Practice differences and knowledge gaps in complex and high-risk interventions between Japan and the USA: A case-based discussion.

Advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) devices and techniques have expanded the pool of eligible patients for revascularization, including those with comorbidities, reduced left ventricular function, or anatomical complexity (defined as CHIP: complex and high-risk interventions in indicated patients). CHIP interventions are typically performed by selected operators who specialize in complex PCI. This review presents two cases performed in the USA, to discuss the similarities and differences in practice patterns between CHIP operators in Japan and the USA. The first case involves a 58-year-old male presenting with myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock, and the second case involves a 51-year-old female with a history of coronary artery bypass grafting presenting with a chronic total occlusion and PCI complicated by vessel perforation. The discussion focuses on appropriate patient selection, the role of the heart team approach for decision-making, the use of hemodynamic support devices, and other relevant factors. By comparing practices in Japan and the USA, this review highlights opportunities for knowledge exchange and potential areas for improving patient outcomes.

Implementation of Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Into a High-Risk PCI Program.

BACKGROUND: How to implement robotic-assisted PCI safely and when to escalate to more complex cases has not been previously described. We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients undergoing robotic-assisted PCI in the first year of a newly established robotic-assisted PCI program. METHODS: All patients who underwent robotic-assisted PCI in the first 12 months at a single academic center were included in the study. Lesion complexity was characterized as "PRECISE-like", "CORA-PCI-like", or "CORA-PCI excluded" based on established criteria. The primary outcome was clinical success, defined as <30% residual stenosis after stenting with a final TIMI flow grade 2-3 and no procedural complications. Secondary outcomes included robotic success, defined as clinical success with robotic completion, unintentional manual conversion rate, procedure time, and procedural complications. RESULTS: Of the 57 consecutive lesions treated, 12 (22.6%) had a PRECISE-like lesion complexity while 32 (56.1%) had a CORA- PCI-like, and 13 (22.8%) a CORA-PCI excluded lesion complexity. There was no significant difference in clinical success (100.0% vs. 96.7% vs. 100.0%, p = 1.00) among the groups but robotic success was numerically lower as complexity increased (100.0% vs. 80.0% vs. 72.7%, p = 0.15), with an increased frequency of manual conversion. There was no significant difference in procedural complication rates among the groups. The robotic completion rate improved during the study period. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted PCI, can be safely implemented in a moderate-sized academic center, with a rapid escalation in patient and lesion complexity.

Predictors of In-Hospital De-Escalation of P2Y12 Inhibitors to Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Ticagrelor or prasugrel are recommended to reduce ischemic events in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, in clinical practice, patients are often switched from a potent P2Y12 inhibitor to clopidogrel prior to or at discharge ('de-escalation'). We sought to assess the incidence and predictors of de-escalation. METHODS: Consecutive patients who received either a ticagrelor or prasugrel loading dose for AMI PCI at two tertiary centers between Jan 2015-Mar 2019 who survived to discharge were included. Data were obtained from the electronic health record and institutional NCDR CathPCI data. Patients who were de-escalated to clopidogrel were compared with those who remained on potent P2Y12 inhibitors through the time of discharge. RESULTS: Of the1818 patients in the cohort, 1146 (63%) were de-escalated. Patients in the de-escalation group were older, more often Black, had lower prevalence of co-morbidities, less often had private insurance, and had less complex PCI. After adjustment, older age remained positively associated (OR 1.2, CI 1.08-1.34, p = .001) and Caucasian race (OR 0.5, CI 0.33-0.77, p = .002), prior MI (OR 0.7, CI 0.5-0.97, p = .032), bifurcation lesion (OR 0.71, CI 0.53-0.95, p = .019), and greater number of stents (OR 0.82, CI 0.75-0.91, p = .0001) were negatively associated with de-escalation. In de-escalated patients, the rationale was not documented in 75.9% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: De-escalation occurred frequently in patients with AMI and was associated with both non-clinical and clinical factors. Medical decision making was poorly documented and represent an area for improvement.

Complete heart block associated with Remdesivir in COVID-19: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Since the pandemic began in 2020, Remdesivir has been widely used for the treatment of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Here, we describe a case of a patient with COVID-19 who developed transient complete atrioventricular (AV) block and bradycardia after initiating treatment with Remdesivir. CASE SUMMARY: A 72-year-old male with a history of atrial fibrillation and lung cancer was hospitalized for COVID-19. Electrocardiogram (ECG) on admission demonstrated atrial fibrillation and right bundle branch block. He was started on a course of Dexamethasone and Remdesivir. Within 24 h of starting Remdesivir, he was noted to be in atrial fibrillation with ventricular rates between 30 and 40 b.p.m. On Day 5 of Remdesivir therapy, ECG demonstrated complete AV block. Having completed the Remdesivir regimen, during the next 48 h, he was closely monitored, and the AV block resolved spontaneously. As he remained asymptomatic and had an adequate chronotropic response with activity, pacemaker implantation was not recommended. DISCUSSION: Despite the widespread use of Remdesivir, there is little known information about its cardiac toxicity. Daily ECGs and close cardiac surveillance of patients who develop severe bradycardia or AV block are essential. Discontinuation of the medication usually results in the resolution of these cardiac disturbances.

Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention.

Background Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents (DES) has been increasingly used for revascularization of saphenous vein graft stenosis without strong clinical evidence favoring their use. Randomized controlled trials comparing DES versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in saphenous vein graft-percutaneous coronary intervention have been inconclusive. Methods and Results We performed a comprehensive literature search through May 15, 2018, for all eligible studies comparing DES versus BMS in patients with saphenous vein graft stenosis in PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Clinical outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target vessel revascularization. Six randomized controlled trials were eligible and included 1582 patients, of whom 797 received DES and 785 received BMS. The follow-up period ranged from 18 months to 60 months. There was no statistically significant difference between DES and BMS for all-cause mortality (risk ratio [RR],1.11; 95% CI, 0.0.77-1.62; P=0.57), cardiovascular mortality (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.64-1.57; P=0.99), major adverse cardiovascular events (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.63-1.10; P=20), target vessel revascularization (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.48-1.11; P=0.14), myocardial infarction (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.48-1.16; P=0.19), or stent thrombosis (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.42-2.65; P=0.90). Conclusions In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for saphenous vein graft lesions, our results showed that there was no significant difference between DES and BMS for mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis.

Intravascular ultrasound-guided vs angiography-guided drug-eluting stent implantation in complex coronary lesions: Meta-analysis of randomized trials.

The relative outcomes of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with angiography-guided PCI with drug-eluting stent (DES) in complex lesions have not been established. We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of IVUS-guided PCI with angiography-guided PCI in patients with complex coronary lesions treated with DES. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched to identify all randomized trials comparing IVUS-guided vs angiography-guided DES implantation. We evaluated major adverse cardiac events (MACE), all-cause and cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and stent thrombosis outcomes at the longest reported follow-up. Random-effects modeling was used to calculate pooled relative risk (RR) and 95% CIs. RESULTS: Eight trials comprising 3,276 patients (1,635 IVUS-guided and 1,641 angiography-guided) enrolling only patients with complex lesions were included. Mean follow-up was 1.4±0.5years. Compared with angiography-guided PCI, patients undergoing IVUS-guided PCI had significantly lower MACE (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.51-0.80, P=.0001), TLR (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.86, P=.004), and TVR (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.87, P=.007). There were no significant differences for stent thrombosis, cardiovascular death, or all-cause death. In meta-regression analysis, IVUS-guided PCI was of greatest benefit in reducing MACE in patients with acute coronary syndromes, diabetes, and long lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis demonstrates a significant reduction in MACE, TVR, and TLR with IVUS-guided DES implantation in complex coronary lesions.

Efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in intermediate surgical risk patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in aortic stenosis patients at high surgical risk has been established. The data on patients with intermediate risk is not conclusive. We performed a meta-analysis of studies which compared TAVR with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients at intermediate surgical risk. METHODS: Several databases searched from inception to February 2015 yielded 7 eligible studies with 2,173 participants. The measured outcome of efficacy was all-cause mortality. Data on safety included stroke, permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI), aortic regurgitation (AR), vascular access complications, and major bleeding. Outcomes were pooled and relative risk (RR) was calculated with the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: There was no difference in either short-term (RR, 1.02; 95% CI: 0.63-1.63; P = 0.94; I2 = 0%) or medium to long-term all-cause mortality (RR, 0.99; 95% CI: 0.81-1.21; P = 0.91; I2 = 0%). There was increased incidence of stroke (RR, 2.96; 95% CI: 0.87-10.09; P = 0.08; I2 = 0%), AR (RR, 3.59; 95% CI: 2.13-7.19; P < 0.00001; I2 = 2%), PPI (RR, 6.53; 95% CI: 1.91-22.32; P < 0.003; I2 = 0%) and vascular access complications (RR, 3.84; 95% CI: 0.65-22.76; P < 0.14; I2 = 48%) in patients with TAVR. There was a small, albeit increased risk of major or life threatening bleeding with SAVR as compared to TAVR (RR, 1.36; 95% CI: 1.04-1.80; P < 0.03; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: In this meta-analysis we found that TAVR may be an acceptable alternative to SAVR in patients with intermediate risk for surgery. However, we must await evidence from the current large randomized trials before widespread adoption of this procedure is undertaken. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Does Surgical Repair of Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation Improve Survival? A Systematic Review.

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is one of the common complications in myocardial infarction (MI) patients. Almost half of the post MI patients have MR (ischemic MR)(17) which is moderate to severe (grade II-IV). Whether there is a mortality benefit of performing mitral valve repair (MVR) along with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with post MI moderate MR remains inconclusive. Literature search was done from PubMed, Google scholar, Ovid, and Medline databases. Studies which included post MI patients with moderate ischemic MR and reported mortality outcomes of performing CABG and MVR were chosen for the systematic review. Our preliminary literature search identified 194 studies, of which 11 studies met our inclusion criteria. Nine studies showed no survival benefit of performing simultaneous MVR and CABG. One study demonstrated survival benefit of performing CABG plus MVR only in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV, and one study suggested survival benefit of performing CABG plus MVR as compared to CABG alone in patient with ischemic MR irrespective of preoperative NYHA functional class. Review of current literature showed mixed results in terms of improvement in functional status but failed to show any survival benefit of performing MVR along with CABG. Limitations of studies include small sample size, difference in baseline demographic variables, and short follow-up period which might influence the outcome of the study. Prospective randomized studies are required to establish clear benefit of performing MVR simultaneously with CABG.

Meta-Analysis of Comparison of the Newer Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors (Prasugrel or Ticagrelor) to Clopidogrel in Patients With Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors are more potent and have faster onset of action than clopidogrel. However, the efficacy and safety in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) are not well studied. A systemic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed to identify randomized clinical trials comparing newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors (prasugrel or ticagrelor) to clopidogrel in patients with NSTE-ACS. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke (major cardiovascular events [MACE]). Secondary outcomes were individual components of the primary outcome, all-cause mortality, and Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major and minor bleeding. A total of 31,470 patients with NSTE-ACS from 4 randomized clinical trials were included (newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors: 15,951; clopidogrel: 15,519). Newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors significantly decreased MACE (relative risk [RR] 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80 to 0.95) and MI (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.96) and showed a trend toward reduction of cardiovascular death (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.01). There was a significant increase in TIMI major bleeding (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.50) and TIMI major or minor bleeding (RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.42). Results were largely similar when stratified by ticagrelor versus prasugrel (pinteraction >0.05) except for increased TIMI major/minor bleeding with prasugrel than ticagrelor (pinteraction = 0.01). In conclusion, in patients with NSTE-ACS, newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors decrease MACE and MI at the expense of a significant increase in the risk of bleeding. Treatment of 1,000 patients with newer oral P2Y12 inhibitors will prevent 16 MACE and 13 MIs at the expense of increase in 6 major bleeding events.

Role of neprilysin inhibitor combinations in hypertension: insights from hypertension and heart failure trials.

Neprilysin is a neutral endopeptidase and its inhibition increases bioavailability of natriuretic peptides, bradykinin, and substance P, resulting in natriuretic, vasodilatatory, and anti-proliferative effects. In concert, these effects are prone to produce a powerful ventricular unloading and antihypertensive response. LCZ696 (Valsartan/sacubitril) is a first-in-class angiotensin II-receptor neprilysin inhibitor. LCZ696 is a novel drug not only for the treatment of heart failure but it is also likely to be a useful antihypertensive drug and may have a preferential effect on systolic pressure. This review discusses (i) the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of this novel drug, (ii) the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of LCZ696 in treatment of hypertension from the available trials, (iii) evidence from other contemporary trials on combined Neprilysin inhibitors, (iv) future trials and areas of research to identify hypertensive patient populations that would most benefit from LCZ696.

Pre-morbid body mass index and mortality after incident heart failure: the ARIC Study.

BACKGROUND: Although obesity is an independent risk factor for heart failure (HF), once HF is established, obesity is associated with lower mortality. It is unclear if the weight loss due to advanced HF leads to this paradoxical finding. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the prognostic impact of pre-morbid obesity in patients with HF. METHODS: In the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) study, we used body mass index (BMI) measured ≥6 months before incident HF (pre-morbid BMI) to evaluate the association of overweight (BMI 25 to <30 kg/m(2)) and obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m(2)) compared with normal BMI (18.5 to <25 kg/m(2)) with mortality after incident HF. RESULTS: Among 1,487 patients with incident HF, 35% were overweight and 47% were obese by pre-morbid BMI measured 4.3 ± 3.1 years before HF diagnosis. Over 10-year follow-up after incident HF, 43% of patients died. After adjustment for demographics and comorbidities, being pre-morbidly overweight (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58 to 0.90; p = 0.004) or obese (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.56 to 0.87; p = 0.001) had a protective association with survival compared with normal BMI. The protective effect of overweight and obesity was consistent across subgroups on the basis of a history of cancer, smoking, and diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results, for the first time, demonstrate that patients who were overweight or obese before HF development have lower mortality after HF diagnosis compared with normal BMI patients. Thus, weight loss due to advanced HF may not completely explain the protective effect of higher BMI in HF patients.

Association of cystatin C with measures of obesity and its impact on cardiovascular events among healthy US adults.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to explore the relationship between cystatin C (CysC) and anthropometric measures of obesity and the influence of this association on mortality [cardiovascular disease (CVD), coronary heart disease, and all-cause] in a nationally representative population free of CVD, diabetes mellitus, and macroalbuminuria (MA). METHODS: The study cohort included 4577 adult participants of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Spearman correlation analysis was performed to ascertain the association between various anthropometric measures and CysC. Formal statistical analyses of the interaction term between anthropometric measures and CysC for outcomes were performed followed by stratified multivariate Cox proportional hazard analyses. RESULTS: A moderate degree of association was seen between CysC and measures of visceral adiposity as represented by waist-to-height ratio (WHR) and waist circumference (WC) and only a weak association between CysC and body mass index (BMI). CysC was predictive of all study outcomes in individuals with normal anthropometric measurements only. CONCLUSIONS: CysC correlated better with measures of visceral adiposity (WC and WHR) compared to BMI and appears to be a better predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes among those with anthropometric measures not suggestive of obesity compared to those with abnormal measures of anthropometry.