Synaptic vesicle protein 2A tumoral expression predicts levetiracetam adverse events.

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy of levetiracetam (LEV) in controlling seizures in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) depends on tumoral expression of synaptic vesicle protein 2A (SV2A). Although LEV is generally well tolerated, neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs) might occur, limiting compliance and seizure control. We aimed to assess the influence of tumoral SV2A expression on the occurrence of LEV-related NPAEs in patients with glioma. METHODS: Specimens from patients enrolled in the multicenter COMPO study, with glioma and BTRE treated with LEV, undergoing neurosurgery were retrieved. Immunohistochemistry-based expression of SV2A in tumoral and peritumoral tissue was scored in a four-point scale from absent (score = 0) to strong (score = 3). Low immunoreactivity (IR) corresponded to scores < 2. Staining ratios (tumoral SV2A IR/peritumoral SV2A IR) were grouped into low (≤ 0.5) and high (> 0.5). NPAEs were assessed longitudinally with the Neuropsychiatry Inventory 12 test (NPI-12). RESULTS: Overall, 18 patients were eligible for analysis. All received LEV monotherapy, with 67% developing NPAEs. Patients with NPAEs had significantly lower median SV2A intensity score compared to patients without NPAEs (score 1 vs 0, p = 0.025). Low staining ratio (≤ 0.5) associated with higher NPAE occurrence compared to SR > 0.5 (85.7% vs 0%, p < 0.01). A SR ≤ 0.5 predicted a consistent increase in risk of NPAEs (OR 45.0; 95% CI 1.8-1128; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that SV2A expression in tumoral and peritumoral tissue correlates with the occurrence of LEV-related NPAEs. Thus, considering that SV2A expression also influences LEV effectiveness, SV2A staining might help in tailoring treatment to patients.

Risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling: a systematic review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this paper was to estimate the risk of miscarriage after amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS) based on a systematic review of the literature. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A search of Medline, Embase, and The Cochrane Library (2000-2017) was carried out to identify studies reporting complications following CVS or amniocentesis. The inclusion criteria for the systematic review were studies reporting results from large controlled studies (N.≥1000 invasive procedures) and those reporting data for pregnancy loss prior to 24 weeks' gestation. Data for cases that had invasive procedure and controls were inputted in contingency tables and risk of miscarriage was estimated for each study. Summary statistics were calculated after taking into account the weighting for each study included in the systematic review. Procedure-related risk of miscarriage was estimated as a weighted risk difference from the summary statistics for cases and controls. EVIDENCE SNTHESIS: The electronic search from the databases yielded 2465 potential citations of which 2431 were excluded, leaving 34 studies for full-text review. The final review included 10 studies for amniocentesis and 6 studies for CVS, which were used to estimate risk of miscarriage in pregnancies that had an invasive procedure and the control pregnancies that did not. The procedure-related risk of miscarriage following amniocentesis was 0.35% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07 to 0.63) and that following CVS was 0.35% (95% CI: -0.31 to 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: The procedure-related risks of miscarriage following amniocentesis and CVS are lower than currently quoted to women.