RESUMO
Objectives: This study presents a case of Candida dubliniensis meningitis in an immunocompetent injection drug user and provides a literature review of CNS infections related to C dubliniensis. Methods: A 32-year-old man with a history of opioid use disorder presented with seizures and underwent extensive diagnostic evaluations, including imaging, lumbar puncture, and tissue biopsies. Treatment consisted of antifungal therapy and placement of ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS). Results: C dublinensis meningitis was identified on culture from a posterior fossa arachnoid sample. The patient demonstrated leptomeningeal enhancement on imaging, which resolved following 20 weeks of fluconazole. The development of hydrocephalus necessitated placement of VPS. Additional published cases of C dublinensis meningitis revealed varying presentations, diagnostic methods, and treatment regimens. Discussion: C dublinensis meningitis is a rare condition affecting both immunocompromised and immunocompetent individuals, particularly those with intravenous drug use. The diagnosis can be challenging, often requiring repeat lumbar punctures, extensive CSF sampling, or meningeal biopsy. Treatment involves a combination of antifungal agents, such as amphotericin B and fluconazole. Intracranial hypertension and hydrocephalus may necessitate surgical intervention. In conclusion, C dublinensis meningitis should be considered as a potential etiology of meningitis, particularly in those with a history of injection drug use.
RESUMO
In this single-center observational study of 118 older adults with advanced cancer who developed non-ventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia, prolonged antibiotic durations (8-14 and ≥15 vs ≤7 d) were not associated with reduced adjusted odds of 90-day all-cause readmission or death. These data may inform antimicrobial stewardship efforts in palliative care settings.
RESUMO
As the Coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues, multiple therapies are rapidly being evaluated for efficacy in clinical trials. Clinical trials should be racially and ethnically representative of the population that will eventually benefit from these medications. There are multiple potential barriers to racial and ethnic minority enrollment in clinical trials, one of which could be that inclusion and exclusion criteria select for certain racial or ethnic groups disproportionately. In this observational cohort study at a single health care system, we examined if there were differences in eligibility for treatment with remdesivir based on clinical trial criteria for racial and ethnic minorities compared to non-Hispanic Whites. 201 electronic medical record charts were reviewed manually. Self-identified Whites were older than other racial or ethnic groups. At the time of presentation, Black, Latinx, and White participants met inclusion criteria for remdesivir at similar rates (72%, 80%, and 73% respectively), and exclusion criteria at similar rates (43%, 38% and 49% for Black, Latinx and White participants respectively). In this study, there was no difference in eligibility for remdesivir based on race or ethnicity alone.