Start Strong, Finish Strong: A Review of Prehabilitation in Cardiac Surgery.

Cardiac surgery constitutes a significant surgical insult in a patient population that is often marred by significant comorbidities, including frailty and reduced physiological reserve. Prehabilitation programs seek to improve patient outcomes and recovery from surgery by implementing a number of preoperative optimization initiatives. Since the initial trial of cardiac prehabilitation twenty-four years ago, new data have emerged on how to best utilize this tool for the perioperative care of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This review will explore recent cardiac prehabilitation investigations, provide clinical considerations for an effective cardiac prehabilitation program, and create a framework for future research studies.

Mechanisms and Preventative Strategies for Persistent Pain following Knee and Hip Joint Replacement Surgery: A Narrative Review.

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a prevalent complication of joint replacement surgery which has the potential to decrease patient satisfaction, increase financial burden, and lead to long-term disability. The identification of risk factors for CPSP following TKA and THA is challenging but essential for targeted preventative therapy. Recent meta-analyses and individual studies highlight associations between elevated state anxiety, depression scores, preoperative pain, diabetes, sleep disturbances, and various other factors with an increased risk of CPSP, with differences observed in prevalence between TKA and THA. While the etiology of CPSP is not fully understood, several factors such as chronic inflammation and preoperative central sensitization have been identified. Other potential mechanisms include genetic factors (e.g., catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) and potassium inwardly rectifying channel subfamily J member 6 (KCNJ6) genes), lipid markers, and psychological risk factors (anxiety and depression). With regards to therapeutics and prevention, multimodal pharmacological analgesia, emphasizing nonopioid analgesics like acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), has gained prominence over epidural analgesia. Nerve blocks and local infiltrative anesthesia have shown mixed results in preventing CPSP. Ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor antagonist, exhibits antihyperalgesic properties, but its efficacy in reducing CPSP is inconclusive. Lidocaine, an amide-type local anesthetic, shows tentative positive effects on CPSP. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) have mixed results, while gabapentinoids, like gabapentin and pregabalin, present hopeful data but require further research, especially in the context of TKA and THA, to justify their use for CPSP prevention.

Postoperative analgesic options after spine surgery: finding the optimal treatment strategies.

INTRODUCTION: Spine surgery is one of the most common types of surgeries performed in the United States; however, managing postoperative pain following spine surgery has proven to be challenging. Patients with spine pathologies have higher incidences of chronic pain and resultant opioid use and potential for tolerance. Implementing a multimodal plan for postoperative analgesia after spine surgery can lead to enhanced recovery and outcomes. AREAS COVERED: This review presents several options for analgesia following spine surgery with an emphasis on multimodal techniques to best aid this specific patient population. In addition to traditional therapeutics, such as acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and opioids, we discuss intrathecal morphine administration and emerging regional anesthesia techniques. EXPERT OPINION: Several adjuncts to improve analgesia following spine surgery are efficacious in the postoperative period. Intrathecal morphine provides sustained analgesia and can be instilled intraoperatively by the surgical team under direct visualization. Local anesthetics deposited under ultrasound guidance by an anesthesiologist trained in regional techniques also provide the opportunity for single injections or continuous analgesia via an indwelling catheter.

Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Pain.

More than 600 million people globally are estimated to be living with chronic pain. It is one of the most common complaints seen in an outpatient setting, with over half of patients complaining of pain during a visit. Failure to properly diagnose and manage chronic pain is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, especially when opioids are involved. Furthermore, it is a tremendous financial strain on the healthcare system, as over USD 100 billion is spent yearly in the United States on healthcare costs related to pain management and opioids. This exceeds the costs of diabetes, heart disease, and cancer-related care combined. Being able to properly diagnose, manage, and treat chronic pain conditions can substantially lower morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs in the United States. This review will outline the current definitions, biopsychosocial model, subclassifications, somatosensory assessments, imaging, clinical prediction models, and treatment modalities associated with chronic pain.

The validity and applications of the analgesia nociception index: a narrative review.

Pain refers to the subjective, unpleasant experience that is related to illness or injury. In contrast to pain, nociception refers to the physiological neural processing of noxious stimuli, such as intra-operative surgical stimuli. One novel device, the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI), aims to objectively measure intra-operative nociception by analyzing the heart rate variability in patients undergoing surgery. Through this method of nociceptive monitoring, the ANI device aims to provide an objective, continuous evaluation of patient comfort levels and allow anesthesiologists to better manage surgical stress and patient analgesia, perhaps with even better efficacy than current practices used to assess nociception. Additionally, ANI may have clinical application in settings outside of the operating room, such as in the intensive care unit. In this narrative review, we compiled and summarized the findings of many studies that have investigated ANI's validity and applications in different clinical settings. Currently, the literature appears mostly supportive of ANI's ability to detect nociception in both surgical and non-surgical settings. However, the ability for ANI to provide clinical benefits, such as decreased intra-operative opioid use, post-operative opioid use, and post-operative pain compared to standard practices appear controversial. Because of the wide variety of methodology, clinical settings, patient populations, and limitations in these studies, more investigation of ANI is needed before any firm conclusions can be drawn on its clinical benefits.

[Zero Emissions. A shared responsibility. Gas capture and recycling project at the Cruces University Hospital (Spain).] / Emisiones Zero. Una responsabilidad compartida. Proyecto captura de gases y reciclado en el Hospital Universitario de Cruces.

OBJECTIVE: The use of volatile anesthetics plays an important role in the production of greenhouse gases and other environmental pollutants that negatively affect global health. Programs to reduce anesthesia contaminants have been shown to be effective and reduce costs. For this reason, we conducted a study to implementing a Zero Emissions Program for zero carbon dioxide emissions derived from anesthetic gases used in the operating room, as recommended by the Green Deal of the European Union by 2030 and be climate neutral in 2050, maintaining satisfaction and current clinical results. METHODS: A Zero Emissions Program was implemented within the Zero safety programs of the Cruces University Hospital in order to produce zero emissions of carbon dioxide derived from the anesthetic gases used in the operating rooms. The contribution of anesthetic gases to carbon dioxide production before and after implementation of program was determined. Data analysis was conducted descriptively to analyze program effectiveness. RESULTS: The implementation of a Zero Emissions Program allowed us to achieve a reduction in emissions to zero. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesiologists must understand that minimizing our harmful impact on environmental health sustainability is not only desirable, but ethically necessary. A way to contribute to this ethical responsibility is Zero Emissions Programs which are effective in reducing emissions to zero, probably improving our impact on planet health.

OBJETIVO: El uso de anestésicos volátiles juega un papel importante en la producción de gases de efecto invernadero y otros contaminantes ambientales que afectan negativamente a la salud mundial. Se ha demostrado que los programas para reducir los contaminantes de la anestesia en el medio ambiente son eficaces y también reducen los costes. Por este motivo nos planteamos como objetivo implementar un Programa de Emisiones Zero para producir cero emisiones de dióxido de carbono derivados de los gases anestésicos utilizados en el quirófano, como recomienda el Pacto Verde de la Unión Europea, para 2030 y ser climáticamente neutros en 2050, manteniendo la satisfacción y los resultados clínicos actuales. METODOS: Se implementó un Programa de Emisiones Zero dentro de los programas Zero de seguridad del Hospital Universitario de Cruces (Barakaldo) con la finalidad de producir cero emisiones de dióxido de carbono derivado de los gases anestésicos utilizados en los quirófanos. Se determinó la contribución de los gases anestésicos a la producción de dióxido de carbono previo y posterior a la implementación del programa. El análisis de los datos se llevó a cabo de forma descriptiva para analizar la efectividad del programa. RESULTADOS: La implementación de un Programa de Emisiones de Zero nos permitió conseguir una disminución de las emisiones a cero. CONCLUSIONES: Los anestesiólogos debemos comprender que minimizar nuestro impacto nocivo en la sostenibilidad de la salud ambiental no es solo deseable, sino éticamente necesario. Una de las formas de contribuir con esta responsabilidad ética es con la implementación de Programas de Emisiones Zero que son eficaces en la reducción a cero de estas emisiones con lo que mejoraremos nuestro impacto en la salud del planeta.

Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Female Patients Undergoing Breast and Gynecological Surgery: A Narrative Review of Risk Factors and Prophylaxis.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) have been widely studied as a multifactorial entity, being of female gender the strongest risk factor. Reported PONV incidence in female surgical populations is extremely variable among randomized clinical trials. In this narrative review, we intend to summarize the incidence, independent predictors, pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for PONV reported in recently published clinical trials carried out in female patients undergoing breast and gynecologic surgery, as well as the implications of the anesthetic agents on the incidence of PONV. A literature search of manuscripts describing PONV management in female surgical populations (breast surgery and gynecologic surgery) was carried out in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases. Postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence were highly variable in patients receiving placebo or no prophylaxis among RCTs whereas consistent results were observed in patients receiving 1 or 2 prophylactic interventions for PONV. Despite efforts made, a considerable number of female patients still experienced significant PONV. It is critical for the anesthesia provider to be aware that the coexistence of independent risk factors such as the level of sex hormones (pre- and postmenopausal), preoperative anxiety or depression, pharmacogenomic pleomorphisms, and ethnicity further enhances the probability of experiencing PONV in female patients. Future RCTs should closely assess the overall risk of PONV in female patients considering patient- and surgery-related factors, and the level of compliance with current guidelines for prevention and management of PONV.

Brain Prehabilitation for Oncologic Surgery.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to summarize the current research on postoperative cognitive complications, such as delirium and cognitive dysfunction. This includes discussion on preoperative preventive strategies, such as physical and nutritional prehabilitation as well as up-to-date information on neuroprehabilitation. RECENT FINDINGS: Current recommendations for prevention of postoperative delirium have focused on multicomponent interventions. The optimal composition of surgical prehabilitation programs targeting exercise and nutrition has not yet been established. The Neurobics Trial shows that cognitive prehabilitation improves cognitive reserve and may be a useful addition to multimodal surgical prehabilitation. Perioperative management of oncologic patients is often associated with a myriad of challenges, such as the management of tumor-related pathologies, adverse events from neoadjuvant therapy, and chronic metabolic and immunological changes associated with malignancy. In addition, oncologic patients are at increased risk of developing frailty, which adversely affects postoperative recovery and further cancer treatment. As a result, oncologic patients are at considerable risk of developing postoperative cognitive complications, such as delirium and cognitive dysfunction. In this review, we discuss the effect of prehabilitation on postoperative cognitive outcomes.

Brain Cancer Progression: A Retrospective Multicenter Comparison of Awake Craniotomy Versus General Anesthesia in High-grade Glioma Resection.

BACKGROUND: High-grade gliomas impose substantial morbidity and mortality due to rapid cancer progression and recurrence. Factors such as surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy remain the cornerstones for treatment of brain cancer and brain cancer research. The role of anesthetics on glioma progression is largely unknown. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study compared patients who underwent high-grade glioma resection with minimal sedation (awake craniotomy) and those who underwent craniotomy with general anesthesia (GA). Various perioperative factors, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and adjuvant treatment regimens were recorded. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), postoperative pain score, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 891 patients were included; 79% received GA, and 21% underwent awake craniotomy. There was no difference in median PFS between awake craniotomy (0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45-0.65 y) and GA (0.53, 95% CI: 0.48-0.60 y) groups (hazard ratio 1.05; P <0.553). Median OS was significantly longer in the awake craniotomy (1.70, 95% CI: 1.30-2.32 y) compared with that in the GA (1.25, 95% CI: 1.15-1.37 y) group (hazard ratio 0.76; P <0.009) but this effect did not persist after controlling for other variables of interest. Median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the awake craniotomy group (2 [range: 0 to 76], interquartile range 3 d vs. 5 [0 to 98], interquartile range 5 for awake craniotomy and GA groups, respectively; P <0.001). Pain scores were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in PFS and OS between patients who underwent surgical resection of high-grade glioma with minimal sedation (awake craniotomy) or GA. Further large prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to explore the role of anesthetics on glioma progression and patient survival.

Frequency and Temporal Distribution of Postoperative Respiratory Depressive Events.

BACKGROUND: The frequency and temporal distribution of postoperative respiratory depression (RD) events are not completely understood. This study determined the temporal distribution and frequency of RD episodes in postsurgical patients continuously monitored by bedside capnography and pulse oximetry. METHODS: This was a post hoc study of a subset of postsurgical patients enrolled in The PRediction of Opioid-induced respiratory Depression In patients monitored by capnoGraphY (PRODIGY) trial from 2 sites in the United States. These patients had undergone continuous bedside monitoring on general care wards. These data were adjudicated for potential RD episodes. The number of RD episodes per patient and the time of each RD episode were determined. The first RD episode experienced by a patient was classified as an "initial" episode, and the initial and all subsequent RD episodes experienced by a patient were classified as "all" episodes. A PRODIGY risk score was calculated. RESULTS: Data analyzed from 250 patients contained 2539 RD episodes in 155 (62.0%, 95% confidence interval, 55.7-68.0) patients with median 2 [0-8], range of 0-545 RD episodes per patient, with a PRODIGY risk score distribution of 100 (40.0%) low, 79 (31.6%) intermediate, 70 (28.0%) high (missing data from 1 patient). Median time to the initial RD episode was 8.8 [5.1-18.0] hours postoperatively. There was a peak occurrence of initial RD events between 14:00 and 20:00 on the day of surgery, and these were associated with a large number of subsequent events in the same timeframe. The peak time of all RD episodes occurred from 02:00 to 06:00. Patients with high PRODIGY risk scores had higher incidence and greater number of RD episodes per patient (P < .001, overall comparisons between groups for both incidence [χ2] and number of episodes [Kruskal-Wallis test]). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous monitoring of surgical patients demonstrates that RD episodes are common, and risk increases with higher PRODIGY scores. In this patient cohort, the rate of initial RD episodes peaked in the afternoon to early evening, while peak rate of all RD episodes occurred in early morning. Further, among patients with RD episodes, the number of episodes increased with higher PRODIGY scores.

Safety of treatment options available for postoperative pain.

IntroductionPostoperative pain is one of the most common adverse events after surgery and has been shown to increase the risk of other complications. On the other hand, liberal opioid use in the perioperative period is also associated with risk of adverse events. The current consensus is therefore to provide multimodal, opioid minimizing analgesia after surgery.Areas CoveredIn this review, we will discuss the benefits and risks associated with non-opioid analgesics, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, gabapentinoids, ketamine, α-2 agonists, and corticosteroids. In addition, we will discuss the general and block-specific risks associated with regional anesthestic techniques.Expert OpinionAdverse events associated with non-opioid analgesics are rare outside their specific contraindicated patient groups, especially when dosed appropriately. α-2 agonists can cause transient hypotension and bradycardia, and gabapentinoids may cause sedation in higher risk patient populations. Regional anesthesia techniques are generally safe when done by an experienced practitioner. We therefore encourage the development of standardized multimodal analgesic protocols, which may facilitate opioid minimization and lead to better patient outcomes.

Ozone therapy for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: Preliminary report of a prospective case-control study.

BACKGROUND: There is still no specific treatment strategies for COVID-19 other than supportive management. DESIGN: A prospective case-control study determined by admittance to the hospital based on bed availability. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen patients with COVID-19 infection (laboratory confirmed) severe pneumonia admitted to hospital between 20th March and 19th April 2020. Patients admitted to the hospital during the study period were assigned to different beds based on bed availability. Depending on the bed the patient was admitted, the treatment was ozone autohemotherapy or standard treatment. Patients in the case group received ozonated blood twice daily starting on the day of admission for a median of four days. Each treatment involved administration of 200 mL autologous whole blood enriched with 200 mL of oxygen-ozone mixture with a 40 µg/mL ozone concentration. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was time from hospital admission to clinical improvement. RESULTS: Nine patients (50%) received ozonated autohemotherapy beginning on the day of admission. Ozonated autohemotherapy was associated with shorter time to clinical improvement (median [IQR]), 7 days [6-10] vs 28 days [8-31], p = 0.04) and better outcomes at 14-days (88.8% vs 33.3%, p = 0.01). In risk-adjusted analyses, ozonated autohemotherapy was associated with a shorter mean time to clinical improvement (-11.3 days, p = 0.04, 95% CI -22.25 to -0.42). CONCLUSION: Ozonated autohemotherapy was associated with a significantly shorter time to clinical improvement in this prospective case-control study. Given the small sample size and study design, these results require evaluation in larger randomized controlled trials. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04444531.

Effect of Cognitive Prehabilitation on the Incidence of Postoperative Delirium Among Older Adults Undergoing Major Noncardiac Surgery: The Neurobics Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Postoperative delirium in older adults is a common and costly complication after surgery. Cognitive reserve affects the risk of postoperative delirium, and thus preoperative augmentation of reserve as a preventive technique is of vital interest. Objective: To determine whether cognitive prehabilitation reduces the incidence of postoperative delirium among older adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prospective, single-blinded randomized clinical trial conducted from March 2015 to August 2019 at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center in Columbus. Patients 60 years and older undergoing major, noncardiac, nonneurological surgery under general anesthesia, with an expected hospital stay of at least 72 hours, were eligible for trial inclusion. Patients were excluded for preoperative cognitive dysfunction and active depression. Interventions: Participation in electronic, tablet-based preoperative cognitive exercise targeting memory, speed, attention, flexibility, and problem-solving functions. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was incidence of delirium between postoperative day 0 to day 7 or discharge, as measured by a brief Confusion Assessment Method, Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale, or a structured medical record review. Secondary outcomes compared delirium characteristics between patients in the intervention and control groups. Results: Of the 699 patients approached for trial participation, 322 completed consent and 268 were randomized. Subsequently, 17 patients were excluded, leaving 251 patients in the primary outcome analysis. A total of 125 patients in the intervention group and 126 control patients were included in the final analysis (median [interquartile range] age, 67 [63-71] years; 163 women [64.9%]). Ninety-seven percent of the patients in the intervention group completed some brain exercise (median, 4.6 [interquartile range, 1.31-7.4] hours). The delirium rate among control participants was 23.0% (29 of 126). With intention-to-treat analysis, the delirium rate in the intervention group was 14.4% (18 of 125; P = .08). Post hoc analysis removed 4 patients who did not attempt any cognitive exercise from the intervention group, yielding a delirium rate of 13.2% (16 of 121; P = .04). Secondary analyses among patients with delirium showed no differences in postoperative delirium onset day or duration or total delirium-positive days across study groups. Conclusions and Relevance: The intervention lowered delirium risk in patients who were at least minimally compliant. The ideal activities, timing, and effective dosage for cognitive exercise-based interventions to decrease postoperative delirium risk and burden need further study. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02230605.

What is the ideal combination antiemetic regimen?

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and post-discharge nausea and vomiting (PDNV) are frequent unpleasant complaints that patients and clinicians report after surgery. PONV and PDNV have been associated with postoperative complications and hospital discharge delays. Despite the extensive evidence describing the use of several regimens in different surgical populations, the ideal regimen has not been established. Several antiemetic drugs have been evaluated in more than 1000 clinical controlled trials for management of this complex emetogenic pathway, including the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) receptor antagonists, dopamine receptor antagonists, neurokinin-type receptor antagonists, antihistaminics, anticholinergics, and corticosteroids, with the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists being the most commonly used for PONV prophylaxis. Because of the complex emetogenic pathway and multifactorial etiology of PONV, a multimodal approach using two or more drugs that act at different neuro-receptor sites is suggested in patients with one or more risk factors to successfully address PONV and reduce its incidence. Nevertheless, the most studied regimens in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are the combination of serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists with dexamethasone or dopamine receptor antagonists (droperidol). Therefore, the safest and more effective combination regimen appears to be the use of serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonist antiemetic drugs with dexamethasone.

Local and Intra-articular Administration of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs for Pain Management in Orthopedic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although growing evidence demonstrates the benefits of locally administered nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for postoperative pain management, there is ongoing debate regarding NSAID use in orthopedic surgery. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: Current data largely support a local site of NSAID action and suggest that effective pain control can be achieved with delivery of NSAIDs intra-articularly (IA) and/or locally at the site of injury, where they can block peripheral production of inflammatory mediators and may desensitize nociceptors. Improvements in postoperative pain control with locally administered NSAIDs have been widely reported in the total joint arthroplasty literature and may offer benefits in patient's undergoing arthroscopic procedures and those with osteoarthritis as well. The purpose of this review is to examine the available evidence in the literature regarding the efficacy and safety profile of the use of local and IA NSAIDs in orthopedic surgery. DATA SOURCES: Narrative literature review using keywords, expert opinion, either during or from live conference. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES: Local and IA administration of NSAIDs for pain management in orthopedic surgery. CONCLUSION: There is convincing evidence that NSAIDs administered locally in and around the joint reduce postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty, yet further research is required regarding the risks of potential chondrotoxicity and the inhibition of bone and soft-tissue healing with locally administered NSAIDs.

Intraoperative Fluid Management in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review.

Fluid management has been widely recognized as an important component of the perioperative care in patients undergoing major procedures including spine surgeries. Patient- and surgery-related factors such as age, length of the surgery, massive intraoperative blood loss, and prone positioning, may impact the intraoperative administration of fluids. In addition, the type of fluid administered may also affect post-operative outcomes. Published literature describing intraoperative fluid management in patients undergoing major spine surgeries is limited and remains controversial. Therefore, we reviewed current literature on intraoperative fluid management and its association with post-operative complications in spine surgery.

Tracheobronchial Slough, a Potential Pathology in Endotracheal Tube Obstruction in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the Intensive Care Setting.

BACKGROUND: A novel coronavirus (COVID-19) erupted in the latter part of 2019. The virus, SARS-CoV-2 can cause a range of symptoms ranging from mild through fulminant respiratory failure. Approximately 25% of hospitalized patients require admission to the intensive care unit, with the majority of those requiring mechanical ventilation. High density consolidations in the bronchial tree and in the pulmonary parenchyma have been described in the advanced phase of the disease. We noted a subset of patients who had a sudden, significant increase in peak airway, plateau and peak inspiratory pressures. Partial or complete ETT occlusion was noted to be the culprit in the majority of these patients. METHODS: With institutional IRB approval, we examined a subset of our mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients. All of the patients were admitted to one of our COVID-19 ICUs. Each was staffed by a board certified intensivist. During multidisciplinary rounds, all arterial blood gas (ABG) results, ventilator settings and ventilator measurements are discussed and addressed. ARDSNet Protocols are employed. In patients with confirmed acute occlusion of the endotracheal tube (ETT), acute elevation in peak airway and peak inspiratory pressures are noted in conjunction with desaturation. Data was collected retrospectively and demographics, ventilatory settings and ABG results were recorded. RESULTS: Our team has observed impeded ventilation in intubated patients who are several days into the critical course. Pathologic evaluation of the removed endotracheal tube contents from one of our patients demonstrated a specimen consistent with sloughed tracheobronchial tissues and inflammatory cells in a background of dense mucin. Of 110 patients admitted to our adult COVID-19 ICUs, 28 patients required urgent exchange of their ETT. CONCLUSION: Caregivers need to be aware of this pathological finding, recognize, and to treat this aspect of the COVID-19 critical illness course, which is becoming more prevalent.

The Effects of Patient Positioning on the Outcome During Posterior Cranial Fossa and Pineal Region Surgery.

Background: Surgery on posterior cranial fossa (PCF) and pineal region (PR) carries the risks of intraoperative trauma to the brainstem structures, blood loss, venous air embolism (VAE), cardiovascular instability, and other complications. Success in surgery, among other factors, depends on selecting the optimal patient position. Our objective was to find associations between patient positioning, incidence of intraoperative complications, neurological recovery, and the extent of surgery. Methods: This observational study was conducted in two medical centers: The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (USA) and The Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute (Russian Federation). Patients were distributed in two groups based on the surgical position: sitting position (SP) or horizontal position (HP). The inclusion criteria were adult patients with space-occupying or vascular lesions requiring an open PCF or PR surgery. Perioperative variables were recorded and summarized using descriptive statistics. The post-treatment survival, functional outcome, and patient satisfaction were assessed at 3 months. Results: A total of 109 patients were included in the study: 53 in SP and 56 in HP. A higher proportion of patients in the HP patients had >300 mL intraoperative blood loss compared to the SP group (32 vs. 13%; p = 0.0250). Intraoperative VAE was diagnosed in 40% of SP patients vs. 0% in the HP group (p < 0.0001). However, trans-esophageal echocardiographic (TEE) monitoring was more common in the SP group. Intraoperative hypotension was documented in 28% of SP patients compared to 9% in HP group (p = 0.0126). A higher proportion of SP patients experienced a new neurological symptom compared to the HP group (49 vs. 29%; p = 0.0281). The extent of tumor resection, postoperative 3-months survival, functional outcome, and patient satisfaction were not different in the groups. Conclusions: The SP was associated with, less intraoperative bleeding, increased intraoperative hypotension, VAE, and postoperative neurological deficit. More HP patients experienced macroglossia and increased blood loss. At 3 months, there was no difference of parameters between the two groups. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: registration number NCT03364283.

The Effect of Increased Intraocular Pressure During Steep Trendelenburg Positioning in Robotic Prostatectomy and Hysterectomy on Structural and Functional Ocular Parameters.

BACKGROUND: Robotic prostatectomy and robotic hysterectomy require steep Trendelenburg positioning. Many authors documented significant increases in intraocular pressure (IOP) during steep Trendelenburg. However, the long-term biological effect of a significant increase in IOP on the structural and functional ocular system is unknown. This study examines the effect of a significant increase in IOP on the visual acuity, retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (RNFLT), and ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness in 52 patients without preexisting ocular disease of both genders before and 3 months after their procedures. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study. The total number of patients included was 56, then 3 females and 1 male case were excluded, totaling 28 robotic hysterectomies and 24 robotic prostatectomies were performed. Patients underwent complete eye examination before the procedure and 3 months after, measuring the main outcome of RNFLT and the secondary outcomes of GCC thickness, foveal threshold (FT), mean deviation (MD), and pattern standard deviation (PSD). These outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. On the day of surgery, we examined the IOP after induction of anesthesia, at the end of steep Trendelenburg, and in the recovery room. RESULTS: There were significant differences in IOP values at the end of steep Trendelenburg versus after induction and 45-60 minutes post-awakening (P < .001 for both groups). No difference between IOP 45 and 60 minutes post-awakening and IOP after induction was observed in either group. The highest IOPs occurred at the end of the steep Trendelenburg time point for both groups. The mean duration of steep Trendelenburg in robotic prostatectomy was 184.6 minutes (standard deviation [SD] = 30.8), while the mean duration in robotic hysterectomy was 123.0 minutes (SD = 29.8). All ophthalmologic examinations were normal preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. The ocular parameters in the retina and optic disk did not differ significantly before surgery and 3 months after. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant increase in IOP during steep Trendelenburg positioning. There was no significant difference in the ocular parameters examined 3 months after the procedure in this cohort.