Fetal and Neonatal Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with Biologics Taken During Pregnancy by Women with Autoimmune Diseases: Insights from an Analysis of the World Health Organization Pharmacovigilance Database (VigiBase®).

INTRODUCTION: Published data on the safety of biologics other than tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors during pregnancy are limited. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to detect pharmacovigilance signals for fetal and neonatal adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to biologics taken by pregnant women with autoimmune diseases. METHODS: We performed a disproportionality analysis of the World Health Organization's VigiBase® pharmacovigilance database from 1968 to June 1, 2021. Data were collected in June 2021. By using terms for different hierarchical levels of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, we selected the following fetal or neonatal ADRs: stillbirth, premature birth, low birth weight, small for gestational age, and congenital malformations. The frequency of all identified ADRs for biologics of interest (adalimumab, infliximab, golimumab, certolizumab, etanercept, anakinra, canakinumab, tocilizumab, sarilumab, ustekinumab, guselkumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, belimumab, abatacept, and rituximab) was compared with that of all other reports for all other drugs and quoted as the reporting odds ratio (ROR) [95% confidence interval]. Reports with known concomitant use of teratogenic drugs were excluded from the main analysis. Other analyses included ROR stratifications by therapeutic indication in the periods 1968-2021 and 2001-2021, and an analysis after excluding reports with steroids. RESULTS: In the main analysis, the RORs were particularly high for musculoskeletal malformations with anakinra (7.18 [3.50-14.73]), canakinumab (19.54 [12.82-29.79]), and abatacept (5.09 [2.77-9.33]), and for immune system disorders with canakinumab (347.88 [217.9-555.50]) and rituximab (9.27 [2.95-29.15]). After the exclusion of reports with steroids, the ROR was significant for neonatal infections with belimumab (28.49 [5.75-141.25]). CONCLUSION: We identified possible associations with some adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes, suggesting that vigilance is required when prescribing certain biologics during pregnancy.

Prognostic factors of Pasteurella infections: a single-center retrospective cohort study over a 14-year period (2005-2018).

BACKGROUND: Pasteurella spp. can lead to fatal infections in humans. OBJECTIVE: To assess prognostic factors of invasive pasteurellosis. METHODS: We conducted a single retrospective cohort study of local versus invasive Pasteurella infections from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2018, in the Amiens-Picardie University Hospital, France. RESULTS: Forty-five (20.9%) invasive pasteurellosis and 22 (10.2%) complicated local infections were reported among a total of 215 Pasteurella infections. The mortality rate among invasive infections was 22.2% (10/ 45) whereas no death was recorded in local infections group. Non-drug-induced prothrombin time test <70% of standard and platelet counts <100,000/mm3 were more frequent in non-survivors than in survivors (p=0.005 and p=0.019) in univariate analyses. A history of neoplasia (adjusted OR=13.62, p=0.020), an evidence of bacteremia (adjusted OR=20.68, p=0.025), and hemoglobin level <10 g/dL (adjusted OR=17.80, p=0.028) were identified as poor prognostic factors in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: Invasive pasteurellosis appears as a serious disease in vulnerable patients, particularly if bacteremia and/or coagulopathies occur.

COVID-19 in DMARD-treated patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases: Insights from an analysis of the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database.

BACKGROUND: To determine whether the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is linked to the risk of COVID-19 among patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). METHODS: We performed a disproportionality analysis of the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database between January 1, 2020, and June 10, 2020. The frequency of COVID-19 reports for all DMARD classes identified was compared with that for all other reports for all other drugs and quoted as the reporting odds ratio (ROR) (95% confidence interval [CI]). RESULTS: Among 980,446 individual case-safety reports voluntarily recorded in the database, 398 identified COVID-19 in DMARD-treated patients with IRDs. There were 177 (44.5%) patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 120 (30.1%) with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), 93 (23.4%) with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and 8 (2.0%) with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Most of the cases of COVID-19 occurred in patients taking anti-TNF agents (84.2%), resulting in a significant disproportionality signal (ROR [95% CI]: 8.31 [7.48-9.23]) - particularly in patients with RA, AS or PsA. A significant inverse disproportionality was found for the anti-IL-6 agent tocilizumab (ROR [95% CI]: 0.12 [0.02-0.88]) and JAK inhibitors (ROR [95% CI]: 0.33 [0.19-0.58]) in patients with RA - suggesting that these two drug classes are safer in the context of RA. CONCLUSION: Our results are in line with the literature on a potentially better safety profile for anti-IL-6 agents and JAK inhibitors. The WHO pharmacovigilance data suggest that COVID-19 is significantly more frequent in patients with IRDs treated with TNF inhibitors.

Associations between dysbiosis-inducing drugs, overall survival and tumor response in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data on the effects of dysbiosis-inducing drugs, and especially antibiotics (ATBs), on clinical outcomes in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). There is a particular lack of data for patients with melanoma. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective study of the associations between ATBs and other drugs known to modify the gut microbiota (proton pump inhibitors, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, statins, opioids, anti-vitamin K, levothyroxine, vitamin D3, antiarrhythmics, metformin and phloroglucinol), overall survival (OS) and tumor response in consecutive cancer patients (particularly those with melanoma) treated with an ICI (ipilimumab, nivolumab or pembrolizumab) over a 9-year period. RESULTS: A total of 372 patients were included. The mean ± standard deviation age was 64.0 ± 12.1 years. The most frequently prescribed ICI was nivolumab (in 58.3% of patients) and the most frequent indications were lung cancer (44.6%) and melanoma (29.6%). Overall, 112 patients (30.1%) had received ATBs. ATB use was associated with (1) shorter OS in the study population as a whole [adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.38 (1.00-1.90), p = 0.048] and in patients with melanoma [adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI): 2.60 (1.06-6.39), p = 0.037], and (2) a lower response rate in the study population as a whole [8.1%, versus 31.1% in patients not treated with ATBs; adjusted odds ratio (95% CI): 6.06 (2.80-14.53), p < 0.001] and in patients with melanoma [adjusted odds ratio (95% CI): 4.41 (1.04-22.80), p = 0.045]. Sensitivity analyses that minimized the indication bias did not reveal an association between OS and the presence of an infection requiring ATBs (quantified as the severity of infection, hospitalization for an infection, or ICI discontinuation). Other dysbiosis-inducing drugs were not associated with a difference in OS. CONCLUSION: Unlike other dysbiosis-inducing drugs, ATBs were associated with poorer clinical outcomes in ICI-treated patients overall and in the subset of patients with melanoma.

Impact of the corticosteroid indication and administration route on overall survival and the tumor response after immune checkpoint inhibitor initiation.

BACKGROUND: Based on their indications, systemic corticosteroids appear to negatively affect clinical outcomes in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-treated patients. There are few data on the influence of topical and inhaled corticosteroids on the ICIs' effectiveness. METHODS: In a single-center study, we retrospectively investigated the impact of systemic corticosteroids according to their indication [an immune-related adverse event (irAE) or another indication] on overall survival (OS) and the tumor response in all consecutive patients after initiation of ipilimumab, nivolumab or pembrolizumab over a 9-year period. The impacts of topical and inhaled corticosteroids were also examined. RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy-two patients were included. The mean ± standard deviation age was 64.0 ± 12.1 years. The most frequently prescribed ICI was nivolumab (in 58.3% of the patients) and the most frequent indications were lung cancer (44.6%) and melanoma (29.6%). Systemic corticosteroid use for an irAE did not have a negative impact on OS [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] 1.04 (0.56-1.95), p = 0.902] or the best overall tumor response [adjusted odds ratio (OR) (95% CI) 1.69 (0.52-6.56), p = 0.413], while systemic corticosteroid use for another indication was associated with shorter OS [adjusted HR (95% CI) 1.34 (1.05-2.03), p = 0.046] and a poor best overall tumor response [adjusted OR (95% CI) 2.04 (1.07-5.80), p = 0.039] with a cumulative dose cut-off of 3215 mg prednisolone equivalent (specificity 71.4%; sensitivity 65.3%) and a time cut-off of 132 days (specificity 71.4%; sensitivity 89.8%). The use of topical corticosteroids was associated with a longer OS; this was probably due to dermatological irAEs. Inhaled corticosteroid use did not influence OS. CONCLUSION: Systemic corticosteroid use for an irAE does not impact OS or the tumor response, whereas use for other indications (themselves often associated with a worse prognosis) does. Topical and inhaled steroids do not have a negative impact on OS.

Rheumatic and musculoskeletal disorders induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: Consequences on overall survival.

OBJECTIVES: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) frequently induce immune related adverse events (irAEs) that may be associated with more favorable clinical outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the impact of all types of rheumatic adverse events (AEs) on overall survival (OS) and tumor response in patients treated with ICIs. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective observational study to analyze the OS and tumor response in patients receiving ICIs who experienced a rheumatic AE compared to those who did not experience any AE. RESULTS: From December 2010 to September 2018, 264 patients with any cancer type were included. Forty-three patients (16.3%) presented with at least one rheumatic AE. The median OS of patients with rheumatic AEs was significantly higher than that of patients without AEs, with 132 weeks (95% CI [69.3-not reached]) and 42.7 weeks (95% CI [25.6-not reached]), respectively (P<0.01). This result remained significant after multivariate analysis (HR 0.54, 95% CI [0.30-0.97], P<0.05). Also, tumor response was better in patients with rheumatic AEs. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of rheumatic AEs in patients treated with ICIs is associated with better survival and tumor response. Therefore, it seems essential to detect rheumatic AEs as early as possible to allow rapid and optimal management, given the long-term response potential of these patients.

Evaluation of Changes Over Time in the Drug Burden and Medication Regimen Complexity in ESRD Patients Before and After Renal Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Medication regimen complexity (MRC) has not been characterized in detail in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The objective of the present study was to quantify changes over time in the prescription drug burden and MRC in patients with ESRD (before transplantation, on discharge after kidney transplantation [M0], and 4 months [M4] and 12 months [M12] afterward). METHODS: We retrospectively studied adult patients having undergone kidney transplantation. The number and types of drug prescribed, the pill burden, and the MRC index (MRCI) at 4 different time points (before transplantation, M0, M4, and M12) were extracted from the patients' medical records. MRCI was calculated by adding each drug score (calculated according to its formulation, dosing frequency, and additional instructions concerning administration). Hence, the MRCI took account of all prescription drugs. A logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with an elevated MRCI at M12. RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) age of the 354 study participants was 52 years (42-62). Respectively 21%, 42%, 53%, and 38% of the patients were taking 10 or more drugs before transplantation and at M0, M4, and M12. At M12, the 3 most frequently prescribed drug classes were immunosuppressants, cardiovascular system drugs, and drugs acting on the alimentary tract and metabolism. The pill burden and MRCI before transplantation were significantly lower (P < 0.001) than at each time point after transplantation. Diabetes and dyslipidemia were independently associated with an elevated MRCI at M12. CONCLUSION: In kidney transplant recipients, the drug burden and MRCI were greater at all time points after transplantation than before transplantation. The impact of the drug burden and MRC on medication adherence and clinical outcomes in these patients requires further evaluation.

The drugs that mostly frequently induce gynecomastia: A national case - noncase study.

AIMS: Drug-induced gynecomastia accounts for up to 25% of cases of gynecomastia. The objective of the present study was to provide a comprehensive overview of drug-induced gynecomastia on the basis of spontaneously reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the French national pharmacovigilance database (FPVD). METHODS: We performed a case - noncase study of drug-induced gynecomastia. Cases corresponded to reports of gynecomastia recorded in the FPVD between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2015. The noncases corresponded to all other spontaneously reported ADRs recorded in the FPVD during the same period. Data were expressed as the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and its 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Of the 255,354 ADRs recorded in the FPVD between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2015, 327 (0.31%) of relevant cases of gynecomastia and 106,800 noncases were analyzed. The RORs were statistically significant for 54 active compounds mentioned 429 times in cases of gynecomastia. A single drug was involved in 59% of cases. The most frequently implicated drug classes were antiretrovirals (23.5%), diuretics (15.5%), proton pump inhibitors (11.9%), HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (9.1%), neuroleptics and related drugs (6.5%), calcium channel blockers (6.3%), and 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (4%). CONCLUSIONS: A comprehensive analysis of a national pharmacovigilance database highlighted the main drug classes suspected of inducing gynecomastia. A physiopathological mechanism (a hormone imbalance with elevated estrogen levels) is known or suspected for most of the drugs involved in gynecomastia. However, we noticed a lack of harmonization in the summary of product characteristics for original vs. generic medicines.

Acute kidney injury associated with febuxostat and allopurinol: a post-marketing study.

BACKGROUND: For patients with recurrent flares of gout, tophi, urate crystal arthropathy, and renal stones, urate-lowering therapies (ULTs, including allopurinol and febuxostat) are the first-line treatment. Due to the widespread use of these ULTs (especially in patients with impaired renal function), assessment of the associated renal risk is essential. Accordingly, we performed a disproportionality analysis of reported cases of acute renal failure (ARF) associated with allopurinol and febuxostat. METHODS: We carried out a case/non-case study of the World Health Organization's VigiBase® pharmacovigilance database between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2018. The frequency of reports of ARF as a standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities query for allopurinol and febuxostat was compared with that of all other reports for the two drugs and quoted as the reporting odds ratio (ROR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]. The results' stability was assessed in a series of sensitivity analyses (notably after the exclusion of putative competing drugs). RESULTS: Among 3509 "suspected drug" notifications for febuxostat and 18,730 for allopurinol, we identified respectively 317 and 1008 cases of ARF. Acute renal failure was reported significantly more frequently for febuxostat and allopurinol than for other drugs (ROR [95%CI] 5.67 [5.05-6.36] and 3.25 [3.05-3.47], respectively). For both drugs, the ROR was higher in women than in men, respectively 11.60 [9.74-13.82] vs. 3.14 [2.69-3.67] for febuxostat and 4.45 [4.04-4.91] vs. 2.29 [2.11-2.50] for allopurinol. The sensitivity analyses confirmed the disproportionality for these two ULTs. CONCLUSIONS: Acute renal failure was reported respectively 5.7 and 3.3 times more frequently for febuxostat and for allopurinol than for other drugs. Due to the potential consequences of ARF, physicians should take account of this disproportionality signal when prescribing the ULTs febuxostat and allopurinol.

Statin-induced myasthenia: A disproportionality analysis of the WHO's VigiBase pharmacovigilance database.

BACKGROUND: Statins have been linked to myasthenia gravis (MG) in recent case reports. However, MG is not currently listed as an adverse drug reaction (ADR) in the summary of product characteristics. METHODS: We performed case/noncase analyses in VigiBase® (the World Health Organization international database of suspected ADR) to identify a signal of MG (expressed as the reporting odds ratio [ROR] and its 95% confidence interval [CI]) for statins. RESULTS: A total of 3967 reports mentioned MG. Of these, 169 were suspected to be statin-induced. A disproportionality signal was found for MG and statins use (ROR [95%CI] = 2.66 [2.28-3.10]). CONCLUSIONS: The present disproportionality analysis revealed a possible drug safety signal linking MG and statins. This potential signal is weak, and is offset by the cardiovascular benefits of statins. Clinicians should be aware of this potential ADR, because it may require consideration of statin withdrawal or treatment of MG.

Ischaemic colitis associated with intravitreal administration of aflibercept: A first case report.

In patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD), the intravitreal injection of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents reduces disease progression and choroidal neovascularization. We report on a first case of ischaemic colitis associated with intravitreal injection of the anti-VEGF agent aflibercept in an 80-year-old female patient. Conservative treatment resulted in a favourable clinical outcome. The anti-VEGF agent was discontinued, and the symptoms did not recur. Although the intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF agents has not previously been linked to the occurrence of ischaemic colitis, consideration of aflibercept's pharmacological properties and the chronological relationship between the administration of this anti-VEGF agent and the occurrence of this systemic adverse event are strongly suggestive of a causal relationship in the present case. Although systemic complications have been rarely associated with intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents, physicians should be aware that novel adverse events can still occur in AMD patients treated with anti-VEGF agents.