The impact of COVID-19 on cancer patients, their carers and oncology health professionals: A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: Cancer patients, carers and oncology health professionals have been impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in many ways, but their experiences and psychosocial responses to the pandemic are still being explored. This study aimed to document the experience of Australians living with cancer, family carers, and Oncology health professionals (HPs) when COVID-19 first emerged. METHODS: In this qualitative study, participants (cancer patients currently receiving treatment, family carers and HPs) completed a semi-structured interview exploring their experiences of COVID-19 and the impact it had on cancer care. Participants also completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (patients) and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (carers and HPs) to assess emotional morbidity. Thematic analysis was undertaken on qualitative data. RESULTS: 32 patients, 16 carers and 29 HPs participated. Qualitative analysis yielded three shared themes: fear and death anxiety, isolation, and uncertainty. For HPs, uncertainty incorporated the potential for moral distress and work-stress. Patients and carers scoring high on anxiety/depression measures were more likely to have advanced disease, expressed greater death anxiety, talked about taking more extreme precautionary measures, and felt more impacted by isolation. CONCLUSION: Cancer and COVID-19 can have compounding psychological impacts on all those receiving or giving care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Screening for distress in patients, and burnout in HPs, is recommended. Increased compassionate access and provision of creative alternatives to face-to-face support are warrented.

Phase 2 study of anastrozole in rare cohorts of patients with estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor positive leiomyosarcomas and carcinosarcomas of the uterine corpus: The PARAGON trial (ANZGOG 0903).

BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors have been used empirically to treat a subset of patients with hormone receptor positive uterine leiomyosarcomas(LMS) and carcinosarcomas (UCS) mainly supported by retrospective data. We evaluated the activity of anastrozole in two rare cohorts; patients with recurrent/metastatic LMS and UCS enrolled in PARAGON, a basket trial of anastrozole in estrogen receptor (ER+)/progesterone receptor positive (PR+) gynecological cancers. METHOD: An investigator-initiated, single-arm, prospective open-label trial of anastrozole 1 mg/day in patients with ER &/or PR + ve LMS or UCS with measurable disease, treated until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was clinical benefit (complete/partial response + stable disease) rate (CBR) at 3 months. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life and toxicity. RESULTS: 39 eligible patients were enrolled, 32 with LMS and 7 with UCS. For the LMS cohort CBR at 3 months was 35% (95% CI: 21-53%) with a median duration of clinical benefit of 5.8 months. Best response was a partial response in one patient. Two patients remained on treatment for more than one year. The median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% CI: 2.6-4.9). For the UCS cohort CBR at 3 months was 43% (95% CI: 16-75%) with a median duration of clinical benefit of 5.6 months. Stable disease was seen in 3 patients but no objective responses were seen. The median progression-free survival was 2.7 months (95% CI, 1.1-8.2). Safety was acceptable with 5/39 evaluable patients showing grade 3 toxicities. CONCLUSION: Whilst objective response rates with anastrozole are low, the clinical benefit rate and good tolerance suggests that aromatase inhibitor therapy may have a role in a subset of patients with metastatic LMS and UCS.

Phase 2 study of anastrozole in patients with estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor positive recurrent low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas: The PARAGON trial (ANZGOG 0903).

BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors are standard of care for low-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas (LGESS), based on very high response rates reported in retrospective studies. We evaluated the activity of anastrozole in recurrent/metastatic LGESS patients enrolled in PARAGON, a basket trial of anastrozole in estrogen receptor (ER±)/progesterone receptor (PR+) gynecological cancers. METHOD: An investigator-initiated, single-arm, prospective open-label trial of anastrozole 1 mg/day in patients with ER ± PR + ve LGESS with measurable disease, treated until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was clinical benefit (complete/partial response + stable disease) rate (CBR) at 3 months. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life and toxicity. RESULTS: 15 eligible patients were enrolled. CBR at 3 months was 73% (95% CI: 48-89.1%); unchanged at 6 months. Best response was 26.7%, including complete response in one (6.7%; 95% CI 1.2-29.8%), partial response in three (20%, 95% CI 7.1-45.2%) and stable disease in seven (46.7%). Four patients ceased treatment by 3 months due to progression. Median PFS was not reached (25th percentile: 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.2-NR)). PFS was 73.3%, 73.3% and 66% at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively. Six patients remained on treatment for an average of 44.2 months (range 34.5-63.6) up until data cut. Toxicity was as expected, with 3 patients stopping due to adverse effects. CONCLUSION: The 26.7% objective response rate with anastrozole is lower than reported in retrospective series, but the CBR was high and durable. The results underscore the importance of prospective trials in rare cancers.

Estimating survival in advanced cancer: a comparison of estimates made by oncologists and patients.

PURPOSE: To compare estimates of expected survival time (EST) made by patients with advanced cancer and their oncologists. METHODS: At enrolment patients recorded their "understanding of how long you may have to live" in best-case, most-likely, and worst-case scenarios. Oncologists estimated survival time for each of their patients as the "median survival of a group of identical patients". We hypothesized that oncologists' estimates of EST would be unbiased (~ 50% longer or shorter than the observed survival time [OST]), imprecise (< 33% within 0.67 to 1.33 times OST), associated with OST, and more accurate than patients' estimates of their own survival. RESULTS: Twenty-six oncologists estimated EST for 179 patients. The median estimate of EST was 6.0 months, and the median OST was 6.2 months. Oncologists' estimates were unbiased (56% longer than OST), imprecise (27% within 0.67 to 1.33 times OST), and significantly associated with OST (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.93, p < 0.01). Only 41 patients (23%) provided a numerical estimate of their survival with 107 patients (60%) responding "I don't know". The median estimate by patients for their most-likely scenario was 12 months. Patient estimates of their most-likely scenario were less precise (17% within 0.67 to 1.33 times OST) and more likely to overestimate survival (85% longer than OST) than oncologist estimates. CONCLUSION: Oncologists' estimates were unbiased and significantly associated with survival. Most patients with advanced cancer did not know their EST or overestimated their survival time compared to their oncologist, highlighting the need for improved prognosis communication training. Trial registration ACTRN1261300128871.

Clinical and genetic predictors of paclitaxel neurotoxicity based on patient- versus clinician-reported incidence and severity of neurotoxicity in the ICON7 trial.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a dose-limiting toxicity of paclitaxel, with no reliable method to identify at-risk patients. We investigated the incidence and risk factors including genetic polymorphisms associated with the development of CIPN based on clinician and patient reporting of neuropathic symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Risk factors for the development of CIPN were examined in 454 patients treated with paclitaxel/carboplatin from the International Collaboration on Ovarian Neoplasms 7 (ICON7) trial. Neuropathy was graded by clinicians by standard adverse event reporting and by patients utilising OV28 questionnaire. Genetic risk factors were examined by selecting six single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes associated with microtubule function. Risk factors were assessed via dose-to-event cox regression models. RESULTS: Grade >2 neuropathy was reported by clinicians in 28% of patients, while 67% of patients reported 'quite a bit' or 'very much' tingling or numbness. Agreement between clinicians and patients was poor (κ = 0.236, 95% confidence interval, 0.177-0.296, P < 0.001). Older age, bevacizumab treatment and bowel resection were associated with clinician reported CIPN, while older age and volume of residual disease were associated with patient-reported neuropathy. There were no significant associations between clinician-reported neuropathy or patient-reported neuropathy and TUBB2, CEP72 or individual MAPT or GSK3B SNPs, however MAPT additive polymorphisms were associated with patient-reported neuropathy and GSK3B additive polymorphisms were associated with clinician reported CIPN. CONCLUSIONS: There was significant discordance between patient- and clinician-reported neurotoxicity. The lack of consensus regarding optimal outcome measures and whose opinion with regard to CIPN takes precedence is a limitation in the investigation of risk factors for CIPN. Care must be taken to select and include patient-reported outcome measures in CIPN assessment to enable accurate identification of genetic and other risk factors for neuropathy.

Use of palliative chemotherapy in patients aged 80 years and over with incurable cancer: experience at three Sydney cancer centres.

BACKGROUND: Octogenarians represent a growing population reviewed in medical oncology clinics, yet there is a paucity of data on how chemotherapy is tolerated in this age group. AIM: To describe the use of palliative first-line chemotherapy in patients 80 years and over and factors associated with its use. METHODS: We identified all new patients aged 80 years or older diagnosed with incurable advanced solid organ cancer and seen in one of three Sydney medical oncology outpatient clinics between January 2009 and December 2013. Patient, disease and treatment details were summarised and factors associated with chemotherapy use explored. RESULTS: Of 420 eligible patients, 100 (24%) started first-line chemotherapy. Younger age at diagnosis was the only factor associated with receiving chemotherapy (median 82.9 vs 84.1 years, P = 0.002). A total of 78% of patients had single-agent chemotherapy, and 41% received a full dose for the first cycle. During treatment, 54% experienced toxicity, necessitating dose reduction, delay or omission, and 32% were hospitalised. These events were associated with receipt of combination chemotherapy (OR 5.1; P = 0.04) and full-dose chemotherapy for cycle 1 (OR 3.5; P = 0.02). Radiological disease control was achieved in 60%. Chemotherapy was stopped because of progressive disease (48%), toxicity (37%) or completion of planned course (17%). CONCLUSION: A quarter of patients 80 years and older received first-line palliative chemotherapy. Despite most receiving a modified dose, one third were hospitalised during treatment. These findings highlight the need for careful clinical assessment and selection of older cancer patients for chemotherapy.

Doctor-to-doctor communication of prognosis in metastatic cancer: a review of letters from medical oncologists to referring doctors.

BACKGROUND: Shared understanding of prognosis is vital for optimal, multidisciplinary, clinical decision making. AIMS: This study aims to determine the frequency and nature of prognostic information in medical oncologists' letters to referring doctors for patients with metastatic cancer. METHODS: We reviewed all consultation letters (to June 2014) for new patients with metastatic cancer presenting to medical oncologists at Concord and Macarthur Cancer Centres between June 2012 and June 2013. We recorded the presence and nature of prognostic information in the letters, patients' characteristics and survival. Characteristics associated with inclusion of prognostic information were explored. RESULTS: We analysed 1344 letters pertaining to 272 patients with a median survival of 13 months. The median number of letters per patient was 4 (interquartile range 1-7), with 50% written by trainees. The terms 'metastatic' or 'stage IV cancer' were included in letters for 253 patients (93%), treatment was described as 'palliative' for 174 patients (64%) and the word 'incurable' was included for 93 (34%). Only 31 patients (11%) had a quantitative estimate of prognosis in any correspondence: median or average survival in 14, general time frame in 12 and, best case, typical and worst case scenarios in 5. Inclusion of quantitative prognostic information was not associated with patient age, cancer type, treatment plan, trainee authoring letter or shorter survival. CONCLUSION: Inclusion of quantitative prognostic information in written correspondence from medical oncologists regarding patients with metastatic cancer was infrequent. Encouraging oncologists to include quantitative prognostic information in their letters could improve communication between oncologists, referring doctors and patients.

Management of undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver in children: a case series and management review.

BACKGROUND: Undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver (UESL) is a rare neoplasm, and the third-most common paediatric hepatic malignancy. However, no treatment guidelines exist. No randomised, controlled trials support specific combinations of therapy. OBJECTIVE: To compare presentation and management of UESL with other series, review the literature, and formulate treatment guidelines. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all hepatic malignancies was conducted from 1996 to 2007 and 5 children with UESL were identified. Management and outcomes were documented. The literature regarding treatment modalities up to September 2012 was reviewed. RESULTS: Over a period of 11 years, 5 patients presented. All underwent surgery and 4 received chemotherapy. One received radiotherapy at relapse. Three are disease-free with follow-up of 58 - 184 months. One died after relapse, as did the patient whose family declined chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The improved outcomes are consistent with the international experience and are probably related to combined treatment modalities and advances in supportive care. Pre-operative percutaneous biopsy provides no benefit if the lesion is resectable because it may not prove to be diagnostic, and may cause recurrence in the biopsy tract. If resectable, the recommended treatment is primary excision and adjuvant chemotherapy, with radiotherapy in selected cases. If unresectable, open biopsy is necessary to document histology, and neo- adjuvant chemotherapy is given prior to resection. If deemed unresectable, liver transplantation is considered.

Using scenarios to explain life expectancy in advanced cancer: attitudes of people with a cancer experience.

PURPOSE: We sought the attitudes of people with a cancer experience to using best case, worst case, and typical scenarios for survival to explain life expectancy. METHODS: Oncology clinic attendees and Breast Cancer Network Australia (BCNA) members completed a survey describing two formats for explaining life expectancy to a hypothetical patient with advanced cancer-providing either three scenarios for survival or just the median survival time. RESULTS: Characteristics of the 505 respondents from outpatient clinics (n = 251) and BCNA (n = 254) were median age of 58 years, female 74 %, and breast primary 64 %. More respondents agreed that explaining three scenarios (vs. median survival) would make sense (93 vs. 75 %), be helpful (93 vs. 69 %), convey hope (68 vs. 44 %), and reassure (60 vs. 40 %), while fewer respondents agreed that explaining three scenarios (vs. median survival) would upset people (24 vs. 36 %); all p values < 0.001. Most respondents agreed that each scenario should be presented: best case 89 %, worst case 82 %, and typical 92 %. For information about their own prognosis, 88 % preferred all three scenarios and 5 % a single estimate of the median. Respondents with higher education were more likely to agree that presenting three scenarios would be helpful (95 vs. 90 %, p = 0.05). Respondents with breast cancer were more likely to agree that explaining three scenarios would upset people (31 vs. 13 %, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most respondents judged presentation of best case, worst case, and typical scenarios preferable and more helpful and reassuring than presentation of just the median survival time when explaining life expectancy to patients with advanced cancer.

Reporting clinical trial information: colorectal cancer trials at Sydney Cancer Centre.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trial units are integral to the functioning of a medical oncology department with patient access to clinical trials an important component in patient care. There has been a paucity of potential key performance indicators in medical oncology and clinical trial information may be utilised for this purpose. The aim of this study was to record retrospectively and collate prospectively collected information regarding basic demographics, response rate, progression and survival plus grade 3 or 4 toxicity in patients enrolled in clinical trials for metastatic colorectal cancer at the Sydney Cancer Centre between 1999 and 2007. METHODS: Baseline patient demographics, clinical response, progression dates, grade 3 or 4 toxicities plus treatment-related fatalities were collected from individual clinical trials. Outcome measures were clinical response, progression-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: There was a total of 14 trials undertaken during the defined period for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. There was available information for 243 patient trials with sufficient information regarding response rates, toxicity, progression and survival. Tumour response rates ranged from 27% to 66% for first line chemotherapy trials and 0% to 20% for non-first line chemotherapy trials. The overall progression-free survival was 6.4 months and overall survival 14.0 months for all trials. There was one treatment-related fatality on clinical trial during this period. CONCLUSIONS: Results of our clinical database have been used here to illustrate the concept and value of reporting clinical trial information in medical oncology. Public reporting of such information may allow for comparisons between units and for quality improvement.

Randomized cross-over trial comparing inpatient and outpatient administration of high-dose cisplatin.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Treatment with high-dose cisplatin (HDC) previously required inpatient (IP) admission with overnight hospitalization, but recently practice has shifted to outpatient (OP) therapy. We aimed to determine whether it is preferable to give HDC as an IP or OP using a two-period cross-over trial. METHODS: Eligible patients were starting chemotherapy with ≥2 cycles of HDC (≥100 mg/dose) and were suitable for OP treatment. All patients received an IP cycle and OP cycle: the order was randomly allocated. Pre-hydration, anti-emetics and chemotherapy were identical for IP and OP. Post-hydration varied by group (3 L normal saline (NS) for IP, 2 L NS for OP). The primary outcome was patient preference for IP versus OP treatment. Secondary outcomes included aspects of health-related quality of life, adverse events (dose delays and reductions, elevated creatinine and unplanned readmissions) and resource use. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were randomized, 53 completed two cycles of HDC. Most patients preferred OP treatment (36 vs 13, P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in patients' ratings of nausea, vomiting, fatigue, anxiety, depression or overall quality of life. Adverse events were few and unrelated to IP versus OP treatment. Nursing time was longer for IP than OP (163 vs 104 min, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: OP treatment was preferred by most patients, appeared safe and used less resources.

Impact of medical Qigong on quality of life, fatigue, mood and inflammation in cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Substantial numbers of cancer patients use complementary medicine therapies, even without a supportive evidence base. This study aimed to evaluate in a randomized controlled trial, the use of Medical Qigong (MQ) compared with usual care to improve the quality of life (QOL) of cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixty-two patients with a range of cancers were recruited. QOL and fatigue were measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue, respectively, and mood status by Profile of Mood State. The inflammatory marker serum C-reactive protein (CRP) was monitored serially. RESULTS: Regression analysis indicated that the MQ group significantly improved overall QOL (t(144) = -5.761, P < 0.001), fatigue (t(153) = -5.621, P < 0.001), mood disturbance (t(122) =2.346, P = 0.021) and inflammation (CRP) (t(99) = 2.042, P < 0.044) compared with usual care after controlling for baseline variables. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that MQ can improve cancer patients' overall QOL and mood status and reduce specific side-effects of treatment. It may also produce physical benefits in the long term through reduced inflammation.

A phase Ib dose-escalation study of erlotinib, capecitabine and oxaliplatin in metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Dysregulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (HER1/EGFR) has been reported in colorectal cancer (CRC). Erlotinib is a potent inhibitor of HER1/EGFR-mediated signaling. This trial of patients with metastatic CRC (MCRC) examined the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics (PK) of erlotinib in combination with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX), a regimen with established efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients previously untreated or treated with one line of 5-fluorouracil and/or irinotecan received escalating oral doses of erlotinib (daily), capecitabine (days 1-14) and i.v. oxaliplatin (day 1 of a 21-day cycle). RESULTS: The first six patients in cohort 1 (erlotinib 100 mg/day, capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2)) had no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). In cohort 2 (capecitabine increased to 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily), two of six patients had DLTs. When cohort 2 was expanded to 11 patients two further DLTs occurred, exceeding the definition of MTD. Cohort 1 was expanded to 12 patients, and no DLTs occurred. The most common adverse events (AEs) were diarrhea and rash. There was a trend for reduced capecitabine concentrations in the presence of erlotinib. While this was not statistically significant, the possibility of an interaction affecting capecitabine PK cannot be excluded. Antitumor activity was observed in both cohorts (one complete and four partial responses, and stable disease in 11 patients). CONCLUSION: The MTD for this combination in MCRC is capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily days 1-14, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) day 1 and erlotinib 100 mg/day of a 21-day cycle. The combination was well tolerated at the MTD, with no unexpected AEs. The use of this combination in MCRC warrants further investigation.

Experience and outcomes of nephroblastoma in Johannesburg, 1998 - 2003.

INTRODUCTION: Outcomes for children with cancer in the developing world are compromised by the difficulties for patients in accessing health services and by competition for resources between oncological services and the myriad other health problems of emerging nations. The purpose of this study is to document and analyse our experience and the outcomes of children with nephroblastoma over recent years. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all patients who underwent combined oncological and surgical treatment for nephroblastoma in the Paediatric Oncology Unit between 1998 and 2003. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were treated for Wilms' tumour; the mean age was 3 years 8 months (range 4 months to 11 years). The majority of children presented with an abdominal swelling or mass. Preoperative chemotherapy was given in forty-six cases (73 %). The tumour stage distribution was 11/63 stage I (17 %), 11/63 stage II (17 %), 21/63 stage III (33 %), 16/63 stage IV (25 %) and 4/63 stage V (6 %). Postoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy was given according to the SIOP protocol. During the study period, thirteen patients (21 %) died (7 cancer-specific, 2 postoperative, 4 sepsis related), thirteen (21 %) were lost to follow-up and thirty-seven (59 %) are free of disease with a mean follow-up period of 3.67 years. Children with stage I and stage II had a disease-free survival at 4 years of 89 %. However, those with stage III, IV and V disease had 4-year survival of 66.75 % (p = 0.07). Overall, four-year post-nephrectomy survival was 76 %. CONCLUSION: Outcomes for children with cancer have improved dramatically over recent years; however, in the developing world, the scarcity of hospital resources and the overwhelming burden of non-cancer diseases can mean that oncological treatment is extremely challenging. In our society, children tend to present with nephroblastoma at an advanced stage; however, treatment by dedicated, multidisciplinary teams can achieve good results.

Phase II study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer: an Australian and New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group study.

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin have shown single-agent activity in relapsed ovarian cancer. This combination was used to determine response rates, time-to-event efficacy measures, and toxicity in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Patients with prior platinum-based chemotherapy who had measurable lesions and/or elevated CA-125 levels were identified as group A (platinum-refractory/platinum-resistant patients) and group B (platinum-sensitive patients). All patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 8 every 21 days for up to eight cycles. Seventy-five patients (21 in group A and 54 in group B), with a median age of 58 years (range, 37-78), were enrolled. A median of six cycles (range, 1-8) was administered. By intent-to-treat analysis, 15 patients with measurable disease achieved partial response for an overall best response rate of 20.0% (9.5% in group A and 24.1% in group B). CA-125 response was observed in 48.4% patients (30.0% in group A and 57.1% in group B). Median time to progressive disease was 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.6-9.0 months) with 5.0 months in group A and 8.3 months in group B. Median overall survival was 17.8 months (95% CI, 12.9-21.3 months) with 9.2 months for group A and 20.0 months for group B. Major grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (61.3%), leukopenia (24.0%), nausea (16.0%), and vomiting (22.7%). We conclude that the combination of oxaliplatin and gemcitabine is active in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, but the regimen is unsatisfactory for further study due to modest response and relatively high toxicity.

Irofulven as first line therapy in recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer: a phase II multicenter study by the Cancer Therapeutics Research Group (CTRG).

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of irofulven, a DNA interacting acylfulvene analog, as first line therapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer received irofulven at a dose of 0.45 mg/kg administered intravenously over 30-min infusion (up to a maximum of 50 mg), on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks. RESULTS: The median number of cycles delivered per patient was 2 (range 1-6). Two patients (9%) had >or= 1-week delay in administration of subsequent cycle of chemotherapy. For the day 8 chemotherapy, dose reductions were required in seven patients (30%); dose omitting occurred in five patients (22%). Grade 3/4 anemia and neutropenia occurred in 22 and 17% of patients, respectively. There was no grade 4 thrombocytopenia and no neutropenic fever was observed. Of the 20 evaluable patients, there were no responses observed, 3 patients had stable disease after 2 cycles of treatment which was not confirmed by a further assessment. Median overall survival was 6.05 months (95% CI 4.55-9.39). CONCLUSIONS: Irofulven was tolerated at the dose of 0.45 mg/kg on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks but showed no evidence of antitumor activity in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Phase II trial of weekly docetaxel for patients with relapsed ovarian cancer who have previously received paclitaxel--ANZGOG 02-01.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the response rate of weekly docetaxel in women with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer previously treated with paclitaxel and at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: In this multi-center phase II trial, 37 patients with relapsed disease were enrolled and treated with weekly docetaxel at 35 mg/m for 5 out of 6 consecutive weeks. Two patient cohorts were considered, those who progressed or relapsed within 4 months (N=7) or at greater than 4 months (N=30) from the time of completing their last course of paclitaxel. RESULTS: Patients in both cohorts received a median of 2 cycles of treatment (range; 1-4). In evaluable patients, the combined overall response rate, using both CA125 and RECIST response criteria was 18.9% (7/37; 95% CI; 10-34%). The combined overall progression-free survival was 3.1 months (95% CI; 2.5-3.8), and the combined overall survival was 12.3 months (95% CI; 8.2-16.4). Treatment was generally well tolerated with the only grade 4 toxicity being skin toxicity (3%). The most common grade 3 toxicities were fatigue (14%) and watery eyes (8%) with grade 3 neutropenia observed in only 5% of patients. CONCLUSION: Weekly docetaxel is well tolerated and has activity in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer previously treated with platinum and paclitaxel.

A multicentre randomised phase II study of carboplatin in combination with gemcitabine at standard rate or fixed dose rate infusion in patients with advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Intracellular gemcitabine triphosphate (dFdCTP) levels can be optimised by administering gemcitabine at a fixed dose rate infusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with chemonaive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomised to receive gemcitabine at a fixed dose rate gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) over 75 min (arm A) or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) over 30 min (arm B) on days 1 and 8 every three week cycle. Carboplatin at AUC of 5 was administered in both treatment arms on day 1 of each cycle. End points were activity, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of plasma and intracellular gemcitabine. RESULTS: 76 patients were randomised. Response rate was 34% in arm A and 42% in arm B. Toxicity and quality of life scores were similar for both treatment arms. Mean plasma Cmax(gemcitabine) and mean dFdCTP AUC in arm A was 20.8 microM +/- 17.2 microM and 35,079 +/- 18,216 microM*min respectively and in arm B, 41.2 +/- 13.9 microM and 32 249 +/- 11 267 microM*min respectively. dFdCTP saturation was reached in Arm B but not in Arm A. CONCLUSION: The saturability of dFdCTP accumulation in Arm A suggests optimal delivery of gemcitabine is achieved using fixed rate infusion compared to 30-min infusion. Fixed dose rate gemcitabine is active and feasible, supporting the concept of fixed dosing rate of gemcitabine in advanced NSCLC. However, this entails a longer infusion time with associated higher costs involved.

Synthesis, characterisation, activities, cell uptake and DNA binding of a trinuclear complex: [[trans-PtCl(NH3)]2mu-[trans-Pd(NH3)(2-hydroxypyridine)-(H2)N(CH2)6NH2)2]Cl4.

The trinuclear complex: [[trans-PtCl(NH3)](2)mu-[trans-Pd(NH(3))(2-hydroxypyridine)-(H(2)N(CH(2))(6)NH(2))(2)]Cl(4) (code named CH25) has been synthesized and characterized. The activity of the compound against human ovarian cancer cell lines: A2780, A2780 cisR and A2780 ZD0473R, cell up take, level of binding with DNA and nature of its interaction with pBR322 plasmid DNA have been determined. The compound is found to exhibit significant anticancer activity against the cell lines-about 45 times as active as cisplatin against A2780 cell line, about 76 times as active as cisplatin against A2780(cisR) cell line and about seven times as active as cisplatin against A2780cell line. The higher activity of CH25 suggests that the compound is able to overcome multiple mechanisms of resistance operating in A2780(cisR) and A2780(ZD0473R) cell lines. The compound is believed to form a range of interstrand GG adducts with duplex DNA that induces global changes in the DNA conformation, unlike cisplatin and ZD0473 [also known as AMD473 and JM473: cis-(2-methylpyridine)(ammine)dichloroplatinum(II)] that form mainly intrastrand adducts that induces a local kink in a DNA strand. The increasing prevention of BamH1 digestion of form I and form II pBR322 plasmid DNA with the increase in concentration of the compound is believed to be due to interstrand binding that brings about global changes in DNA conformation.

A phase II study of fixed-dose capecitabine and assessment of predictors of toxicity in patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and activity of fixed-dose capecitabine in patients with advanced colorectal cancer and to correlate pretreatment plasma concentrations of homocysteine and serum and red cell folate with toxicity. Patients received capecitabine 2000 mg (4 x 500 mg tablets) twice daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks. They were reviewed weekly during the first cycle and then three weekly for safety assessment. Eligibility criteria were advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer, < or = 2 prior chemotherapy regimens, ECOG performance status 0-2 and life expectancy >12 weeks. A total of 60 patients were enrolled and 55 were evaluable for efficacy. The median age was 72 years and 63% of patients had a performance status of 1 or 2. Confirmed tumour responses were reported in 15 patients (28%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 15.7-40.3%). The median time to disease progression was 4.9 months and median overall survival was 11.2 months. The median ratio of fixed dose to body surface area (BSA)-calculated dose was 88% (range 65-108%). Significant myelosuppression was not observed. Grade 2/3 treatment-related adverse events were diarrhoea (34%), fatigue (27%), stomatitis (15%) and hand-foot syndrome (22%). Dose reduction due to adverse events was required in 16 patients (29%) and multiple reductions in five patients (9%). There was no grade 3/4 haematological toxicity, any grade 4 adverse events or treatment-related deaths. Patients with higher pretreatment levels of serum folate experienced significantly greater toxicity (P = 0.02, CI: 1.0-1.2) during cycle 1 and over the entire treatment period (P = 0.04, CI: 1.0-1.3). Pretreatment homocysteine concentrations did not predict for toxicity. In conclusion, fixed-dose capecitabine appears to have similar efficacy and safety compared to the currently recommended dose schedule based on body surface area and simplifies drug administration. A high pretreatment folate may be predictive of increased toxicity from capecitabine.