Adding a First Metatarsal Pin to An Ankle Tubular External Fixator Does Not Reduce the Incidence of Early Reduction Loss.

External fixation with a bilateral frame configuration (delta frame, DF) is a routine approach for treating ankle fractures and dislocations with severe soft tissue damage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate to what extent adding a first metatarsal fixation contributes to the stability of the fixation as evidenced by reduced frequency of early loss of reduction. A retrospective study was performed to compare the rate of early reduction loss in patients treated with a bilateral frame external fixation as part of a 2-stage treatment protocol for periarticular ankle fractures, in a level one trauma center between 2006 and 2016. The cohort was divided into 2 groups according to the frame configuration that had been used: DF only and DF with first metatarsal fixation (DF+1MT). A multivariate analysis assessing risk factors for postoperative loss of reduction was conducted. A total of 67 patients were included in the study, of which 30 underwent fixation by DF and 37 by DF+1MT. Early loss of reduction was recorded in 13 (19.4%) patients, 6 (20%) in the DF group and 7 (18.9%) in the DF+1MT group (p = .576). None of the assessed risk factors reached statistical significance. To conclude, the addition of a first metatarsal pin as an enhancement of external fixation with a delta frame configuration did not reduce the incidence of early loss of reduction. There is no evidence to support the claim that adding this pin contributes to the stability of the fixation in a clinically relevant manner.

Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations: Experience of a tertiary center.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-induced perforation (EP) is a rare but severe complication. We describe the risk factors, management, and outcome of ERCP-induced perforations in a tertiary center. METHODS: This is a case-control study. All EP cases between March 2004 and February 2015 were compared to a control group without perforation. Data on patients, procedures, presentation, perforation type, radiologic findings, management, and outcome were assessed. RESULTS: Of 6,934 endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies, 37 patients (0.53%) had EP. Independent risk factors included failure of cannulation, a procedure described as "difficult," performing a precut and resection of a periampullary adenoma. Perforation was diagnosed during the procedure in 7 patients (19%). Median interval for diagnosis was 11 hours (range: 0-201 hours), with 84% diagnosed within 30 hours. The periampullary region was the most common EP site (51%). Twenty-nine patients (78%) were managed conservatively and 8 (22%) were operated. Three patients failed conservative management and required delayed operation. Failure of conservative management had a detrimental effect on morbidity and duration of stay. All patients who required operative intervention had perforation of either the duodenal free wall or the periampullary region. CONCLUSION: Clear risk factors can be used to raise suspicion of EP. Early diagnosis and management are critical for better outcome. This is especially important when operative intervention is indicated. Nonetheless, the majority of patients may be managed conservatively.