Speech Perception and Sound Localization Skills in Inner Ear Malformations: Children With Incomplete Partition Type-II.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate binaural auditory skills in bimodal and bilateral pediatric cochlear implant (CI) users with incomplete partition type-II (IP-II) and to reveal the effect of IP-II on performance by comparing the results to pediatric CI users with normal cochlear morphology. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. METHODS: Forty-one CI users (mean age 8.8 ± 1.9) were grouped as bimodal (BIM-IP) and bilateral (BIL-IP) users with IP-II; bimodal (BIM-N) and bilateral (BIL-N) users with normal cochlear anatomy. Speech perception in noise and sound localization skills were compared under 2 conditions; binaural (bilateral or bimodal) and monaural (first CI alone). RESULTS: BIM-IP and BIL-IP showed no performance difference in binaural tasks. The BIM-N group showed remarkably poor performance in comparison to the groups of BIL-IP (p = .007), BIM-IP (p < .001), and BIL-N (p = .004) in terms of speech-in-noise skills. In sound localization abilities, similar significant differences were found between the group of BIM-N and the groups of BIL-IP (p = .001), BIM-IP (p < .001), and BIL-N (p = .004). All groups showed statistically significant improvements in binaural condition on both tasks (p < .05). CONCLUSION: We revealed that bilateral and bimodal pediatric CI users with IP-II benefitted from implantation as much as bilateral users with normal anatomy. Differences in residual hearing between groups may explain the poor performance of bimodal users with normal cochlear morphology. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first study to unveil binaural performance characteristics in children diagnosed with a specific inner ear malformation subgroup.

Evaluation of the non-auditory responses in individuals with auditory brainstem implant.

OBJECTIVES: After auditory brainstem implant (ABI) surgery, stimulation of certain cranial nerves may result in a non-auditory response, and the electrodes that stimulate these nerves may be deactivated. The goals of this study are to compare the number of active electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting, to investigate non-auditory response types and their frequency as a result of non-auditory stimulation, to compare the placements of deactivated electrodes as a result of non-auditory stimulation in the initial activation and the last fitting. METHODS: The computer software system was used to perform a retrospective analysis of the fitting data of 69 ABI users who underwent auditory brainstem implant surgery between January 1997 and January 2019. The non-auditory response types, deactive electrodes, and the positioning of the deactive electrodes horizontally and vertically were recorded in these users during the initial activation and the last fitting. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the number of active electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting. The proportion of the users with deactive electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting was not statistically significant different. In the horizontal and vertical placement classification, the placement of the deactive electrodes was not statistically different between initial activation and last fitting. The most common type of non-auditory response was facial nerve stimulation at the initial activation and no auditory perception at the last fitting. According to the difference between the number of active and deactive electrodes in the initial activation and the last fitting, as well as the auditory and non-auditory responses, it was found that the ABI users were statistically different between the initial activation and the last fitting. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that not only auditory but also non-auditory responses occur in most ABI users. In addition, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to examine the frequencies of non-auditory response types, and the placement of the electrodes that cause these responses according to horizontal and vertical classifications.

Revision Surgery for Pediatric Nontumor Auditory Brainstem Implant Users: Audiological, Rehabilitative, and Surgical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To report the audiological, rehabilitative, and surgical outcomes of revision surgery for pediatric auditory brainstem implant (ABI) users. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Five pediatric ABI users who had revision surgery for device malfunctions. INTERVENTIONS: Revision surgery for ABI malfunctions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The findings of free-field audiometry with the device, the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale, and the pattern discrimination, word identification, sentence recognition, and expressive and receptive language tests before the device failure and after revision surgery were obtained from the patient records and compared. RESULTS: The revision rate for pediatric ABI was 6.45%. The Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale and expressive-receptive language scores showed improvements following revision surgery, while the aided thresholds, pattern perception, and word identification scores did not change. Individual differences in performance for these measures were observed. CONCLUSION: Equal or improved performance after the revision surgeries in the current study showed that revision surgery is successful and important for pediatric ABI users. It is essential to consider remedying the loss of auditory input in sensitive periods of pediatric development.

Auditory perception skills in children receiving simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants: early speech-discrimination results.

PURPOSE: The objective of the present study is to evaluate early speech-perception abilities using VRISD in toddlers who received simultaneous bilateral CIs between 12 and 36 months of age and to compare them with the findings in NH infants and to monitor the development of speech-perception skills within 6 months after cochlear implantation. METHODS: The VRISD test was performed using video visual reinforcement to assess speech-discrimination ability in the CI and NH groups. Four stimuli were used for testing in the present study: /a/, /i/, /ba/, and /da/. The two contrasts used for the research were /a-i/ and /ba-da/. Auditory and listening skills in the CI group were assessed using the IT-MAIS. RESULTS: The responses to the /a-i/ and /ba-da/ phoneme contrast were found to be similar in the NH and CI groups. No statistically significant difference was found between the groups (p > 0.05). VRISD test result and the IT-MAIS score were highly correlated in CI group (p = 0.001, r = 0.822). CONCLUSION: The VRISD test can be effectively used to evaluate the development of speech-discrimination skills in hearing-impaired babies before and after CI. This research suggests that the development of speech-perception ability with CI is seriously influenced by environmental exposure and sound access. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the speech-perception skills in toddlers with simultaneous bilateral CI.

Social competence in children with cochlear implants: is it possible to catch up with their peers?

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to compare social competence skills in children with CI and their normal hearing peers. METHODS: Forty-six children with normal hearing and 46 children with CI between the ages of 42 and 72 months were included in the control group and study group, respectively. Preschool teachers rated children's social competence in the classroom using the Social Competence and Behavior Evaluation-Preschool Edition. Three subscales constitute the structure of the SCBE-30 scale: anger-aggression, social competence, and anxiety-withdrawal. RESULTS: The analyses showed that there were statistically significant differences between social competence scores of the study group and the control group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between anger-aggression scores and anxiety-withdrawal scores of the study group and the control group. There was a significant correlation found between anger-aggression score and the age of starting rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Anger-aggression scores and anxiety-withdrawal scores were similar between children using cochlear implant and normal hearing peers, whereas children with CI show lower social competence abilities than normal hearing peers. Earlier beginning to the rehabilitation programs coincide with lower anger-aggression scores. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to reflect these findings more objectively, from the view of teachers.

Bimodal stimulation in children with inner ear malformation: One side cochlear implant and contralateral auditory brainstem implant.

OBJECTIVE: To determine audiological outcomes of children who use a cochlear implant (CI) in one ear and an auditory brainstem implant (ABI) in the contralateral ear. DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve children followed with CI and contralateral auditory brainstem implant (ABI) by Hacettepe University Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Audiology in Turkey. All children were diagnosed with different inner ear malformations with cochlear nerve aplasia/hypoplasia. CI was planned in the ear with better sound detection during behavioural testing with inserted ear phones and with better CN as seen on MRI. Due to the limited auditory and speech progress with the cochlear implant, ABI was performed on the contralateral ear in all subjects. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Audiological performance and auditory perception skills of children with cochlear nerve deficiency (CND) who use bimodal electrical stimulation with CI and contralateral ABI. RESULTS: Mean age of the subjects was 84.00 ± 33.94 months. Age at CI surgery and ABI surgery was 25.00 ± 10.98 months and 41.50 ± 16.14 months, respectively. However, hearing thresholds only with CI and only with ABI did not reveal significant difference, and auditory perception scores improved with bimodal stimulation. The MAIS scores were significantly improved from unilateral CI to bimodal stimulation (P = .002). Pattern perception and word recognition scores were significantly higher with the bimodal condition when compared to CI only and ABI only conditions. CONCLUSION: Children with CND showed better performance with CI and contralateral ABI combined. Depending on the audiological and radiological results, bimodal stimulation should be advised for children with CND.

Is Early Cochlear Implant Device Activation Safe for All on-the-Ear and off-the-Ear Sound Processors?

BACKGROUND: Cochlear implantation (CI) is an effective treatment option for patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss. When CI first started, it was recommended to wait until at least 4 weeks after the CI surgery for the initial activation because of possible complications. Advances in the surgical techniques and experiences in fitting have made initial activation possible within 24 h. OBJECTIVES: To compare the complaints and complications after early activation between behind-the-ear (BTE) and off-the-ear (OTE) sound processors and to show the impact of early activation on the electrode impedance values. METHOD: CI surgeries performed between March 2013 and July 2018 were retrospectively analyzed from the database. In total, 294 CI users were included in the present study. The impedance measurements were analyzed postoperatively at the initial activation prior to the stimulation, and 4 weeks after the initial activation in the first-month follow-up visit. A customized questionnaire was administered in the first-month follow-up fitting session to caregivers and/or patients who were using CI at least for 6 months. Medical records were also reviewed to identify any postoperative complications. RESULTS: In the early activation group, impedance values were significantly lower than in the control group (p < 0.05) at first fitting. At the first-month follow-up, no significant difference was found between the groups (p > 0.05). The most common side effects were reported to be edema (6.1%) and pain (5.7%) in the early activation group. In patients with OTE sound processors, the rate of side effects such as skin infection, wound swelling, skin hyperemia, and pain was higher than in patients with BTE sound processors; however, a statistical significance was only observed in wound swelling (p = 0.005). Selecting the appropriate magnet was defined as a problem for the OTE sound processors during the initial activation. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that early activation of CI was clinically safe and feasible in patients with BTE sound processors. When using OTE sound processors, the audiologists should be careful during the activation period and inform patients of possible side effects. The first fitting should be delayed for 4 weeks after CI for OTE sound processors. This current study is the first to report this finding with 5 years of experience in a large cohort.

Audiologic and radiologic findings in cochlear hypoplasia.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study is to evaluate audiologic and radiologic findings of cochlear hypoplasia which is a subgroup of inner ear malformations. METHODS: This study was a prospective clinical study and based on voluntary participation from cases with cochlear hypoplasia diagnosis. The study was conducted at Hacettepe University, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Department of Audiology. Subjects were selected from an inner ear malformations database. Inclusion criteria were having cochlear hypoplasia for at least one ear. There were 66 subjects with an age range of 12 months and 60 years 5 months. For each subject, pure tone audiometry and tympanometry were applied according to chronological and cognitive age. And also, auditory brainstem response test was applied to when it is need. Subjects' radiologic results were reevaluated to confirm cochlear hypoplasia, cochlear nerve and cochlear aperture. RESULTS: Cochlear hypoplasia types were statistically significantly different in terms of HL degree. This difference was caused by cochlear hypoplasia type IV group being was statistically different from the other three groups. Like with degree of HL, cochlear hypoplasia groups were statistically different from other three groups in terms of type of hearing loss. Cochlear aperture and cochlear nerve status showed variation according to cochlear hypoplasia type but these differences were not statistically approved. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, incidence of cochlear hypoplasia was 23.5% in all inner ear malformation. With this study, it was seen that subtypes of cochlear hypoplasia showed variability in terms of degree and type of hearing loss and also cochlear aperture and cochlear nerve status. Especially cochlear hypoplasia type IV differs from other three cochlear hypoplasia types.