A 4-weekly course of rituximab is safe and improves tumor control for patients with minimal residual disease persisting 3 months after autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: results of a prospective multicenter phase II study in patients with follicular lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: This study explored the efficacy and safety of rituximab as treatment of clinical or molecular residual disease after autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in follicular lymphoma (FL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with CD20+ FL and clinically (group A, n = 14) or clono-specific PCR-detectable (group B, n = 25) residual disease persisting 3 months after ASCT received rituximab 375 mg/m² once weekly for 4 weeks. RESULTS: Response rate at day 50 was 36% [90% confidence interval (CI) 15-61] in group A (World Health Organization criteria) and 52% (90% CI 34-70) in group B (conversion PCR-undetectable status to undetectable status). The best response rate was 71% [nine complete responses (CRs) and one partial response] in group A and 76% in group B. At 36 months, all 10 responses persisted in group A, whereas 46% of patients in group B still had PCR-undetectable disease. Furthermore, 68% of patients in group B were still in clinical CR. Rituximab after ASCT was safe with few grade 3-4 toxic effects (15% patients), mainly acute reactions and infections. CONCLUSION: Rituximab induced a high rate of durable CRs in patients with clinically detectable disease, as well as durable eradication of PCR-detectable disease in patients with FL after ASCT. Continued molecular responses assessed with a highly sensitive and clono-specific PCR technique were correlated with an excellent disease control.

Rituximab induction immunotherapy for first-line low-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma: survival analyses with 7-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to report long-term results of rituximab induction monotherapy in patients with low-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma (LTBFL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 49 first-line LTBFL patients who received weekly doses of rituximab (375 mg/m(2)), 46 have been followed with a long-term analysis of clinical and molecular responses. RESULTS: Best clinical response (at any staging within a year following treatment) was 80%, 24 (52%) patients had complete or unconfirmed complete response, 13 (28%) had partial response and 9 (20%) had stable or progressive disease. Of 31 patients having a positive bcl2-JH rearrangement, 15 (48%) became negative following treatment. After 83.9 months of follow-up (95% confidence interval 6.4-92.8 months), the median progression-free survival is 23.5 months and overall survival (OS) is 91.7%. Five patients died (one progression, one myelodysplasia, one diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and two solid tumors). Seven patients (15%) are progression-free including five who are bcl2 informative. No unexpected long-term adverse event has been observed. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of patients remain progression-free 7 years after a single 4-dose rituximab treatment in first-line LTBFL. The 7-year overall survivalOS is very high in this selected population of patients.

Clinical value of circulating endothelial cells and circulating tumor cells in metastatic breast cancer patients treated first line with bevacizumab and chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: We investigated whether circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating endothelial cells (CECs) predict clinical outcome of first-line chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab in metastatic breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a French substudy of the MO19391 trial, CTC and CEC counts (CellSearch system) at baseline and changes after two cycles of treatment were correlated with time to progression (TtP). RESULTS: CTC and CEC levels were not correlated in the 67 patients included. At baseline, CTC positivity was a significant prognostic marker for TtP at a threshold of 3 CTC/7.5 ml (P < 0.05) but not at 5 CTC/7.5 ml (P = 0.09). Baseline CEC levels (median 17 CEC/4 ml, range 1-769) were associated with age > or =45 years (P = 0.01), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (P < 0.01) and not with TtP at any threshold. Changes of CTC count during treatment were not a surrogate of TtP, with any of the model tested (threshold based or relative decrease in percent). However, increase in CEC count was associated with improved TtP, at the threshold of 20 CEC/4 ml (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab combined with first-line chemotherapy may modify the predictive value of CTC during treatment possibly due to impaired tumor cells intravasation through vessels endothelium. Variations in CEC levels appear to be a promising early surrogate marker of TtP under antiangiogenic treatment.

Nomegestrol acetate may enhance the skeletal effects of estradiol on biochemical markers of bone turnover in menopausal women after a 12-week treatment period.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of a 12-week treatment with 17ss-estradiol given alone and in sequential combination with 3.75 mg of nomegestrol acetate (Naemis), or a placebo on biochemical markers of bone turnover in menopausal women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, placebo and estradiol-controlled multicenter study was conducted. A total of 176 patients who had been menopausal for 1-10 years, hysterectomized or not, having no contraindications to hormone replacement therapy, without any risks factors for osteoporosis, received one of these treatments during 12 weeks: placebo, 1.5 mg estradiol (E(2)) or 1.5 mg E(2)/3.75 mg nomegestrol acetate (E(2)/NOMAC). The primary efficacy variables were the change in bone markers (total alkaline phosphatase, bone alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin; urinary type-I collagen peptides). RESULTS: The four biochemical markers decreased only in the E(2)/NOMAC group. Bone alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin and urinary type-I collagen peptides decreased in the E(2) group. For both active treatment groups compared to the placebo group, the changes were statistically significant after a 12-week treatment. There were no statistically significant differences between the E(2) and the E(2)/NOMAC groups except for total serum alkaline phosphatase, whose mean value decreased in the E(2)/NOMAC group but increased slightly in the E(2) group (p < 0.001). Furthermore, after a 6-week treatment, the changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover were similar to those found after 12 weeks. Safety data were satisfactory with regard to estradiol given alone or in combination with nomegestrol acetate. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrated that 1.5 mg E(2) is effective in reducing bone turnover in postmenopausal women and proved that the combination of 1.5 mg E(2) and 3.75 mg nomegestrol acetate has no deleterious effect on bone remodelling.