Adeno-Associated Viral Vector Integration: Implications for Long-Term Efficacy and Safety.

Adeno-associated viral vector (AAV) gene therapy provides a promising platform for treatment of monogenic inherited disorders. Clinical studies have demonstrated long-term expression with reduction in bleeding using this approach for the treatment of hemophilia. Despite these advances, there are unknowns surrounding the natural history of recombinant AAV (rAAV) vectors and the cellular mechanisms mediating vector persistence. These unknowns underpin questions regarding long-term efficacy and safety. The predominant mechanism via which AAV is proposed to persist is in circular double-stranded extrachromosomal DNA structures (episomes) within the nucleus. Studies of wild-type (WT-AAV) and rAAV have demonstrated that AAV also persists via integration into a host cell's DNA. It is important to determine whether these integration events can mediate expression or could result in any long-term safety concerns. WT-AAV infection affects a large proportion of the general population, which is thought to have no long-term sequelae. Recent studies have highlighted that this WT-AAV has been detected in cases of acute hepatitis in children and in a minority of cases of hepatocellular carcinoma. Integration following treatment using rAAV has also been reported in preclinical and clinical studies. There have been variable reports on the potential implications of integration for rAAV vectors with data in some murine studies demonstrating recurrent integration with development of hepatocellular carcinoma. These findings have not been seen in other pre-clinical or clinical studies. In this review, we will summarize current understanding of the natural history of AAV (wild-type and recombinant) with a focus on genomic integration and the cellular implications.

Vector integration and fate in the hemophilia dog liver multiple years after AAV-FVIII gene transfer.

ABSTRACT: Gene therapy using adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors is a promising approach for the treatment of monogenic disorders. Long-term multiyear transgene expression has been demonstrated in animal models and clinical studies. Nevertheless, uncertainties remain concerning the nature of AAV vector persistence and whether there is a potential for genotoxicity. Here, we describe the mechanisms of AAV vector persistence in the liver of a severe hemophilia A dog model (male = 4, hemizygous; and female = 4, homozygous), more than a decade after portal vein delivery. The predominant vector form was nonintegrated episomal structures with levels correlating with long-term transgene expression. Random integration was seen in all samples (median frequency, 9.3e-4 sites per cell), with small numbers of nonrandom common integration sites associated with open chromatin. No full-length integrated vectors were found, supporting predominant episomal vector-mediated long-term transgene expression. Despite integration, this was not associated with oncogene upregulation or histopathological evidence of tumorigenesis. These findings support the long-term safety of this therapeutic modality.

Application of in-vitro-cultured primary hepatocytes to evaluate species translatability and AAV transduction mechanisms of action.

Recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) is an effective platform for therapeutic gene transfer; however, tissue-tropism differences between species are a challenge for successful translation of preclinical results to humans. We evaluated the use of in vitro primary hepatocyte cultures to predict in vivo liver-directed AAV expression in different species. We assessed whether in vitro AAV transduction assays in cultured primary hepatocytes from mice, nonhuman primates (NHPs), and humans could model in vivo liver-directed AAV expression of valoctocogene roxaparvovec (AAV5-hFVIII-SQ), an experimental gene therapy for hemophilia A with a hepatocyte-selective promoter. Relative levels of DNA and RNA in hepatocytes grown in vitro correlated with in vivo liver transduction across species. Expression in NHP hepatocytes more closely reflected expression in human hepatocytes than in mouse hepatocytes. We used this hepatocyte culture model to assess transduction efficacy of a novel liver-directed AAV capsid across species and identified which of 3 different canine factor VIII vectors produced the most transgene expression. Results were confirmed in vivo. Further, we determined mechanisms mediating inhibition of AAV5-hFVIII-SQ expression by concomitant isotretinoin using primary human hepatocytes. These studies support using in vitro primary hepatocyte models to predict species translatability of liver-directed AAV gene therapy and improve mechanistic understanding of drug-drug interactions.

Gene therapy for hemophilia: Current status and laboratory consequences.

Since the cloning and characterization of the factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX genes in the mid-1980s, gene therapy has been perceived as having significant potential for the treatment of severe hemophilia. Now, some 35 years later, these proposals are close to being realized through the licensing of the first clinical gene therapy product. Adeno-associated viral vector-mediated gene therapy for hemophilia A and B has been extensively investigated in preclinical models over the past 20 years, and since 2011, there has been increasing evidence in early phase clinical trials that this therapeutic strategy can provide safe and effective rescue of the hemostatic phenotype in severe hemophilia. As the uptake of hemophilia gene therapy progresses, it is clear that many aspects of the gene therapy process require crucial laboratory support to ensure safe and effective outcomes from his new therapeutic paradigm. These laboratory contributions extend from evaluations of the gene therapy vehicle, assessments of the patient immune status for the vector, and ultimately the performance of assays to determine the hemostatic benefit of the gene therapy and potentially of its long-term safety on the host genome. As with many aspects of past hemophilia care, the safe and effective delivery of gene therapy will require an informed and coordinated contribution from laboratory science.

Advances and challenges for hemophilia gene therapy.

Hemophilia is an X-linked inherited bleeding disorder, resulting from defects in the F8 (hemophilia A) or F9 (hemophilia B) genes. Persons with hemophilia have bleeding episodes into the soft tissues and joints, which are treated with self-infusion of factor VIII or IX concentrates. Hemophilia provides an attractive target for gene therapy studies, due to the monogenic nature of these disorders and easily measurable endpoints (factor levels and bleed rates). All successful, pre-clinical and clinical studies to date have utilized recombinant adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors for factor VIII or IX hepatocyte transduction. Recent clinical data have presented normalization of factor levels in some patients with improvements in bleed rate and quality of life. The main toxicity seen within these studies has been early transient elevation in liver enzymes, with variable effect on transgene expression. Although long-term data are awaited, durable expression has been seen within the hemophilia dog model with no late-toxicity or oncogenesis. There are a number of phase III studies currently recruiting; however, there may be some limitations in translating these data to clinical practice, due to inclusion/exclusion criteria. AAV-based gene therapy is one of a number of novel approaches for treatment of hemophilia with other gene therapy (in vivo and ex vivo) and non-replacement therapies progressing through clinical trials. Availability of these high-cost novel therapeutics will require evolution of both clinical and financial healthcare services to allow equitable personalization of care for persons with hemophilia.

Treatment burden, haemostatic strategies and real world inhibitor screening practice in non-severe haemophilia A.

Inhibitor formation in non-severe haemophilia A is a life-long risk and associated with morbidity and mortality. There is a paucity of data to understand real-world inhibitor screening practice. We evaluated the treatment burden, haemostatic strategies, F8 genotyping and inhibitor screening practices in non-severe haemophilia A in seven London haemophilia centres. In the 2-year study period, 44% (377/853) patients received at least one haemostatic treatment. Seventy-nine percent of those treated (296/377) received factor VIII (FVIII) concentrate. F8 genotype was known in 88% (331/377) of individuals. Eighteen per cent (58/331) had 'high-risk' F8 genotypes. In patients with 'standard-risk' F8 genotypes treated on-demand with FVIII concentrate, 51·3% episodes (243/474) were screened within 1 year. However, poor screening compliance was observed after 'high-risk' treatment episodes. In patients with 'standard-risk' F8 genotypes, 12·3% (28/227) of treatment episodes were screened in the subsequent 6 weeks after surgery or a bleed requiring ≥5 exposure days. Similarly, in the context of 'high-risk' F8 genotypes after any FVIII exposure, only 13·6% (12/88) of episodes were screened within 6 weeks. Further study is required to assess optimal practice of inhibitor screening in non-severe haemophilia A to inform subsequent clinical decisions and provide more robust prevalence data to further understand the underlying immunological mechanism.

Rituximab, used alone or in combination, is superior to other treatment modalities in splenic marginal zone lymphoma.

Splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) is a rare B-cell malignancy, with no standard treatment other than splenectomy. Rituximab has shown encouraging results. We therefore retrospectively assessed 43 patients from two centres, who received rituximab, either alone or with chemotherapy. All patients responded, 34/43 (79%) achieving a complete response (CR), compared with 3/10 (30%) after chemotherapy without rituximab (P = 0·005). Of these 10 patients, 9 (90%) subsequently achieved a CR after rituximab (P = 0·02). Rituximab monotherapy appeared equally as effective as rituximab combination therapy (90% vs. 79% CR, P = 0·7) with significantly less toxicity (12·5% vs. 83%, P = 0·002). Splenectomized patients were more likely to obtain a CR with rituximab (16/16, 100%) than unsplenectomized patients (18/27, 67%, P = 0·008). Disease-free survival (DFS) at 3 years was better after rituximab than after splenectomy alone [79% (95% confidence interval 60-89) vs. 29% (8-54), Hazard ratio (HR) 0·28 (0·12-0·68), P = 0·003] and better than after chemotherapy without rituximab [25% (4-55), HR 0·21 (0·08-0·51), P = 0·0004]. Survival at 3 years after rituximab was 98%. In summary, the CR and DFS rates after rituximab, given alone or with chemotherapy, were significantly better than after chemotherapy without rituximab in the same patients, with manageable toxicity. Rituximab, with or without splenectomy, should be considered for the treatment of SMZL.