A review of the totality of evidence supporting the development and approval of a pegfilgrastim biosimilar (LA-EP2006).

OBJECTIVE: The totality-of-evidence approach requires that similarity between a proposed biosimilar and a reference biologic is demonstrated across a range of analytical, preclinical, and clinical parameters to establish biosimilarity. We describe the totality of evidence for Sandoz biosimilar pegfilgrastim (LA-EP2006 [marketed as Ziextenzo]) that supported its regulatory approval in Europe and the United States. METHODS: Analytical similarity to the reference biologic [marketed by Amgen as Neulasta] was first investigated with regard to physiochemical quality attributes such as primary structure, pegylation, higher-order structures, variants and impurities, molecular size variants, and formulation (protein content, pH, excipients, etc.). In vitro biological activity studies were performed to examine the primary mechanism of action of pegfilgrastim. Bioequivalence (clinical pharmacokinetics [PK] and pharmacodynamics [PD]) of Sandoz biosimilar pegfilgrastim to the reference biologic was studied in healthy volunteers; efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity were assessed during confirmatory clinical efficacy studies in patients undergoing treatment for breast cancer. RESULTS: No meaningful or relevant differences were identified between Sandoz biosimilar pegfilgrastim and the reference biologic during analytical testing. Similar receptor binding and induction of cellular proliferation in vitro confirmed no functional differences between the biologics. Clinical studies in healthy adult participants demonstrated PK/PD biosimilarity and a similar safety profile between biosimilar and reference pegfilgrastim. Clinical studies in a sensitive patient population also demonstrated similar efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity between Sandoz biosimilar pegfilgrastim and the reference biologic. CONCLUSIONS: The totality of evidence confirms that Sandoz biosimilar pegfilgrastim matches the reference biologic and will therefore provide equivalent efficacy and safety in all eligible indications.

A large multicentre, randomized, double-blind, cross-over study in healthy volunteers to compare pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of a pegfilgrastim biosimilar with its US- and EU-reference biologics.

AIMS: Recombinant PEGylated human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (pegfilgrastim) is indicated for the reduction of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and prevention of febrile neutropenia. Biosimilar pegfilgrastim is expected to reduce the financial burden of this complication of chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to demonstrate biosimilarity between Sandoz biosimilar pegfilgrastim and its US- and EU-approved reference biologics. METHODS: Phase I, randomized, double-blind, single-dose, 3-period, 6-sequence cross-over, multicentre study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and immunogenicity of Sandoz biosimilar pegfilgrastim with US- and EU-references in healthy adults. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity was demonstrated between the 3 biologics, as the 90% confidence interval for all primary pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic endpoint comparisons were contained within the predefined similarity margins of 0.80-1.25. Safety, immunogenicity and tolerability were also similar. CONCLUSIONS: Sandoz biosimilar pegfilgrastim demonstrated pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity to both US- and EU-reference biologics. No meaningful differences in safety, local tolerability and immunogenicity were identified.

Clinical pharmacology, efficacy and safety study of a triple-secured fibrinogen concentrate in adults and adolescent patients with congenital fibrinogen deficiency.

Essentials A novel fibrinogen concentrate was evaluated in patients with congenital fibrinogen deficiency. An open-label, phase 2-3 trial studied pharmacology, efficacy, and safety in patients >6 years. The product offers safe and effective therapy in the treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding. Data in recovery show the need of adjusted treatment and further investigation in children. SUMMARY: Background Single-factor replacement therapy is considered the most suitable treatment option for hereditary fibrinogen deficiency. A triple-secured plasma-derived human fibrinogen product was developed to increase the safety of the former fibrinogen concentrate. Objectives This non-randomized, open-label, prospective study investigated pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of a novel fibrinogen concentrate (FibCLOT® /CLOTTAFACT® LFB, France) in inherited deficiency. Patients/Methods Fourteen patients ≥40 kg received fibrinogen concentrate for pharmacology and 16 ≥ 23 kg received treatment for bleeding or surgery. Each treatment was followed by a 3-week safety observation period. Key outcomes included number of infusions, dose, bleeding control, daily assessment, hemoglobin, blood loss, transfusions, and physicians' global assessment of response. Results Incremental recovery was 2.35 mg mL-1  per mg kg-1 and maximal concentration 1.41 g L-1 (geometric mean) after 0.060 g kg-1 infusion in 14 afibrinogenemic patients. Terminal half-life was 69.3 h (non-compartmental analysis). The maximum clot firmness was increased by a mean of 10.3 mm from baseline to maximal effect. Sixteen patients participated to the efficacy phase: 32 bleeding episodes were treated in 9 patients, and 15 patients underwent 38 surgical/invasive procedures. All patients achieved appropriate hemostasis: response to treatment was successful in all bleeds (95% CI, 0.89-1.00) and procedures (95% CI, 0.91-1.00). Most (94%) bleeds were controlled with a single infusion (median 0.050 g kg-1 ). Two patients experienced asymptomatic distal venous thromboses identified by systematic ultrasound. Conclusion FibCLOT® /CLOTTAFACT® showed a pharmacokinetic profile comparable to that of other fibrinogen concentrates and provides safe and clinically effective substitution therapy for fibrinogen-deficient patients.

A Multicentre Study on the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of IqYmune®, a Highly Purified 10% Liquid Intravenous Immunoglobulin, in Patients with Primary Immune Deficiency.

This multicentre, open-label, prospective, single-arm study was designed to evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety of IqYmune®, a highly purified 10% polyvalent immunoglobulin preparation for intravenous administration in patients with primary immunodeficiency. IqYmune® was administered to 62 patients (aged 2-61 years) with X-linked agammaglobulinemia or common variable immune deficiency at a dose from 0.22 to 0.97 g/kg every 3 to 4 weeks for 12 months with an infusion rate up to 8 mL/kg/h. A pharmacokinetic study was performed at steady state between the 8th and the 9th infusion. A single case of serious bacterial infection was observed, leading to an annualized rate of serious bacterial infections/patient (primary endpoint) of 0.017 (98% CI: 0.000, 0.115). Overall, 228 infections were reported, most frequently bronchitis, chronic sinusitis, nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infection. The mean annualized rate of infections was 3.79/patient. A lower risk of infections was associated with an IgG trough level > 8 g/L (p = 0.01). The mean annualized durations of absence from work or school and of hospitalization due to infections were 1.01 and 0.89 days/patient, respectively. The mean serum IgG trough level before the 6th infusion was 7.73 g/L after a mean dose of IqYmune® of 0.57 g/kg. The pharmacokinetic profile of IqYmune® was consistent with that of other intravenous immunoglobulins. Overall, 15.5% of infusions were associated with an adverse event occurring within 72 h post infusion. Headache was the most common adverse event. In conclusion, IqYmune® was shown to be effective and well tolerated in patients with primary immunodeficiency.

Identifying key components of the PrPC-PrPSc replicative interface.

In prion disease, direct interaction between the cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) and its misfolded disease-associated conformer PrP(Sc) is a crucial, although poorly understood step promoting the formation of nascent PrP(Sc) and prion infectivity. Recently, we hypothesized that three regions of PrP (corresponding to amino acid residues 23-33, 98-110, and 136-158) interacting specifically and robustly with PrP(Sc), likely represent peptidic components of one flank of the prion replicative interface. In this study, we created epitope-tagged mouse PrP(C) molecules in which the PrP sequences 23-33, 98-110, and 136-158 were modified. These novel PrP molecules were individually expressed in the prion-infected neuroblastoma cell line (ScN2a) and the conversion of each mutated mouse PrP(C) substrate to PrP(Sc) compared with that of the epitope-tagged wild-type mouse PrP(C). Mutations within PrP 98-110, substituting all 4 wild-type lysine residues with alanine residues, prevented conversion to PrP(Sc). Furthermore, when residues within PrP 136-140 were collectively scrambled, changed to alanines, or amino acids at positions 136, 137, and 139 individually replaced by alanine, conversion to PrP(Sc) was similarly halted. However, other PrP molecules containing mutations within regions 23-33 and 101-104 were able to readily convert to PrP(Sc). These results suggest that PrP sequence comprising residues 98-110 and 136-140 not only participates in the specific binding interaction between PrP(C) and PrP(Sc), but also in the process leading to conversion of PrP(Sc)-sequestered PrP(C) into its disease-associated form.