Prognostic Value of Baseline Tumor Burden and Tumor Dissemination Extracted From 18 F-FDG PET/CT in a Cohort of Adult Patients With Early or Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the prognostic value of baseline tumor burden and dissemination parameters extracted from 18 F-FDG PET/CT in patients with early or advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treated with ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) or escalated BEACOPP (increased bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with classical Hodgkin lymphoma were retrospectively included. Progression-free survival (PFS) analysis of dichotomized clinicobiological and PET/CT parameters (SUV max , TMTV, TLG, D max , and D bulk ) was performed. Optimal cutoff values for quantitative metrics were defined as the values maximizing the Youden index from receiver operating characteristic analysis. PFS rates were estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves, and the log-rank test was used to assess statistical significance. Hazard ratios were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: With a median age of 32 years, 166 patients were enrolled. A total of 111 patients had ABVD or ABVD-like treatment with or without radiotherapy and 55 patients with escalated BEACOPP treatment. The median follow-up was 55 months. Only International Prognostic Score (IPS >1), TMTV >107 cm 3 , and TLG >1628 were found to be significant prognostic factors for PFS on univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed that IPS and TLG were independently prognostic and, combined, identified 4 risk groups ( P < 0.001): low (low TLG and low IPS; 4-year PFS, 95%), intermediate-low (high IPS and low TLG; 4-year PFS, 79%), intermediate-high (low IPS and high TLG; 4-year PFS, 78%), and high (high TLG and high IPS; 4-year PFS, 71%). CONCLUSIONS: Combining baseline TLG with IPS could improve PFS prediction.

Brain radiotherapy in patients treated for a newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma: professional practice evaluation in 19 French centers.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was a multicentric evaluation of professional practices, analyzing the irradiation technique itself and its impact on survival and recurrence sites, in primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the technical and clinical records of 79 PCNSL patients included in the database of the national expert network for oculocerebral lymphoma ('LOC') who were treated with brain radiotherapy as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma between 2011 and 2018. RESULTS: The number of patients treated with brain radiotherapy gradually decreased over time. The heterogeneity of radiotherapy prescriptions was significant, and 55% of them did not comply with published recommendations in terms of irradiation dose and/or volume. The proportion of complete responders to induction chemotherapy treated with reduced-dose radiotherapy increased over time. Partial brain radiotherapy was associated with significantly lower overall survival in univariate analysis. In partial responders to induction chemotherapy, increasing the total dose to the brain >30 Gy and adding a boost to the WBRT induced a trend toward improved progression-free and overall survival. Five recurrences (13%) occurred exclusively in the eyes, all in patients whose eyes had been excluded from the irradiation target volume and including 2 patients without ocular involvement at diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The visibility of recommendations for prescribing brain radiotherapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma needs to be improved to harmonize practices and improve their quality. We propose an update of the recommendations.

Phase II study of concomitant radiotherapy with atezolizumab in oligometastatic soft tissue sarcomas: STEREOSARC trial protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Up to 50% of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients develop metastases in the course of their disease. Cytotoxic therapy is a standard treatment in this setting but yields average tumour response rates of 25% at first line and ≤10% at later lines. In oligometastatic stage, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) allows reaching high control rates at treated sites (≥80%) and is potentially equally effective to surgery in term of overall survival. In order to shift the balance towards antitumour immunity by multisite irradiation, radiation could be combined with inhibitors of the immunosuppressive pathways. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: STEREOSARC is a prospective, multicentric, randomised phase II, designed to evaluate the efficacy of SBRT associated with immunotherapy versus SBRT only. Randomisation is performed with a 2:1 ratio within two arms. The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy, in term of progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months, of immunomodulated stereotactic multisite irradiation in oligometastatic sarcoma patients. The secondary objectives include PFS by immune response criteria, overall survival, quality-of-life evaluation and developing mathematical models of tumour growth and dissemination predictive of oligometastatic versus polymetastatic evolution. Patients will be randomised in two groups: SBRT with atezolizumab and SBRT alone. The total number of included patients should be 103. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03548428). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by Comité de Protection des Personnes du sud-ouest et outre-mer 4 on 18 October 2019 (Reference CPP2019-09-076-PP) and from National Agency for Medical and Health products Safety (Reference: MEDAECNAT-2019-08-00004_2017-004239-35) on 18 September 2019.The results will be disseminated to patients upon individual request or through media release from scientific meetings. The results will be communicated through scientific meetings and publications.

R-CHOP 14 with or without radiotherapy in nonbulky limited-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

The benefit of radiotherapy (RT) after chemotherapy in limited-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains controversial. We conducted a randomized trial in patients with nonbulky limited-stage DLBCL to evaluate the benefit of RT after rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP). Patients were stratified according to the modified International Prognostic Index, including lactate dehydrogenase, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, age, and disease stage. The patients received 4 or 6 consecutive cycles of R-CHOP delivered once every 2 weeks, followed or not by RT at 40 Gy delivered 4 weeks after the last R-CHOP cycle. All patients were evaluated by fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography scans performed at baseline, after 4 cycles of R-CHOP, and at the end of treatment. The primary objective of the trial was event-free survival (EFS) from randomization. The trial randomly assigned 165 patients in the R-CHOP arm and 169 in the R-CHOP plus RT arm. In an intent-to-treat analysis with a median follow-up of 64 months, 5-year EFS was not statistically significantly different between the 2 arms, with 89% ± 2.9% in the R-CHOP arm vs 92% ± 2.4% in the R-CHOP plus RT arm (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-1.2; P = .18). Overall survival was also not different at 92% (95% CI, 89.5%-94.5%) for patients assigned to R-CHOP alone and 96% (95% CI, 94.3%-97.7%) for those assigned to R-CHOP plus RT (P = not significant). R-CHOP alone is not inferior to R-CHOP followed by RT in patients with nonbulky limited-stage DLBCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00841945.

Gene expression profiling and its utility in prediction of local relapse after breast-conserving therapy in early breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Local relapse (LR) after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) is not accurately predicted by histological/clinical factors. Gene expression profiling was used here to discover LR-associated transcriptional alterations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gene expression profiling was carried out of 81 early breast carcinomas obtained from 30 patients who developed a LR (LR(+)) after BCT and 51 who did not (LR(-)). LR(+) and LR(-) samples were matched for known LR risk features. RESULTS: LR was not associated with a given molecular subtype. Supervised analysis identified a 212-gene signature, which was not validated in independent tumors. No gene set or biological pathway was differentially expressed between LR(+) and LR(-) groups. Twelve published prognostic expression signatures failed to distinguish these groups of carcinomas. The gene expression profiles of 9 cases of LR and the corresponding primary tumors were very similar despite the delivery of radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: In this series, the onset of LR was not predicted by gene expression alterations.

[Influence of the delay between conservative surgery and radiation therapy on local relapse in node-positive breast tumor]. / Rôle du délai chirurgie conservatrice-radiothérapie sur les rechutes locales du cancer du sein avec envahissement ganglionnaire.

It has been shown that a delay in radiotherapy (RT) initiation resulted in a higher local relapse (LR) rate. The present analysis investigated retrospectively if the RT-adjuvant therapy sequence modified local-disease-free survival (L-DFS) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in node-positive (N +) breast cancer patients. Among seven French Adjuvant Study Group trials, 1,831 patients were assessable: 475 received RT directly after BCS, 567 after the 3rd chemotherapy (CT) cycle, and 789 after the 6th CT cycle. In the 1,356 patients receiving CT, it consisted of FEC regimens (fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide) in 83.5% of patients. After a 102-month median follow-up, 214 patients (11.7%) developed LR. The 9-year L-DFS rates were 92.0%, 81.5%, and 87.4%, respectively (p < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, the timing of RT was not associated with a higher rate of LR, whereas tumor size and hormonotherapy were prognostic factors. In our population, there was no increase in the risk of LR when RT was delayed to deliver adjuvant CT. Prognostic factors were tumor size, and hormonotherapy. The number of CT courses could modify this risk.

Influence of the time between surgery and radiotherapy on local recurrence in patients with lymph node-positive, early-stage, invasive breast carcinoma undergoing breast-conserving surgery: results of the French Adjuvant Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has produced significant reductions in ipsilateral breast carcinoma (BC) recurrence. It was shown previously that a delay in the initiation of RT resulted in a higher local recurrence (LR) rate. In the current retrospective analysis, the authors investigated whether the RT-adjuvant therapy sequence modified local-disease-free survival (L-DFS) after BCS in patients with early-stage, lymph node-positive BC. METHODS: Among 7 French Adjuvant Study Group trials, 1831 patients were assessable, including 475 patients who received RT directly after BCS (95 patients received no adjuvant therapy, and 380 patients received hormone therapy), 567 patients who received RT after the third chemotherapy (CT) cycle (250 patients received 1-3 courses, and 317 patients received 4-6 courses), and 789 patients received RT after the sixth CT cycle. In the 1356 patients who received CT, the regimens consisted of fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2); epirubicin 50 mg/m(2), 75 mg/m(2), or 100 mg/m(2); and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2) in 83.5% of patients. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 102 months, 214 patients (11.7%) developed LR. The 9-year L-DFS rates were 92.0%, 81.5%, and 87.4%, respectively (P < 0.0001). It was worse in patients who received 1-3 CT cycles (P = 0.02). Patients who received hormone therapy were less likely to develop LR (P = 0.02). In the multivariate analysis, the timing of RT was not associated with a higher rate of LR, whereas tumor size > 2 cm and no hormone therapy were prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: In the study population, there was no increase in the risk of LR when RT was delayed to deliver adjuvant CT. Prognostic factors were tumor size, and hormone therapy. The number of CT courses could modified this risk.