos que atinge diversos países, como os da América. Estimar a prevalência nas Américas de anemia materna e anemia ferropriva em gestantes.Revisão rápida com busca no Medline, via PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, Lilacs e Open Grey. Incluíram-se estudos do tipo transversal, que estimassem a prevalência de anemia materna e anemia ferropriva. Foram realizadas metanálises com efeito randômico. 5.148 artigos foram encontrados, apenas 39 atenderam aos critérios de elegibilidade. As metanálises apresentaram prevalência de 30% (IC95%: 28%; 32%. I2: 99,4%) para anemia materna e frequência de 32% (IC95%: 25%; 40%. I2: 96,6%) para anemia ferropriva.Anemia materna é um evento frequente na população das Américas, com 30% para anemia materna e 32% para anemia ferropriva, destacando a necessidade de medidas de prevenção e promoção à saúde mais eficazes.

Anemia in pregnant women is a relevant problem of wide geographical expansion, typical of large urban centers and that affects several countries, such as America. To estimate the prevalence of maternal anemia and iron deficiency anemia in pregnant women in the Americas.Rapid review with search in Medline, Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, Lilacs and Open Grey databases. Cross-sectional studies that estimated the prevalence of maternal anemia and iron deficiency anemia were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. 5148 articles were found, only 30 met the eligibility criteria. Meta-analyses showed a prevalence of 30% (95%CI: 28%; 32%. I2: 99.4%) for maternal anemia and a frequency of 32% (95%CI: 25%; 40%. I2: 96.6%) for iron deficiency anemia. Maternal anemia is a frequent event in the population of the Americas, with prevalence of 30% for maternal anemia and 32% for iron deficiency anemia, highlighting the need for more effective prevention and health promotion measures.

Periodontite materna e baixo peso ao nascer: revisão sistemática e metanálise / Maternal periodontitis and low birth weight: systematic review and meta-analysis

Resumo Evidências recentes apontam para a influência de processos inflamatórios periodontais na ocorrência de baixo peso ao nascer. Embora muitos estudos empregaram métodos robustos de investigação, ainda não existe consenso sobre o tópico. Analisar sistematicamente a relação entre a periodontite materna e o baixo peso ao nascer. A busca por estudos foi realizada até abril de 2019. Os delineamentos de estudos incluídos foram coorte e caso-controle que estimaram a associação entre a periodontite e o baixo peso ao nascer, sem limite quanto ao idioma ou data da publicação. Análise de heterogeneidade dos estudos, análises de subgrupo e metanálises com modelo de efeitos randômicos foram realizadas. Foram estimadas as medidas de associação sumária por meio da Odds Ratio bruta e ajustada, com respectivos intervalos de confiança a 95%. A inspeção visual de gráficos foi empregada para avaliar viés de publicação. Um total de 21 artigos foram identificados e todos foram selecionados para a metanálise. O modelo final aponta que a periodontite em gestantes se associou ao baixo peso ao nascer (ORbruta=2,13; IC95%=1,60-2,83; I2=80,0% e ORajustada=2,64; IC95%=2,04-3,42; I2=17,4%). Gestantes com periodontite podem ter mais que o dobro de probabilidade de terem filhos com baixo peso ao nascer.

Abstract Recent evidence points to the influence of periodontal inflammatory processes on the occurrence of low birth weight. Although many studies employed robust investigation methods, there is still no general agreement on the relationship between maternal periodontitis and low birth weight. The search for studies was conducted until April 2019. The studies included cohort and case-control studies that estimated the association between periodontitis and low birth weight, with no restriction on language or date of publication. Analysis of the heterogeneity of studies, subgroup analyses and meta-analyses with a random effects model were performed. Summary association measurements were estimated using the crude and adjusted Odds Ratio, with respective 95% confidence intervals. Visual inspection of graphs was used to assess publication bias. A total of 21 articles were identified, all of which were selected for the meta-analysis. The final model indicates that periodontitis in pregnant women was associated with low birth weight (ORgross=2.13; CI95%=1.60-2.83; I2=80.0% and ORadjusted=2.64; CI95%=2.04-3.42; I2=17.4%). Pregnant women with periodontitis may be more than twice as likely to have low birth weight babies.

An accuracy study of the clinical diagnosis of periodontitis in pregnant women.

BACKGROUND: There exists a diverse range of criteria used in epidemiological studies for the diagnosis of periodontitis. The results from these studies should be evaluated with consideration to the diagnostic criteria used, and this may account for differences between studies especially in some population groups such as pregnant females. The objective is to evaluate the diagnostic criteria used in a variety of epidemiologic studies of periodontitis in pregnant females. METHODS: An accuracy study with cross-sectional design was performed out from a database of 671 pregnant females, using six different sets of criteria for the diagnosis of periodontitis. Women were classified for periodontitis, as follows: Center for Disease Control and Prevention/American Academy of Periodontology (CDC/AAP, 2012 criterion), the gold standard, Gomes-Filho et al.(2018) criterion, Albandar et al.(2007) criterion, Bassani et al.(2007) criterion, López et al.(2002) criterion, and Nesse et al.(2008) criterion. For comparison amongst the gold standard and the other criteria, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratio were determined. RESULTS: The frequency of periodontitis ranged from 25.0% to 90.2%. The Bassani et al. (2007) criterion was found to be more sensitive among the studies, and thus more suitable for diagnostic screening studies. Gomes-Filho et al.(2018), Albandar et al. (2007), López et al. (2002), and Nesse et al. (2008) criteria were considered more specific, which makes them more useful for studies of periodontitis with the aim of using diagnosis for confirmation of disease. CONCLUSIONS: A variation in the occurrence of periodontitis was observed. The criterion must be chosen according to the research aims and population characteristics.