Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
World J Urol ; 41(12): 3867-3876, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37823940

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Transperineal mpMRI-targeted fusion prostate biopsies (TPFBx) are recommended for prostate cancer diagnosis, but little is known about their learning curve (LC), especially when performed under local anaesthesia (LA). We investigated how operators' and institutions' experience might affect biopsy results. METHODS: Baseline, procedure and pathology data of consecutive TPFBx under LA were prospectively collected at two academic Institutions, from Sep 2016 to May 2019. Main inclusion criterion was a positive MRI. Endpoints were biopsy duration, clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate on targeted cores (csCDR-T), complications, pain and urinary function. Data were analysed per-centre and per-operator (with ≥ 50 procedures), comparing groups of consecutive patient, and subsequently through regression and CUSUM analyses. Learning curves were plotted using an adjusted lowess smoothing function. RESULTS: We included 1014 patients, with 27.3% csCDR-T and a median duration was 15 min (IQR 12-18). A LC for biopsy duration was detected, with the steeper phase ending after around 50 procedures, in most operators. No reproducible evidence in favour of an impact of experience on csPCa detection was found at operator's level, whilst a possible gentle LC of limited clinical relevance emerged at Institutional level; complications, pain and IPSS variations were not related to operator experience. CONCLUSION: The implementation of TPFBx under LA was feasible, safe and efficient since early phases with a relatively short learning curve for procedure time.


Assuntos
Imagem por Ressonância Magnética Intervencionista , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Multiparamétrica , Neoplasias da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Próstata/patologia , Curva de Aprendizado , Anestesia Local , Estudos Prospectivos , Imagem por Ressonância Magnética Intervencionista/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Dor
2.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 59(5)2023 Apr 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37241052

RESUMO

Background and Objectives: Inguinal hernia (IH) is a usual finding in men with prostate cancer (PCa) due to their similar risk factors, such as age, gender, and smoking. This study aims to present a single institution's experience with simultaneous IH repair (IHR) and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 452 patients who underwent RARP between January 2018 and December 2020. A total of 73 patients had a concomitant IHR with a monofilament polypropylene mesh. Patients with bowel in the hernia sac or recurrent hernia were excluded. Results: The median age and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score were 67 years (inter-quartile range (IQR) 56-77) and 2 (IQR 1-3), respectively. The median prostate volume and preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were 38 mL (IQR 25.0-75.2) and 7.8 ng/mL (IQR 2.6-23.0), respectively. The surgery was successfully performed in all cases. The median overall and IHR operative time were 190.0 (IQR 140.0-230.0) and 32.5 (IQR 14.0-40.0) minutes, respectively. The median estimated blood loss and length of hospital stay were 100 mL (IQR 10-170) and 3 days (IQR 2-4), respectively. Only five (6.8%) minor complications occurred after surgery. At the 24-month follow-up, no cases of mesh infection, seroma formation, or groin pain were recorded. Conclusions: This study confirmed the safety and efficacy of performing simultaneous RARP and IHR.


Assuntos
Hérnia Inguinal , Laparoscopia , Neoplasias da Próstata , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Próstata , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Polipropilenos , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Hérnia Inguinal/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/complicações , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos
3.
BJU Int ; 127(1): 122-130, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32455504

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcomes of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) transperineal targeted fusion biopsy (TPFBx) under local anaesthesia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively screened 1327 patients with a positive mpMRI undergoing TPFBx (targeted cores and systematic cores) under local anaesthesia, at two tertiary referral institutions, between September 2016 and May 2019, for inclusion in the present study. Primary outcomes were detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) defined as (1) International Society of Urological Pathologists (ISUP) grade >1 or ISUP grade 1 with >50% involvement of prostate cancer (PCa) in a single core or in >2 cores (D1) and (2) ISUP grade >1 PCa (D2). Secondary outcomes were: assessment of peri-procedural pain (numerical rating scale [NRS]) and procedure timings; erectile (International Index of Erectile Function) and urinary (International Prostate Symptom Score) function changes; and complications. We also investigated the value of systematic sampling and concordance with radical prostatectomy (RP). RESULTS: A total of 1014 patients were included, of whom csPCa was diagnosed in 39.4% (n = 400). The procedure was tolerable (NRS pain score 3.1 ± 2.3), with no impact on erectile (P = 0.45) or urinary (P = 0.58) function, and a low rate of complications (Clavien-Dindo grades 1 or 2, n = 8; grade >2, n = 0). No post-biopsy sepsis was recorded. Twenty-two men (95% confidence interval [CI] 17-29) needed to undergo additional systematic biopsy to diagnose one csPCa missed by targeted biopsies (D1). ISUP grade concordance of biopsies with RP was as follows: k = 0.40 (95% CI 0.31-0.49) for targeted cores alone and k = 0.65 (95% CI 0.57-0.72; P < 0.05) overall. CONCLUSIONS: The use of TPFBx under local anaesthesia yielded good csPCa detection and was feasible, quick, well tolerated and safe. Infectious risk was negligible. Addition of systematic to targeted cores may not be needed in all men, although it improves csPCa detection and concordance with RP.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local , Biópsia com Agulha de Grande Calibre/métodos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Biópsia com Agulha de Grande Calibre/efeitos adversos , Hematúria/etiologia , Humanos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/efeitos adversos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Multiparamétrica , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Ereção Peniana , Períneo , Estudos Prospectivos , Micção
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA