Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; 53(1): 1-8, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33043748

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Effective antiretroviral treatment of HIV-1, defined as continuously undetectable virus in blood, has substantial effects on the infectiousness and spread of HIV. AIM: This paper outlines the assessment of the Swedish Reference Group for Antiviral Therapy (RAV) and Public Health Agency of Sweden regarding contagiousness of HIV-infected persons on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Results and Conclusion: The expert group concludes that there is no risk of transmission of HIV during vaginal or anal intercourse if the HIV-infected person fulfils the criteria for effective ART. Summary: The effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) for HIV-1 infection has dramatically reduced the morbidity and mortality among people who live with HIV. ART also has a noticeable effect on the infectiousness and on the spread of the disease in society. Knowledge about this has grown gradually. For ART to be regarded effective, the level of the HIV RNA in the plasma should be repeatedly and continuously undetectable and the patient should be assessed as continually having high adherence to treatment. Based on available knowledge the Swedish Reference Group for Antiviral Therapy (RAV) and the Public Health Agency of Sweden make the following assessment: There is no risk of HIV transmission during vaginal or anal intercourse if the HIV positive person fulfils the criteria for effective treatment. This includes intercourse where a condom is not used. However, there are a number of other reasons for recommending the use of condoms, primarily to protect against the transmission of other STIs (sexually transmitted infections) and hepatitis, as well as unwanted pregnancy. The occurrence of other STIs does not affect the risk of HIV transmission in persons on effective ART. It is plausible that the risk for transmission of HIV infection between people who inject drugs and share injection equipment is reduced if the individual with HIV is on effective ART, but there are no studies that directly show this. The risk of transmission from mother to child during pregnancy, labour and delivery is very low if the mother's treatment is initiated well before delivery and if the treatment aim of undetectable virus levels is attained. This is dependent on healthcare services being aware of the mother's HIV infection at an early stage. In most contacts with health and medical care, including dental care, the risk of transmission is not significant if the patient is on effective treatment, but the risk may remain, although considerably reduced, in more advanced interventions such as surgery. When an incident with risk of transmission occurs, the patient must always inform those potentially exposed about his or her HIV infection.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , HIV-1 , Antirretrovirais/uso terapêutico , Criança , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Humanos , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas , Gravidez , Suécia/epidemiologia
2.
Harm Reduct J ; 14(1): 57, 2017 08 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28814336

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: People who inject drugs (PWID) frequently engage in injection risk behaviours exposing them to blood-borne infections. Understanding the underlying causes that drive various types and levels of risk behaviours is important to better target preventive interventions. METHODS: A total of 2150 PWID in Swedish remand prisons were interviewed between 2002 and 2012. Questions on socio-demographic and drug-related variables were asked in relation to the following outcomes: Having shared injection drug solution and having lent out or having received already used drug injection equipment within a 12 month recall period. RESULTS: Women shared solutions more than men (odds ratio (OR) 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03; 2.21). Those who had begun to inject drugs before age 17 had a higher risk (OR 1.43, 95% CI 0.99; 2.08) of having received used equipment compared to 17-19 year olds. Amphetamine-injectors shared solutions more than those injecting heroin (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.64; 3.62). A housing contract lowered the risk of unsafe injection by 37-59% compared to being homeless. CONCLUSIONS: Women, early drug debut, amphetamine users and homeless people had a significantly higher level of injection risk behaviour and need special attention and tailored prevention to successfully combat hepatitis C and HIV transmission among PWID. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT02234167.


Assuntos
Usuários de Drogas/psicologia , Assunção de Riscos , Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idade de Início , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Anfetaminas/psicologia , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Hepatite C/prevenção & controle , Dependência de Heroína/psicologia , Pessoas Mal Alojadas , Humanos , Masculino , Uso Comum de Agulhas e Seringas , Prisões , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Suécia , Adulto Jovem
3.
J Clin Nurs ; 25(23-24): 3605-3618, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27135281

RESUMO

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore motivators and barriers to HIV testing and to assess the factors associated with testing among men who have sex with men. BACKGROUND: Previous research has considered fear, worries and structural barriers as hindrances to HIV testing among men who have sex with men. However, few studies have included assessments of actual HIV testing when exploring barriers or motivators for such testing. DESIGN: The design of the study was a stratified cross-sectional online survey (n = 2373). METHOD: Factor analysis was conducted to analyse the barriers and motivators for HIV testing. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess predictors for HIV testing. RESULTS: Many men who have sex with men test for HIV regularly, and specific reasons for testing were having unprotected sex or starting/ending a relationship. A lack of awareness and a perception of being at low risk for exposure were common reasons for never being tested. Fear and anxiety as well as barriers related to the use of test services remain important hindrances for testing. Predictors associated with having been tested within the past 12 months were: younger age (15-25 years old compared with 47+); knowledge on where to take an HIV test on short notice as well as having talked with a counsellor, having received condoms for free, or having had unprotected anal intercourse with casual partners within the last 12 months. CONCLUSION: Easily accessible test services offering testing and counselling on short notice should be available for all men who have sex with men. Outreach activities, distribution of free condoms and testing at venues where men who have sex with men meet are important prevention add-ons that can contribute to increased awareness about HIV and testing. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Test services must ensure confidentiality and health care professionals who meet men who have sex with men for testing need competency with regards to men who have sex with men sexual health needs.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Homossexualidade Masculina/psicologia , Motivação , Adolescente , Adulto , Ansiedade , Preservativos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Infecções por HIV/psicologia , Humanos , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Parceiros Sexuais , Suécia , Adulto Jovem
4.
Infect Dis (Lond) ; 48(2): 93-8, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26414596

RESUMO

In 2014 the Public Health Agency of Sweden and the Swedish Reference Group for Antiviral Therapy (RAV) conducted a review and analysis of the state of knowledge on the duration of follow-up after exposure to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Up until then a follow-up of 12 weeks after exposure had been recommended, but improved tests and new information on early diagnosis motivated a re-evaluation of the national recommendations by experts representing infectious diseases and microbiology, county medical officers, the RAV, the Public Health Agency, and other national authorities. Based on the current state of knowledge the Public Health Agency of Sweden and the RAV recommend, starting in April 2015, a follow-up period of 6 weeks after possible HIV-1 exposure, if HIV testing is performed using laboratory-based combination tests detecting both HIV antibody and antigen. If point-of-care rapid HIV tests are used, a follow-up period of 8 weeks is recommended, because currently available rapid tests have insufficient sensitivity for detection of HIV-1 antigen. A follow-up period of 12 weeks is recommended after a possible exposure for HIV-2, since presently used assays do not include HIV-2 antigens and only limited information is available on the development of HIV antibodies during early HIV-2 infection. If pre- or post-exposure prophylaxis is administered, the follow-up period is recommended to begin after completion of prophylaxis. Even if infection cannot be reliably excluded before the end of the recommended follow-up period, HIV testing should be performed at first contact for persons who seek such testing.


Assuntos
Fármacos Anti-HIV/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Anti-HIV/sangue , Antígenos HIV/sangue , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , Profilaxia Pós-Exposição/métodos , Testes Sorológicos/métodos , Quimioprevenção/métodos , Diagnóstico Precoce , Infecções por HIV/virologia , HIV-1/isolamento & purificação , HIV-2/isolamento & purificação , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Exposição Ocupacional , Suécia , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA