Impact of multidisciplinary hip fracture program on timing of surgery in elderly patients.

UNLABELLED: The effect of patient characteristics and organizational and system factors on time to surgery were studied using Emilia Romagna Region database and hospital survey. The results showed that the implementation of a Hip Fracture Program significantly increased the probability of early surgery while single intervention had only slight effect INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of formal Hip Fracture Program (HFP) on timing of surgery in hip fracture older patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study based on Emilia Romagna administrative databases. Data on organizational and system factor were also obtained through a hospital survey. A multilevel logistic regression analysis was carried out to assess the effect of covariates on early surgery, taking into account patient level, hospital level, and trust level variability. RESULTS: From 1 January to 31 December 2011, 5,520 subjects over 65 years old underwent surgical repair for hip fracture in Emilia Romagna. The mean waiting time to surgery was 3.4 ± 12.3 days, and the overall percentage of patients operated within 2 days was 52.2%. In the adjusted multilevel logistic model, significant risk factors affecting the timing of surgical intervention at patient level were age, comorbidity, day of admission, and antiplatelet or warfarin therapy while no significant single variables were found at hospital level including dedicated operation theater, hospital volume, dedicated orthogeriatric beds, and geriatrician involvement. The most significant variable was the implementation of HFP at trust level that increased three times the probability of early surgery after adjusting for confounding variables (OR 3.216, 95% CI 0.582-6.539). CONCLUSIONS: Several modifiable organizational factors may affect the proportion of patients with hip fracture undergoing early surgery. This study suggests that the development and the implementation of an evidence-based HFP at trust level are a key point of the strategy of quality of care.

Assessment of 126,913 inguinal hernia repairs in the Emilia-Romagna region of Italy: analysis of 10 years.

PURPOSE: Inguinal hernioplasty could be used as an indicator of the surgical quality offered in different health institutions and countries, thereby establishing a scientific basis from which the procedure can be critically assessed and ultimately improved. Quality assessment of hernioplasties could be conducted using two different methods: either analyzing dedicated regional/national databases (DD) or reviewing administrative databases (AD). METHODS: A retrospective study of inguinal hernioplasties was carried out in the Emilia-Romagna hospitals between 2000 and 2009. Data were obtained by analyzing Hospital Discharge records regional Databases (HDD). Descriptive and multivariate statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: 126,913 inguinal hernioplasty procedures were performed. The annual rate was on average 34 per 10,000 inhabitants. An increase of the case mix complexity and relevant changes in procedure technique were recorded. From multivariate analysis, the following independent factors related to a hospitalization longer than 1 day emerged: procedures in urgent setting (OR 3.6, CI 3.4-3.7), Charlson's score ≥2 (OR 3.4, CI 3.1-3.7), laparoscopy (OR 2.1, CI 1.9-2.3), no mesh use (OR 2.1, CI 2-2.3), age >65 years (OR 1.9, CI 1.8-1.9), associated interventions (OR 1.9, CI 1.8-1.9), bilateral hernia (OR 1.7, CI 1.6-1.8), recurrent hernia (OR 1.2, CI 1.1-1.2) and female gender (OR 1.2, CI 1.2-1.3). Factors related to non-prosthetic hernioplasty were: bilateral hernia (OR 2.7, CI 2.5-2.9), female gender (OR 1.8, CI 1.8-2.0), emergency setting (OR 1.6, CI 1.5-1.8), recurrences (OR 1.5, CI 1.4-1.6) and associated interventions (OR 1.5, CI 1.4-1.6). CONCLUSION: Inguinal hernia should be treated as an outpatient procedure in the majority of patients. Precise guidelines are necessary. HDD demonstrated to be a good and trustworthy system to collect clinical data. When precise guidelines are lacking, legal/institutional indications play a pivotal role in shifting the hernia surgery toward a one-day surgery regimen.